Back
 AJIBM  Vol.7 No.9 , September 2017
Study on Community Cooperation Game of the Main Body in Regional Innovation Ecosystem
Lei Lei1,2,3,4, Song Wei1
Abstract: Cooperative innovation of heterogeneous population is more and more important in regional innovation ecosystem, and cross-border cooperation has become one of the effective ways to break through the predicament of ecological niche development. However, the existence of opportunistic behavior will restrain the cooperation motivation among the main communities and threaten the stability of the ecosystem population cooperation network. In order to avoid possible speculation, participants tend to make commitments beforehand. However, how can the commitment effectively avoid partner speculation so as to improve cooperation performance? In this paper, we will study the community game strategy of main body in innovation under multivariate uncertainty, and analyze the impact of commitment on collaborative innovation action.
Cite this paper: Lei, L. , Wei, S. , (2017) Study on Community Cooperation Game of the Main Body in Regional Innovation Ecosystem. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, 1079-1095. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.79076.
References

[1]   Veugelers, R. (1998) Collaboration in R & D: An Assessment of Theoretical and Empirical Findings. De Economist, 146, 419-443.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003243727470

[2]   Geroski, P.A. (1995) Markets for Technology: Knowledge, Innovation and Appropriability. In: Stoneman, P., Ed., Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 90-131.

[3]   Jeffrey, K.R. and Thomas, Y.C. (2004) Building Deep Supplier Relationships. Harvard Business Review, 12, 104-114.

[4]   Harabi, N. (1998) Innovation through Vertical Relations between Firms, Suppliers and Customers: A Study of German Firms. Industry Innovation, 5, 157-179.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719800000009

[5]   Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L., Petersen, K.J. and Monczka, R.M. (1999) Involving Suppliers in New Product Development. California Management Review, 42, 59-82.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41166019

[6]   Chen, Y.K., Meng, W.D. and Zou, Y. (2010) Alliance Strategy of Vertical Cooperative Innovation Enterprises under Competitive Conditions. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 30, 857-864.

[7]   Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S. (1994) Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

[8]   Helm, R. and Kloyer, M. (2004) Controlling Contractual Exchange Risks in R & D Inter-Firm Cooperation: An Empirical Study. Research Policy, 33, 1103-1122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.003

[9]   Sun, C.H., Yu, H. and Qi, J.G. (2010) Opportunism Behavior of Resource Input in Enterprise Cooperation R & D. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 30, 447-455.

[10]   Brander, J.A. and Spencer, B.J. (1983) Strategic Commitment with R & D: The Symmetric Case. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 225-235.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003549

[11]   Banerjee, S. and Lin, P. (2003) Downstream R & D, Raising Rivals’ Costs, and Input Price Contracts. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 79-96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(02)00010-3

[12]   Sun, G.Y. and Han, J.J. (2007) The manufacturer price strategystatistics and decision Internet plus incentive integrated enterprise R&D. Statistics & Decision, 8, 150-153.

[13]   Feng, H., Ma, S.H. and Cui, Y.F. (2006) Study on the Interaction between Strategic Transfer Pricing, Commitment Strategy and Downstream Innovation. China Management Science, 14, 61-68.

[14]   Gilbert, S.M. and Viswanath, C. (2003) Strategic Commitment to Price Stimulates Downstream Innovation in a Supply Chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 150, 617-639.

[15]   Kim, S.-H. and Netessine, S. (2013) Collaborative Cost Reduction and Component Procurement under Information Asymmetry. Management Science, 59, 189-206.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1573

 
 
Top