Back
 JTR  Vol.5 No.2 , June 2017
Revisiting Acid-Fast Bacilli Microscopy of Concentrated Sputum Smears as an Efficient Tool for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: A Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern India
Abstract: Background and objectives: With 2.2 million new cases every year, Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be an epidemic of large proportions in India. Conventional direct sputum smear microscopy, though limited in its sensitivity, is still the most common method of testing for TB. Newer techniques such as concentrated sputum microscopy, have shown some promise in improving this limited sensitivity. We have compared the efficacy of concentrated sputum versus the direct smear technique in 1000 sputum samples of patients suspected to be suffering from TB. Methods: A total of 1000 sputum specimens were collected for direct acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, concentrated AFB smear and culture from St. John’s Medical College and Hospital. 39 contaminated samples were (3.9%) omitted during the final analysis. Mycobacterial culture was used as the reference standard method for the detection of TB. Results: 184 and 198 of the 961 samples were found to AFB positive by direct smear microscopy and concentrated smear technique respectively. The measured sensitivity and specificity of direct smear microscopy were 69.86% and 95.82%, while that of concentrated smear microscopy was 76.71% and 95.96 % respectively. 33 samples found to be negative by the direct smear method turned out to be positive by the concentrated smear technique. Conclusions: Though our study suggests no significant statistical difference between the two techniques of detecting pulmonary tuberculosis, we recommend the use of the concentrated technique in centres such as ours, where facilities are already in place. In this way, the number of cases of TB that remain untreated may significantly come down.
Cite this paper: Kumar, J. , Dhar, C. and Srinivasa, H. (2017) Revisiting Acid-Fast Bacilli Microscopy of Concentrated Sputum Smears as an Efficient Tool for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: A Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern India. Journal of Tuberculosis Research, 5, 146-154. doi: 10.4236/jtr.2017.52016.
References

[1]   WHO (2016) Global Tuberculosis Report 2016.

[2]   Arinaminpathy, N., Batra, D., Khaparde, S., Vualnam, T., Maheshwari, N., Sharma, L., et al. (2016) The Number of Privately Treated Tuberculosis Cases in India: An Estimation from Drug Sales Data. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 16, 1255-1260.

[3]   Aber, V.R., Allen, B.W., Mitchison, D.A., Ayuma, P., Edwards, E.A. and Keyes, A.B. (1980) Quality Control in Tuberculosis Bacteriology. 1. Laboratory Studies on Isolated Positive Cultures and the Efficiency of Direct Smear Examination. Tubercle, 61, 123-133.

[4]   Bird, B.R., Denniston, M.M., Huebner, R.E. and Good, R.C. (1996) Changing Practices in Mycobacteriology: A Follow-Up Survey of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34, 554-559.

[5]   World Health Organization (1193) WHO Declares TB a Global Emergency. Health Horizon.
http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/

[6]   Tattersfield, A. (2005) Toman’s Tuberculosis: Case Detection, Treatment and Monitoring: Questions and Answers, 2nd Edition. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 70.

[7]   Angeby, K.A.K., Alvarado-Gálvez, C., Pineda-García, L. and Hoffner, S.E. (2000) Improved Sputum Microscopy for a More Sensitive Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Technical Note. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 4, 684-687.

[8]   Betty, A., Forbes, D.F.S. and WeissFeld, A.S. (2007) Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. 12th Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

[9]   BACTEC MGIT 960 System User’s Manual 2004/06. Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks.

[10]   Cornfield, D.B., Beavis, K.G., Greene, J.A., Bojak, M. and Bondi, J. (1997) Mycobacterial Growth and Bacterial Contamination in the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube and BACTEC 460 Culture Systems. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35, 2068-2071.

[11]   Pfyffer, G.E., Welscher, H.M., Kissling, P., Cieslak, C., Casal, M.J., Gutierrez, J., et al. (1997) Comparison of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) with Radiometric and Solid Culture for Recovery of Acid-Fast Bacilli. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35, 364-368.

[12]   Leitritz, L., Schubert, S., Bucherl, B., Masch, A., Heesemann, J. and Roggenkamp, A. (2001) Evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460TB Systems for Recovery of Mycobacteria from Clinical Specimens of a University Hospital with Low Incidence of Tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39, 3764-3767.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.10.3764-3767.2001

[13]   RNTCP (2010) Status TB Report. Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi.

[14]   Marie Yvette, C.B.M., Myrna, T., Mendoza, M.D., Regina, S., Celada, R.M.T., Heidi, R. and Santos, R.M.T. (1995) Accuracy of AFB in Relation to TB Culture in Detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 24.

[15]   Cattamanchi, A., Dowdy, D.W., Davis, J.L., Worodria, W., Yoo, S., Joloba, M., et al. (2009) Sensitivity of Direct versus Concentrated Sputum Smear Microscopy in HIV-Infected Patients Suspected of Having Pulmonary Tuberculosis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 9, 53.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-53

[16]   Uddin, M.K., Chowdhury, M.R., Ahmed, S., Rahman, M.T., Khatun, R., van Leth, F., et al. (2013) Comparison of Direct versus Concentrated Smear Microscopy in Detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. BMC Research Notes, 6, 291.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-291

[17]   Peterson, E.M., Nakasone, A., Platon-DeLeon, J.M., Jang, Y., de La Maza, L.M. and Desmond, E. (1999) Comparison of Direct and Concentrated Acid-Fast Smears to Identify Specimens Culture Positive for Mycobacterium spp. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37, 3564-3568.

[18]   Central Tuberculosis Division (2005) Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program Technical and Operational Guidelines for Tuberculosis Control. Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.

[19]   Reza, L.W., Satyanarayana, S., Pandey, A., Kumar, S., Devendrappa, N.M., Anand, L., et al. (2013) LED Fluorescence Microscopy Increases the Detection of Smear- Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Medical Colleges of India. Public Health Action, 3, 240-242.
https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.13.0021

[20]   Thapa, B., Reza, L.W., Kumar, A.M., Pandey, A., Satyanarayana, S. and Chadha, S. (2015) Light Emitting Diode Fluorescence Microscopy Increased the Detection of Smear-Positives during Follow-Up of Tuberculosis Patients in India: Program Implications. BMC Research Notes, 8, 596.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1584-z

 
 
Top