OJOG  Vol.1 No.3 , September 2011
Awareness and perception of assisted reproductive technology practice amongst women with infertility in Northern Nigeria
Abstract: Background: Involuntary infertility is a tragedy in most African setting. This is due to premium placed on fertility as a result of roles children fulfill in the family and the society. Aetiologic factors of infertility in sub-Saharan Africa are mostly infection related and they are mainly associated with poor treatment outcome to conventional non assisted conception technique. Objective: To evaluate the level of awareness and perception of assisted conception treatment among women attending fertility clinic. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Results: One hundred and ninety six women attending fertility clinic were interviewed. Mean age was 34.8year and mean duration of infertility of 4.1 years. Of the 196 infertile women interviewed, 150 (76.5%) have heard of Assisted Reproductive Technology treatment. Sources of information were mainly family relation (46%) and friends (28.7%). Knowledge on some of Assisted Reproductive Technology practices showed that 50.7% were aware that the treatment could fail, 36.8% knew it could be applied for male infertility treatment, 9.3% and 18.7% respectively are aware that donor oocyte and sperm could be used for treatment. Perception on babies conceived from assisted conception treatment revealed that 52% of patients interviewed could not comment if they are normal and natural babies. Majority of patients could not affirm if they will agree to the use of donor gamete or zygote for their treatment. Conclusion: Awareness of assisted conception treatment was high, however knowledge on specifics of treatment was low and perception on some of the practices was unfavorable. Sensitization of the public will help overcome some beliefs that may be at tangent to some practices of assisted conception.
Cite this paper: nullAdesiyun, A. , Ameh, N. , Avidime, S. and Muazu, A. (2011) Awareness and perception of assisted reproductive technology practice amongst women with infertility in Northern Nigeria. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1, 144-148. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2011.13027.

[1]   Reproductive Health Outlook. (RHO) Overview and lessons learned. Infertility.

[2]   W. Cates, Farley, T.M. and Rowe, P.J. (1985) World-wide patterns of infertility: Is Africa different? Lancet, 2, 596-598. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(85)90594-X

[3]   Giwa-Osagie, O.F. (1984) Aetiologic classification and sociomedical characteristics of infertility in 250 couples. International Journal of Fertility, 29, 104-108.

[4]   Osegbe, D.N. and Amaku, E.O. (1985) The causes of male infertility in 504 consecutive Nigerian patients. International Urology Nephrology, 17, 349.

[5]   Inhorn, M.C. and Buss, K.A. (1994). Ethnography epidemiology and infertility in Eqypt. Social Science Medicine, 39, 671-686.

[6]   Oye-Adeniran, B.A. and Giwa-Osagie, O.F. (2000) Bacterio-spermia in fertile and infertile men. Nig Medicine Journal, 38, 53-56.

[7]   Hull, M.G.R. and Fleming, C.E. (1995) Tubal surgery versus assisted reproduction: Assessing their role in infertility therapy. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 160-167. doi:10.1097/00001703-199506000-00002

[8]   Ogedengbe, O.K., Giwa-Osagie, O.F. and Ogunyemi, O. (1987) Implications of pattern of tubal disease for microsurgery and in vitro fertilization in Lagos. Journal of National Medical Association, 79, 510-512.

[9]   Cooke, I.D. (2007) The globalization of reproductive technology. In Kruger TF, van der Spuy Z, Kemper BD (eds). Advances in fertility studies and reproductive medicine. Cape Town Juticalpa, 234-240.

[10]   Adamson, G.D., de-Mauzon, J., Lancaster, P., Nygren, K.G., Sullivan, E. and Zegers-Hochschild, F. (2006) World Collaborative Report on in-vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 1586-1662. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.011

[11]   Moreira, P., Fall, C., Dieng, T., Fall, A., Diouf, A. and Moreau, J.C. (2008) Assisted reproductive technology-indications and perceptions among couple presenting with infertility at Dakar university hospital. Medicine for Mali, 28, 50-56.

[12]   The Bertarelli Foundation Scientific Board (2000) Public perception on infertility and its treatment: An international survey. Human Reproduction, 15, 330-334. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.2.330

[13]   Milne, B. (1988) Couples experience with in vitro fertilization. Journal of Obstetric Gynaecologic Neonatal Nursing, 17, 347-352. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1988.tb00454.x

[14]   Laffont, I. and Edelmann, R.J. (1994) Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: A gender comparison. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstrics and Gynaecology, 5, 85-92.

[15]   Newton, C.R., Hearn, M.T. and Yuspe, A.A. (1990) Psychological assessment and follow-up after in vitro fertilization: Assessing the impact of failure. Fertility and Sterility, 54, 879-886.

[16]   Sohrabuand, F. and Jafarabadi, M. (2005) Knowledge and attitudes of infertile couples about assisted reproductive technology. Iranian Journal of Reprod Medicine, 3, 90-94.

[17]   Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C., Ceyhan, S.T., Goktolga, U. and Baser, I. (2008) Opinion of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 89, 817-822. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.022

[18]   Chliaoutakis, J.E. (2002) A relationship between traditionally motivated pattern and gamete donation and surrogacy in urban area of Greece. Human Reproduction, 17, 2187-2191. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.8.2187

[19]   Annas, G.J. (1998) The shadowlands-secrets, lies and assisted reproduction. New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 935-939. doi:10.1056/NEJM199809243391325

[20]   Chlaoutakis, J.E., koukouli, S. and Papadakaki, M. (2002) Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public’s intention to have resource to gamete donation and surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 17, 2995-3002. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.11.2995

[21]   Purewal, S., van den Akker, O.B.A. (2009) Systematic review of oocyte donation: Investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Human Reproduction Update, 15, 499-515. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp018