Global Horticulture Market Outlook 2015 projects that horticulture industry plays vital role in the future. The globe has initiated measures to support this industry. In 2011, global fruits and vegetables production were 548 million tonnes and 990 million tonnes respectively. And the global floriculture industry size was around USD 109 billion  .
Globalization has witnessed the focus on integration of developing country firms geographically with PAN world with supply networks or commodity chains. These global supply chain linkages help to connect developing countries’ firms with developed countries’ suppliers and customers. Gereffi   , emphasises not only that independent companies in different countries are linked together in trading relationships, but also that the chain should be considered as a network governed to a large extent by key agents within it. Watts’s paper focused on the trade in fresh vegetables and said that this sector has become one of the most vibrant sectors in international trade, and during the l990s, imports of fruit and vegetable products by EU countries surpassed all other categories of agricultural products (Wattsl 994).
Gereffi  reported GCCs [Global Commodity Chains] novel in increasingly organizing international production and trade in strategic decision making and economic networks at global scale by industrial and commercial firms. Gereffi  classified the commodity chains are producer-driven and buyer-driven. Producer-driven commodity chains are governing by transnational firms and buyer-driven commodities govern by retailers, importers and brand-name companies. These firms link overseas factories and traders with evolving product niches in their main consumer markets.
India is one of the largest agrarian economies of the world. In the context of economic liberalization, it promotes export led growth. The Indian National Agriculture Policy (NAP) focuses more on demand driven agricultural growth in domestic and export markets. Of late, WTO trade liberalization and multilateral negotiations also focus more on international agricultural commodity markets in the light of improvement of market access and limitation of export subsidies.
Horticulture marketing define as finding out what your customers want and supplying it to them at a profit therefore involves: identifying buyers, understanding what they want in terms of products and how they want to be supplied, operating a production-marketing chain that delivers the right products at the right time and making enough profit to continue to operate.
Horticultural sector contributes 54% of agricultural Exports and 28% of AgGDP in India. Over the last decade this sector grown at the growth rate of 3.6 percent. NHB, 2011 reported that India is second largest producer of fruits and vegetables in the world next only to China. This tremendous production potential offers India’s greater opportunities for exports. India produced in 2010-11, 146.55 MTs of vegetables and 74.88 MTs of fruits. And its requirement is 175.2 MTs vegetables and 74.40 MTs fruits. In 2011-12, India exported vegetables and fruits worth Rs. 4801.29 crores. The consumption basket is changing towards fruits and vegetables. National Horticultural Mission started in 2005, Foreign Trade Policy (2004-09) advocating to boost export growth and promotion of horticultural products. XI & XII Plans also emphasizing accelerated horticultural growth.
India is one of the world’s leading producers of finest tea 23 per cent share by volume in 2013. Its contribute 12 per cent share in world tea exports in 2013- 2014. The CIS countries accounted for 19.8 per cent of total exports in 2013- 2014 with US$ 152.46 million. India registered exports of 225.7 million kg. for approximately 78 per cent of total exports during 2013-2014  . In 2013-2014, the Russian federation was the topmost importer of Indian tea, followed by UAE and Iran respectively.
Coffee Board, 2014 reported that India ranked in coffee production seventh largest in the world and third largest Asia. India exported coffee during 2013- 2014, 313,025 metric tonnes and earned foreign revenue 793.22 US$ million. India exports coffee to over 45 countries, over 50 per cent of to Europe. Italy is the largest importing more than 25 per cent from India  .
We are living in multi-speed world economies. Horticultural commodities play significant role in living economics. World Development Report  reported that markets are central to the lives of poor people and World Bank, World Development Report  framed institutions that support the development of markets.
UNCTAD  study revealed that India’s exports to world are income elastic and found that 1% decline in GDP growth of world will lead to 1.88% decline in India’s growth of exports. Singh and S. K. Singla  found from their study (1992 to 2006) that India has been unable to diversify its exports as well as export destinations. Export from India has experienced instability primarily in the developing countries. Demand for India’s exports was found to be elastic to both relative prices and income of the importing countries. Traill  predicts that by 2015 supermarket’s share of the retail food market will reach 61% in Argentina, Mexico, and Poland, 67% in Hungary and 76% in Brazil. IFPRI’s  research shown that agricultural Market reforms liberalization programs adopted by many developing countries in the past had limited success in developing private, efficient, and competitive agricultural markets. Dastagiri and Immanuelraj  advocates reforms needed to shift Indian farming from traditional farming to an agribusiness sector and develop linkages farmers to super markets and export markets is a key driver for industrialization of agriculture.
Alberto and Stefano  estimated import price demand elasticity in the destination markets of Italian exports found that Italy has a relatively low elasticity of substitution in main specialization sector (machinery and equipment), while has higher substitution elasticity for traditional goods like textiles, jewelry and leather. Reardon and Hopkins  ; Minton (2008) found that super markets and retailers competing om price, convenience, quality of the products and safety. Mithofer et al.  found that smallholders were linked to the export market by middlemen in Kenya. Galanopoulos et al.  reported that though Mediterranean countries are traditional growers of fruit and vegetables but unable to competitive in the global market. Dastagiri et al.  estimated and found that for all vegetables the NPC is less than 1 indicating they are competitive in the international markets. Lenné & Ward  found that the export vegetable subsector as a role model for improving the efficiency, growth and economic value of domestic vegetable marketing systems in East Africa. Dastagiri et al.  reported that most of the Indian horticultural commodity markets were operating efficiently and producer-consumer was the most efficient channel. Diego et al  found in Niamey, Niger for market retailers net profit (NP) for amaranth and lettuce on marketplace, whereas the NP of cabbage and tomato strongly depended on season and marketplace.
This paper examines the position of Indian producers and exporters in the horticultural export trade from the perspective of the global supply chain analysis. There are limited studies on market research of horticulture commodity global supply chains and identification of major global markets. This study analyses Indian horticultural commodities export markets linking to global supply chains and price trends, elasticity’s and instability & identification of their destinations. Finally, the study will suggest multispeed strategies for improvement of global supply chains, prices, production, and trade.
The Specific Objectives are:
1) To analyze exports price growth rates of India’s horticultural commodities.
2) To estimate export elasticity’s for Indian fruits, vegetables, flowers and Tea & Coffee.
3) To identify major destinations for horticultural commodities and their share in world horticultural exports.
4) To trace India’s horticultural commodities Global Supply chains.
5) To suggests polices and strategies for boosting Indian horticultural exports and foreign earnings.
The study analyses the marketing of horticultural commodities exports with global supply chain perspective. India’s major export horticultural commodities were selected. It includes fruits, nuts, vegetables, flowers, coffee and tea. Study Period is 1990-1991 to 2012-2013. Data on quantity, values, and prices of exports, international prices and destinations of fruits, vegetables, flowers coffee and tea were collected. India is exporting these commodities to maximum 130 countries. Data sources are Agricultural Produce Export Development Authority (APEDA), Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence (DGCIS),National Horticultural Board (NHB), FAO Stat, Centre for monitoring on Indian economy (CMIE), Foreign Trade Year Book, Planning commission reports, National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD), EXIM Bank, export companies, Tea & Coffee Boards. Compound annual growth rates and trends of quantity exports, prices, and price elasticity’s of exports were estimated. For each commodity, the countries classified in to the top 10 countries based on major share of exports and rest as other countries. Finally top 3 countries of India’s exports for each commodity are identified. India’s horticultural commodities global supply chains traced with the help of experts of export companies, growers and literature. The compound growth rates, price elasticity’s, instability index of exports were estimated using the following formulae’s.
Growth rate formulae: 
The growth rates were calculated by fitting Exponential function for exports, prices etc for the period 1990-1991 to 2012-2013.
Assuming multiplicative error term in the Equation (1), model may be linearized by logarithmic transformation
where, are the parameters to be estimated by ordinary least square regression, t = time trend in year,
Price elasticity of exports formulae:
The percentage change in quantity exports is % ΔQ, and the percentage change in price is %ΔP. We calculate %ΔQ as ΔQ/Qave and we calculate %ΔP as ΔP/Pave, so we calculate the price elasticity of exports as .
Instability Index formulae:
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Exports, Price Growth Rates, Elasticity’s, Destinations, of Fruits, Vegetables & Flowers
3.1.1. Exports, Price Growth Rates
The quantity of exports and export price growth rates (%) of India’s fruits, vegetables and flowers during 1990-2012 are shown in Table 1 & Table 2. The export growth rates of fruits such as Banana, Mango, Pomegranate, Grapes are 19.6%, 5.8%, 19%, 14.4% respectively. Mango and Grapes exports are stable as their coefficient of variation is less than 100 percent whereas Banana and pomegranate are instable as their coefficient of variation is more than 100 percent. The export growth rates of fruits such as Mango, Pomegranate, and Grapes are more during 1990-2000 compared to 2000-2012.
Whereas export growth rates of vegetables such as Onion, Gherkin, Green chilies, potato are 8.4%, 23%, 5%, 13.1%, −28.9% respectively. The export growth rate for Rose is 7.8% and walnut is −8%. During 2000-2012, all variables growth rates of Green Chillies are negative because of low export prices and lack of demand during this period. Onion and Gherkins exports are stable as their coefficient of variation is less than 100 percent whereas Green chillies and Potato exports are instable as their coefficient of variation is more than 100 percent. It was found that the growth rates are positive for fruits, vegetables and flowers and for mushrooms and walnut are negative. The price growth rates of fruits such as Mango, Pomegranate, Grapes, Banana are 3.5%, 6.7%, 6.2%, 1.7% respectively. Similarly, vegetables price growth rates are Onion 6.1%, Gherkin 3.7%, Green chilies 0.8%, Potato 3.7%, and Mushrooms 5.4%. The Rose price growth rate is 30.6% and walnut is 6.5%. The study found that the price growth rates of all fruits, vegetables and flowers are positive and high.
It was found that the export growth rates of fruits, vegetables and flowers are positive except mushrooms and walnut. Contrastingly price growth rates for all commodities in the export destinations were positive and high. The prices of fruits, vegetables and flowers are stable as their coefficient of variation is less than 100 percent. The study concludes that all commodities quantity export growth rates more than price growth rates except walnut and mushrooms.
3.1.2. Export Elasticity’s
How responsive are export quantities to a change in international prices is of direct relevance in international economics. Export price elasticities are signals for exporters to increase or decrease their exports as it indicates exports responsiveness to changes in price.
The India’s fruits, vegetables and flowers export elasticity’s during 1990-2012 (%) are shown in Table 1 & Table 2. The elasticities of Fruits such as Banana, Mango, Pomegranate, Grapes are 4.58%, 1.38%, 1.31%, 1.31% respectively. The export elasticity’s of Vegetables are Onion 1.15%, Gherkin 1.84%, Green chilies 3.98%, Potato 1.42%. The Rose export elasticity is 0.59% and walnut is 6.68%.
It was found that banana has among fruits high export elasticity (4.38) and Green Chillies among vegetables have high (3.98). All elasticity’s of fruits, vegetables and flowers are elastic whereas walnut and mushrooms are inelastic.
3.1.3. Export Destinations
India’s fruits, vegetables and flowers export destinations and their share in the world exports during 2000-2012 are shown in Table 1 & Table 2. India exports these commodities to ranges from 40 to 130 countries of the world. For each commodity, the countries classified in to the top 10 countries which accounted major share of exports and rest as other countries. Finally, it was found that the top 3 countries which accounted 60% to 78% of India’s exports.
The major destinations for Indian mango is UAE (37.20%), Bangladesh (32.66%), Saudi Arabia (9.46%), for Grapes; Bangladesh (29.02%), Netherland (18.29), United Kingdom (15.3%), for Banana; Nepal (78.28%), UAE (6.17%), Maldives (3.13%). for Pomegranate; UAE (48.52%), Bangladesh (12.76%), Saudi Arabia (8.30%). The major destinations for walnut are Nepal (13.08%), United Kingdom (11.52%), France (10.18%).
The major destinations for Indian vegetables are; for Potato; South Africa (29.75%), UAE (11.93%), Pakistan (12.61%), for Onion; Bangladesh (29.77%), Maldives (21.64%), UAE (15.92%), for Green Chillies; United Kingdom (16.30%), Pakistan (13.54%), UAE (12.19%), for Gherkins; USA (20.32%), France (17.75%), Spain (14.88%), for Mushroom; USA (80.93%), Israel (12.65%), Russia (1.27%). Netherland (26.34%), Ethiopia (21.03%), UAE (9.43%) are he major destinations for India’s rose are.
The study found that the India is the major shopping basket for world fruits and vegetables. India’s 65% - 90% fruits and 50% to 65% vegetables exports in fresh products go to West Asia and East European markets. The 53% exports of Gherkins, 94% Mushrooms going to the USA, United Kingdom, France, Spain,
Table 1. Fruits of destination, exports, prices and elasticity’s     .
Source: Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2014  & Agricultural Produce Export Development Authority (APEDA) 2014  .
Table 2. Vegetables and flowers of destination, exports, prices and elasticity’s.
Source: Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2014  .
Israel and Russia. Netherland, Ethiopia and UAE are the major destinations for Indian rose. The major destinations (40%) for Walnut is Nepal, UK and France.
3.2. Exports and Overseas Prices Growth Rates of Tea and Coffee
The quantity of exports and export price growth rates (%) of India’s Tea and Coffee during 1990-2012 are shown in Table 3. The export growth rates of Tea and Coffee are 0.7%, 4.9% respectively. Tea exports are stable as their coefficient of variation is less than 100 percent but Coffee exports are unstable as coefficient of variation more than 100. Singh and S. K. Singla  found from their study (1992 to 2006) that exports from India have experienced instability primarily in the developing countries. The price growth rates of Tea and Coffee are 4.8%, 7.7%, respectively. It was found that the prices of Tea Coffee are stable as their coefficient of variation is less than 100 percent. The study concludes that Tea and Coffee commodities quantity export growth rates less than price growth rates.
Country Wise Exports and Overseas Prices Growth Rates
The growth rates of exports and prices of Coffee for major countries are in Table 4. During 1996-1997 to 2013-2014, the export growth rates shows that Japan has the highest growth rate (18.3) followed by Newzeland (9.1), Belgium (8.7), Italy (7.0), and France (4.6). Whereas price growth rates shows that Japan has highest growth rates (5.6), followed by Belgium (4.8), Greece (4.2), Italy (4.1) and Newzeland (3.5). This indicates that India should export Coffee to these overseas markets. The exports and prices are stable in these countries.
The growth rates of exports and prices of Tea for major countries are in Table 5. During 1996-1997 to 2013-2014, Australia has the highest growth rate (61.0) followed by Japan (48.6), Netherland (34.2), and USA (23.9). The exports are unstable. For the same period the price growth rates shows that USA has the highest growth rates (10.1), followed by Japan (8.3) and Russia (6.9). The prices are stable. This indicates that India should export Tea to these overseas markets.
3) Export Elasticity’s
In international Economics How responsive is export quantities to a change in international prices are of direct relevance. Export price elasticity’s are signals for exporters to increase or decrease their exports as it measures indicates exports responsiveness to changes in prices.
The export elasticity’s of India’s Tea and Coffee during 1990-2012 (%) are shown in Table 6. During this period the export elasticity’s of Tea and Coffee are 13.5%, 61.4 respectively which are highly elastic. This indicates that Tea and Coffee are highly competitive in overseas markets.
3.3. Countrywise Tea & Coffee Elasticity’s
The Coffee export elasticity’s for different overseas markets are in Table 7. Dur-
Table 3. The exports and international price growth rates of India’s Tea & Coffee during 1990-2012 (%).
Qty (000 tonnes), Value (Lakh Rs.), Price (Lakh Rs). Source: Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2014  .
Table 4. Country wise Coffee exports and price growth rate during 1990-2012 (%).
Qty (000 tonnes), Value (Lakh Rs.), Price (Lakh Rs). Source: Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics. 2014  .
Table 5. Country wise Tea exports and price growth rates during 1990-2012 (%).
Qty (000 tonnes), Value (Lakh Rs.), Price (Lakh Rs). Source: Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics. 2014  .
Table 6. Export elasticity’s of India’s Tea & Coffee during 1990-2012 (%).
Table 7. Export elasticity’s of India’s Coffee during 1990-2012 (%).
Table 8. Export elasticity’s of India’s Tea during 1990-2012 (%).
ing 1996-1997 to 2013-2014, Saudi Arabia has the highest elasticity (1.77) followed by UK (1.57), Italy (1.39), and France (1.27). This indicates that India should export Coffee to these overseas markets compare to other countries. India has comparative advantage to export to Middle East and Europe markets.
The Tea export elasticity’s for different overseas markets are in Table 8. During 1996-1997 to 2013-2014, UK has the highest elasticity (3.93), followed by France (2.42), and Australia (1.90). This indicates that India should export Tea to these overseas markets. Tea is export commodity for developed countries.
3.4. Export Destinations
India’s Tea and Coffee export destinations and their share in the world exports during 1990-1991 to 2011-2012 are shown in Table 9 to Table 10. India exports these commodities to ranges from 40 to 150 countries of the world. For each commodity, the countries classified in to the top 10 countries which accounted major share of exports and rest as other countries. Finally, it was found that the
Table 9. India’s Coffee export destinations in the world during 1990-2012.
Source: Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics. 2014  .
Table 10. India’s Tea export destinations in the world during 1990-2012.
Source: Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics. 2014  .
top 3 countries which accounted 55% to 60% of India’s exports.
The major destinations for Indian Tea is Australia (18.67%), Russia (17.33%) USA (15.94%), for Coffee Italy (28.73%), Germany (13.88), Belgium (7.56%). India has comparative advantage exporting Tea and Coffee to developed countries. This finding is also confirming with elasticity’s, export and price growth rates.
3.5. Global Supply Chains
3.5.1. Horticultural Export-Import Companies
Indian the top leading modern horticultural export and import companies are wide Table 11. These leading company’s exports fruits, vegetables, cocoa, coconut, coir, herbal plants, medicinal plants and organic products and wide range of products to Middle East and throughout the globe.
3.5.2. Market Players in Horticulture Global Supply Chains
The agents and their role in modern horticultural global supply chain have shown in Table 12. The global supply chain mainly includes producers - exporters - Importers - super markets - consumers. The major market players are exporters, importers and super markets. The producers produce horticultural commodities with high input system and good agricultural practices and sell to exporter. Exporters play major role of processing, packing, storage, and transport to importer. Exporters also do enforcement of procedures, safety and standard issues. Importer buys the product and does trading activity to super markets. Finally, supermarkets will supply commodities to consumer.
3.5.3. Indian Horticultural Commodities Global Supply Chains
The forward linkages of producers to exporters in India and backward linkages of importer to consumers in importing countries channels are discussed in this section. The Flow of Indian horticultural commodities to Europe, UK and US Shown in Figure 1 and to Middle East shown in Figure 2 and to South Asia, Africa and South East Asia shown in Figure 3. The supply chain channel to Europe, UK, US shows that growers - exporter - importer - supermarket - consumer. It is highly developed model and no middlemen involved in importing countries. Similarly, the same type of channel found for Middle East countries. In case of South Asia, Africa and South East Asia importing countries supply chain channels lengthy and middlemen involved. The farmers in Developed countries like UK, US, Europe felt the importance of connecting directly customers of domestic and exporters. This helped them to avoid middlemen as these are no way useful in value addition, quality and economic gains. Scientific, planned and organizing came to fore see and predict market signals and demand and supply position in international and local markets. This has increased their income and living standard. South Asia, East Asia, Latin America and Africa (developing countries) the supply channels are lengthy and middlemen are involved. This is major limitation in these countries farmers to realize high income. There is a need to start data harmonization and single window processing. In this connec-
Table 11. The top leading modern horticulture export and import companies in India.
Source: http://agriculture-livestock.europages.co.uk/companies/India/Horticulture%20-%20import-export.html dated 29-12-2015    .
Table 12. The modern horticulture global supply chain players and their role.
Figure 1. Flow of horticultural commodities from India to/for countries of UK and Europe, US.
Figure 2. Flow of horticultural commodities from India to/for countries of Middle East.
Figure 3. Flow of horticultural commodities from India to/for countries of South Asia, Africa and South East Asia.
tion Digital India will help exporter to access various resources available at government level.
The study findings were useful in designing policies and programs for escalating exports and foreign income, recognizing profitable destinations and modern export supply chains. The export growth rates during 1990-2012 (%) of India’s fruits, vegetables and flowers are positive except mushroom and walnut. The export growth rates (qty) range from 5.8% Mango to 19.6% banana and vegetables; 8.4% onion to 23% green chillies and rose export growth rate was 7.8%. Mango, grapes, onion and gherkins exports are stable whereas Banana, Pomegranate, Green chillies and Potato are unstable. During this period the price elasticities of exports of fruits, vegetables and flowers are positive except walnut and mushrooms. This implies that Indian exports of these commodities are highly responsive to price changes in the international markets. Among fruits, the highest elasticity was found for banana (4.58%) and among vegetables green chillies recorded high (3.98%). This implies that India should increase exports of these commodities to earn more foreign earnings. Bangladesh, UAE, Pakistan, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, UK, Saudi Arabia, Nepal, Netherland and France are the major destinations (65% - 90%) for Indian fruits. Nepal, UK and France (40%) are the major destinations for walnut. The major share 50% to 65% of India’s vegetables (potato, onion, green chilies) are exported to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Pakistan, Malaysia and UK.
The export growth rates during 1990-2012 (%) of India’s Tea (0.7%) and coffee (4.9%) are positive. The exports of Tea are stable and of Coffee are unstable. During this period the price elasticities of exports of Tea and Coffee are elastic. Among the highest elasticity was found for Coffee (61.4%) and Tea (13.1%). During 1996-1997 to 2013-2014, Saudi Arabia has showed the highest coffee export elasticity (1.77) followed by UK (1.57), Italy (1.39) and France (1.27). India has comparative advantage to export to Middle East and Europe markets. While during the same period, UK has showed the highest tea export elasticity (3.93), followed by France (2.42) and Australia (1.90). Tea is export commodity for developed countries. The major destinations which accounted 50% to 60% share for Indian Tea and Coffee are Australia, Russia & USA, Italy, Germany, and Belgium.
India has top leading modern horticultural export and import companies. The supply chain channel to Europe, UK, US shows that highly developed model and no middlemen involved. Similarly, the same type of channel found for Middle East countries. In case of South Asia, Africa and South East Asia importing countries supply chain channels lengthy and middlemen involved. UK, Europe, US (developed countries) farmers connecting with direct customers in domestic markets as well exporters. This eliminated middlemen as they are no use in improving quality and commercial gains.
The study helps in designing agricultural policies and programs to increase horticultural exports and foreign earnings in Asia, Africa and East European markets and USA. India should develop modern supply chains and apply multispeed straggles of exports. Scientific, planned and organizing required to fore see demand and supply position in international and local markets. South Asia, East Asia, Latin America and Africa the supply channels are lengthy and middlemen are involved. In this connection Digital India will help in various export activities. The exporter has an access to various resources available at government level. In the Globalization era the global supply chain model must be connecting producers directly with exporters and importers or consumers of importing countries. This is possible digitalization of data and single window processing.
The international trade in general and export marketing in particular is complex phenomenon because of too many variables effects on trade. This study estimated only few indicators such as elasticities, growth rates, market destinations and traced global supply chains. Hence, future research should be focus on more trade parameters and policies influencing on them.
 Gereffi, G. (1994) The Organisation of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks. In: Gereffi, G. and Korzeniewicz, M., Eds., Commodity Clains and Global Capitalism, Praeger, Westport, 95-122.
 Singh, K. and Sangla, K. (2012) An Analysis of India’s Exports (1991-2006). ZENITH International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research, 2, 79-108.
 Dastagiri, M.B., Hanumanthaiah, C.V., Paramsivam, P., Sidhu, R.S., Sudha, M., Mandal, S., Singh, B., Chand, K. and Ganesh Kumar, B. (2012) Marketing Efficiency of India’s Horticultural Commodities under Different Supply Chains. Out Look on Agriculture, 41, 271-278.
 Reardon, T. and Hopkins, R. (2006) The Supermarket Revolution in Developing Countries: Policies to Address Emerging Tensions among Supermarkets, Suppliers and Traditional Retailers. Europeans Journal of Development Research, 18, 522-545.
 Mithofer, D., Nangole, E. and Asfaw, S. (2008) Smallholder Access to the Export Market: The Case of Vegetables in Kenya. Outlook on Agriculture, 37, 203-211.
 Galanopoulos, K., Nilsson, F.O.L., Wajnblom, E. and Surry, Y. (2009) Fruit and Vegetable Production in the New Millennium: Will Mediterranean Production Satisfy Increasing European Demand? Outlook on Agriculture, 38, 235-242.
 Dastagiri, M.B., Chand, R., Immanuelraj, T.K., Hanumanthaiah, C.V., Paramsivam, P., Sidhu, R.S., Sudha, M., Mandal, S., Singh, B., Chand, K. and Ganesh Kumar, B. (2013) Indian Vegetables: Production Trends, Marketing Efficiency and Export Competitiveness. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 1, 1-11.
 Lenne, J.M., Pink, D.A.C., Spence, N.J., Ward, A.F., Njuki, J. and Ota, M. (2005) The Vegetable Export System: A Role Model for Local Vegetable Production in Kenya. Outlook on Agriculture, 34, 225-232.
 Diego, R.V.C., Buerkert, A. and Schlecht, E. (2011) Economic Benefit to Gardeners and Retailers from Cultivating and Marketing Vegetables in Niamey, Niger. Outlook on Agriculture, 40, 71-78.