Back
 JWARP  Vol.9 No.8 , July 2017
Passive Samplers Deployment in the Ayapel Swamp for Monitoring Temporal Dynamics of Mercury in the Water Column
Abstract: Passive sampling is a simple and efficacious sampling technique that guarantees a safe collection and transportation of samples to the analysis site, and obtaining results with more temporal resolution. As a case of study, passive samplers were deployed in the Ayapel Swamp, Colombia, located in the influence zone of open pit gold mines. Mercury, iron and manganese were sampled at two different depths by the Chemcatcher? passive sampler and regular grab sampling. Additionally, dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction potential, pH and water temperature were measured. The results showed that depth and time did not have a significant influence (ANOVA, confidence level of 95%) on mercury concentration on both passive samplers and grab sampling. However, concentration of Fe and Hg in passive samplers had a high positive correlation, but it may be because depth increase during sampling period caused the dilution of both analytes. In conclusion, passive samplers proved to be a valuable tool for understanding the response of mercury to the Ayapel Swamp dynamics.
Cite this paper: Murillo, D. , León, D. and Jiménez, C. (2017) Passive Samplers Deployment in the Ayapel Swamp for Monitoring Temporal Dynamics of Mercury in the Water Column. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 873-880. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2017.98058.
References

[1]   Mason, R.P. and Sheu, G.R. (2002) Role of the Ocean in the Global Mercury Cycle. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 40-1-40-14.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb001440

[2]   Morel, F.M., Kraepiel, A.M. and Amyot, M. (1998) The Chemical Cycle and Bioaccumulation of Mercury. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 543-566.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.543

[3]   Mills, G.A., et al. (2009) Monitoring Heavy Metals Using Passive Sampling Devices In: Rapid Chemical and Biological Techniques for Water Monitoring, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 241-261.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470745427.ch4a

[4]   Selin, N.E. (2009) Global Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury: A Review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 43.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314

[5]   Shastri, Y. and Diwekar, U. (2008) Optimal Control of Lake pH for Mercury Bioaccumulation Control. Ecological Modelling, 216, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.019

[6]   Mergler, D., et al. (2007) Methylmercury Exposure and Health Effects in Humans: A Worldwide Concern. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36, 3-11.
https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[3:MEAHEI]2.0.CO;2

[7]   Paraquetti, H.H.M., Ayres, G.A., De Almeida, M.D., Molisani, M.M. and De Lacerda, L.D. (2004) Mercury Distribution, Speciation and Flux in the Sepetiba Bay Tributaries, SE Brazil. Water Research, 38, 1439-1448.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.039

[8]   Fernández-Gómez, C., Hintelmann, H. and Díez, S. (2012). Passive Sampling for Inorganic Contaminants in Water. In: Pawliszyn, J., Ed., Comprehensive Sampling and Sample Preparation, Academic Press, Oxford, 281-296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-381373-2.00015-6

[9]   Marrugo-Negrete, J., Benítez, L.N., Olivero-Verbel, J., Lans, E. and Gutierrez, F.V. (2010) Spatial and Seasonal Mercury Distribution in the Ayapel Marsh, Mojana Region, Colombia. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 20, 451-459.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2010.499451

[10]   Aguilar-Martínez, R., et al. (2009) Application of Chemcatcher Passive Sampler for Monitoring Levels of Mercury in Contaminated River Water. Talanta, 77, 1483-1489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.09.037

[11]   Aguilera, M. (2009) Ciénaga de Ayapel: Riqueza en Biodiversidad y Recursos Hídricos. Banco de la República, Bogota.

[12]   Quémerais, B., Cossa, D., Rondeau, B., Pham, T. and Fortin, B. (1998) Mercury Distribution in Relation to Iron and Manganese in the Waters of the St. Lawrence River. Science of the Total Environment, 213, 193-201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00092-8

[13]   Chadwick, S.P., Babiarz, C.L., Hurley, J.P. and Armstrong, D.E. (2006) Influences of Iron, Manganese, and Dissolved Organic Carbon on the Hypolimnetic Cycling of Amended Mercury. Science of the Total Environment, 368, 177-188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.039

[14]   Richard, J.H., Bischoff, C., Ahrens, C.G. and Biester, H. (2016) Mercury(II) Reduction and Co-Precipitation of Metallic Mercury on Hydrous Ferric Oxide in Contaminated Groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 539, 36-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.116

[15]   Meili, M. (1997) Mercury in Lakes and Rivers. Metal Ions in Biological Systems, 34, 21-51.

[16]   Sellers, P., Kelly, C.A. and Rudd, J.W. (2001) Fluxes of Methylmercury to the Water Column of a Drainage Lake: The Relative Importance of Internal and External Sources. Limnology and Oceanography, 46, 623-631.
https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.3.0623

[17]   O’Driscoll, N.J., Beauchamp, S., Siciliano, S.D., Rencz, A.N. and Lean, D.R. (2003) Continuous Analysis of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury (DGM) and Mercury Flux in Two Freshwater Lakes in Kejimkujik Park, Nova Scotia: Evaluating Mercury Flux Models with Quantitative Data. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 2226-2235.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es025944y

[18]   Kaczynski, S.E. and Kieber, R.J. (1993) Aqueous Trivalent Chromium Photo Production in Natural Waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 27, 1572-1576.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es00045a011

[19]   Barkay, T. and Wagner-Dobler, I. (2005) Microbial Transformations of Mercury: Potentials, Challenges, and Achievements in Controlling Mercury Toxicity in the Environment. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 57, 1-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2164(05)57001-1

[20]   Seller, P., Kelly, C., Rudd, J. and MacHutchon, A. (1996) Photodegradation of Methylmercury in Lakes. Nature, 380, 694-697.
https://doi.org/10.1038/380694a0

 
 
Top