Back
 AJIBM  Vol.7 No.3 , March 2017
Why Continuous Improvement Programs Fail in the Egyptian Manufacturing Organizations? A Research Study of the Evidence
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present the core variables derived from literature that contributes to the failure of continuous improvement (CI) programs in the Egyptian manufacturing industry. The approach used is to find the previous literature reviews of the problem, group the variables affecting the problem, develop the research model and theoretical frameworks, and test the variables through a survey using the appropriate scale and measurements. From the data measurements and analysis, continuous improvement programs can fail due to multi factors; they can be grouped under six themes: strategic planning, change management, knowledge management, performance measurement, CI performance & sustainability, and motivation. The research is limited to the manufacturing industry. Continuous improvement programs/initiatives defined for the purpose of the study as TQM, Lean, Six Sigma, and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle. The value of this research is to create awareness for the manufacturing organizations about the requirements of change in the form of CI implementation.
Cite this paper: Soliman, M. (2017) Why Continuous Improvement Programs Fail in the Egyptian Manufacturing Organizations? A Research Study of the Evidence. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, 202-222. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.73016.
References

[1]   Ahmed, M.H. (2013) Lean Transformation Guidance: Why Organizations Fail to Achieve and Sustain Excellence through Lean Improvement. International Journal of Lean Thinking, 4, 31-40. http://thinkinglean.com/img/files/PAPER_4(2).pdf

[2]   Angel, D.C. and Pritchard, C. (2008) Where “Six Sigma” Went Wrong. Transport Topics, 5.

[3]   Byrne, A. (2012) The Lean Turnaround: How Business Leaders Use Lean Principles to Create Value and Transform Their Company. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[4]   Liker, J.K. (2002) The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[5]   McLean, R.S. and Antony, J. (2014) Why Continuous Improvement Initiatives Fail in Manufacturing Environments? A Systematic Review of the Evidence. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63, 370-376.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2013-0124

[6]   Liker, J.K. and Convis, G.L. (2012) The Toyota Way to Lean Leadership: Achieving and Sustaining Excellence through Leadership Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[7]   Jaca, C., Viles, E., Mateo, R. and Santos, J. (2012) Components of Sustainable Improvement Systems: Theory and Practice. The TQM Journal, 24, 142-154.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731211215080

[8]   Soliman, M.H.A. (2016) Hoshin Kanri: How Toyota Creates a Culture of Continuous Improvement to Achieve Lean Goals. CreateSpace, South Carolina.

[9]   Soliman, M.H.A. (2015) A New Routine for Culture Change. Industrial Management, 57, 25-30.

[10]   Drucker, P.F. (1954) The Practice of Management. HarperCollins Publishers, New York.

[11]   Liker, J.K. and Trachilis, G. (2015) Developing Lean Leaders at All Levels: A Practical Guide. Lean Leadership Institute Publications, Cambridge.

[12]   Balle, M. and Balle, F. (2014) Lead with Respect: A Novel of Lean Practice. Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge.

[13]   Balle, M. and Balle, F. (2010) Lean Manager: A Novel of Lean Transformation. Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge.

[14]   Taylor, F.W. (1919) The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers, New York.

[15]   Kaufman, J. (2012) The Personal MBA: Master the Art of Business. Portfolio Publishing, New York.

[16]   Rother, M. (2009) The Toyota Kata: Managing People for Improvement. Adaptiveness and Superior Results. McGraw Hill, New York.

[17]   Quesada-Pineda, H.J. and Madrigal, J. (2013) Sustaining Continuous Improvement: A Longitudinal and Regional Study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5, 43.

[18]   Blaikie, N. (2003) Analyzing Quantitative Data. From Description to Explanation. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 353.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208604

[19]   Lissitz, R.W. and Green, S.B. (1975) Effect of the Number of Scale Points on Reliability: A Monte Carlo Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 10-13.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076268

[20]   Singh, R.M. and Gupta, M. (2014) Knowledge Management in Teams: Empirical Integration and Development of a Scale. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 777-794.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0450

[21]   Manolopoulos, D. (2007) An Evaluation of Employee Motivation in the Extended Public Sector in Greece. Employee Relations, 30, 63-85.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450810835428

[22]   Herzberg, F. (1968/2003) One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees? Harvard Business Review, 46, 87-96.

[23]   Jurgensen, C.E. (1978) Job Preferences (What Makes a Job Good or Bad?). Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 267-276.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.3.267

[24]   Tharenou, P. (1993) A Test of Reciprocal Causality for Absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 269-287.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140306

[25]   Nunnally, J. (1978) Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[26]   Osterloh, M., Frey, B. and Frost, J. (2002) The Dynamics of Motivation of New Organizational Forms. International Journal of the Economics and Business, 9, 61-77.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510110102976

 
 
Top