eparation of the seven DRASTIC layers was conducted as prescribed by the authors with modification of the net recharge component. Geographical information system (GIS) was employed in the assessment.

2.3.1. Depth to Water Level

Most parts of the study area have groundwater level within 5 - 30 feet, it reaches up to about 50 - 75 feet in some locations such as Sabon Gayan. In some locations around Badiko and Tudun Wada, groundwater level is found within 5 feet above mean sea level. A thematic layer of this parameter for the study area was created using the spatial analyst function of Arc GIS 10.0 according to the model rating (Figure 2).

2.3.2. Net Recharge

In the study area, there was no readily available data on recharge from documentary sources, as such a simple formula proposed by [44] was used to determine the net recharge:

(2)

Slope was generated by reclassifying the thematic layer of topography which was secured from the Digital Elevation Model of the area (section 2.3.6). Soil

Table 1. Data Type and Sources.

Figure 2. Thematic Layer of Depth to Water Level (ft) in Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

permeability as used in the formula, is a qualitative value given to the three soil types in the area (section 2.3.4). Sandy soils was rated 5, sandy loam 3 and loamy sand 4. Rainfall is expectedly uniform in the whole study area and exceeded 1000 mm according to literature, a uniform rating of 4 which signifies rainfall greater than 850 mm was adopted. Thematic layer of net recharge was produced using Equation 3. Recharge pattern is somewhat uniform in the whole study area and follows the pattern of topography. Using the model builder of Arc GIS 10.0, the qualitative classification of recharge was achieved (Figure 3).

2.3.3. Aquifer Media

According to literature and VES report, the study area is completely overlaid by uniform aquifer media, the weathered metamorphic/igneous rock which has the DRASTIC rating between 3 - 5. Typical rating of 4, as suggested by [18] was adopted in most parts of the study area. The value was adjusted in some areas to reflect the degree of consolidation of the aquifer materials. In some areas around Malali and Unguwan Rimi, where the materials are highly consolidated according to the VES reports, a rating of 3 was adopted. A rating of 5 was adopted in some areas such as Unguwan Pama, Romi and Barnawa due to the extreme weathering of the aquifer media. The result is depicted on Figure 4.

2.3.4. Soil Media

A scanned copy of Soil map of Nigeria produced by [45] was georefrenced, digi-

Figure 3. Qualitative Classification of Net Recharge in Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

Figure 4. Thematic Layer of Aquifer Media in Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

tized and the study area was extracted and vectorized. From the map and its accompanying report, two major soil textural classes were present in the area, the sandy loam and loamy sand. The third soil group which is the recent alluvium soil found within the course and the flood plain of River Kaduna, Rivers Tubo, Chidawaki, Rumana among others was described as sandy soil in the report, as such a rating of 9 was adopted for the category. Sandy loam which can be seen in the north, northeast, and eastern tips of the study area, was rated 6 according to the model. Loamy sand which occupies most parts of the study area, but not considered by the model was adjusted to 6.5. A thematic soil map of the area (Figure 5) was produced according to this rating using Arc GIS 10.0.

2.3.5. Topography

Topography of the area was generated using Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of Arc GIS 10.0. Slope percent was then calculated using the slope function of the same software. It was classified according to the DRASTIC rating as can be seen on Figure 6.

2.3.6. Impact of Vadose Zone

The vadose zone media of the study area is metamorphic/igneous formation which has the theoretical rating of between 2 - 8. A typical rating of 4 was adopted for most parts of the area according to the DRASTIC rating. The rating

Figure 5. Thematic Layer of Soil Media in Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

was also adjusted to 2 and 3 for massive igneous around Malali and partially weathered formation around Malali, Unguwan Rimi and the like. Using the same software, the vadose zone map of the area was produced (Figure 7).

2.3.7. Hydraulic Conductivity

Information on this parameter appeared scanty in the study area. However, almost all the available information documented through pumping test of some boreholes in the area, indicated that the conductivity falls within the range of 1 - 100 gallon per day per square feet, thus, a rating of 1 was adopted for the parameter throughout the study area (Figure 8).

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Drastic Index Vulnerability Mapping

Using the model builder of Arc GIS 10.0, Equation (1) was inputted and the model runs to produce the final DRASTIC vulnerability map of Kaduna metropolis (Figure 9).

The highest DRASTIC value obtained in the whole study area was 131 while the lowest was 77. Theoretically, the highest value of normal DRASTIC is 223 while the lowest is 65. The values can thus be graded into five qualitative classes (Table 2).

Figure 6. Thematic Layer of Slope in Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

Figure 7. Thematic Layer of Vadose Zone Media in Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

Figure 8. Thematic Layer of Hydraulic Conductivity in Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

Figure 9. Unclassified DRASTIC Vulnerability Map of Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

Table 2. Classification and Description of DRASTIC Index Values.

Source: Discerned from [18] based on the theoretical values.

Putting this in mind, it is noticeable that, the groundwater vulnerability to contamination of the entire study area falls within very low, low and slightly moderate vulnerability (Figure 10). However, the essence of this study is to determine which area is more vulnerable to groundwater contamination than others, as such, the obtained values were retained and reclassified (via “reclass” function of ArcGIS) into five classes of very low, low, moderate, high and very high vulnerability to contamination (Figure 11) as suggested by [15] .

From the classified DRASTIC vulnerability map, one can rightly see that, majority of the study area falls within very low, low and moderate vulnerability to groundwater contamination. Very low vulnerability areas can be seen in the northern part around Turunku and Sabon Gida, in the northeast around Rinagi,

Figure 10. Classified DRASTIC Vulnerability Map of Kaduna Metropolis Based on Total DRASTIC Scores. Source: Data Analysis (2016).

Figure 11. Classified DRASTIC Vulnerability Map of Kaduna Metropolis. Source: Data Analysis (2015).

and in the southwest around Kasewa Hill. The same vulnerability class occurred in the southern part of the study area around Bakin Kasuwan Gwari and south- eastern tip.

Low vulnerability areas can be seen in the northwest around Rumana and Zato, and southwest around Jimmu, Nima and Kasewa Hill. In the south and southeast, low vulnerability class is predominant as can be seen around Kukau, Kakau and Kankomi respectively, the same class can be found in the north around Afaka and Rigachikun, in the northeast around Butonu and in the center at Babban Saura and Kamazo.

Moderate vulnerability happens to be the most dominant class in the study area. Encircling the high vulnerability areas, moderate vulnerability occurs to the north around Rigachikun Forest Reserve, Afaka and Kawo. It can also be seen around Gwogote and Tagwaye in the west, as well as most eastern and southern parts of the study area.

High groundwater vulnerability areas occupied most of the central parts of Kaduna metropolis especially within the township, Tudun Nupawa and Unguwan Shanu. It also occupies the northern part of the metropolis stretching from NDC, Rigachikun, Maraban Jos and Birnin Yero. The same class occurs in Kaduna south around Kakuri, Makera and Sabon Tasha, and in the southeast around Chidunu and Anguwan Tanko. Other areas belonging to this category are Kwane and Kadi in the west as well as Gwarso in the north-western part of the study area.

Very high vulnerability class occupies very small portion of the study area. It can be seen as an encircled area in the east, and in scattered form in the west, south-west, as well as southern part of the study area. Fewer areas also occurred at the center around River Mashi and north-western part of the area.

3.2. Map Production, Data Quality and Reliability

It is generally believed that, the quality of any map is determined by the quality of the input data used in map production. In this research, several types and sources of data were consulted, extracted, gathered and synthesized for the production of the thematic layers used in the production of the final DRASTIC vulnerability map. Its believed that, the data used for the task and at this scale, represent the best quality information which is available at the moment. However, with improved data quality, the map quality will also be greatly improved. Mapping and models in general, are simplifications of the complex reality. Groundwater vulnerability assessments and mapping as put forward by [46] are “a means to synthesize complex hydrogeological information into a form useable by planners, decision and policy makers, geoscientists and the public”.

4. Conclusions

From the previous section, it can be concluded that groundwater system in most parts of Kaduna metropolis is low to moderately vulnerable to contamination. However, this does not preclude the occurrence of real pollution incidence in the area which may be tight to the potential or actual contaminants sources (hazards) present. In view of this, a low vulnerability area with very high hazards may be exposed to higher risk of groundwater contamination than a highly vulnerable area with low or very low hazards. Conversely, contamination incidence may be low in a highly vulnerable area with high hazards, but with adequate control measures to safeguard the groundwater system. The vulnerability map will serve as screening tool and guide the administrators where to direct resources (more vulnerable areas) when there is limited resources. It may be used for preventive purposes through prioritization of areas where groundwater protection is critical. This will help in reducing the cost of groundwater monitoring in the area.

That notwithstanding, it is recommended that land use(s) with high groundwater potential hazards be located in the low vulnerability areas. Where an existing land use with higher contamination hazard is already located on a highly vulnerable area, more sophisticated control measures should be put in place. Proper documentation of potential and existing groundwater contaminants sources in the area, will therefore, be vital for sustainable groundwater quality management in Kaduna metropolis.

Appendix 1

Rating of Drastic Index Model (Aller et al. 1987).

Submit or recommend next manuscript to SCIRP and we will provide best service for you:

Accepting pre-submission inquiries through Email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.

A wide selection of journals (inclusive of 9 subjects, more than 200 journals)

Providing 24-hour high-quality service

User-friendly online submission system

Fair and swift peer-review system

Efficient typesetting and proofreading procedure

Display of the result of downloads and visits, as well as the number of cited articles

Maximum dissemination of your research work

Submit your manuscript at: http://papersubmission.scirp.org/

Or contact gep@scirp.org

Cite this paper
Ahmed, M. , Tanko, A. , Eduvie, M. and Ahmed, M. (2017) Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability in Kaduna Metropolis, Northwest Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 99-117. doi: 10.4236/gep.2017.56011.
References

[1]   Max Lock Consultancy Nig. Ltd. and Partners (2008) Kaduna Master Plan Interim Report, Kaduna.

[2]   Yidana, S.M., Yakubo, B.B. and Akabzaa, T.M. (2010) Analysis of Groundwater Quality Using Multivariate and Spatial Analyses in the Keta Basin, Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 58, 220-234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2010.03.003

[3]   Yerima, F.A.K., Daura, M.M. and Gambo, B.A. (2008) Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Bama Town, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Environment, 3, 128-137.

[4]   Raja, G. and Venkatesan, P. (2010) Assessment of Groundwater Pollution and Its Impact in and around Punnam Area of Karur District, Tamilnadu, India. E-Journal of Chemistry, 7, 473-478.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/782134

[5]   Mohammed, S.A.S., Naik, M., Fakruddin, S.P., and Nazeer, Z.A.M. (2008) Studies of Contaminant Transport at an Industrial Waste Dumpsite of Bangalore, India. Ambiente e Agua An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Sciences, 3, 55-66.
https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.61

[6]   Galadima, A., Garba, Z.N., Leke, L., Almustapha, M.N. and Adam, I.K. (2011) Domestic Water Pollution among Local Communities in Nigeria—Causes and Consequences. European Journal of Scientific Research, 4, 592-603.

[7]   Foster, S.S.D. and Chilton, P.J. (2003) Groundwater: The Processes and Global Significance of Aquifer Degradation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358, 1957-1972.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1380

[8]   Asadi, S.S., Vuppala, P. and Reddy, M.A. (2007) Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques for Evaluation of Groundwater Quality in Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (Zone-V), India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 4, 45-52.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2007010008

[9]   Sagnak, C. (N.D) Groundwater pollution originated from geological formation, example of Konya-Cumra-Karapinar Plain with GIS application. Department of Geotechnical Services and Groundwater, State Hydraulics Works, Ankara, Turkey.

[10]   Berg, M., Tran, H.C., Nguyen, T.C., Pham, H.V., Schertenleib, R. and Giger, W. (2001) Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater and Drinking Water in Vietnam: A Human Health Threat. Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 2621-2626.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es010027y

[11]   Castillejos, K.M. (2010) Assessing Integrated Watershed Management and Spatial Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution in Priority Watersheds of the Yacyreta Dam in Paraguay. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wales (Bangor University) and Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE).

[12]   Mukherjee, S. and Nelliyat, P. (2007) Groundwater Pollution and Emerging Environmental Challenges of Industrial Effluent Irrigation in Mettupalayam Taluk, Tamil Nadu. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, Discussion Paper 4, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

[13]   Singh, C.K., Shashtri, S. and Mukherjee, S. (2010) Integrating Multivariate Statistical Analysis with GIS for Geochemical Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Shiwaliks of Punjab, India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62, 1387-1405.

[14]   Atlantic Environmental Services, Inc. (1996) Task 210: Surficial Site Investigation, Improvements to Routes 82&85 Salem and Montville. Project No. 1178-075-210, Prepared for Environmental Compliance Division, Department of Transportation, Newington, State of Connecticut.

[15]   Vrba, J. and Zaporozec, A. (1994) Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability, Vol. 16. International Contribution to Hydrogeology, Hannover, 131 p.

[16]   Zaporezec, A. (1994) Concept of Groundwater Vulnerability. In: Vrba, J. and Zaporezec, A., Eds., Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability, Vol. 16. International Contribution to Hydrogeology, Hannover.

[17]   Vrba, J. and Civita, M. (1994) Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability. In: Vrba, J. and Zaporezec, A., Eds., Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability, Vol. 16, International Contribution to Hydrogeology, Hannover, 31-48.

[18]   Aller, A., Lehr, J.H., Petty, R. and Bennet, T. (1987) DRASTIC: A Standardized System to Evaluate Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings. National Water Well Association, Wethington, OH.

[19]   Foster, S.S.D. (1987) Fundamental Concepts in Aquifer Vulnerability, Pollution Risk and Protection Strategy. In: Duijvenbooden, W. and Waegeningh, H.G., Eds., Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants, TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, Proceedings and Information 38, 69-86.

[20]   Doerfliger, N., Jeannin, P.Y. and Zwahlen, F. (1999) Water Vulnerability Assessment in Karst Environments: A New Method of Defining Protection Areas Using a Multiattribute Approach and GIS Tools (EPIK Method). Environmental Geology, 39, 165-176.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050446

[21]   Goldscheider, N., Klute, M., Sturm, S. and Hotzl, H. (2000) The PI Method—A GIS-Based Approach to Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability with Special Consideration on Karst Aquifers. Zeitschrift für angewandte Geologie, 46, 157-166.

[22]   Vias, J.M., Andreo, B., Perles, M.J. and Carrasco, F. (2005) A Comparative Study of four Schemes for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping in a Diffuse Flow Carbonate Aquifer under Mediterranean Climatic Conditions. Environmental Geology, 47, 586-595.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1185-y

[23]   Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Groundwater Susceptibility Analysis Process Manual. Division of drinking and Ground Waters, Source Water Assessment and Protection Programme, Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio.

[24]   Ahmed, A.A. (2007) Using Contamination and Pesticide DRASTIC GIS-Based Models for Vulnerability Assessment of Quaternary Aquifer at Sohag, Egypt. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on the Geology of Africa, Assiut, Egypt, October 2007.

[25]   Dickerson, J.R. (2007) A Modified DRASTIC Model for Siting Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in Williams County, Ohio. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Graduate College of Bowling Green State University, Ohio.

[26]   Jasrotia, A.S. and Singh, R. (2005) Groundwater Pollution Vulnerability Using the DRASTIC Model in a GIS Environment, Devak-Rui Watershed, India. Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 13, 1-10.

[27]   Babiker, I.S., Mohamed, A.A.M., Hiyama, T. and Kato, K. (2005) A GIS-Based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Science of the Total Environment, 345, 127-140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005

[28]   Al-adamat, R.A.N., Foster, I.D.L. and Baban, S.M.J. (2003) Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk Mapping for the Basaltic Aquifer of the Azraq Basin of Jordan Using GIS, Remote Sensing and DRASTIC. Applied Geography, 23, 303-324.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.007

[29]   Lobo-Ferreira J.P. (2000) GIS and Mathematical Modelling for the Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution: Application to Two Chinese Case Study Areas. Ecosystem Service and Sustainable Watershed Management in North China, International Conference, Beijing, 23-25 August 2000, 69-90.

[30]   Sekhar, M.C. and Kumar, K.K. (1999) The Use of DRASTIC Modelling Indices for the Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Potential. Proceedings of IUGG 99 Symposium on Impacts of Urban Growth on Surface Water and Groundwater Quality, HS5, IAHS Publ. No. 259, Birmingham, 18-30 July 1999, 111-113.

[31]   Webb, T.H. and Lilburne, L.R. (1999) Use of the LEACHM Model and the DRASTIC Index to Map Relative Risk of Groundwater Contamination by Pesticide Leaching. Journal of Hydrology (NZ), 38, 271-288.

[32]   Engel, B., Navulur, K. and Cooper, B. (1996) Estimating Groundwater Vulnerability to Nonpoint Source Pollution from Nitrates and Pesticides on a Regional Scale. Proceedings of the Vienna Conference, IAHS Publ. No.2 35, April 1996.

[33]   Barber, D.J. (1994) Groundwater Pollution Potential of Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Report No. 4, Department of Natural Resources, Ohio.

[34]   Foster, S.S.D. and Skinner, A.C. (1995) Groundwater Protection: The Science and Practice of Land Surface Zoning, Groundwater Quality: Remediation and Protection. Proceedings of the Prague Conference, IAHS Publ. No. 225, May 1995.

[35]   Zwahlen, F. (2004) Vulnerability and Risk Mapping for the Protection of Carbonate (Karst) Aquifers. Final Report (COST Action 620), European Commission, Directorate XII Science, Research and Development, Report EUR 20912, Brussels, 297 p.

[36]   Wang, J., He, J. and Chen, H. (2012) Assessment of Groundwater Contamination Risk Using Hazard Quantification, a Modified Drastic Model and Groundwater Value, Beijing Plain, China. Science of the Total Environment, 432, 216-226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.005

[37]   Amadi, A.N., Okoye, N.O., Alabi, A.D., Tukur, A. and Angwa, E.M. (2014) Quality Assessment of Soil and Groundwater near Kaduna Refinery and Petrochemical Company, Northwest Nigeria. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 3, 884-893.
https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2014/6579

[38]   Al-Amin, M.A. (2013) Energy Production and Environmental Concerns in Nigeria: The Case of Kaduna Petroleum Refinery on Its Host Communities. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policies, 3, 69-77.

[39]   Eduvie, M.O. and Olaniyan, I.O. (2013) Groundwater Quality Appraisal in Southern Parts of Kaduna State, Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Engineering, 3, 77-83.
https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajee.20130301.11

[40]   Muhammad, M.N. (2012) Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Low Income High Density Areas of Kaduna Metropolis. Academic Research Journal, 2.

[41]   Yabaya, A. and Aliyu, A. (2012) Microbial Quality Assessment of Well Water in Kaduna North Local Government. Journal of Biological Science and Bioconservation, 4, 1-6.

[42]   Mallo, I.Y. (2001) Morphometric Characteristics of Barnawa River Catchment in Kaduna Metropolis, Northern Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4, 22-28.

[43]   Eduvie, M.O. (2003) Exploration, Evaluation and Development of Groundwater in Southern Kaduna State. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

[44]   Piscopo, G. (2001) Groundwater Vulnerability Map Explanatory Notes, Macquarie Catchment, Parramatta. Centre for Natural Resources, NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation.

[45]   Federal Department of Agricultural Land Resources (1990) The Reconnaissance Soil Survey of Nigeria, Soils Report Vol. 2. Scanned Map and Report downloaded from soil.isric@wur.nl

[46]   Ligget, J.A. and Talwar, S. (2009) Groundwater Vulnerability Assessments and Integrated Water Resources Management. Streamline Watershed Management Bulletin, 13, 18-29.

 
 
Top