Back
 CUS  Vol.5 No.3 , September 2017
New Forms of Place-Making and Public Space in Contemporary Urban Development in Seoul, South Korea
Abstract: Place-making and its evolving role in urban design has become a major issue in setting the 21st century urban development agenda. A key aspect of this within South East and East Asia in particular is an apparent tension between global aspirations and local tradition in emerging states such as China, South Korea and Malaysia. The intention of this paper is to provide a better understanding of how new place making can be incorporated in contemporary urban development, particularly within this South East/East Asian context, so that the needs of local cultures can be sustained and developed, whilst acknowledging the desire of emerging states to gain international respect and recognition. The focus of this research is on exploring how these two views of design—the globally aspirational, and the locally situated and informed— might be reconciled, using the particular context of South Korea and the city of Seoul as a case study.
Cite this paper: Choi, H. (2017) New Forms of Place-Making and Public Space in Contemporary Urban Development in Seoul, South Korea. Current Urban Studies, 5, 332-347. doi: 10.4236/cus.2017.53018.
References

[1]   Abel, C. (1997). Architecture and Identity: Towards a Global Eco-Culture. Oxford: Architectural Press.

[2]   Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minmeapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[3]   Choi, H. S. (2011). Transcription Files in Possession of Place-Identity in 21st Century New Town Development. Ph.D. Dissertation Appendices, Oxford: Department of Built Environment, Oxford Brookes University.

[4]   Frampton, K. (1985). Modern Architecture—A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson.

[5]   Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp.109-142). Cambridge: MIT Press.

[6]   Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

[7]   Kernbeisser, K. (2010). Bank of Korea.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kernbeisser/3075738499/in/photolist-5FMXU8-RfFoMj-q98gtG-6PenZv-VBq8ux-SHbwdQ-8cGcZK-s6nSt-VtttzL-U5SGHW-9J2yaS-9HZ3Yk-6tKpWo-6jZMQ7-9HYAUv-5LbMPm-VBq9or-s6o7j-HjV8eF-VBq3KH-V2fJxh-6jVDqK-V2fK6S-fpAMo3-5kuRC3-93D5o-VBq6Mz-8VCX1k-6jVJMZ-baAPK-5FS85G-7s7Aeh-skMg1W-9jwceT-U8q44k-Uipy6n-Ui6as2-fuDXoN-hjJT9N-abCwRX-WebpEq-7towUA-baANE-s6o4S-VBq6DD-KvjZR-5LbMK9-baAPt-cNoScN-8dzEbP

[8]   Kim, B. (1991). Openness and Cultivation. Seoul: Moonji Publishing.

[9]   Kim, D. C. (2013). https://pixabay.com/en/users/olmusician-2219832/

[10]   King, A. D. (2004). Spaces of Global Cultures: Architecture Urbanism Identity. London: Routhledge Publishing.

[11]   King, R. (2009). Seoul, Conditions of Possibility, and the Postnational Hyperspace. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1068/d5908

[12]   Lee, M. H. (2012). Seoul Map Analysis and Analysis of the Public Usage. Seoul: Seoul National University.

[13]   Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[14]   McDowell, L. (Ed.) (1997). Undoing Place. New York: Wiley.

[15]   Mitchell, D. (1995). The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public and Democracy. Annuals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 108-133.

[16]   Park, H. S. (2017). Sejong-No. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/157696424422525786/

[17]   Rapoport, A. (1977). Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards a Man-Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design, Urban and Regional Planning Series 15. Oxford: Pergamon Publishing.

[18]   Seon, J. (2003). Seoul Urban Development. Seoul: Hanul Academy Press.

[19]   Seoul Metropolitan Government (2010). Seoul History. http://www.seoul.go.kr/

[20]   Stern, P., & Hall, P. (2010). Historical Limits: Narrowing Possibilities in ‘Ontario’S Most Historic Town’. Canadian Geographer, 54, 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00296.x

[21]   Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Attachment and Identity as Related to Place and Perceived Climate. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 207-218.

[22]   Werbner, P. (1998). Negotiating Public Space: Strategies and Styles of Female Domestic Workers in Singapore. Urban Studies, 35, 583-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984925

[23]   Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington DC: Conservation Foundation.

[24]   Yoo, S. (2010). Views of New Public Space Sejong-No and Gyeongbok Palace, Korea-Japan 100 Years on—Efforts to Correct Wrongs Done by Japanese. Seoul: Korean Herald.

[25]   Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

 
 
Top