AJIBM  Vol.7 No.3 , March 2017
The Effects of Altruism and Social Background in an Online-Based, Pay-What-You-Want Situation
Abstract: Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) is a participative pricing mechanism that leaves it up to the customer to choose a purchase price. Presently, the factors that influence customers’ willingness to pay are still not completely understood. This study examines the degree to which willingness to pay in an anonymous PWYW purchase situation on the Internet is influenced by the social motif of altruism and communication that as a part of the purchase price, will be donated to a charitable institution identified in advance. We hypothesized that altruism as well as a social background exerted an increasing impact on willingness to pay. A specific purchase situation in which the social background was manipulated was simulated by using online surveys. Altruism was measured using a 7-point Likert-type scale. The sample consisted of 403 participants, predominantly students and young adult employees. We found that communication of a social background led to a highly significant increase in willingness to pay (p < 0.001). Furthermore, altruism positively impacted the willingness to pay only on the condition that a social background was communicated (p < 0.001). The insights acquired provide evidence for multiple theoretical assumptions that postulate a relation between willingness to pay and the social background of a purchase situation. The interaction effect of altruism and social background explains why researchers have rarely succeeded in showing a fundamental effect of altruism on the willingness to pay in anonymous PWYW situations: To stimulate this correlation, additional characteristics of the purchase scenario seem to be determinative.
Cite this paper: Peschla, H. , Suessmair, A. and Meier, G. (2017) The Effects of Altruism and Social Background in an Online-Based, Pay-What-You-Want Situation. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, 245-269. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.73018.

[1]   Simon, H. and Fassnacht, M. (2016) Preismanagement: Strategie-Analyse-Entscheidung-
Umsetzung. 4th Edition, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.

[2]   Kim, J.-Y. (2008) Das Projekt: Pay-What-You-Want.

[3]   Schößler, T. (2016) Preispolitik für Theater: Strategische Preisgestaltung zwischen
Einnahmesteigerung und öffentlichem Auftrag. Springer VS, Wiesbaden.

[4]   Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2009) Pay What You Want: A New Participative Pricing
Mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44-58.

[5]   Rossel, L. (2014) Vergütungsmodell Pay What You Want: Wenn Kunden den Preis für ein Gut

[6]   Gahler, M. (2016) Pay-What-You-Want im Internet: Empirische Analyse der Einflussgrößen auf
die freiwillige Zahlungsbereitschaft. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.

[7]   Regner, T. (2010) Why Consumers Pay Voluntarily: Evidence from Online Music. Jena Economic
Research Papers, 081.

[8]   Hinz, O. (2008) Interaktive Preismechanismen in dynamischen Märkten. Verlag DR.
KOVAC, Hamburg.

[9]   Chandran, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2005) Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers’ Cognitions
and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 249-259.

[10]   Der Wiener Deewan (2015).

[11]   Kunter, M. (2015) Exploring the Pay-What-You-Want Payment Motivation. Journal of Business
Research, 68, 2347-2357.

[12]   Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2010) Pay-What-You-Want—Praxisrelevanz und
Konsumentenverhalten. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 80, 147-169.

[13]   Riener, G. and Traxler, C. (2012) Norms, Moods, and Free Lunch: Longitudinal Evidence on
Payments from a Pay-What-You-Want Restaurant. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 476-483.

[14]   Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G. and Nelson, L. (2012) Pay-What-You-Want, Identity, and
Self-Signaling in Markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America, 109, 7236-7240.

[15]   Schmidt, K., Spann, M. and Zeithammer, R. (2015) Pay What You Want as a Marketing Strategy
in Monopolistic and Competitive Markets. Management Science,
61, 1217-1236.

[16]   Schons, L.M., Rese, M., Wieseke, J., Rasmussen, W., Weber, D. and Strotmann, W. C. (2014)
There Is Nothing Permanent Except Change—Analyzing Individual Price Dynamics in “Pay-What-
You-Want” Situations. Marketing Letters, 25, 25-36.

[17]   Roy, R., Rabbanee, F.K. and Sharma, P. (2015) Antecedents, Outcomes, and Mediating Role of
Internal Reference Prices in Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) Pricing. Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, 34, 117-136.

[18]   Hilbert, L.P. and Suessmair, A. (2015) The Effects of Social Interaction and Social Norm
Compliance in Pay-What-You-Want Situations. American Journal of Industrial and Business
Management, 5, 548-556.

[19]   Dorn, T. and Suessmair, A. (2016) Is It Really Worth It? A Test of Pay-What-You-Want Pricing
Strategies in a German Consumer Behaviour Context. Global Business and Economics
Review, 18, 82-100.

[20]   Lee, S.R., Baumgartner, H. and Pieters, R. (2011) Are You Really Paying What You Wish?:
Interpersonal Influences on Price Decisions. In: Ahluwalia, R., Chartrand, T.L. and Ratner, R.K.,
Eds., NA—Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 39, Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN, 540-541.

[21]   Regner, T. and Riener, G. (2012) Voluntary Payments, Privacy and Social Pressure on the
Internet: A Natural Field Experiment. DICE Discussion Paper, 82.

[22]   Armstrong Soule, C. and Madrigal, R. (2015) Anchors and Norms in Anonymous Pay-What-
You-Want Pricing Contexts. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 167-175.

[23]   Jang, H. and Chu, W. (2012) Are Consumers Acting Fairy Toward Companies? An Examination
of Pay-What-You-Want-Pricing. Journal of Macromarketing, 32, 348-360.

[24]   Johnson, J.W. and Cui, A.P. (2013) To Influence or Not to Influence: External Reference Price
Strategies in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing. Journal of Business Research, 66, 275-281.

[25]   Kim, J.-Y., Kaufmann, K. and Stegemann, M. (2014) The Impact of Buyer-Seller Relationships
and Reference Prices,on the Effectiveness of the Pay What You Want Pricing Mechanism. Marketing Letters, 25, 409-423.

[26]   Thomas, S. and Gierl, H. (2014) Pay What You Want: How to Affect the Price Consumers Are
Willing to Pay. Proceedings of the 13th ICORIA: International Conference on Research in Advertising, Amsterdam, 26-28 June 2014.

[27]   Singer, T. and Ricard, M. (2015) Mitgefühl in der Wirtschaft: Ein bahnbrechender Forschungsbericht.
Albrecht Knaus Verlag, München.

[28]   Jung, M., Nelson, L., Gneezy, A. and Gneezy, U. (2014) Paying More When Paying for Others.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 414-431.

[29]   Shelle, S. and Morwitz, V. (2013) We’re in This Together: How Sellers, Social Values, and
Relationship Norms Influence Consumer Payments in Pay-What-You-Want Contexts. Unpublished.

[30]   Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L. and Brown, A. (2010) Shared Social Responsibility: A Field
Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving. Science,
329, 325-326.

[31]   Huber, O. (2013) Das psychologische Experiment: Eine Einführung. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.

[32]   Goldberg, L. (2014) 30 NEO Facets: Altruism.

[33]   BITKOM (2013) Trends im E-Commerce: Konsumverhalten beim Online-Shopping. Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien e.V., Hrsg.

[34]   Brandt, M. (2015) Das kaufen deutsche Onlineshopper.

[35]   Meyer, R. (2003) E-Commerce: Grundlagen und Praxiswissen für den Online-Handel. Verlag Dr. Müller e.K. und Lizenzgeber, Düsseldorf.

[36]   Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels (2016) Durchschnittspreis von Reiseführern in
Deutschland bis 2015. Börsenblatt, 12, 30.

[37]   Small, D. and Loewenstein, G. (2003) Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and
Identifiability. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26, 5-16.

[38]   Marett, K., Pearson, R. and Moore, R. (2012) Pay What You Want: An Exploratory Study of
Social Exchange and Buyer-Determined Prices of iProducts. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30, Article 10.

[39]   Gneezy, U., Keenan, E. and Gneezy, A. (2014) Avoiding Overhead Aversion in Charity. Science,
346, 632-635.