Back
 JST  Vol.7 No.1 , March 2017
Sol-Gel Relative Humidity Sensors: Impact of Electrode Geometry on Performance in Soil Suction Measurements
Abstract: This paper describes the experimental procedure followed to fabricate and validate sol-gel based RH sensors which will be incorporated in soil specimens for standard laboratorial tests. It is the first time such sensors were used for soil suction measurement. They are microfabricated relative humidity sensors (footprint area 11,000 μm × 22,000 μm) operating based on changes in electrical resistivity detected by a cerium doped silica titania film deposited using a sol-gel technique. Their design required gathering experts in several engineering specialties. The working principle of the sensors is based on water vapour equilibrium between the air in the soil and in the sol-gel pores, due to the contact between the two porous materials. The spacing between interdigitated aluminium electrodes was optimized to improve the sensing properties of the sol-gel. The calibration of the different prototypes was done against compacted clay, varying the spacing between 100 and 700 μm. The sensors were also incorporated in soil samples for suction measurement during wetting and drying paths. They were validated by comparing the readings with those from a water dew point potentiometer. From this study it was possible to determine the optimum electrodes spacing of 200 μm. Error was explained by sol-gel heterogeneity effect and by the resolution of the sensing area provided by the electrodes spacing. When comparing with other sensors operating inside soil specimens in standard laboratorial tests, these sol-gel sensors extend the operation range available with the alternative technologies: while conventional tensiometers measure suction ranges from 0 to 1.8 MPa, our sensors demonstrate good results between 1 to 10 MPa (and higher).
Cite this paper: Cardoso, R. , Sarapajevaite, G. , Korsun, O. , Cardoso, S. and Ilharco, L. (2017) Sol-Gel Relative Humidity Sensors: Impact of Electrode Geometry on Performance in Soil Suction Measurements. Journal of Sensor Technology, 7, 1-23. doi: 10.4236/jst.2017.71001.
References

[1]   Fredlund, D.G. and Rahardjo, H. (1993) Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172759

[2]   Traversa, E. (1995) Ceramic Sensors for Humidity Detection: The State-of-the-Art and Future Developments. Sensors and Actuators B, 23, 135-156.

[3]   Rittersma, Z.M. (2002) Recent Achievements in Miniaturizd Humidity Sensors—A Review of Transducer Techniques. Sensor and Actuators A, 96, 196-210.

[4]   Albrecht, B., Benson, C. and Beuermann, S. (2003) Polymer Capacitance Sensors for Measuring Soil Gas Humidity in Drier Soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 26, 1-9.

[5]   Kozhukharov, S., Nenova, Z., Nenov, T., Nedev, N. and Machkova, M. (2013) Elucidation of the Contribution of Modified Titania Films over the Performance of Thin Film Humidity Sensors. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 48, 142-146.

[6]   Kozhukharov, S., Nenova, Z., Nenov, T., Nedev, N. and Machkova, M. (2015) Humidity Sensing Elements Based on Cerium Doped Titania-Silica Thin Films Prepared via a Sol-Gel Method. Sensors and Actuators B, 210, 676-684.

[7]   Sukhyy, K.M., Gomza, Y.P., Belyanovskaya, E.A., Klepko, V.V., Shilova, O.A. and Sukhyy, M.P. (2015) Resistive Humidity Sensors Based on Proton-Conducting Organic-Inorganic Silicophosphates Doped by Polyionenes. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 74, 472-481.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3622-7

[8]   Yuan, Q., Li, N., Geng, W., Chi, Y., Tu, J., Li, X. and Shao, C. (2011) Humidity Sensing Properties of Mesoporous Iron Oxide/Silica Composite Prepared via Hydrothermal Process. Sensors and Actuators B, 160, 334-340.

[9]   Tarantino, A., Gallipoli, D., Augarde, C.E., De Gennaro, V., Gomez, R., Laloui, L., Mancuso, C., El Mountassir, G., Munoz, J.J, Pereira, J.-M., Peron, H., Pisoni, G., Romero, E., Raveendiraraj, A., Rojas, J.A.C, Toll, D.G., Tombolato, S. and Wheeler, S. (2011) Benchmark of Experimental Techniques for Measuring and Controlling Suction. Geotechnique, 61, 303-312.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2011.61.4.303

[10]   Tarantino, A. and Mongiovì, L. (2003) Calibration of Tensiometer for Direct Measurement of Matric Suction. Géotechnique, 53, 137-141.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.1.137

[11]   Lourenco, S., Gallipoli, D., Toll, D., Augarde, C. and Evans, F. (2011) Towards a Tensiometer Based Suction Control System for Laboratory Testing of Unsaturated Soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34, 1-10.

[12]   Pagay, V., Santiago, M., Sessoms, D.A., Huber, E.J., Vincent, O., Pharkya, A., Corso, T.N., Lakso, A.N. and Stroock, A.D. (2014) A Microtensiometer Capable of Measuring Water Potentials below -10 MPa. Lab on Chip, 14, 2806-2817.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC00342J

[13]   WP4C (2014) WP4C Dew Point Potentiometer. Operator’s Manual. Version June 20, 2014. Decagon Devices, Inc.
http://www.decagon.com

[14]   Leong, E.-C., Tripathy, S. and Rahardjo, H. (2003) Total Suction Measurement of Unsaturated Soils with a Device Using the Chilled-Mirror Dew-Point Technique. Géotechnique, 53, 173-182.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.2.173

[15]   Cardoso, R., Lima, A., Romero, E. and Ferrari, A. (2007) A Comparative Study of Soil Suction Measurement Using Two Different High-Range Psychrometers. Experimental Unsaturated Soil Mechanics, Springer Proceedings in Physics, 112, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 79-94.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69873-6_8

[16]   Romero, E., Della Vecchia, G. and Jommi, C. (2011) An Insight into the Water Retention Properties of Compacted Clayey Soils. Géotechnique, 61, 313-328.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2011.61.4.313

[17]   Vanapalli, S.K., Fredlund, D.G. and Pufahl, D.E. (1999) The Influence of Soil Structure and Stress History on the Soil-Water Characteristics of a Compacted Till. Géotechique, 49, 143-159.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.2.143

[18]   Jiang, K., Fei, T. and Zhang, T. (2014) Humidity Sensor Using Li-Loaded Microporous Organic Polymer Assembled by 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene and Terephthalic Aldehydeitle. RSC Advances, 4, 28451-28455.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra02763a

[19]   Parlange, J.-Y. (1976) Capillary Hysteresis and Relationship between Drying and Wetting Curves. Water Resources Research, 12, 224-228.
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i002p00224

[20]   Van Genuchten, M.T. (1980) A Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 892-898.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

 
 
Top