Back
 AS  Vol.8 No.4 , April 2017
Effect of Biochar Type and Size on in Vitro Rumen Fermentation of Orchard Grass Hay
Abstract:
Biochar, a byproduct from the biofuels industry, may be a potential feed additive in ruminant diets due to possible improvements in microbial fermentation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the nutritive value, in vitro digestibility, volatile fatty acid (VFA) production, and gas production of biochar inclusion to an orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) basal diet. The study was designed as a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement with 3 different biochar sources and 2 biochar processed sizes as the main effects factors. Experimental treatments were biochar from 3 different tree types: 1) Chestnut Oak (Quercus prinus L.; CO), 2) Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera; YP), or 3) White Pine (Pinus strobus L.; WP), and processed at 2 different biochar particle sizes: a) <178 μm (Fine) or b) >178 μm (Coarse). Biochar was added to the basal diet of orchard grass hay (872.35 g/kg of DM, 98.31 g/kg of CP, and 704.02 g/kg of aNDF, DM basis) at a rate of 81 g/kg DM. Biochar residual ash content was greater (P < 0.01) for Fine particle size and greater (P < 0.01) for CO and YP biochar sources. Biochar aNDF content exhibited a type × size interaction (P = 0.01) with lower aNDF content in both WP sizes compared with their respective biochar type and size. Gas production was not influenced (P = 0.23) by biochar tree type; however, gas production was increased (P = 0.05) by Fine particle size compared with Coarse biochar. The in vitro true digestibility (IVTD) of orchard grass hay was increased (P = 0.01) by the inclusion of Fine biochar particle size compared with Coarse particle size. Additionally, in vitro CP true digestibility (DCP) exhibited a type × size interaction (P = 0.01). Crude protein digestibility was lower for Fine particle-sized CO and WP biochar sources compared with Coarse particle-sized CO and WP (P ≤ 0.004). However, DCP was not different between Coarse and Fine particle-sized YP biochar (P = 0.70). Volatile fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) were not altered by biochar type (P ≥ 0.66) or particle size (P ≥ 0.19). These results indicate that both tree type and particle size of biochar may need to be carefully considered before incorporating into a ruminant diet. Furthermore, Fine particle-sized biochar may be the most effective to incorporate as a feed additive in a ruminant diet based on digestibility parameters.
Cite this paper: McFarlane, Z. , Myer, P. , Cope, E. , Evans, N. , Carson Bone, T. , Biss, B. and Mulliniks, J. (2017) Effect of Biochar Type and Size on in Vitro Rumen Fermentation of Orchard Grass Hay. Agricultural Sciences, 8, 316-325. doi: 10.4236/as.2017.84023.
References

[1]   Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2009) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthscan, London.

[2]   Banner, R.E., Rogosic, J., Burritt, E.A. and Provenza, F.D. (2000) Supplemental Barley and Charcoal Increase Intake of Sagebrush by Lambs. Journal of Range Management, 53, 415-420.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4003753

[3]   Villalba, J.J., Provenza, F.D. and Banner, R.E. (2002) Influence of Macronutrients and Activated Charcoal on Intake of Sagebrush by Sheep and Goats. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 2099-2109.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8082099x

[4]   Toth, J.D. and Dou, Z. (2016) Use and Impact of Biochar and Charcoal in Animal Production Systems. In: Guo, M., He, Z. and Uchimiya, M., Eds., Agricultural and Environmental Applications of Biochar: Advances and Barriers, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, 199-224.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub63.2014.0043.5

[5]   Leng, R.A., Inthapanya, S. and Preston, T.R. (2012) Biochar Lowers Net Methane Production from Rumen Fluid In Vitro. Livestock Research Rural Development, 24, 103.

[6]   Leng, R., Inthapanya, S. and Preston, T.R. (2012) Methane Production Is Reduced in an In Vitro Incubation When the Rumen Fluid Is Taken from Cattle that Previously Received Biochar in their Diet. Livestock Research Rural Development, 24, 211.

[7]   Leng, R., Inthapanya, S. and Preston, T.R. (2013) All Biochars Are Not Equal in Lowering Methane Production in in Vitro Rumen Incubations. Livestock Research Rural Development, 25, 106.

[8]   Leng, R.A., Preston, T.R. and Inthapanya, S. (2012) Biochar Reduces Enteric Methane and Improves Growth and Feed Conversion in Local “Yellow” Cattle Fed Cassava Root Chips and Fresh Cassava Foliage. Livestock Research Rural Development, 24, 199.

[9]   AOAC (1990) Official Method of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.

[10]   Pereira, C., Muetzel, R., Camps, S., Arbestain, M., Bishop, P., Hina, K. and Hedley, M. (2014) Assessment of the Influence of Biochar on Rumen and Silage Fermentation: A Laboratory-Scale Experiment. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 196, 220-231.

[11]   McDougall, E. (1948) Studies on Ruminant Saliva. The Composition and Output of Sheep’s Saliva. Biochemical Journal, 43, 99-109.
https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0430099

[12]   Erwin, E., Marco, G. and Emery, E. (1961) Volatile Fatty Acid Analyses of Blood and Rumen Fluid by Gas Chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science, 44, 1768-1771.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89956-6

[13]   Marten, G. and Barnes, R. (1980) Prediction of Energy Digestibility of Forages with In Vitro Rumen Fermentation and Fungal Enzyme Systems. In: Pigden, W.J., Balch, C.C. and Graham, M., Eds., Workshop on Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feed, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.

[14]   Heilman, P. and Norby, R.J. (1998) Nutrient Cycling and Fertility Management in Temperate Short Rotation Foresty Systems. Biomass Bioenergeering, 14, 361-370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10072-1

[15]   Manya, J.J. (2012) Pyrolysis for Biochar Purposes: A Review to Establish Current Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 7939-7954.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es301029g

[16]   Spokas, K.A., Cantrell, K.B., Novak, J.M., Archer, D.A., Ippolito, J.A., Collins, H.P., Boateng, A.A., Lima, I.M., Lamb, M.C. and McAloon, A.J. (2012) Biochar: A Synthesis of Its Agronomic Impact beyond Carbon Sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, 973-989.
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0069

[17]   Menke, K.H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D. and Schneider, W. (1979) The Estimation of the Digestibility and Metabolisable Energy Content of Ruminant Feeding Stuffs from the Gas Production When They Are Incubated with Rumen Liquor. Journal of Agricultural Science, 93, 217-222.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305

[18]   Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H. (1988) Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and in Vitro Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28, 7-55.

[19]   Leng, R.A. (2014) Interactions between Microbial Consortia in Biofilms: A Paradigm Shift in Rumen Microbial Ecology and Enteric Methane Mitigation. Animal Production Science, 54, 519-543.
https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13381

[20]   Hansen, H.H., Storm, I.M.L.D. and Sell, A.M. (2012) Effect of Biochar on In Vitro Rumen Methane Production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A: Animal Science, 62, 305-309.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2013.789548

 
 
Top