OJCE  Vol.7 No.2 , June 2017
Simple Correlations between Rock Abrasion and Other Significant Rock Properties for Rock Mass and Intact Quartzite
Abstract: Rock abrasion plays a significant role in geotechnical design, tunneling operations and the safety of foundations from scour. It is imperative to determine such properties of uniaxial compression strength (UCS), rock quality designation (RQD) and hardness for rock engineering to help determine the amount of scour at foundation locations in order to prevent structural collapse, wear on drilling tools and help predict unstable rock conditions. Current practice for estimating maximum rock abrasion is based on the Los Angeles abrasion test; however, more research is needed to provide a more accurate and compatible method for all subsurface materials used in mining and civil engineering projects. This report will provide simple correlations relating abrasion resistance to RQD, UCS, Geological Strength Index (GSI) and Rock Mass Rating (RMR) and shear strength of metamorphic rock (Quartzite). Methods, results, recommendations and conclusions are presented. The paper also introduces recommendations for future rock abrasion techniques and discusses the use of these correlations exhibiting strong relationships between the mentioned rock properties.
Cite this paper: Ureel, S. and Momayez, M. (2017) Simple Correlations between Rock Abrasion and Other Significant Rock Properties for Rock Mass and Intact Quartzite. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, 194-207. doi: 10.4236/ojce.2017.72012.

[1]   Okubo, S., Kukui, K. and Nishimatsu, Y. (2011) Estimating Abrasivity of Rock by Laboratory and in Situ Tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 44, 231-244.

[2]   Yavuz, H., Ugur, I. and Demirdag, S. (2008) Abrasion Resistance of Carbonate Rocks Used in Dimension Stone Industry and Correlations between Abrasion and Rock Properties. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 45, 260-267.

[3]   Cargill, J.S. and Shakoor, A. (1990) Evaluation of Empirical Methods for Measuring Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics, Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstract, 27, 495-503.

[4]   Kiliç, A. and Teymen, A. (2008) Determination of Mechanical Properties of Rocks Using Simple Methods. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 67, 237-244.

[5]   Petrica, M., Badisch, E. and Peinsitt, T. (2013) Abrasive Wear Mechanisms and Their Relation to Rock Properties. Wear, 308, 86-94.

[6]   Kahraman, S. and Gunaydin, O. (2007) Predicting the Los Angeles Abrasion Loss of Rock Aggregates from the Uniaxial Compressive Strength. Materials Letters, 61, 4861-4865.

[7]   Call & Nicholas, Inc. (2006) Relationship between Hardness, Consistency and Uniaxial Compressive Strength Table. Tucson.

[8]   Deere, D.U., Hendron, A.J., Patton, F.D. and Cording, E.J. (1967) Design of Surface and Near Surface Construction in Rock. Failure and Breakage of Rock, Proceedings of 8th US Symposium of Rock Mechanics, New York, 237-302.

[9]   Marinos, P. and Hoek, E. (2000) GSI—A Geologically Friendly Tool for Rock Mass Strength Estimation. Proceedings of GeoEng 2000 Conforence, Melbourne.

[10]   Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989) Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. Wiley, New York.

[11]   Kahraman, S. and Fener, M. (2007) Empirical Methods to Predict the Abrasion Resistance of Rock Aggregates. Bulletin of Engineering Geology Environmental, 66, 449-455.