GEP  Vol.5 No.9 , September 2017
The Effect of Land Cover Change on Flooding in Texas
Abstract: The world population has been increasing while, similarly, both the number of environmental disasters and the loss resulting from those have been on the rise. It is also expected that the trend will continue. Especially, what is noticeable is that more and more people and property concentrate on cities. In fact, urbanization is a major global trend simply because most people want to get their jobs, raise and educate their children, and enjoy riches of diverse cultures, recreation activities, and entertainment, which cities can provide to them. Urbanization always involves transforming the natural environment into a man-made environment, contributing to changes in land use and land cover patterns as well as in landscape and hydrology in the built-up areas. These changes, in turn, negatively influence the natural environment because those changes almost always tend to result in the disruption of its fragile ecosystems in balance. In addition, the changes mean the land used, for example, for a natural ecosystem may be converted into an impervious land, which can increase human vulnerability to floods, causing human and property losses. There has been some research done to investigate the relationship between land use/land cover change and environmental hazards. However, little research has been conducted to test direct effects of land cover change on environmental disasters such as floods, hurricanes, and hazardous material releases by using GIS and remote sensing technologies. Therefore, this research aimed to analyze the effect of land cover change on floods. More specifically, the research tested whether land cover change is related to flood disasters in Texas from 1993 to 2012. One of the main findings of this research is that both decrease in forest areas and increase in urban built-up areas contributed to the property damage resulting from flood events.
Cite this paper: Hwang, S. (2017) The Effect of Land Cover Change on Flooding in Texas. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 123-137. doi: 10.4236/gep.2017.59009.

[1]   Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997) The Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Report. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.

[2]   Gallardo, M., Gómez, I., Vilar, L., Martínez-Vega, J. and Martín, M.P. (2016) Impacts of Future Land Use/Land Cover on Wildfire Occurrence in the Madrid Region (Spain). Regional Environmental Change, 16, 1047-1061.

[3]   Persichillo, M.G., Bordoni, M. and Meisina, C. (2017) The Role of Land Use Changes in the Distribution of Shallow Landslides. Science of the Total Environment, 574, 924-937.

[4]   Liu, J. and Shi, Z.W. (2017) Quantifying Land-Use Change Impacts on the Dynamic Evolution of Flood Vulnerability. Land Use Policy, 65, 198-210.

[5]   Shi, P.-J., Yuan, Y., Zheng, J., Wang, J.-A., Ge, Y. and Qiu, G.-Y. (2007) The Effect of Land Use/Cover Change on Surface Runoff in Shenzhen Region, China, Catena, 69, 31-35.

[6]   Lepers, E., Lambin, E.F., Janetos, A.C., Defries, R., Achard, F., Ramankutty, N. and Scholes, R.J. (2005) A Synthesis of Information on Rapid Land-Cover Change for the Period 1981-2000. BioScience, 55, 115-124.[0115:ASOIOR]2.0.CO;2

[7]   Census Bureau (2011) Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for the United States, Regions, States, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2011. 2011 Population Estimates. United States Census Bureau, Population Division.

[8]   US Census Bureau (2010) State and County Quick Facts for Year 2010.

[9]   Blake, E.S., Rappaport, E.N. and Landsea, C.W. (2007) The Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Tropical Cyclones from 1851 to 2006. National Weather Service: National Hurricane Center.

[10]   Associated Press (2007) Texas No. 1 Producer of Greenhouse Gases. Associated Press, Dallas Morning News.

[11]   Loveland, T.R. and Shaw, D.M. (1996) Multiresolution Land Characterization: Building Collaborative Partnerships. In: Scott, J.M., Tear, T. and Davis, F., Eds., Gap Analysis: A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning, Proceedings of the ASPRS/GAP Symposium, Charlotte, National Biological Service, Moscow, 83-89.

[12]   US Geological Survey. (n.d.) NLCD Classification Schemes.

[13]   Vogelmann, J.E., Sohl, T.L., Campbell, P.V. and Shaw, D.M. (1998) Regional Land Cover Characterization Using Landsat thematic Mapper Data and Ancillary Data Sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51, 415-428.

[14]   US Geological Survey (n.d.) 1992 National Land Cover Data.

[15]   Alcántara-Ayala, I., Esteban-Chávez, O. and Parrot, J.F. (2005) Landsliding Related to Land-Cover Change: A Diachronic Analysis of Hillslope Instability Distribution in the Sierra Norte, Puebla, Mexico. Catena, 65, 152-165.

[16]   Karsli, F., Atasoy, M., Yalcin, A., Reis, S., Demir, O. and Gokceoglu, C. (2009) Effects of Land-Use Changes on Landslides in a Landslide-Prone Area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 156, 241-255.

[17]   Van Beek, L.P.H. and Van Asch, T.W. (2004) Regional Assessment of the Effects of Land-Use Change on Landslide Hazard by Means of Physically Based Modelling. Natural Hazards, 31, 289-304.

[18]   Bronstert, A., Niehoff, D. and Bürger, G. (2002) Effects of Climate and Land-Use Change on Storm Runoff Generation: Present Knowledge and Modelling Capabilities. Hydrological Processes, 16, 509-529.

[19]   Gibbard, S., Caldeira, K., Bala, G., Phillips, T.J. and Wickett, M. (2005) Climate Effects of Global Land Cover Change. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L23705.