Back
 IJMPCERO  Vol.6 No.2 , May 2017
Penumbral Dose Characteristics of Physical and Virtual Wedge Profiles
Abstract: Purpose: Both physical and virtual wedges are used in radiotherapy to get uniform and desired dose distribution in clinical setting. All linear accelerators of different venders have computer controlled dynamic wedges called virtual wedge filters. Penumbra is one of the important photon beam characteristics needed to be understood in radiation therapy at the time of commissioning of Treatment Planning system (TPS) as well as applying various treatment planning algorithms in clinical applications. In this study we measured the dose profiles of open field, physical wedges (PW) and virtual wedges (VW) for energies (6 MV & 15 MV), various field sizes (10 × 10, 15 × 15 & 20 × 20 cm2), depths (dmax, 10 cm, 20 cm) and wedge angles (15°, 30°, 45° and 60°). From beam profile we calculated the penumbral width for open and wedged fields. The study was carried out on Siemens ONCOR IMRT Plus linear accelerator. The obtained penumbral width of PW and VW of all wedge angles was subtracted from the penumbral width of open field. The deviations in penumbral width were compared and statistically analyzed as a function of energy, depth, field size and wedge angles. Material and Method: The penumbral width was measured using IBA CC13 ion chamber in IBA Blue phantom (a 3D water phantom). The source to surface distance (SSD) during our study was kept 100cm and measurement was taken for 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20 cm2 field sizes and for 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° wedges. These measurements were taken for both 6 MV and 15 MV photon energies. Virtual wedge profiles were acquired using LDA-99 linear detector array (IBA, Germany). The deviations in penumbral width for both PW and VW were calculated by subtracting the penumbral width from open field penumbral width in gun direction (in-plane) and deviation in VW penumbral width, and were obtained by subtracting the open field penumbral width in left-right direction (cross-plane) direction. The measured deviations were plotted for both PW and VW. Statistics on the measured deviations was performed by using SPSS Version 15. Results & Conclusion: The results of one way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) show that the deviations are significant with energy and the deviations are higher in lower energy than higher energy. The deviations increase as depth increases, the deviations are also significant with depth. The deviations increase with field sizes; the deviations as a function of field size are highly significant. The deviations are higher in PW than VW but the deviations with wedge type are in-significant. As wedge angle increases, deviations also increase and the effect of wedge angle is highly significant on deviations.
Cite this paper: Farrukh, S. , Ilyas, N. , Naveed, M. , Haseeb, A. , Bilal, M. , Najamuddin, D. and Iqbal, J. (2017) Penumbral Dose Characteristics of Physical and Virtual Wedge Profiles. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 6, 216-224. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2017.62020.
References

[1]   Darby, S.C., Ewertz, M., McGale, P., Bennet, A.M., Blom-Goldman, U., Bronnum, D., Correa, C., Cutter, D., Gagliardi, G., Gigante, B., Jensen, M.B., Nisbet, A., Peto, R., Rahimi, K. and Taylor, C. (2013) Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women After Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 11, 987-998.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209825

[2]   Bhatnagar, A.K., Brandner, E., Sonnik, D., Wu, A., Kalnicki, S. and Deutsch, M. (2006) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Reduces the Dose to the Contralateral Breast When Compared to Conventional Tangential Fields for Primary Breast Irradiation. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1, 41-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9032-8

[3]   Ling, T.C., et al. (2016) Analysis of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), Proton and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for Reducing Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Complications in Esophageal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel), 6, 2356-2368.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers6042356

[4]   Xie, X., Ouyang, S., Wang, H., Yang, W., Jin, H., Hu, B. and Shen, L. (2014) Dosimetric Comparison of Left-Sided Whole Breast Irradiation with 3D-CRT, IP-IMRT and Hybrid IMRT. Oncology Reports, 31, 2195-2205.

[5]   Wolff, D., Stieler, F., Welzel, G., Lorenz, F., Abo-Madyan, Y., Mai, S., Herskind, C., Polednik, M., Steil, V. and Wenz, F. (2015) Comparison of Hybrid Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Technique and Double Arc VMAT Technique in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Radiology and Oncology, 49, 291-298.

[6]   Pdgorsak, E.B. (2005) Radiation Oncology Physics: A Hand Book for Teachers and Students. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

[7]   Schlegel, A.L., Bortfeld, T. and Grosu, A.L. (2006) New Technologies in Radiation Oncology. Springer, Berlin.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29999-8

[8]   Khan, F.M. (2003) Physics of Radiation Therapy. 3rd Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

[9]   Pastyr, O., Echner, G., Hartmann, G.H. and Richter, J. (2011) Dynamic Edge Focussing: A New MLC-Design to Deliver IMRT with a Double Focussing High Precision Multi-Leaf Collimator. Journal of Radiotherapy & Medical Oncology, 61, 624-643.

[10]   Butson, M.J., Yu, P.K.N. and Cheung, T. (2003) Rounded End Multi-Leaf Penumbral Measurements with Radiochromic Film. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 48, 247-252.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/17/402

[11]   Cherry, P. (2009) Practical Radiotherapy: Physics and Equipment. 2nd Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.

[12]   Mohan, R., Arnfield, M., Tong, S. and Wu, Q. (2000) The Impact of Fluctuations in Intensity Patterns on the Number of Monitor Units and the Quality and Accuracy of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Journal of Medical Physics, 27, 1226-1237.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.599000

[13]   Grigorov, G.N. and Chow, J.C. (2016) Leakage-Penumbra Effect in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Step-and-Shoot Dose Delivery. World Journal of Radiology, 8, 73-81.
https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.73

[14]   Attalla, E.M., Abo-Elenein, H.S., Ammar, H. and El-Desoky, I. (2010) Comparison of Dosimetric Characteristics of Siemens Virtual and Physical Wedges for ONCOR Linear Accelerator. Journal of Medical Physics, 35.

[15]   Christopher, F.N. and Suh, T.S. (2016) Radiotherapy Using Hard Wedges Is No Longer Appropriate and Should Be Discontinued. AAPM, Medical Physics, 43, 1031.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4939262

[16]   Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (2016) Technical Quality Control Guidelines for Medical Linear Acclerators and Mulitleaf Collimators. www.cpqr.ca

 
 
Top