Back
 OJCM  Vol.7 No.4 , August 2017
The Determination of Interfacial Shear Strength in Short Fiber Reinforced Poly Ethylene Terephthalate by Kelly-Tyson Theory
Abstract: The interfacial shear strength value measuring by the modified Kelly-Tyson equation method was studied the measurement accuracy. The measuring accuracy by using the modified Kelly-Tyson equation method is compared to the nano-indentation testing method. The results and an influential factor are described. An error in the modified Kelly-Tyson equation is verified to avoid the incorrect measurement when the interfacial shear strength was measured by the modified Kelly-Tyson equation. To study the different interfacial shear strength behavior, short fiber reinforced PET composites were fabricated. In this study, an advance fabricating technique for short fiber reinforced composite as direct fiber feeding process is conducted to fabricate GF/recycled PET for studying the interfacial shear strength. The result indicates that the modified Kelly-Tyson equation method accurately provides the accurate interfacial shear strength value, if it is conducted with the sample without a horizontally aligned fiber. So the high fiber loading content sample should be avoided to get the more accuracy result. The large horizontally aligned fiber area into specimens extremely resulted in the incorrect measurement of the interfacial shear strength value by the modified Kelly-Tyson equation method. The fiber agglomeration factor and the sensitively horizontally aligned fiber area must be considered its influence on the measuring for improving the equation effectiveness.
Cite this paper: Thodsaratpreeyakul, W. , Uawongsuwan, P. , Kataoka, A. , Negoro, T. and Hamada, H. (2017) The Determination of Interfacial Shear Strength in Short Fiber Reinforced Poly Ethylene Terephthalate by Kelly-Tyson Theory. Open Journal of Composite Materials, 7, 218-226. doi: 10.4236/ojcm.2017.74015.
References

[1]   Morrell, S.H. (1981) A Review of the Effects of Surface Treatments on Polymer-Filler Interactions. Plastics and Rubber Processing and Applications, 1, 179.

[2]   Silverstein, M.S. and Breuer, O. (1993) Relationship between Surface Properties and Adhesion for Etched Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Fibers. Composites Science and Technology, 48, 151-157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(93)90131-Y

[3]   Laura, D.M., Keskkula, H., Barlow, J.W. and Paul, D.R. (2002) Effect of Glass Fiber Surface Chemistry on the Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced, Rubber-Toughened Nylon 6. Polymer, 43, 4673-4687.

[4]   King, T.R., Adams, D.F. and Buttry, D.A. (1991) Anodic Oxidation of Pitch-Precursor Carbon Fibres in Ammonium Sulphate Solutions: The Effect of Fibre Surface Treatment on Composite Mechanical Properties. Composites, 22, 380-387.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(91)90553-S

[5]   Mader, E. (1997) Study of Fibre Surface Treatments for Control of Interphase Properties in Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 57, 1077-1088.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00002-X

[6]   Della Volpe, C., Fambri, L., Fenner, R., Migliaresi, C. and Pegoretti, A. (1994) Air-Plasma Treated Polyethylene Fibres: Effect of Time and Temperature Ageing on Fibre Surface Properties and on Fibre-Matrix Adhesion. Journal of Materials Science, 29, 3919-3925.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355950

[7]   DiBenedetto, A.T. (1985) Evaluation of Fiber Surface Treatments in Composite Materials. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 57, 1659-1665.
https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557111659

[8]   Takaku, A. and Arridge, R.G. (1973) The Effect of Interfacial Radial and Shear Stress on Fiber Pull-out in Composite Materials. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 6, 2038-2047.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/6/17/310

[9]   Folkes, M.J. and Wong, W.K. (1987) Determination of Interfacial Shear Strength in Fibre-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. Polymer, 28, 1309-1314.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(87)90443-5

[10]   Pitkethly, M.J., Favre, J.P., Gaur, U., Jakubowski, J., Mudrich, S.F., Caldwell, D.L. and Hampe, A. (1993) A Round-Robin Programme on Interfacial Test Methods. Composites Science and Technology, 48, 205-214.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(93)90138-7

[11]   Feillard, P., Désarmot, G. and Favre, J.P. (1993) A Critical Assessment of the Fragmentation Test for Glass/Epoxy Systems. Composites Science and Technology, 49, 109-119.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(93)90050-Q

[12]   Feillard, P., Desarmot, G. and Favre, J.P. (1994) Theoretical Aspects of the Fragmentation Test. Composites Science and Technology, 50, 265-279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(94)90148-1

[13]   Wagner, H.D., Gallis, H.E. and Wiesel, E. (1993) Study of the Interface in Kevlar 49-Epoxy Composites by Means of Microbond and Fragmentation Tests: Effects of Materials and Testing Variables. Journal of Materials Science, 28, 2238-2244.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367590

[14]   Uawongsuwan, P. (2014) Structure and Properties of Short Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite and Hybrid Composite Fabricated by Injection Molding Process. Ph.D. Thesis, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Tokyo.

[15]   Hsueh, C.H. (2000) Young’s Modulus of Unidirectional Discontinuous-Fiber Composite. Composites Science and Technology, 60, 2671-2680.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00128-7

[16]   Eberhardt, C. and Clarke, A. (2001) Fibre-Orientation Measurements in Short-Glass-Fibre Composites. Part I: Automated, High-Angular-Resolution Measurement by Confocal Microscopy. Composites Science and Technology, 61, 1389-1400.

[17]   Shao, Y.F. (1986) Science and Engineering of Short Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, Cambridge.

[18]   Folkes, M.J. (1982) Short Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics Research Studies. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken.

 
 
Top