OJAPr  Vol.5 No.3 , September 2017
Investigation and Comparison of 2.4 GHz Wearable Antennas on Three Textile Substrates and Its Performance Characteristics
In this paper, two different methods were used for investigating the RF characteristics of three types of textile materials. Goch, Jeans and Leather substrates were studied. A microstrip ring resonator method and DAK (Dielectric Assessment Kit) method were used. Bluetooth antennas were designed and fabricated using these substrates. The results were compared for the two methods. The bending effect of these antennas on its impedance characteristics due to human body movements was also studied. Finally, all antennas were simulated by CST simulator version 2016, fabricated using folded cupper and measured by Agilent 8719ES VNA. The measured results agree well with the simulated results.

1. Introduction

In recent years, flexible and textile antennas have taken a lot of attention due to their application in wearable systems. Nowadays, research efforts focus on the development of novel textiles to be used as antenna substrates. Wearable antennas need to be integrated within everyday clothing, be low profile, and be hidden as much as possible [1] [2] . A microstrip antenna with a textile material as a substrate is flexible, low profile, light weight and small size, therefore this type of antenna is more suitable for design and fabricates to be worn or carried on one’s body [3] [4] . In the microstrip antenna, the material properties of the textile substrate such as: dielectric constant and loss tangent play important roles in the propagation of electromagnetic energy in dielectric media and have effect on the antenna performance [5] . A variety of techniques are available to measure these properties.

In this paper, two different methods for measuring the dielectric constant and loss tangent were used: the first using a microstrip ring resonator method and the second using DAK (Dielectric Assessment Kit). Therefore, the second has been used to confirm the results determined using the first. The measurement of dielectric constant and loss tangent of three different textile materials were performed: Goch, Jeans and Leather. First the microstrip ring resonator is a very popular technique for measuring the dielectric constant, and loss tangent because of its easy fabrication, planar structure, compact size and high quality factor, so there are few radiation losses of ring resonator and more accurate results [6] [7] . The ring resonator device consists of the ring and two feed lines on the upper surface of the substrate, and the ground plane occupies the lower surface of the substrate. Also a small gap ∆ is included between the ring and each feed line, as shown in Figure 1 [8] .

By fabricating this ring model above using the three different textile materials: Goch, Jeans and Leather and obtaining the S21 for each other, the peak in the S21 was recorded around each resonance and the nth resonance occurs at [9] :

F n = n c 2 π r ε r (1)

where r is the mean radius; c is the speed of light in a vacuum and εr is the required dielectric constant.

Also, the insertion loss (S21 (dB)) is introduced as [10] ,

I L = 20 log ( 1 Q L Q u ) (2)

where: QL is the loaded quality factor, and Qu is the unloaded quality factor.

(Hint: if QL and QU are similar, this means that this material is very lossy, so it must be QU ? QL to avoid excessive losses).

Figure 1. The relative positions of the ring and feed lines on the upper surface of the substrate.

Also, the loaded quality factor can be measured from S21 curve as [10] ,

Q L = f 0 Δ f (3)

where: f0: is the resonance frequency, and ∆f: is the difference between high freq. and low freq. around f0 ( Δ f = f h f l ).

To calculate the loss tangent of any material firstly must be determined unloaded quality factor (Qu) from Equation (2) and then applied it in Equation (4) [11] ,

1 Q u = 1 Q c + 1 Q d (4)

where: Qd is the dielectric quality factor, and Qc is conduction quality factor.

Also the conduction quality factor can be calculated by [11] ,

Q c = h f 0 μ 0 Π σ c (5)

where: h is the thickness of substrate, f0 is the resonance frequency, µ0 is the permeability of free space, and σc is the conductivity of conduction walls.

From Equation (4), the dielectric quality factor (Qd) can be determined by subtracting the conductor quality factor (Qc) from the unloaded quality factor (Qu), and then the loss tangent can be obtained as [11] ,

tan δ = 1 Q d (6)

The second method is The Dielectric Assessment Kit (DAK) equipment which offers high-precision dielectric parameter measurements (permittivity, permeability, conductivity, loss tangent) over the very broad frequency range from 10  MHz to 67  GHz for applications in the electronic, chemical, food, and medical industries [12] . This method has been used to confirm the results determined using the ring resonator method.

In Sections 2 and 3, based on the results of dielectric constant and loss tangent of three different textile materials: Goch, Jeans and Leather, we designed and fabricated three wearable Bluetooth antennas to compare between three textile materials in Section 4. However, it’s not possible to keep wearable antenna position in flat at all the time due to human body movement [13] . Therefore, the performance characteristics of these wearable Bluetooth antennas under bent conditions are also investigated in Section 5.

2. Ring Resonator Method

In order to design any microstrip antenna on textile substrate the dielectric constant and loss tangent of this substrate must be known. For this purpose, we used the microstrip ring resonator method to measure the dielectric constant and loss tangent of three different textile materials: Goch, Jeans and Leather. The thickness of the different substrate materials are measured by using digital vernier gauge and are mentioned in Table 1. Figure 2 illustrates the fabricated geometry of the microstrip ring resonator which applied on three square (50 × 50 mm) different textile materials as substrates and square ground plane with dimensions 50 × 50 mm. The dimensions of the ring and inset feed for three geometries are the same and mentioned in Table 2. The measured S21 for the ring resonator for three different substrates is shown in Figure 3. The results of ring resonator method for dielectric extraction (dielectric constant εr and loss tangent tanδ) are tabulated in Table 3.

Table 1. The thickness of the textile materials.

Table 2. The Dimensions of Ring Resonator Structure.

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 2. The Fabricated Ring Resonator Structure for: (a) Goch, (b) Jeans, and (c) Leather substrates.

Figure 3. Measured S21 as a function of frequency for the ring resonator for three different substrates: Goch, Jeans and Leather.

Table 3. The Results of Ring Resonator Method for Characterization of Three Textile Substrates.

Table 4. The Results of Dielectric Assessment Kit (DAK).

3. Dielectric Assessment Kit Equipment (DAK)

Another method for measuring the dielectric constant and loss tangent of the same three textile materials: Goch, Jeans and Leather, is called the dielectric assessment kit (DAK) equipment. This method is used to confirm the results which obtaining from the ring resonator method. The measured results of the DAK equipment for dielectric extraction (dielectric constant ε and loss tangent tanδ) are tabulated in Table 4.

From comparing the obtained results using the two methods, it can be observed that both of them estimate the values for Goch, Jeans and Leather, but there are some slight differences between them, this is an inherent thing.

4. Bluetooth Antenna Design

A three Bluetooth microstrip patch antennas using three different types of textile materials as substrates are designed. These substrates are Goch, Jeans and Leather which already have been identified their dielectric characteristics (dielectric constant ε and loss tangent tanδ) in sections 2 and 3. Figure 4 illustrates the fabricated geometry of each antenna where the copper foil is cut in proper dimensions and then pasted on the textile substrate. These dimensions are mentioned in Table 5.

The simulated and measured S11 for this antenna are plotted in Figure 5. From these results, found that the measured results agree well with the simulated results for jeans but there are slight differences for Goch and Leather due to

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 4. The Fabricated Geometry of Wearable Patch Antenna with: (a) Goch, (b) Jeans, and (c) Leather substrates.

Table 5. The Dimensions of Wearable Patch Antennas (units: mm).

Figure 5. Simulated and Measured S11 of the proposed antenna with: (a) Goch, (b) Jeans, (c) Leather.

some problems during manufacturing. The simulation performances of these antennas are also mentioned in Table 6. Finally, in each patch wearable antenna the current distributions are simulated in Figure 6, in addition, the radiations patterns of the proposed antennas in E-plane (φ = 0˚) and H-plane (φ = 90˚) are also simulated and plotted in Figure 7.

From Figure 5, the experimental matching frequency band as in the S11 curves has shifted up relative to the simulated one but this shift is more in the Goch and Leather substrates than Jeans substrate. In Table 6, from comparing between Goch and jeans substrates, Jeans is twice more lossy than Goch, moreover the thickness of Jeans is just half of that of Goch. So, the efficiency of Jeans substrate is much lower than Goch antenna, also from comparing between Goch and leather substrates, the realized gain of Goch is much close to the patch with

Table 6. The simulation performance of the three Wearable Antennas for Bluetooth applications.

Figure 6. The Current Distribution for the proposed Wearable Antennas with: (a) Goch, (b) Jeans, and (c) Leather.

Figure 7. Radiation Pattern for the three Antennas at 2.45 GHz in: (a) E-plane (φ = 0˚) and (b) H-plane (φ = 90˚).

leather substrate, due to the two substrate material with similar loss tangent, dielectric constant and thickness.

5. Effects of Antenna Bending on Its Performance Characteristics

To investigate the effect of antenna bending on its impedance characteristics for three Bluetooth patch antennas with three different textile materials: Goch, Jeans and Leather, this study is carried out by bending each textile antenna around curved surfaces with diameters of 70 mm and 150 mm. These dimensions are typical for human body (e.g., arm, leg, and shoulder). The results for wearable patch antennas for flat position and for both bending diameters are shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8(c) indicates that the resonant frequency remains more constant for certain amount of bending than Figure 8(a) and Figure 8(b). So, the antenna pasted on Leather substrate performs better than the other antennas pasted on Goch or Jeans substrates.

6. Conclusion

Two methods for fabric characterization were presented in this paper: a microstrip ring resonator method and DAC (Dielectric Assessment Kit) method. They used for measuring the dielectric constant (εr) and loss tangent (tanδ) of three different textile materials: Goch, Jeans and Leather where the second has been used to confirm the results determined using the first. Based on these data, three Bluetooth rectangular patch wearable antennas were designed and fabricated on these materials. Comparing between the simulated and measured results and also keeping in mind the effect of bending on each textile antenna, we found that the Bluetooth patch wearable antenna with Leather textile material is easier to place within clothing where it has higher water resistance than the other. In addition, the Goch textile material is fluffy and hairy. When the patch is pasted on

Figure 8. S11 for Antennas Bending while antennas flat and curved with diameter 70 mm and 150 mm: (a) Goch, (b) Jeans, and (c) Leather substrates.

it, there is air layer between patch and substrate to make it press and then return to the original thickness, so the results are not more accurate. Also the jeans textile material is very lossy material because the loaded and unloaded quality factors are very close to each other according to insertion loss results. Therefore, the leather textile material is the best choice as a substrate for wearable microstrip antennas.

Cite this paper
Ahmed, M. , Ahmed, M. and Shaalan, A. (2017) Investigation and Comparison of 2.4 GHz Wearable Antennas on Three Textile Substrates and Its Performance Characteristics. Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 5, 110-120. doi: 10.4236/ojapr.2017.53009.

[1]   Dumanli, S., Sayer, L., Mellios, E., Fafoutis, X., Hilton, G. and Craddock, I. (2017) Off-Body Antenna Wireless Performance Evaluation in a Residential Environment. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, PP, 1. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8024016/

[2]   Jiang, Z.H., Gregory, M.D. and Werner, D.H. (2016) Design and Experimental Investigation of a Compact Circularly Polarized Integrated Filtering Antenna for Wearable Biotelemetric Devices. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 10, 328-338.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7159065/ https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2438551

[3]   Salvado, R., Loss, C., Goncalves, R. and Pinho, P. (2004) Textile Materials for the Design of Wearable Antennas: A Survey. Sensors (Basel), 12, 15841-15857.

[4]   Salonen, P., Rahmat-Samii, Y., Schafhth, M. and Kivikoski, M. (2004) Effect of Textile Materials on Wearable Antenna Performance: A Case Study of GPS Antennas. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Monterey, CA, 20-25 June 2004.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1329673/ https://doi.org/10.1109/APS.2004.1329673

[5]   Kiourti, A., Lee, C. and Volakis, J.L. (2015) Fabrication of Textile Antennas and Circuits with 0.1 mm Precision. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 15, 151-153.

[6]   Hopkins, R. and Free, C. (2008) Equivalent Circuit for the Microstrip Ring Resonator Suitable for Broadband Materials Characterization. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 2, 66-73. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4447457/ https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map:20070039

[7]   Yang, L., Rida, A., Vyas, R. and Tentzeris, M.M. (2007) RFID Tag and RF Structures on Paper Substrate Using Inkjet-Printing Technology. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 55, 2894-2901.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4383080/ https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2007.909886

[8]   Roy, B., Sarkar, P.P. and Chowdhury, S. (2013) Wideband Rectangular Wearable Jeans Antenna. Microwave and Optical Technology Letter, 55, 1270-1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.27548

[9]   Rashidian, A., Aligodarz, M.T. and Klymyshyn, D.M. (2012) Dielectric Characterization of Materials Using a Modified Microstrip Ring Resonator Technique. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 19, No. 4.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6260016/ https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2012.6260016

[10]   Kwok, R.S. and Liang, J. (1999) Characterization of High-Q Resonator for Microwave-Filter Application. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 47, 111-114.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/740093/ https://doi.org/10.1109/22.740093

[11]   Pozar, D.M. (2005) Electromagnetic Theory in Microwave Engineering. 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-EHEP002016.html

[12]   https://www.speag.com/products/dak/dielectric-measurements/

[13]   Ferreira, D., Pires, P., Rodrigues, R. and Caldeirinha, R.F.S. (2017) Wearable Textile Antennas: Examining the Effect of Bending on Their Performance. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 59, 54-59.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7908965/ https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2017.2686093