ENG  Vol.9 No.5 , May 2017
Food Production Engineering Efficiency: A Critical Analysis of the Conventional Metrics Used in Measuring Agricultural Efficiency
Abstract: An analysis is reported of conventional vs. alternative metrics used in measuring food production efficiency. Economic efficiency is driven by marketplace economics, while engineering efficiency is driven by useful energy conservation. As farming systems are optimized for maximum efficiency, how “efficiency” is defined will dictate the methods used in food production. Farming methods that are optimized in terms of economic efficiency have environmental consequences that are not inherent of engineering efficiency; however, farming methods optimized in terms of engineering efficiency have labor requirements not inherent of economic efficiency. A shift from optimizing food production in terms of economic efficiency to engineering efficiency may be necessary in order to feed a growing human population.
Cite this paper: McGuire, M. (2017) Food Production Engineering Efficiency: A Critical Analysis of the Conventional Metrics Used in Measuring Agricultural Efficiency. Engineering, 9, 427-433. doi: 10.4236/eng.2017.95025.

[1]   Ragan, C. (2005) Explaining Different Concepts of Efficiency. Pearson Education Canada, Inc., Toronto.

[2]   Kirkpatrick, D. and Neel, J. 4-H Market Steer Handbook. USDA Extension Service Program.

[3]   USDA (1995) Animal Manure Management.

[4]   Fulhage, C. (2003) Manure Management in Hoop Structures. Nutrients and Bacterial Waste, EQ352, 1-4.

[5]   Zublena, J.P., Barker, J.C., Parker, J.W. and Stanislaw, C.M. (1997) Swine Manure as a Fertilizer Source. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, 439.

[6]   Mukhtar, S., Capareda, S. and Smith, E. (2006) Manure to Energy: Understanding Processes, Principles, and Jargon. Texas Cooperative Extension, the Texas A&M University System, No. E-428.

[7]   United States Department of Agriculture (2016) National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference.

[8]   Voisin, A. (1959) Grass Productivity. Philosophical Library, New York.

[9]   United States Department of Agriculture (2005) Guidelines for Calculating Manure Dry Weight and Effectiveness.

[10]   Duffy, M. and Honeyman, M. (2000) Labor Requirements for Market Swine Produced in Hoop Structures. Animal Science Research Reports, No. 25, Iowa State University, Ames.

[11]   Lammers, P., Kenealy, M., Kliebenstein, J., Harmon, J., Helmers, M. and Honeyman, M. (2011) Energy Use in Pig Production: An Examination of Current Iowa Systems. National Center for Biotechnology Information, 90, 1056-1068.

[12]   Wiggins, B. (1996) Discriminant Analysis of Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Fecal Streptococci, a Method to Differentiate Human and Animal Sources of Fecal Pollution in Natural Waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62, 3997-4002.

[13]   Harwood, V., Whitlock, J. and Withington, V. (2000) Classification of Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Indicator Bacteria by Discriminant Analysis: Use in Predicting the Source of Fecal Contamination in Subtropical Waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 3698-3704.

[14]   Krumperman, P. (1983) Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Indexing of Escherichia Coli to Identify High-Risk Sources of Fecal Contamination of Foods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 46, 165-170.

[15]   Azanu, D., Mortey, C., Darko, G., Weisser, J., Styrishave, B. and Abaidoo, R. (2016) Uptake of Antibiotics from Irrigation Water by Plants. Chemosphere, 157, 107-114.

[16]   Hansen, C. (2015) Interviewee, Farmer, Mosaic Farms. [Interview]

[17]   Sage, R. (2015) Interviewee, Farmer, Red Bird Acres. [Interview]

[18]   Pimentel, D. and Pimentel, M. (1979) Food Energy and Society. Edward Arnold, London.

[19]   National Research Council (2010) Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use. The National Academic Press, Washington, DC.