AJIBM  Vol.7 No.4 , April 2017
Factor Analysis of the Effects of the Introduction of English Supplementary Education to Future Classrooms
Abstract: This paper explores trends in the development of technological applications in education, attempts to identify key decision-making factors related to the transition from traditional classrooms to future classrooms, and seeks to determine and analyze the relationships between structural factors and their importance. This study investigates the future evolution of education and predicts possible pathways and strategic proposals related to educational evolution by observing previous modes of operation within traditional education and traditional education models, investigating operational and structural modes within the current educational environment, and studying solutions to current problems and the accomplishment of educational reforms. Using a service design workshop, we explore key factors affecting English education in the classrooms of the future, conducting analysis by addressing the interaction between operations management, flipped education, and modes of learning. This study investigates key factors related to the introduction of supplementary English education into future classrooms, in addition to providing valuable considerations and viewpoints related to the development of future classrooms. This study focuses on investments in the educational environment of future classrooms and brings educational resources into play to increase educational efficacy. The ability of supplementary education to quickly evolve away from traditional teaching s is fostered by allowing for the continued operational development of Taiwan’s supplementary education institutions. We hope that future technology and artificial intelligence will optimize learning environments and enable the establishment of a new paradigm in education.
Cite this paper: Hsu, C. , Chen, M. , Shia, B. and Wang, S. (2017) Factor Analysis of the Effects of the Introduction of English Supplementary Education to Future Classrooms. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, 386-403. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.74028.

[1]   Bray, M., de Castro, B.V. and de Guzman, A.B. (2015) Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring? The Asian Journal of Educational Research and Synergy, 3.

[2]   Sung, P.F. (2010) The Use of Performance Evaluation Matrices to Explore the Educational Outcomes of Students. Master’s Thesis, The Graduate School of Finance, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taiwan, 1-77.

[3]   Chang, I.H., Hsu, C.M. and Chang, I.T. (2014) The Strategies of Integrating Information Technology into Classroom Management: A Discussion on the Innovative Application Model Smarter Classroom. Journal of Education Research, No. 239, 32-52.

[4]   Tu, J.C., Chiu, S.P., Chuang, L.W. and Chu, W.C. (2011) Research of Key Factors Influencing Online Learning Effectiveness of Distance Education. Journal of Cultural and Creative Industries Research, 3, 166.

[5]   Zurita, G., Hasbun, B., Baloian, N. and Jerez, O. (2015) A Blended Learning Environment for Enhancing Meaningful Learning Using 21st Century Skills Emerging Issues in Smart Learning. Springer, Berlin, 1-8.

[6]   Lopez-Perez, M.V., Perez-Lopez, M.C. and Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011) Blended Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions and Their Relation to Outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818-826.

[7]   Stevenson, K. and Zweier, L. (2011) Creating a Learning Flow: A Hybrid Course Model for High-Failure-Rate Math Classes. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 34.

[8]   Cross, N. (2011) Design Thinking: Understanding how Designers Think and Work. Berg Publishers Ltd., Oxford.

[9]   Blomkvist, J. and Holmlid, S. (2010) Service Prototyping According to Service Design Practitioners. Paper presented at the 2nd Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation.

[10]   Kimbell, L. (2011) Designing for Service as One Way of Designing Services. International Journal of Design, 5, 41-52.

[11]   Secomandi, F. and Snelders, D. (2011) The Object of Service Design. Design Issues, 27, 20-34.

[12]   Segelström, F. (2009) Communicating through Visualizations: Service Designers on Visualizing User Research. Paper presented at the 1st Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation, Oslo, Norway.

[13]   Zomerdijk, L.G. and Voss, C.A. (2010) Service Design for Experience-Centric Services. Journal of Service Research, 13, 67-82.

[14]   Sangiorgi, D. (2009) Building up a Framework for Service Design Research. Paper presented at the 8th European Academy of Design Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland.

[15]   Friedland, B. and Yamauchi, Y. (2011) Reflexive Design Thinking: Putting More Human in Human-Centered Practices. Interactions, 18, 66-71.

[16]   Lee, W.S., Huang, A.Y., Chang, Y.Y. and Cheng, C.M. (2011) Analysis of Decision Making Factors for Equity Investment by DEMATEL and Analytic Network Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 8375-8383.

[17]   Hubbard, P. and Romeo, K. (2012) 3. Diversity in Learner Training. In: Stockwell, G., Ed., Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Diversity in Research and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[18]   Shetty, C.K.G. and Kolur, M. (2011) Interactive E-Learning System Using Pattern Recognition and Augmented Reality. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 1, 21-29.

[19]   Chun, D., Smith, B. and Kern, R. (2016) Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 64-80.

[20]   Merchant, Z., Goetz, E.T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W. and Davis, T.J. (2014) Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Based Instruction on Students’ Learning Outcomes in K-12 and Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40.

[21]   Collins, L. and Muñoz, C. (2016) The Foreign Language Classroom: Current Perspectives and Future Considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 133-147.

[22]   Muñoz, C. (2012) Intensive Exposure Experiences in Second Language Learning. Vol. 65, Multilingual Matters.