1. Basic Idea, the Padmabhan Approximation of
To do this, we look at  which is of the form
Our objective is to use Equation (1) with 
and  
and   
The next step will be to utilize 
as well as use the Non-Linear Electrodynamic minimum value of the scale factor  which is in the spirit of  and which is avoiding using  .
2. Using the Section 1 Material to Isolate a Minimum Value of the Inflaton, beyond Equation (4)
From  we make the following approximation, i.e. simply put a relationship of the Lagrangian multiplier giving us the following: if
If the following is true, i.e. in a Pre-Plankian to Planckian regime of space- time
Here, −g is a constant, as assumed in  which means in the Pre-Planckian to Plackian regime we would have Equation (5) as a constant, so then we are looking at, if, an energy density as given by Zeldovich, as talked about with  setting a minimum energy density given by
And with the following substitution of
Then to first order we would be looking at Equation (11) re written as leading to
And if Equation (1) holds, we would have by 
And if is the square of Planck’s length, after some algebra, and assuming
We will examine the consequences of these assumptions as to what this says about the NLED approximation for the initial scale factor, as given in  .
3. Conclusions: Examining the Contribution of the Inflaton
In  Corda gives a very lucid introduction as to the physics of the inflaton. We urge the readers to look at it as it refers to Equation (17), second line. In particular, it gives the template for the possible range of values for in Equation (16).
The take away is that we are assuming a relatively large initial entropy (based upon a count of massive gravitons) being recycled from one universe to the next, which would influence the behavior of the first line of Equation (16) and tie into the behavior of the 2nd line of the inflaton Equation (16) given above. The exact particulars of are being investigated.
Keep in mind the importance of the result from reference  below which forms the core of Equation (17) below
We have to adhere to this e fold business, and this will influence our choices as to how to model the inflaton.
Furthermore the constraints given in   and  as to the influence of LIGO on our gravity models have to be looked into and not contravened.
This is a way of also showing if general relativity is the final theory of gravitation. i.e., if massive gravity is confirmed, as given in  , then GR is perhaps to be replaced by a scalar-tensor theory, as has been shown by Corda.
Finally is a re-do of what was brought up in  by Tang. In a density equation of stated with a relaxation procedure, between different physical states, Tank writes if m, and n are different quantum level states, then, if is the “Atomic coherence time”
We will here, in our work assign the same sort of physical state which would in place have if in which then the solution to this problem would be given by Equation (11). The idea would be as follows. If model the density of states as having the flavor of gravitons preserving the essential quantum “state”, and not changing if we go from the Pre-Planckian to Planckian state.
There would be then the matter of identifying, and the time, if. In our review we would put likely as the Pre-Planck- ian to Planckian transition time.
Note that in the m = n time if our “density of states” was referring to gravitons, keeping the same states as if m = n is picked, that the second part of Equation (17) is in referral to quantum states of a graviton having a non-planar character which would not have a planar wave character.
In the case of we are then referring to changes in the states of presumed gravitons as information carriers, and the density equation, has in Eq. (17) as a wave with explicit damped by time evolution wave component times a planar wave component.
We presume here that the frequency term, would be in the high gigahertz range.
In any case, the details of this sketchy idea should be from the Pre-Planckian to Planckian regime of space-time given far more structure in a future document.
We should note that the removal of initial singularities is due to Non-Linear Electrodynamics, as seen in  , by Camara et al., which is also in tandem with    which give also frequency specifications, which could also affect, i.e. a tie in, with Gravitons, and Nonlinear Electrodynamics, which should be developed further.
This work is supported in part by National Nature Science Foundation of China grant No. 11375279.
 Padmanabhan, T. (2005) Understanding Our Universe: Current Status and Open Issues. In: Ashtekar, A., Ed., 100 Years of Relativity, Space-Time, Structure: Einstein and Beyond, World Scientific, Singapore, 175-204. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503107
 Beckwith, A. (2016) Gedanken Experiment for Refining the Unruh Metric Tensor Uncertainty Principle via Schwarzschild Geometry and Planckian Space-Time with Initial Nonzero Entropy and Applying the Riemannian-Penrose Inequality and Initial Kinetic Energy for a Lower Bound to Graviton Mass (Massive Gravity). Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 2, 106-124. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2016.21012
 Abbott, B.P., et al. (2016) LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 061102.
 Abbott, B.P., et al. (2016) LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration: GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 241103.
 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration (2016) Tests of General Relativity with GW150914. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 221101.
 Corda, C. (2009) Interferometric Detection of Gravitational Waves: The Definitive Test for General Relativity. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 18, 2275-2282.
 Corda, C. and Mosquera, C.H. (2010) Removing Black-Hole Singularities with Nonlinear Electrodynamics. Modern Physics Letters A, 25, 2423-2429.