JSSM  Vol.4 No.3 , September 2011
Perceived Self-Efficacy and Its Effect on Online Learning Acceptance and Student Satisfaction
Abstract: This paper investigates the effect of perceived self-efficacy on perceptions of ease of use and usefulness of online learning systems, and its effects on behavioral intention toward online learning acceptance and student satisfaction. Eight hundred and seventy-two samples collected from students in online classes in the United States and Korea were analyzed using factor analysis and structural equation modeling techniques. The results show that: 1) perceived self-effi- cacy serves as an antecedent to online learning acceptance and its degree of importance is partially a function of cultural background; and 2) perceived usefulness of online learning systems influences positively on online learning acceptance and student satisfaction. Significant differences were found between Korean and US students but how much of this was due to cultural differences or degree of experience could not be determined.
Cite this paper: nullJ. Lee and S. Mendlinger, "Perceived Self-Efficacy and Its Effect on Online Learning Acceptance and Student Satisfaction," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2011, pp. 243-252. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2011.43029.

[1]   J. O’Donoghue, G. Singh and L. Dorward, “Virtual Education in Universities: A Technological Imperative,” British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2001, pp. 511-523.

[2]   A. Basile and J. M. D’Aquila, “An Experimental Analysis of Computer-Mediated Instruction and Student Attitudes in Principles of Financial Accounting Course,” Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 77, No. 3, 2002, pp. 137-143. doi:10.1080/08832320209599062

[3]   T. J. Lawson, “Teaching a Social Psychology Course on the Web,” Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2000, pp. 285-289. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2704_07

[4]   P. Jones, G. Packham, C. Miller and A. Jones, “An Initial Evaluation of Student Withdrawals within an e-Learning Environment: The Case of e-College Wales,” Electronic Journal on e-Learning, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2004, pp. 113-120.

[5]   K. Hong, A. A. Ridzuan and M. Kuek, “Students’ Attitudes Toward the Use of the Internet for Learning: A Study at a University in Malaysia,” Educational Techno- logy & Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2003, pp. 45-49.

[6]   K. Xie, T. K. Debacker and C. Ferguson, “Extending the Traditional Classroom through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2006, pp. 67-89. doi:10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6

[7]   M. G. Moore and G. Kearsley, “Distance Education: A Systems View,” 2nd Edition, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, 2005.

[8]   V. Roach and L. Lemasters, “Satisfaction with Online Learning: A Comparative Descriptive Study,” Journal of Interactive Online Learning, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2006, pp. 317-332.

[9]   S. J. Simon, “The Impact of Culture and Gender on Web Sites: An Empirical Study,” The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2001, pp. 18-37.

[10]   M. J. Rosenberg, “E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.

[11]   E. McFadzean and J. McKenzie, “Facilitating Virtual Learning Groups: A Practical Approach,” Journal of Mana- gement Development, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2001, pp. 470-494. doi:10.1108/02621710110399774

[12]   M. Allen, J. Bourhis, N. Burrell and E. Marbry, “Com- paring Student Satisfaction with Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta- Analysis,” US Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2002, pp. 83-97. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3

[13]   K. Hong, K. Lai and D. Holton, “Students’ Satisfaction and Perceived Learning with a Web-Based Course,” Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003, pp. 116-124.

[14]   T. J. F. Mitchell, S. Y. Chen and R. D. Macredie, “The Relationship between Web Enjoyment and Student Perceptions and Learning Using a Web-Based Tutorial,” Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2005, pp. 27-40. doi:10.1080/13581650500075546

[15]   W. Liu, K. S. Teh, R. Peiris, Y. S. Choi, A. D. Cheok, C. L. Mei-Ling, Y. L. Theng, T. H. D. Nguyen, T. C. T. Qui and A. V. Vasilakos, “Internet-Enabled User Interfaces for Distance Learning,” International Journal of Techno- logy and Human Interaction, Vol. 5, No.1, 2009, pp. 51-77. doi:10.4018/jthi.2009010105

[16]   C. Changchit, “An Exploratory Study on Students’ Perceptions of Technology Used in Distance Learning Environment,” Review of Business Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2007, pp. 31-35.

[17]   L. Hammoud, S. Love, L. Baldwin and S. Y. Chen, “Evaluating WebCT Use in Relation to Students’ Attitude and Performance,” International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2008, pp. 26-43. doi:10.4018/jicte.2008040103

[18]   A. Bandura, “Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control,” Freeman Press, New York, 1997.

[19]   M. Eastin and R. LaRose, “Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide,” Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2000.

[20]   G. Marakas, M. Yi and R. Johnson, “The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: To- ward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Reason,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1998, pp. 126-163. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.126

[21]   R. Agarwal, V. Sambamurthy and R. Stair, “The Evolving Relationship between General and Special Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, pp. 418-430. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876

[22]   F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008

[23]   F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi and P. R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

[24]   Y. Lin, “Understanding Students’ Technology Appropria- tion and Learning Perceptions in Online Learning En- vironments,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer- sity of Missouri, Columbia, 2005.

[25]   G. Hofstede, “Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.

[26]   M. Srite, J. B. Thatcher and E. Galy, “Does within-Culture Variation Matter? An Empirical Study of Computer Usa- ge,” Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1-25. doi:10.4018/jgim.2008010101

[27]   P. Zaharias, “Cross Cultural Differences in Perceptions of e-Learning Usability: An Empirical Investigation,” Inter- national Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, Vol. 4, No.3, 2008, pp. 1-26.

[28]   M. Gallivan and M. Srite, “Information Technology and Culture: Identifying Fragmentary and Holistic Perspec- tives of Culture,” Information & Organization, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2005, pp. 295-338.

[29]   M. Srite and E. Karahanna, “The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 1-26.

[30]   M. Graff, J. Davies and M. McNorton, “Cross-Cultural Differences in Computer Use, Computer Attitudes, and Cognitive Style between UK and Chinese Students,” In: G. Richards, Ed., Proceedings of World Conference on E- Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, 2003, pp. 1893- 1900.

[31]   S. Downey, R. M. Wentling, T. Wentling and A. Wads- worth, “The Relationship between National Culture and the usability of an e-Learning System,” Human Resour- ce Development International, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2005, pp. 47-64. doi:10.1080/1367886042000338245

[32]   J. L. Arbuckle, “AMOS (version 6.0),” Small Waters, Chicago, 2006.

[33]   L. A. Hayduk, “Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances,” Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1987.

[34]   K. A. Bollen, “Structural Equations with Latent Variables,” Wiley, New York, 1989.

[35]   J. H. Steiger, “Structural Model Evaluation and Modifica- tion: An Interval Estimation Approach,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1990, pp. 173-180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4