JSEMAT  Vol.1 No.3 , October 2011
The Behaviour of Superalloys in Marine Gas Turbine Engine Conditions
ABSTRACT
This paper presents hot corrosion results carried out systematically on the selected nickel based superalloys such as IN 738 LC, GTM-SU-718 and GTM-SU-263 for marine gas turbine engines both at high and low temperatures that represent type I and type II hot corrosion respectively. The results were compared with advanced superalloy under similar conditions in order to understand the characteristics of the selected superalloys. It is observed that the selected superalloys are relatively more resistant to type I and type II hot corrosion when compared to advanced superalloy. In fact, the advanced superalloy is extremely vulnerable to both types of hot corrosion. Subsequently, the relevant reaction mechanisms that are responsible for slow and faster degradation of various superalloys under varied hot corrosion conditions were discussed. Based on the results obtained with different techniques, a degradation mechanism for all the selected superalloys as well as advanced superalloy under both types of hot corrosion conditions was explained. Finally, the necessity as well as developmental efforts with regard to smart corrosion resistant coatings for their effective protection under high temperature conditions was stressed for their enhanced efficiency.

Cite this paper
nullI. Gurrappa, A. Gogia and I. Yashwanth, "The Behaviour of Superalloys in Marine Gas Turbine Engine Conditions," Journal of Surface Engineered Materials and Advanced Technology, Vol. 1 No. 3, 2011, pp. 144-149. doi: 10.4236/jsemat.2011.13022.
References
[1]   N. Das, US patent 5,925,198, July 1999

[2]   M. R. Khajavi and M. H. Shariat, “Failure of First Stage Gas Turbine Blades,” Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2004, pp. 589-597. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2003.08.010

[3]   J. M. Gallardo, J. A. Rodrigue and E. J. Herrera, “Failure of Gas Turbine Blades,” Wear, Vol. 252, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 264-268. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00885-7

[4]   N. Eliaz, G, Shemesh and R. M. Latarision, “Hot Cor- rosion in Gas Turbine Components,” Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2002, pp. 31-43. doi:10.1016/S1350-6307(00)00035-2

[5]   M. Konter and M. Thumann, “Materials and Manufac- turing of Advanced Industrial Gas Turbine Components,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 117, No. 3, 2001, pp. 386-390. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00785-3

[6]   J. Stringer, “High Temperature Corrosion of Superalloys,” Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 1987, pp. 482-493

[7]   A. S. Radcliff, “Factors Influencing Gas Turbine Use and Performance,” Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 1987, pp. 554-561

[8]   R. F. Singer, “New Materials for Industrial Gas Tubines,” Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 1987, pp. 726- 732

[9]   I. Gurrappa, “Hot Corrosion Behaviour of CM 247 LC Alloy in Na2SO4 and NaCl Environments,” Oxidation of Metals, Vol. 51, No. 5-6, 1999, pp. 353-382. doi:10.1023/A:1018831025272

[10]   C. J. Wang and J. H. Lin, “The Oxidation of MAR M247 Superalloy with Na2SO4 Coating,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2002, pp. 123-129. doi:10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00527-2

[11]   I. Gurrappa and A. S. Rao, “Thermal Barrier Coatings for Enhanced Efficiency of Gas Turbine Engines,” Surface and Coating Technology, Vol. 201, No. 6, 2006, pp. 3016- 3029. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.06.026

[12]   I. Gurrappa, I. V. S.Yashwanth, A. K. Gogia, H. Mura- kami and S. Kuroda, Interlational Materials Revews, (In Press)

[13]   I. Gurrappa, “Identification of a Smart Bond Coating for Gas Turbine Engine Applied Lications,” Journal of Coat- ing Technology Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2008, pp. 385- 390. doi:10.1007/s11998-008-9103-y

[14]   I. Gurrappa, “Final Report on Design and Development of Smart Coatings for Aerospace Applied Lications,” Euro- pean Commission, July 2008

 
 
Top