Human-Simulating Intelligent PID Control

Zhuning  Liu

doi:10.4236/ijmnta.2017.62007

Zhuning Liu^*

Abstract: Motivated by PID control simplicity, robustness and validity to deal with the nonlinearity and uncertainties of dynamics, through simulating the intelligent behavior of human manual control, and only using the elementary information on hand, this paper introduces a simple formulation to represent prior knowledge and experiences of human manual control, and proposes a simple and practicable control law, named Human-Simulating Intelligent PID control (HSI-PID), and the simple tuning rules with the explicit physical meaning. HSI-PID control can not only easily incorporate prior knowledge and experiences of experts control into the controller but also automatically acquire knowledge of control experiences from the past control behavior to correct the control action online. The theoretical analysis and simulation results show that: HSI-PID control has the better flexibility, stronger robustness, and especially the faster self-learning ability, and it can make the motion of system identically track the desired response, whether the controlled system has the strong nonlinearity and uncertainties of dynamics or not, even under the actions of uncertain, varying-time and strong disturbances.

Keywords: Nonlinear Control, PID Control, Manual Control, Knowledge-Based Control, Intelligent Control

Cite this paper: Liu, Z. (2017) Human-Simulating Intelligent PID Control. International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, 6, 74-83. doi: 10.4236/ijmnta.2017.62007.

References

[1] Liu, J.K. (2004) Advanced PID Control MATLAB Simulation. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing.

[2] Knospe, C.R. (2006) PID Control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 26, 30-31.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2006.1580151

[3] Hu, B.G. (2006) A Study on Nnonlinear PID Controllers—Proportional Component Approach. Acta Automatica Sinica, 32, 219-227.

[4] Arimoto, S. (1994) A Class of Quasi-Natural Potentials and Hyper-Stable PID Servo-Loops for Nonlinear Robotic System, Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 30, 1005-1012.
https://doi.org/10.9746/sicetr1965.30.1005

[5] Kelly, R. (1998) Global Positioning of Robotic Manipulators via PD Control plus a Class of Nonlinear Integral Actions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 43, 934-938.
https://doi.org/10.1109/9.701091

[6] Ortega, R., Loria, A. and Kelly, R. (1995) A Semiglobally Stable Output Feedback PI2D Regulator for Robot Manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40, 1432-1436.
https://doi.org/10.1109/9.402235

[7] Liu, B.S. and Tian, B.L. (2009) General Integral Control. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Control, Singapore, 22-24 January 2009, 136-143.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icacc.2009.30

[8] Liu, B.S., Luo, X.Q. and Li, J.H. (2013) General Concave Integral Control. Intelligent Control and Automation, 4, 356-361.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ica.2013.44042

[9] Liu, B.S., Luo, X.Q. and Li, J.H. (2014) General Convex Integral Control. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 11, 565-570.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-014-0813-6

[10] Liu, B.S. (2014) Constructive General Bounded Integral Control. Intelligent Control and Automation, 5,146-155.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ica.2014.53017

[11] Liu, B.S. (2014) On the Generalization of Integrator and Integral Control Action. International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, 3, 44-52.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmnta.2014.32007

[12] Peng, L. (1995) Neural Network Control of the Intelligent Underwater Vehicle, Ocean Engineering, 13, 38-46.