In May 2013, the United Nations (UN) adopted the KYOTO Protocol  relating to the pollution emission agents and the transfer registers (based on the so called PRTR Protocol or Kiev Protocol)  together with the UN Convention on climate changes.
This Convention is referring, among others, to the landfills having a daily activity of more than 10,000 tons/day MSW which amounts to more than 450,000 tons/year. For these landfills, starting with 2007, the individual CH4 emission rate  has to be calculated and the results have to be communicated to the public. EU has adopted the European Emission Register in order to be in conformity with the PRTR Protocol. This Register provides some criteria to be fulfilled: transparency, coherence, the possibility to compare results. These criteria are a condition for the calculated results to be accepted into a national data base. Romania has adopted the UN PRTR Protocol and for the MSW landfills with more than 10,000 tons/day, the CH4 emission will be included in a register. The Member State governments have to report all aspects related to the Climate Changes  to an inter-governmental group.
It is very clear that a method to estimate the CH4 methane gas emission from MSW landfills is absolutely necessary  .
This method has to cover the calculation of the CH4 emission from both conforming and non-conforming MSW Romanian landfills   . This method was applied for the CH4 emission calculation of 13 MSW landfills―conforming and non-conforming. In this paper the calculated values for CH4 emission    and the equivalent CO2 for 1 non-conforming and for 2 conforming landfills are presented.
Analyzed landfills are located in Satu Mare, Ilfov and Bucharest municipality, Romania. The proposed method has a high degree of efficiency.
The CH4 emission calculus for those 13 Municipal landfills (msw) and the drawing up adjacent graphics related to the equivalent of CO2 demonstrate that the GEG is present. The Romanian Environmental Authorities have to act on this matter and to acknowledge about the GEG intensity and its duration  , in the same time.
The Proposed method allows us the quantitative evaluation of CH4 emission to be used as a natural energy source. Within the actual management of wastes only the sort of wastes having economical energy value is applied, according to the Europe Council provisions. It is to be mentioned also that only 20% of the generated wastes is sorted. In the deposit body, they are not included: metallic wastes, plastics, tires, recyclable wood or with energetic value, paper wastes and recyclable cartoon. It is to be mentioned also that, from information delivered by the local source, within the landfill body they are not included: inert wastes (construction and demolition), plastics, soils and stones, asbestos; the total contents of these wastes are not considered to be more than 10%.
I have to make a remark: the drawing up graphics were obtained by manual calculation rather than using specific software.
2. Present Situation
All types of wastes were deposited together  , in specially designated MSW deposit areas, those coming from the anthropic activities as well as those generated by the agriculture and live-stock farm activities, e.g. animal and bird dejections. The bio-degradable wastes (rubbish) generated by intensive agriculture have to be taken into consideration as well.
The problem of the global warming and the obligation to apply the Kyoto Convention requirements involve the fulfillment of the rules regarding the limitation of the MSW gas emission  and the prohibition to have MSW landfills which do not comply with the rules of environmental protection  .
Since 1999 Romania has started to have MSW landfills, in ecological condition, in accordance with the European regulation in the field, and, from 2007, when Romania adhered to the European Union (EU), all the MSW landfills have to respect, strictly, the EU legislation, as provided within the 75/442/CE Directives   provisions.
This Directive   was adapted  to the Romanian legislation by Government Decision  order no. 349/2005.
3. Estimative Methods for Ch4 Gas Emission Calculation
The quantity of the CH4 gas emission from MSW landfills can be estimated, by calculus applying two methods, as follows:
METHOD No. 1
IPCC 2006 Method-Default Method (DM).
This method supposes that a non-dangerous MSW deposit will generate   , within a year, a certain quantity of CH4 and, in the next year, it will be a new amount of CH4 This method will not take into consideration the hypothesis that an MSW deposit is a conglomerate mixed wastes one (see Table 1). Another factor to be taken into consideration is the time-the basic factor for GES emission  . Different MSW components are gradually, deteriorated in time, so CH4 and CO2 as well as the non-methane gases, and are generated.
In order to illustrate results due to the method 1 use, the conform MSW calculus equations regarding CH4 emission   will be indicated, as follows.
These calculus equations are:
Table 1. The percentage composition of the MSW landfills.
・ L0-CH4 generated potential which depends by the MSW morphological composition it will be calculated by using the following relation,   ;
・ R-CH4 recovered at the inventory year of, the recommended value, supposing that CH4 is burned and not collected; if not, the recovered quantity of CH4 calculated by using this method will be reduced from the CH4 generated quantity.
・ 0X-oxide factor having a fractionary values-0 for non-conforming deposits and 0.1 for the well arrangements (conforming) deposits.
CH4 generated potential, where:
・ MCF-CH4 correction factor, whose values are dependent by the location and the management of MSW;
・ DOCf-the DOC dissimilated fraction-0.55 having values within the interval 0.5 ÷ 0.6;
・ F- CH4 fraction part-from deposit gas (LFG)  , given value is 0.5;
・ 16/12-the C conversion coefficient within CH4;
The Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) is determined   by using the relation:
・ A-the MSW fraction represented by paper and non-reciclable textiles     .
・ B-the MSW fraction represented by garden and parks wastes, and other bio-degradable organic wastes, excepted food wastes     .
・ C-the MSW fraction represented by food wastes and other bio-degradable wastes,     ;
・ D-the MSW fraction represented by woods or straw wastes, [IPCC],     ;
This method has the following difficulty:
-Don’t take into consideration that in the last 6 months deposited MSW are not degradable
-The CH4 emission quantity is very high (inadmissible)
It is supposed that a MSW landfill will generate, within a year, a certain amount of CH4 gas emission which can be estimated  . This method doesn’t take into consideration the hypothesis that a MSW landfill is a mixed conglomerate of wastes (rubbish).
Another factor to be considered is the time which is the basic factor for CH4 gas emission  . Different components of the MSW landfill are, gradually, degraded in time, and CH4, other gases are produced  .
METHOD No. 2
I developed a new calculation method for the methane gas emission estimation, from the Romanian waste landfills   , method called: “DANILA VIERU METHOD FOR A CONFORMING AND NON-CONFORMING MSW LANDFILLS CH4 GAS EMISSION ESTIMATION IN ROMANIA, BY CALCULUS”.
According to the above- mentioned method, it is assumed that the waste (rubbish) from MSW landfills will be gradually degraded  based on the following factors   :
Structure of the wastes (rubbish) composition;
Environmental factors existing in that area;
The thickness of the waste (rubbish) layer;
The compacting grade (level);
The depth of the place where the MSW is located;
Time passed from the first deposition of wastes (rubbish).
Due to the time factor, this method was called: “DANILA VIERU METHOD FOR CONFORMING AND NON-CONFORMING MSW LANDFILLS CH4GAS EMISSION ESTIMATION IN ROMANIA, BY CALCULUS”.
The IPCC-International Experts Group on Climate Change makes recommendation  related to the use of some coefficients concerning the estimation of CH4 gas emission from MSW landfills but no to the use a specific calculus formula.
In the case of a MSW conglomerate landfill, having a broad range of types and amounts of wastes (rubbish), Romania did not possess an adequate (proper) formula for the MSW CH4 gas emission estimation up to the year of 2012. The statistics of the wastes (rubbish), under the rule of the
Regulations no. 2150/2002 on waste statistics  do not solve the problem of the composition of the waste (rubbish) from MSW. The use of waste statistics assumes that the waste (rubbish) should be analyzed by means of a representative sample of economic operators and human agglomeration  .
Taking into consideration that every district of Romania has approx. 200 economic operators and urban agglomeration we shall have approximately 8400 economic operators, in total  .
Approximately 500,000 economic operators are assumed to be in the country which means that statistics representation will cover only 1.6% of the total country economic operators. This fact is quite unacceptable.
DESCRIPTION OF”DANILA VIERU METHOD FOR CONFORMING AND NON-CONFORMING MSW LANDFILLS CH4 GAS EMISSION ESTIMATION IN ROMANIA, BY CALCULUS”
The method: “Danila Vieru method for conforming and non-conforming MSW landfills CH4 gas emission estimation, in Romania, by calculus”, makes use of the following formula:
This formula (equation) has some advantages, e.g.:
1) The hierarchy  of degraded MSW, IN TIME, under the environmental factors [atmospheric precipitations, annual average temperature, alternating periods of rain and drought, freezing and non-freezing periods, the degree of compression, the thickness of waste (rubbish) layers, etc.  ;
2) The use of time periods for the degradation of MSW;
3) The use of IPCC recommendation related to the application of the methodology calculation formula of CH4 gas emission from MSW landfills;
4) Taking into consideration the specific environmental conditions of every district of Romania;
5) The specific economic conditions of every district, such as: industrial development, hand-made production, various branches of agriculture, etc. are taken into consideration;
It is well-known that CH4 methane is a specific gas, and its contribution (percentage) to global warming is about 4 ÷ 5% so that the need for the quantification of CH4 gas emission is imperative. In the meantime, measures to reduce the contribution of the CH4 gas emission from MSW landfills have to be taken into account.
In July 16, 2009, due to the presence of non-conforming MSW landfills in Romania, some of them are closed while others will be in transition periods, in the case of MSW landfills, the emission of CH4 methane gas will continue even after the closing period of non-conforming MSW landfills until approximately the year 2017. Before wastes (rubbish) are deposited within the body of MSW and a rational sorting have to be are done.
After the closure of MSW landfills, the quantity of the CH4 gas emission will decrease but still will continues to exist  . Following the legal conditions for opening a new MSW landfill it is absolutely necessary to know the evolution of CO2 (in equivalent), the location of the new MSW landfill and the potential impact over the environment. As it is known, in approximately
In my opinion, the above mentioned remarks should be taken into consideration when a CH4 methane gas emission calculus formula is applied, for the entirely territory of Romania.
4. Example of Calculus, Methodology―The Assessment
a) The percentage composition of MSW landfill body is in accordance with the data provisions given in Table 1.
b) The wastes (rubbish) from the MSW landfill body are gradually degraded in accordance with the environment conditions;
c) To calculate the quantity of CH4 gas emission from degraded MSW, at the year of calculation, the
IPCC recommended values  have been taken into consideration.
d) The MSW degraded quantity has the same percentage composition as the MSW landfill body;
e) The MSW degraded quantity generates DOC-Dissolved Organic Carbon, and, as a consequence, the CH4 gas emission is produced.
f) The MSW degraded quantity calculated, in the year T, is given by the expression: Qmswdegrad.T
Within Table 1 the waste composition, as% from total, was established following information delivered by:
・ Local Environmental Authorities, in accordance with the Regalement of the Council of Europe no. 2150/2002 and the European Parliament information with referring to the waste statistics (November 25/2002)  . For example, for the Region 8 Bucharest Ilfov-landfill Chiajna, the information delivered (see Figure 1, also) are: “Methane Vol.?54.4%, Carbon Dioxide Vol.?38.1%, Oxygen Vol.? 1.3%, Nitrogen Vol.?6.1%, etc. As an important remark, within the year 2011 about 7.5 million cubic meters of Methane gas has been extracted.”
・ Direct observation done at the MSW landfills location with referring to the wastes composition;
・ Direct information delivered by local authorities regarding annually collected wastes quantities and the way of the management;
・ Information delivered by the MSW landfills administrators related to the collection area, quantities and type of wastes included in MSW.
Figure 1. The Evolution of CO2 (equivalent) and CH4 emission from the landfill Rudeni-Chitila-Iridex, Environmental Reg. 8, Bucharest, Ilfov District, in the period: 2000 ÷ 2011.
Table 2 presents the composition of the MSW landfills wastes, located within 3 environmental regions areas-region 8 Bucharest Ilfov, Satu Mare County and Bihor county. It is to be mentioned that the Waste composition, as a conglo- merate landfill, is subjected to the environment factors, and as a consequence, the LFG gas (mainly, CH4) is generated, covering the total lifetime of the deposit.
5. The Evaluation of Qmswdegrad.T in the T Year of Calculation
To determine the MSW degraded quantity, in the first year of emission, the following formula has been used:
After the first year, the calculation formula became:
・ Qmsw.T-MSW, the amount deposited in the account, [Gg];
・ QmswT-1)-MSW deposited one year ago; [Gg];
・ QmswundergradT-1-the remaining amount of MSW degraded after year calculation [Gg];
・ K: is the degradation rate of MSW. This factor depends on waste composition and site conditions, and describes the degradation process rate. The IPCC Guidelines  give, for K, a very wide range of values between 0.005 and 0.4.
・ t: time of degradation
・ t: time of wastes degradation within deposit body; during calculation process, t is replaced with relation (13 − m)/12 or (25 − m)/12, where m re- present the no. of months when msw wastes were degraded within deposit body, at the calculation year. m?within the interval 7 ≤ m ≤ 12, m- within the interval 7 ≤ m ≤ 18, represents no. of months when 45% of the wastes is degraded in the proportion of 45%. The m values are established in accordance with the deposit nomograme, based on the deposit equation,  . The deposit
Table 2. The MSW percentage (%) composition within the deposit body in some environmental Romanian regions.
equation has an unique solution, but in every year has another expression i.e. in the year  , in the year,  etc. How to drawing up the Nomograme  of the MSW deposit will be explained in another paper.
・ T-represent the year of calculation not the current calendar year.
A certain MSW deposited quantity remains undegraded every year   . This quantity will be taken into consideration in the next year as the Qmswundegrad.T.
This quantity can be estimated by using the formula:
The calculation of the total Dissolved Organic Carbon?(TDOCdissolved.T)- quantity from MSW degraded, at the year T, Qmswdegrad.T has been done by means of the following formula
A = DOC generated by Qmswdegrad.T which contains% MSWbiodegrad stated;
k0: in accordance with 
B = DOC generated by Qmsw(G+P)degrad.T which contains %MSW(G+P), stated;
k1: in accordance with  , DOC generated ratio by% MSW(G+P)degrad.T, deposited;
C = DOC generated by Qmswdegrad.T which contains %MSWH+C+text., stated;
k2: in accordance with  , DOC generated ratio by %MSW(H+C+ text.)degrad.T , deposited;
D = DOC generated by Qmswdegrad.T which contains %MSW(wood+straw), stated
k3: in accordance with  , DOC generated ratio by% MSW(wood+strawdegrad.)T, deposited;
E = DOC generated by Qmsw degrade.T which contains %MSWsludge, stated;
kn: in accordance with  , DOC generated ratio by% MSWsludg.degrad.T, deposited;
G = DOC generated by Qmswdegrad.T which contains %MSWindustry, stated;
k4: in accordance with  , DOC generated ratio by% MSWind.degrad.T, deposited.
The total composition of MSW wastes within the body can be changed annually, at two years, at three years or five years depending on the best environment information detained.
% TDOCdissolved.T is the ratio because DOC is distributed within total wastes deposited but it is considered to be generated only by Qmswdegrad.T and it is determined by using the following formula:
where Qmsw taken into consid.T is calculated by using the relation:
・ DOCf = fraction [%] of DOC dissolved under anaerobic conditions (taking into consideration the environmental condition from landfill) which generated CH4.
The calculus can be done in this way:
・ Empirical  by using the formula: 0.014 T + 0.28, where T?is the annual average temperature, in C0, in the district where MSW is located.
By using IPCC recommended values for the temperate-continental zones, in Eastern and Central Europe,   we found the following percentage values: 50%, 55%, 60% and 77%.
If we take into consideration the Romanian districts climate zone conditions the recommended values (as percentage) are to be: 43%, 45%, 50%, 55% and 60%.
・ 1.3333(16/12) is the conversion factor of the carbon from CH4 emission.
・ F-MSW landfill CH4 gas emission correction factor and depends on the management of landfill; this factor assumes the compacting level of the solid municipal waste (rubbish) MSW landfill body and its values are:
a) 0.4 ÷ 0.5-if landfill is not compacted;
b) 0.6 ÷ 0.7-if the landfill is compacted by means of a compactor and a bulldozer;
c) 0.8 ÷ 0.9-if landfill is compacted with two bulldozers and two compactors. It is to be observed that there is not value 1 because there are no perfect ways of management.
・ Fr-is a correction factor of CH4 gas emission fraction from gas deposit [Landfill Gas-], according to the IPPC recommended values; these values of Fr are within interval 40 ÷ 60%,
Taking into consideration the above formula and using adequate input data, the graphical representations for the evolution of the equivalent CO2 of MSW landfills    ―Landfill Rudeni-Chitila-Iridex, Landfill Vidra-Ecosud are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
The evolution of the equivalent CO2 for a non-conforming MSW landfill is presented in Figure 3. It is to be observed that the CH4 gas emission continues, after the closing date?the year 2010, as shown.
Wastes deposited quantities (msw) within deposit body are shown in Table 3. These quantities, due to “m” values, according to the Nomograme  , generated CH4 quantities as presented within Figure 1, with the following signi-
Figure 2. Evolution of CO2 (equivalent) and CH4 Methane gas emission from the landfills Vidra-Ecosud, Ilfov District, in the period: 2000 ÷ 2011.
Figure 3. The MSW landfill disposal time period: 1970 ÷ 2015 lasting for CH4 gas emission, after disposal was completed. The percentage composition of MSW may be changed, year by year. The sludge from MSW can be taken into consideration, separately or may be incorporated within bio-degraded waste (rubbish).
Table 3. Present the MSW wastes deposited within the body, for the period 2000 ÷ 2011.
ficance    : in the year 2011 there were collected 7.5 million cubic meters of CH4 which have been used for green energy production.
For the period 2000 to 2011, the percentage (%) of MSW composition has been considered, as shown in Table 1. Plastic wastes, inert waste, construction and demolition have not to be taken into consideration because they will not affect the CH4 gas emission   .
The data were confirmed by collection data.
6. A Case Study
Within 2000 ÷ 2011 period (see Figure 1) quantities belonging to the interval 250 ÷ 400 Gg, there were deposited, annually. The GEG Effect has been intensified has been intensified, so that in the year of 2011 and a quantity of 7.5 million cubic meters of CH4 has been used for electric energy production. As a direct consequence the GEG Effect decreased considerably, see Figure 1.
For the period 2000 to 2011, the CH4 calculated values of gas emissions are presented in Figure 1, by using Formula (1):
Using some indicators related to the MSW landfills CH4 gas emission, a calculation model is presented below. These indicators are those recommended by IPCC group of experts, group for the Central and Eastern Europe,  as follows:
MSW landfill deposited at the Year 2000;
MSW landfill deposited at the Year 2001;
At the starting year of emission within the Equation (2) can be used the expression:
 where represents the number of months in which maximum 45% of deposited are degradeted,  .
After the emission starting the expression,  ,  can be used. -the number of months is allocated to the Nomograme  .
is degraded quantity, Equation (2) Which generated (Organic Carbon Dissolved), and, finally, , at the year 2001.
 , no. of months for the period 2000-2001, when MSW are degradeted, according to the MSW landfill Nomograme  .
By using Equation (4) the is calculated.
, [Gg], calculated by using the Equation (4)
[Gg], quantity remained un-degraded in the end of 2001.
By using formula shown below
, was determined
The terms A, B, C, D, E, G are calculated at the year 2001, by using adequate equations
, the bio-degradable wastes DOC generation ratio, is in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes;
, the park and garden wastes DOC generation ratio, in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter wastes;
, the papers + cartoon + textiles wastes DOC generation ratio, in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes;
, the wood + straw wastes DOC generation ratio in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes;
, the containing sludge wastes DOC generation ratio in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes;
, the industrial wastes (similar to home wastes) DOC generation ratio, in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes;
The gas emission quantity at the year 2001 is calculated by applying the, as follows:
[Gg] is MSW degraded quantity at the year 2001 which generated DOC and, later on, CH4 methane gas    ;
・ 1.52% is the percentage% TDOC within landfill body;
・ 0.5 represent DOCf taking into consideration the existing condition from the analyzed emission;
・ 1.3333 (16/12) represent C from CH4;
・ represents the management level of the analyzed MSW landfill, at the year 2001;
・ 0.5 represents the% content of CH4 Methane gas within Landfill Gas (LFG).
It is to be observed that the CH4 gas emission increased gradually, but not suddenly, in accordance with the environmental condition of the landfill location  . A certain wastes (rubbish) quantity of landfill will remain un- degraded and will be taken into consideration in the next year, so the process of MSW degraded will generate again DOC, and, as a consequence, CH4 Methane gas:
At the year 2011, for the same MSW landfill-Chitila-Rudeni-Iridex, the quantity of emission will be    ;
, the quantity of landfill un-degraded, remained from the year 2010;
MSW landfill deposited taken into consideration for the calculus of :
By using the Formula (2)
in accordance with MSW deposit nomograme    .
the non-degraded quantity of remained in the end of the year 2011; the is used:
By using the Equation (12), the percentage has been calculated, as follows:
was calculated by using the Equation (5)
The parameters-A, B, C, D, E, F, G, are determined at the year 2011, by using corresponding equations.
the biodegradable DOC generation ratio, in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes.
, parks and garden wastes DOC generation ratio in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes    .
, the papers + cartoon + textiles wastes DOC generation ratio in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes.
, the wood + straw wastes DOC generation ratio in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes.
, wastes (containing sludge) DOC generation ratio in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V, wastes    .
, MSW landfill containing industrial wastes (similar to home wastes) DOC generation ratio, in accordance with [IPCC, 2006], Chapter V wastes,
The quantity of in the year 2011 gas emission is calculated by applying Formula (1) as follows:
[Gg] is MSW degraded quantity of in 2011 which generated DOC and, later on, CH4
Methane gas;, is the percentage % TDOC within landfill body;
represent DOCf taking into consideration existing condition from the analyzed emission;
(16/12) represent C from CH4;
represents the management level of the analyzed MSW landfill, in the year 2001;
The content of CH4 methane gas within Landfill Gas (LFG).
It is to be observed that the CH4 gas emission increased gradually, but not suddenly, in accordance with the environmental condition of the landfill location  . A certain waste (rubbish) quantity of MSW landfill will remain un-de- graded and will be taken into consideration in the next year, so the process of degraded will generate again DOC, and, as a consequence, CH4 Methane gas:
It is to be observed that the CH4 gas emission increased gradually, but not suddenly, in accordance with the environmental condition of the landfill location   . A certain waste (rubbish) quantity of MSW landfill will remain un- degraded and will be taken into consideration in the next year, so the process of MSW degraded will generate again DOC.
The sludge from MSW can be taken into consideration, separately or may be incorporated within bio-degraded waste (rubbish).
This article doesn’t comment on the present calculation model but rather draws the attention to a more adapted to the real conditions estimation, by calculus, of the CH4 gas emission from the actual MSW landfills in Romania, which have to be estimated by the end of 2017. Even if deposited MSW quantities were up to 30 (Gg), in the beginning of 1979 and reached 90 (Gg) in 2010, the evolution of CO2 exists and has to be known by the Romanian authorities.
It is considered that this estimation has to be determined up to the life-end of the considered landfill. As an example, at the existing MSW landfill, in the Satu Mare County, the evolution of the equivalent CO2 for a period of 42 years up to 2010 when it was closed is presented. The authorities have to inform the public about the evolution of the equivalent CO2 for existing MSW landfill and also for the location of the new MSW landfills.
On the other hand, for the non-hazardous MSW landfills having a capacity between [Gg] it was observed that the top management of this MSW landfills issued estimated quantities of CH4 gas at unrealistic values, sometimes more than two times lower with respect to the real one, estimated by usual calculation models.
To reduce the greenhouse effect, the evolution of the equivalent CO2 for the existing MSW landfills in Romania has to be estimated in such a way as to be useful for an applicable environmental planning in accordance with the government’s and the European policy in the field of environmental protection. Other gas emissions such as: NON-METHANE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, , , , , have not been taken into consideration.
The real estimation of the CH4 emission quantity from MSW
Finally, it is to be noted that the calculation of the CH4 emission quantity, by using the Danila Vieru’s Method, , will help Romanian environmental authorities to implement the legal and right decisions regarding the adequate moment when the collected emission can be burned, and thus be used in an economical manner.
The proposed method could be applied for the CH4 emission calculation at MSW landfills quantities between 100 ÷ 200 (Gg/y) e.g. the Satu Mare non- conforming MSW landfill (see Figure 3).
This method which was verified for Romanian landfills could be easily adapted for other countries too, paving the way for a real estimation of the methane gas emission, as real as possible.
The proposed method can be applied either to the MSW landfills which respect legal providing and those (MSW) which not respect such provisions. The quantitative CH4 estimation is beneficial for the Environmental Authorities but also for the potential investors interested in the CH4 management. It is to be noted that potential investors have to know the emission quantity and its duration. After MSW depositing is over, it is absolutely necessary to the time-dura- tion when the emission is stopped. In the same time, after the CH4 emission is over, the resulted compost should be of interest for the farmers.
The author would like to express thanks for their support and understandings to the staff members of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and to the local and regional subsidiaries of ETA’s for their help and suggestions.
The author would like to express deep thanks and gratitude, including for the moral support, to Prof. Dr. Eng. Vladimir Rojanski for his advices in order to complete my work in order to estimate the CH4 gas emission, by a calculus formula, both for conforming and non-conforming MSW solid landfills.
 Heijo Scharff, J.J. (2006) Applying Guidance for Methane Emission Estimation for Landfills. Emission Estimation Technique Manual for Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills, Version 2.0. Assendelft, the Netherlands.
 Cai, B.-F., Liu, J.-G., Gao, Q.-X., et al. Estimation of Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills in China Based on, Point Emission Sources Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning.
 Tabasaran, O. (1981) Gas Production from Landfill. In: Bridgewater, A.V. and Lidgren, K., Eds., Household Waste Management in Europe, Economics and Techniques, Van Nostrand, Reinhold Co., New York, 159-175.