OJCE  Vol.7 No.1 , March 2017
Interaction of Twin Circular Shallow Tunnels in Soils—Parametric Study
In big and crowded cities with limited urban areas, it is sometimes necessary to build twin tunnels to overcome transportation problems. In a city like Riyadh in Saudi Arabia, tunneling becomes very essential to solve effectively traffic conjunctions and associated problems. The city started to construct big tunneling projects and it is expected in the near future to start building twin tunnels. If the design and construction process of twin tunnels are not understood and considered, damage to the tunnel lining or excessive ground surface settlement may take place. In this study, the interaction between adjacent tunnels excavated through soils in Saudi Arabia has been investigated using FE analysis and the range of the encountered soil properties. The investigation considered the effect of spacing between the twin tunnels and ground conditions on tunnel behavior. The analysis focused on the effect of constructing twin tunnels on ground surface settlement, contact pressure between lining and ground, and change in tunnel diameter. Based on the results obtained, it was observed that as the compressibility ratio, c, and spacing between tunnels decreased, the interaction effect between tunnels increased. For compressibility ratio of 0.01, the excavation of the new tunnel caused an increase in the lining deformation of the old one in the range of 0.1% to 0.3%. Furthermore, the excavation of the new tunnel leads to an increase in the contact pressure at the crown of the old one by 7% - 9%. At the spring line level, the excavation of the new tunnel had almost no effect on the far side of the old one. On the other hand, and for low compressibility ratio, the new tunnel excavation significantly affected contact pressure at the near side of the old one. For an expected tunnel life of 100 years, the results show an increase in the normalized contact pressure at the crown of the old tunnel due to the excavation of the new one in the range of 2% - 7% for compressibility ratio ranging between 0.01 - 0.1, respectively.
Cite this paper: Shalabi, F. (2017) Interaction of Twin Circular Shallow Tunnels in Soils—Parametric Study. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, 100-115. doi: 10.4236/ojce.2017.71006.

[1]   Terzaghi, K. (1946) Rock Defects and Loads on Tunnel Supports. In: Proctor, R.V. and White, T.L., Eds., Rock Tunneling with Steel Supports, Commercial Shearing and Stamping Company, Youngstown.

[2]   Morgan, H.D. (1961) A Contribution to the Analysis of Stress in a Circular Tunnel. Geotechnique, 11, 37-46.

[3]   Peck, R.B. (1969) Deep Excavation and Tunneling in Soft Ground. State of the Art Report. 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, 225-290.

[4]   Deere, D.U., Peck, R.B., Monsees, J.E., Parker, H.W. and Schmidt, B. (1969) Design of Tunnel Support Systems. Highway Research Record No. 339, 26-33.

[5]   Cording, E.J. and Deere, D.U. (1972) Rock Tunnel Supports and Field Measurements. Proceedings of 1st NARETC, Chicago, 601-622.

[6]   Peck, R.B., Hendron, A.J. and Mohraz, B. (1972) State of the Art of Soft-Ground Tunneling. International Proceedings of the North American Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, Chicago, 5-7 June 1972, 259-286.

[7]   Kulhawy, F.H. (1974) Finite Element Modeling Criteria for Underground Openings in Rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 11, 465-472.

[8]   Wood, A.M. (1975) The Circular Tunnel in Elastic Ground. Geotechnique, 25, 115-127.

[9]   Einstein, H.H. and Schwartz, C.W. (1979) Simplified Analysis for Tunnel Supports. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 105, 499-517.

[10]   Ranken, R.E., Ghaboussi, J. and Hendron, A.J. (1987) Analysis of Ground-Liner Interaction for Tunnels. Report UMTA-IL-06-0043-78-3. US Department Transportation, Washington DC.

[11]   Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989) Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. Wiley, New York.

[12]   Penzien, J. and Wu, C.L. (1998) Stresses in Linings of Bored Tunnels. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27, 283-300.<283::AID-EQE732>3.0.CO;2-T

[13]   Shalabi, F.I. (2004) Assessment of Tunnel Design Based on Different Empirical Approaches: Case Study in Jordan. International Conference on Structural and Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Technology, Mansoura, 23-25 March 2004, 1-16.

[14]   Shalabi, F. (2005) FE Analysis of Time-Dependent Behavior of Tunneling in Squeezing Ground Using Two Different Creep Models. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 20, 271-279.

[15]   Shalabi, F.I. and Cording, E.J. (2005) 3D-Finite Element Analysis of Segmental Concrete Tunnel Lining Deformation and Moments under the Effect of Static and Earthquake Loading. Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Torino, 19-24 June 2005, 75-82.

[16]   Shalabi, F., Hussam, A. and Omar, H. (2009) Elasto-Plastic Behavior of Raghadan Tunnel Based on RMR and Hoek-Brown Classification. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27, 237-248.

[17]   Shalabi, F.I., Cording, E.J. and Paul, S.L. (2012) Concrete Segment Tunnel Lining Sealant Performance under Earthquake Loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 31, 51-60.

[18]   Shalabi, F.I., Cording, E.J. and Paul, S.L. (2016) Sealant Behavior of Gasketed Segmental Tunnel Lining-Conceptual Model. Geommechanics and Tunnelling, 9, 345-355.

[19]   Tsuchiyama, S., Hayakawa, T. and Konno, H. (1988) Deformation Behavior of the Tunnel under the Excavation of Crossing Tunnel. Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Innsbruck, April 1988, 1591-1596.

[20]   Kim, S., Burd, H. and Milligan, G. (1996) Interaction between Closely Spaced Tunnels in Clay. Proceedings of International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Soil Ground, London, April 1996, 543-548.

[21]   Kim, S., Burd, H. and Milligan, G. (1998) Model Testing of Closely Spaced Tunnels in Clay. Geotechnique, 48, 375-388.

[22]   Liu, H., Small, J. and Carter, J. (2008) Full 3D Modelling for Effects of Tunneling on Existing Support Systems in the Sydney Region. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23, 399-340.

[23]   Do, N., Dias, D., Oreste, P. and Maigre, I. (2014) Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of a Mechanized Twin Tunnels in Soft Ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 42, 40-51.

[24]   Chehade F. and Shahrour I. (2008) Numerical Analysis of the Interaction between Twin-Tunnels: Influence of the Relative Position and Construction Procedure. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 23, 210-214.

[25]   Saho, J. and Kumar, J. (2013) Stability of Long Unsupported Twin Circular Tunnels in Soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 38, 326-335.

[26]   Fang, Q., Zhang, D., Li, Q. and Wong L. (2015) Effects of Twin Tunnels Construction beneath Existing Shield-Driven Twin Tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 45, 128-137.

[27]   Fargnoli, V., Boldini D. and Amorosi, A. (2015) Twin Tunnel Excavation in Coarse Grained Soils: Observation and Numerical Back-Predictions under Free Field Conditions and in Presence of a Surface Structure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 49, 454-469.

[28]   ABAQUS Theory and Users Manual, Version 10.2. Habbit, Karlsson and Sorenseb Inc., Pawtuket.

[29]   Ouyang, F. (2005) Abaqus Implementation of Creep Failure in Polymer Matrix Composites with Transverse Isotropy. Master Thesis, The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron, Akron.