Solvability of Nonlinear Sequential Fractional Dynamical Systems with Damping

Show more

1. Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to study the solvability of the following nonlinear sequential fractional dynamical systems which involve fractional Riemann- Liouville derivatives with damping:

(1.1)

In dimensional Euclidean space, where, , , , is the standard Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative with the lower limit zero, and denotes the sequential Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative presented by Miller and Ross in [1]. is a vector, a sufficiently order differentiable function; is an any matrix and ; is a continuous function.

In this connection, the so-called time-fractional diffusion equation that is obtained from the classical diffusion equation by replacing the first-order time derivative by a fractional derivative of order with has to be especially mentioned. As a consequence, the time-fractional diffusion equation appeared to be a suitable mathematical model for the so-called sub-diffusion processes and thus became important and useful for different applications. For more details on this topics one can see for instance (see [8] [9] [10]) and the reference therein.

Significant progresses have been made for the integer and fractional order differential equations (see [27] [28] [29]). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is still little information known for the solvability of the nonlinear sequential fractional dynamical systems with damping and this fact is the motivation of the present work. Our aim in this paper is to provide some suitable sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the nonlinear sequential fractional dynamical systems which involve fractional Riemann- Liouville derivatives with damping.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we will present some basic definitions and preliminary facts which will be used throughout the following sections. In Section 3, we establish a suitable concept of solutions for problem (1.1) and present the existence and uniqueness of solutions under some appropriate conditions.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we introduce some basic definitions and preliminaries which are used throughout this paper. For the -dimensional Euclidean space, let denote the Banach space of all continuous functions from into equipped with the norm for and we also introduce the space with the norm. Obviously, the space is a Banach space.

Next, for the convenience of the readers, we first present some useful definitions and fundamental facts of fractional calculus theory, which can be found in [7] [30].

Definition 2.1. The integral

is called Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order, where is the gamma function.

Definition 2.2. For a function given in the interval the expression

is called the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order q, where, denotes the integer part of number q.

Definition 2.3. 1) The Mittag-Leffler function in two parameters is defined as

where and denotes the complex plane.

In particularly, for we obtain the Mittag-Leffler function in one parameter as:

In addition, the Laplace transform of the Mittag-Leffler function is

where denotes the real parts of.

2) For an matrix, we define the Mittag-Leffler matrix function as follows:

and the Laplace transform of the Mittag-Leffler matrix function is

where is the identity matrix.

In order to study the solutions of problem (1.1), we need:

Lemma 2.4. ([30]) Let and let be the fractional integral of order If and then we have the following equality

Next, the Laplace transform formula for the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral is defined by

where is the Laplace of defined by

is a constant.

Lemma 2.5 Let and if and is a solution of the problem

(2.1)

then, satisfies the following equation

Proof. Apply Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator on both sides of the equation (2.1), we get

i.e.,

Then by Lemma 2.4, we obtain

(2.2)

It follows from (2.2) that

(2.3)

Next, let taking the Laplace transformations

and

to the Equation (2.3), one can obtain

(2.4)

Taking inverse Laplace transform to both sides of the expression (2.4), then

Finally substituting Laplace transformation of Mittag-Leffler function and Laplace convolution operator, we get the solution of the given system as

(2.5)

This completes the proof of the lemma.

According to Lemma 2.5, we give the following definition:

Definition 2.6. A function is called a generalized solution of (1.1) if it satisfies the following fractional integral equation

3. Existence of Solutions

In this section, we present the existence and uniqueness of solutions for problem (1.1) under some appropriate conditions by a well known fixed point theorem.

To obtain the global existence of mild solutions of problem (1.1), we suppose:

H(f): The function satisfied is continuous for all and there exists a constant such that

.

Now, we are in the position to present the main result of this section.

Theorem 3.1. Assume that the condition H(f) holds. Then the problem (1.1) has a unique solution on

Proof. Define the operator as

Clearly, the problem of finding solutions for system (1.1) is reduced to find the fixed point of F. Firstly, under the assumption of our theorem, it is easy to check that F maps into itself. So it is only need to show that is a contraction operator on.

Let and then for any and we have

(3.1)

Using (3.1) and induction on, it follows easily that

Therefore, we obtain

Since is the general term of the Mittag-Leffler series and this series is uniformly convergent on real axis, then for large enough, one can obtain

Hence, is a contraction operator for large integer and hence. By applying the well-known Banach’s contraction mapping principle, we know that the operator and also has a unique fixed point on So problem (1.1) has a unique solution on. This completes the proof.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful reviewing and valuable suggestions. This work is supported by National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11371125), is also supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education of Hunan Province (Grant No. 13A013). The second author is also supported by open fund of Guangxi Key laboratory of hybrid computation, NNSF of China Grants No. 11661001, the Project of Guangxi Education Department grant No. KY2016YB417.

References

[1] Baleanu, D. and Golmankhaneh, A.K. (2010) On Electromagnetic field in Frac-tional Space. Nonlinear Anal.: RWA, 11, 288-292.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.058

[2] Caffarelli, L. and Silvestre, L. (2007) An Extension Problem Related to the Fractional Laplacian. Comm. Partial Differ. Equat., 32, 1245-1260.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300600987306

[3] Caffarelli, L. and Vasseur, A. (2010) Drift Diffusion Equations with Fractional Diffusion and the Quasi-Geostrophic Equation. Annals of Math., 171, 1903-1930.
https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010.171.1903

[4] Eidelman, S.D. and Ko-chubei, A.N. (2004) Cauchy Problems for Fractional Diffusion Equations. J. Differ. Equat., 199, 211-255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2003.12.002

[5] Kochubei, A.N. (2012) Frac-tional-Parabolic Systems. Potential Anal., 37, 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-011-9243-z

[6] Lakshmikantham, V. and Vatsala, A.S. (2008) Basic Theory of Fractional Differential Equations. Nonlinear Anal., 69, 2677-2682.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042

[7] Podlubny, I. (1999) Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego.

[8] Li, K.X., Peng, J.G. and Jia, J.X. (2012) Cauchy Problems for Fractional Differential Equations with Riemann-Liouville Fractional Derivatives. J. Func. Anal., 263, 476- 510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2012.04.011

[9] Naito, K. (1987) Controllability of Semilinear Control Systems Dominated by the Linear Part. SIAM J. Control Optim., 25, 715-722. https://doi.org/10.1137/0325040

[10] Schneider, W.R. and Wyss, W. (1989) Fractional Diffusion and Wave Equations. J. Math. Phys., 30, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528578

[11] Díaz J.I., Henry, J. and Ramos, A.M. (1998) On the Approximate Controllability of Some Semilinear, Parabolic Boundary-Value Problems. Appl. Math. Optim., 37, 71- 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002459900069

[12] Fabre, C., Puel, J. and Zuazua, E. (1995) Approximate Controllability of a Semilinear Heat Equation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 125, 31-61.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500030742

[13] Kilbas, A.A., Srivastava, H.M. and Trujillo, J.J. (2006) Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. In: North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Vol. 204, Elservier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

[14] Liu, Z.H. and Li, X.W. (2013) On the Controllability of Impulsive Fractional Evolution Inclusions in Banach Spaces. J Optim. Theory Appl., 156, 167-182.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-012-0236-x

[15] Liu, Z.H., Lv, J.Y. and Sak-thivel, R. (2013) Approximate Controllability of Fractional Functional Evolution Inclusions with Delay in Hilbert Spaces. IMA. J. Math. Control In-fo.

[16] Nigmatullin, R.R. (1984) To the Theoretical Explanation of the “Universal Response”. Phys. Stat. Solidi B, 123, 739-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221230241

[17] Pazy, A. (1983) Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. Sprin-ger-Verlag, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5561-1

[18] Rykaczewski, K. (2012) Approximate Controllability of Differential of Fractional Inclutions in Hilbert Spaces. Nonlinear Anal., 75, 2701-2702.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.10.049

[19] De Teresa, L. (1998) Approx-imate Controllability of Semilinear Heat Equation in IRN. SIAM J. Control Optim., 36, 2128-2147.
https://doi.org/10.1137/S036012997322042

[20] Triggiani, R. (1977) A Note on the Lack of Exact Controllability for Mild Solutions in Banach Spaces. SIAM J. Control Optim., 15, 407-411.
https://doi.org/10.1137/0315028

[21] Triggiani, R. (1980) Addendum: A Note on the Lack of Exact Controllability for Mild Solutions in Banach Spaces. SIAM J. Control Optim., 18, 98-99.
https://doi.org/10.1137/0318007

[22] Carrasco, A. and Leiva, H. (2008) Ap-proximate Controllability of a System of Parabolic Equations with Delay. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 345, 845-853.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.068

[23] Leiva, H., Merentes, N. and Sanchez, J.L. (2012) Approximate Controllability of Semilinear Reaction Differential Equations. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.171

[24] Li, Y. and Zhou, H.X. (1996) Approximate Controllability for a Class of Semilinear Parabolic Systems with a Boundary Control. J. Sys. Sci. Math. Sci., 16, 235-251.

[25] Wang, C. (2010) Approximate Controllability of a Class of Semilinear Systems with Boundary Degeneracy. J. Evol. Equ., 10, 163-193.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-009-0044-4

[26] Wang, C. and Du, R. (2013) Approximate Controllability of a Class of Semilinear Degenerate Systems with Convection Term. J Differential Equations.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2013.01.038

[27] Ye, H.P., Gao, J.M. and Ding, Y.S. (2007) A Generalized Gronwall Inequality and Its Application to a Fractional Differential Equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 328, 1075- 1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.05.061

[28] Zhou, H.X. (1983) Approx-imate Controllability for a Class of Semilinear Abstract Equations. SIMA J. Control Optim., 22, 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1137/0322026

[29] Zhou, Y. and Jiao, F. (2010) Existence of Mild Solutions for Fractional Neutral Evolution Equations. Comput. Math. Appl., 59, 1063-1077.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.06.026

[30] Kumar, S. and Sukavanam, N. (2012) Approximate Controllability of Fractional Order Semilinear Systems with Bounded Delay. J. Differ. Equat., 252, 6163-6174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2012.02.014