Carbon Footprint Analyses of Wastewater Treatment Systems in Puducherry

G.  Vijayan; R.  Saravanane; T.  Sundararajan

doi:10.4236/cweee.2017.63019

G. Vijayan¹^*, R. Saravanane², T. Sundararajan²

Abstract:

Carbon footprint analysis is a method to quantify the life cycle Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions and identify the measure to reduce climate change impacts. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified that the global warming and climate change which is one of the most important issues in the domain of environment are caused by the excessive emission of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) mainly constituting Carbon dioxide (CO₂), Methane (CH₄) and Nitrous oxide (N₂O). The municipal wastewater treatment plant receives wastewater for treatment and finally discharges the treated effluent. The emissions of GHG during the treatment of wastewater as well as during the treatment process of sludge and also for energy generation are known to be on-site GHG emissions. Off-site GHG emissions are generated due to transportation and disposal of sludge, off-site energy and chemical production. In Puducherry, the municipal wastewater is being treated using oxidation ponds, Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) and Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR). Wastewater treatment using Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) technology is one of the state-of-the art wastewater management systems. In this technology equalization, biological treatment and secondary clarification are performed in a single reactor in a time control sequence. The emissions of GHG from the Oxidation ponds of 12.5 MLD, UASB reactor of 2.5 MLD and SBR of 17 MLD were assessed based on the IPCC guidelines and the total emissions of GHG in terms of equivalent of CO₂ were compared. The performance of the SBR is more efficient and the emissions of GHG are less than the emissions in the UASB as well as in oxidation ponds. The emission of GHG in SBR is about 60% of the existing treatment systems of oxidation ponds and UASB thus a reduction of 40% GHG emission could be achieved.

Keywords: Greenhouse Gas (GHG), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Global Warming Potential (GWP), Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR), Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB)

Cite this paper: Vijayan, G. , Saravanane, R. and Sundararajan, T. (2017) Carbon Footprint Analyses of Wastewater Treatment Systems in Puducherry. Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, 6, 281-303. doi: 10.4236/cweee.2017.63019.

References

[1] Doorn, M.R.J., Towprayoon, S., Vieira, S.M.M., Irving, W., Palmer, C., Pipatti, R. and Wang, C. (2006) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.

[2] United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Research Triangle International (RTI) (2010) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation Methodologies for Biogenic Emissions from Selected Source Categories.

[3] Chai, C., Zhang, D., Yu, Y., Feng, Y. and Wong, M.S. (2015) Carbon Footprint Analyses of Mainstream Wastewater Treatment Technologies under Different Sludge Treatment Scenarios in China. Water, 7, 918-938.

[4] Das, S. (2011) Estimation of Greenhouse Gases Emissions from Biological Wastewater Treatment Plants at Windsor. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Paper 77.

[5] Trends in Global CO2 Emissions: 2014 Report—The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra.

[6] Pahuja, N., Pandey, N., Mandal, K. and Bandyopadhyay, C. (2014) GHG Mitigation in India: An Overview of the Current Policy Landscape. Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington DC.
http://www.wri.org/publication/ghg-mitigation-ind-policy

[7] MoEF (2010) India Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2007) Report of Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
http://envfor.nic.in/

[8] Snip, L.J.P. (2010) Quantifying the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Waste Water Treatment Plants. Thesis Project Systems and Control, MES (Environmental Sciences), Wageningen, The Netherlands.

[9] Ma, Z.-Y., Feng, Gao, Q.-X., Lu, Y.-N., Liu, J.-R. and Li, W.-T. (2015) CH4 Emissions and Reduction Potential in Wastewater Treatment in China. Advances in Climate Change Research, 6, 216-224.

[10] U.S. EPA (1983) An Emerging Technology, Sequencing Batch Reactors. A Project Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

[11] Arceivala, S.J. and Asolekakar, S.R. (2008) Wastewater Treatment for Pollution Control and Reuse. Third Edition, Tata McGraw-Hill.

[12] U.S. EPA (1986) Design Manual, Summary Report Sequencing Batch Reactors. EPA/625/8-86/011.

[13] U.S. EPA (1999) Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Sequencing Batch Reactors. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 832-F-99-073.

[14] U.S. EPA (2000) Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Package Plants. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 832-F-00-016.

[15] The New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission (2005) Manual for Sequencing Batch Reactor Design and Operational Considerations.

[16] Sweetapple, C., Fu, G. and Butler, D. (2014) Multi-Objective Optimisation of Wastewater Treatment Plant Control to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Water Research, 55, 52-62.

[17] Butler, E., Hung, Y.-T., Al Ahmad, M.S., Yeh, R.Y.-L., Liu, R.L.-H. and Fu, Y.-P. (2015) Oxidation Pond for Municipal Wastewater Treatment. Applied Water Science, 7, 31-51.

[18] Hernandez-Paniagua, I.Y., Ramirez-Vargas, R., Ramos-Gomez, M.S., Dendooven, L., Avelar-Gonzalez, F.J. and Thalasso, F. (2014) Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stabilization Ponds in Subtropical Climates. Environmental Technology, 35, 727-734.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.848910

[19] Heffernana, B., Blancb, J. and Spanjersc, H. (2012) Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Municipal UASB Sewage Treatment Plants. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 9, 127-137.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2012.696546

[20] Guo, J., Ma, F., Qu, Y., Li, A. and Wang, L. (2012) Systematical Strategies for Wastewater Treatment and the Generated Wastes and Greenhouse Gases in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 6, 271-279.

[21] Gupta, D. and Singh, S.K. (2015) Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wastewater Treatment Plants. International Journal of Environmental Engineering, 7, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEE.2015.069251

[22] Chandran, K. (2010) Greenhouse Nitrogen Emission from Wastewater Treatment Operations: Interim Report. Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Report No. U4R07a.

[23] Doorn, M.R.J., Strait, R., Barnard, W. and Eklund, B. (1997) Estimate of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Industrial and Domestic Wastewater Treatment. Final Report, EPA-600/R-97-091, Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

[24] Caniani, D., Esposito, G., Gori, R. and Mannina, G. (2015) Towards a New Decision Support System for Design, Management and Operation of Wastewater Treatment Plants for the Reduction of Greenhouse Gases Emission. Water, 7, 5599-5616.

[25] Cakir, F.Y. and Stenstrom, M.K. (2005) Greenhouse Gas Production: A Comparison between Aerobic and Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Technology. Water Research, 39, 4197-4203.

[26] Monteith, H.D., Sahely, H.R., MacLean, H.L. and Bagley, D.M. (2005) A Rational Procedure for Estimation of Greenhouse-Gas Emissions from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. Water Environment Research, 77, 390-403.
https://doi.org/10.2175/106143005x51978

[27] Préndez, M. and Lara-González, S. (2008) Application of Strategies for Sanitation Management in Wastewater Treatment Plants in Order to Control/Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emission. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 658-664.

[28] Rosso, D. and Stenstrom, M.K. (2008) The Carbon-Sequestration Potential of Municipal Wastewater Treatment. Chemosphere, 70, 1468-1475.