Back
 ChnStd  Vol.6 No.3 , August 2017
Research on China’s Social Governance Mode Transformation and Upgrading in Supply-Side Reform Field—From the Perspective of Public Management
Abstract: Supply-side reform has provided an advance institutional environment for the transformation and upgrading of social governance mode in China. In fact, supply-side reform requires the transformation and upgrading of social governance mode, while the latter is an inherent process of the former; supply-side reform and social governance mode’s transformation and upgrading are serving for each other as important impetus, making progress during their interaction. Based on the polycentric governance mode theory, holistic governance theory and social quality theory, the supply-side reform of government should proceed in social governance subject, system design and public service supply. In the context of supply-side reform, social governance mode transformation should stick to the principle of “addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division”: with the “addition effect” of the collaboration between supply-side reform and social governance mode transformation, the single-center social governance mode will be transformed to polycentric governance mode; with the “subtraction effect” of administrative intervention, the government-dominated governance mode will be transformed to government-guided mode; with the “multiplication effect” of institutional innovation, the campaign- governance mode will be transformed into institutional mode; with the “division effect” of compulsory control, the control-stabilization governance mode can be transformed to social quality governance mode.
Cite this paper: Li, X. (2017) Research on China’s Social Governance Mode Transformation and Upgrading in Supply-Side Reform Field—From the Perspective of Public Management. Chinese Studies, 6, 188-200. doi: 10.4236/chnstd.2017.63019.
References

[1]   Beck, W., der Maesen, L., Thomese, F., & Walker, A. (Eds.). (2001). Social Quality: A Vision for Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1, 11-14.

[2]   Ding Huang. 丁煌. (1998). Seeking the Coordination and Unification of Fairness and Efficiency—Comments on the Value Pursuit of Modern Western New Public Administration 寻求公平与效率的协调与统一—评现代西方新公共行政学的价值追求. Chinese Public Administration, 12, 81-84.

[3]   Feng Zhifeng. 冯志峰. (2007). Definition and Characteristics of China’s Campaign-Style Governance 中国运动式治理的定义及特征. Journal of the Yinchuan Municipal Party College of C.P.C., 2, 29-32.

[4]   Jin Taijun. 金太军. (2000). Historical Evolution of Value Orientation of Western Public Administration 西方公共行政价值取向的历史演变. Jianghai Academic Journal, 6, 37-41.

[5]   Lin Ka. 林卡. (2010). Social Quality Theory: New Perspective of Studying the Construction of Harmonious Society 社会质量理论: 研究和谐社会建设的新视角. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2, 105-111.

[6]   Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (2006). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

[7]   Peng Jinpeng. 彭锦鹏. (2005). Holistic and Institutional Governance: Theoretical Strategy 全观型与制度化治理:理论策略. Political Science Review (Taiwan), 23, 22-27.

[8]   Quan Zhongxie. 全钟燮. (2008). The Social Construction of Public Administration: Explanation and Criticism 公共行政的社会建构: 解释与批评. Trans. Sun Boying et al. Beijing: Peking University Press.

[9]   Wang Dahai, & Zhang Yulei. 汪大海, 张玉磊. (2013). From Campaign-Style Governance to Institutional Governance: Governance Mode Selection of New Urbanization 从运动式治理到制度化治理: 新型城镇化的治理模式选择. Exploration and Free Views, 11, 47-50.

[10]   Xu Xiaolin, & Zhu Guowei. 徐晓林, 朱国伟. (2011). Explain and Orientation: Institutionalism Perspective of Campaign-Style Governance—Analysis in the Background of “Mediocre Management and Accountability” 解释与取向: 运动式治理的制度主义视野——以“治庸问责”风暴为背景的分析. Study and Practice, 8, 86-94.

[11]   Zhang Kangzhi. 张康之. (2012). Research on the Transformation of Government Behavior Mode from Control to Guiding 论政府行为模式从控制向引导的转变. Journal of Beijing Administrative College, 2, 22-29.

 
 
Top