AJIBM  Vol.7 No.4 , April 2017
The Operation Process and Genetic Mechanism of Chinese Campaign-Style Governance Model: The Case Study of APEC Blue
Abstract: As a typical model of state governance, campaign- governance has become an effective complement and correction mechanism for the Chinese government to make up for the deficiencies of conventional governance mechanism. It is used for special rectification for any major issues, for example, emergencies, social problems etc. In recent years, the application of campaign- governance in environmental pollution control has aroused widespread concern in academia and society. On the basis of previous studies, this article will regard the policy—“APEC Blue” as the case study, exploring the operation process and genetic mechanism of campaign- governance model. Specifically, this article will discuss the three stages of goal setting, mobilization implementation and policy evaluation. Moreover, the empirical study found that bureaucratic difficulties, path dependence, omnipotent government thinking, diversified demand and limited policy tools, cross-sectoral cooperation and internal assessment mechanism are the important reasons for the large-scale use of campaign- governance in practice. Therefore, we should correctly treat the value of campaign- governance and give full play to the positive social effects in state governance.
Cite this paper: Sun, Y. and Guo, J. (2017) The Operation Process and Genetic Mechanism of Chinese Campaign-Style Governance Model: The Case Study of APEC Blue. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, 372-385. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.74027.

[1]   Yang, Z. (2016) Macro, Medium and Micro Political Levels and Legitimacy: A Four-Dimensional Framework for Interpreting Campaign-Style Governance Model. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 11, 28-38.

[2]   Arendt, H. (2014) Responsibility and Judgment. Shanghai People’s Publishing House, Shanghai.

[3]   Walder, A. (1986) Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. University of California Press, Berkeley.

[4]   Heilmann, S. and Perry, E.J. (2011) Mao’s Invisible Hand: The Political Foundation of Adaptive Governance in China. Harvard University Press, Harvard.

[5]   Madsen (2002) Mobilization of the Chinese People in the Mao Era. Chinese Workers’ Publishing House, Beijing.

[6]   Perry, E. and Li, L. (2015) Rethinking the Watershed in 1949—A Dialogue between Politics and History. Academia Bimestris, 1, 5-49.

[7]   Townsend, J.R. and Womack, B. (2005) Politics in China. Jiangsu People Press, Nanjing.

[8]   Feng, Z. (2007) The Definition and Characteristics of Chinese Campaign-Style Governance. Journal of the Yinchuan Municipal Party College of C.P.C., 2, 29-32.

[9]   Tang, H. (2007) Normal Society and Campaign-Style Governance—A Study on the Policy of “Severe Crackdown” in China’s Social Security. Open Times, 3, 115-129.

[10]   Feng, S. (2011) The Formation and Variation of the National Movement in China: An Explanation Based on the Unity of Government. Open Times, 1, 73-97.

[11]   Li, Z. (2006) The Campaign Management. World Standardization & Quality Management, 2, 7-10.

[12]   Zhou, X. (2012) Campaign Governance Mechanism: Rethinking the Institutional Logic of Chinese State Administration. Open Times, 9, 105-125.

[13]   Tan, J. (2008) Emancipating the Mind: Different from “Sports Thinking”. Bound Together, 6, 39-40.

[14]   Tang, X. (2009) The Choice of Policy Tools and the Social Mobilization Ability of the Government—An Explanation of the “Campaign-Style Governance”. Study & Exploration, 3, 59-65.

[15]   Ou, Y. (2014) On Campaign-Styled Governance at the Grassroots Level: A Discussion with Zhou Xueguang. Open Times, 6, 180-190.

[16]   Fan, Y. and Yin, Y. (2016) The Selection of Collaborative Governance Models for the Transboundary Environmental Issues: Theoretical Discussion and Three Cases. Journal of Public Management, 2, 63-75.

[17]   Ye, M. (2013) From Political Campaign to Campaigning Governance:the Mobilization Politics before and after the Reform. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2, 75-81.

[18]   Taleb, N.N. (2007) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House, Inc.

[19]   Wang, C. (2008) Eradicating the Soil of the “Campaign-Style” Thinking. Journal of the Party School of CPC Hangzhou, 3, 44-45.

[20]   Feng, Z. (2007) The Cause and Reform of Chinese Campaign-Style Governance. Wei Shi, 10, 56-57.

[21]   Wang, H. (1990) Total Social Resources and Social Regulation: Chinese Significance. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 4, 2-12.

[22]   Mao, X. (2014) The Analysis of the Causes of Campaign-Style Governance—Based on the Perspective of Administrative Thinking. China Economist, 11, 38-39.

[23]   Zhang, H. (2003) The Social Public Management Must Move from the Moving Paradigm to the Normalization Paradigm. Exploration and Free Views, 11, 26-27.

[24]   Yang, Z. (2010) Study on Multi-Center Collaborative Governance Model: Based on the Three Contents of the Inspection. Journal of Nanjing Party Institute of CPC, 3, 42-49.

[25]   Wang, L.-Z. and Liu, J.-F. (2007) From Campaign-Style Governance to Sustainable Governance—The Changing Logic and Approach of Public Management in Modern China. Future and Development, 5, 54-58.

[26]   Huang, K. (2013) China Mobilized Governance: The Commentary of Domestic Research Literatures. Chinese Public Administration, 10, 107-112.