AJPS  Vol.8 No.1 , January 2017
Influence of Different Geomorphic Surfaces and Profile Modification on the Growth of Maesopsis eminni (Engl) at the Yongka Western Highlands Research Garden Park Nkwen-Bamenda, North West Cameroon
Abstract: The growth of Maesopsis under the influence of various geomorphic surfaces was followed within a period of 70 months. Young plants of two months old were transplanted into 70 × 70 × 70 cm holes under natural conditions (no inputs such as manure and other amendments). A randomized complete block design was set up for the experiment, alongside a control, and growth parameters followed (height and collar circumference). Three blocks with different geomorphic surfaces were put in place for the experiment (upper slope or block 1, middle slope or block 2 and foot slope or block 3). Results of the experiment indicated that geomorphic surface had a significant effect on height but not on collar circumference. Plant height increased progressively from upper slope to foot slope; less tall trees were found at the upper slope, while the tallest trees were found at the foot slope. After 70 months, maximum average height attained by plants for the experiment was 1228.3 cm, observed in block 3 (foot slope), significant at 0.05 confidence level with respect to geomorphic surface. In blocks 1 and 2 (upper slope and middle slope), maximum average heights attained were 798.5 and 937.5 cm, respectively and were shown to be statistically equal at 0.05 confidence level. Geomorphic surface had no effect on collar circumference. Maximum average collar circumferences attained after 70 months were 62.8 cm (observed at the upper slope), 61.3 cm (observed at the middle slope) and 76.3 cm (observed at the foot slope) and the various collar circumferences were shown to be statistically the same at 0.05 confidence level. For the control, maximum height attained after 70 months was 1240 cm (observed at the foot slope). At the upper slope and middle slope, maximum average heights were respectively, 800 cm and 905 cm, and were statistically equal at the 0.05 confidence level but different from the foot slope value of 1240 cm. Maximum average collar circumference was observed at the foot slope (76.3 cm), while circumferences of 62.8 cm and 61.3 cm were respectively observed at the upper and middle slopes. In the control, collar circumference was shown to be statistically equal at the upper and middle slopes but different from that at the foot slope at 0.05 confidence level. Correlations between growth parameters were more explained for the control than for the experiment. Increasing plant height was associated with decreasing percent slope (at a p-value of 0.05) corresponding to increasing soil depth favoring root exploration and soil and water retention. Profile modification enhanced plant growth and enabled the cultivation of trees on all geomorphic surfaces.
Cite this paper: Yerima, B. , Enang, R. , Makem, C. , Guehjung, N. and Ayuk, G. (2017) Influence of Different Geomorphic Surfaces and Profile Modification on the Growth of Maesopsis eminni (Engl) at the Yongka Western Highlands Research Garden Park Nkwen-Bamenda, North West Cameroon. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 69-84. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2017.81006.

[1]   Yerima, B.P.K. (2010) Protective Measures Taken for Preserving Species Endangered of Extinction Due to the Climate Change in Yongka Western Highlands Research Garden-Park, Nkwen-Bamenda, NW Region, Cameroon. Support Africa International, 4-11.

[2]   Egger, K. (1986) Ecological Intensification. Soil Conservation and Improvement of Tropical Soils by Pastoral Agroforestry Systems. Collection Documents Systèmes Agraires, 6, 129-135.

[3]   Walters, S.J., Christopher, S.C., Kellogg, E.A. and Stevens, P.F. (1999) Plant Systematics.

[4]   Joker, D. (2000) Maesopsis eminii-48. Seed Leaflet, No. 48.

[5]   Aubreville, A. (1959) La flore forestière de la Cote d’Ivoire, 2nd Edition, 3 Vols., Centre Technique Forestier Tropical, Nogent-sur-Marne.

[6]   Buchholz, T. (2003) Silvicultural Potential of Maesopsis eminii in Uganda. I-TOO Working Paper No. 12.

[7]   Büttner, S. (2004) Seed Source, Seed Size and Seed Sowing Technique of Maesopsis eminii in Uganda—A Study on Improved Nursery Management. I-TOO Working Paper No. 16.

[8]   Hallé, N. (1962) Rhamnacées. Flore du Gabon, 4, 49-52.

[9]   Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R. and Anthony, S. (2009) Agroforestry Database: A Tree Reference and Selection Guide Version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya.

[10]   Santesson, C.G. (1926) Some Medicinal Plants from Cameroon and Their Utilizations by the Local Population. Archives of Botany, 20, 1-34.

[11]   Noumi, E. and Tchakonang, N.Y.C. (2001) Plants Used as Abortifacient in the Sangmelima Region of Southern Cameroon. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 76, 263-268.

[12]   Ainslie, J.R. (1937) List of Plants Used in Native Medicine in Nigeria. Institute Paper 7, Imperial Forestry Institute, Oxford University, Oxford.

[13]   Irvine, F.R. (1961) Woody Plants of Ghana, with Special Reference to Their Uses. Oxford University Press, London.

[14]   Harborne, J.B. and Baxter, H. (1993) Phytochemical Dictionnary and Handbook of Bioactive Compounds from Plants. Taylor and Francis, London.

[15]   Alves, T.M., Nagem, T.J., De Carvalho, L.H., Krettli, A.U. and Zani, C.L. (1997) Antiplasmodial Triterpene from Vernonia brasiliana. Planta Medica, 63, 554-555.

[16]   Geetha, T. and Varalakshmi, P. (1998) Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Lupeol Linoleate in Adjuvant Induced Arthritis. Fitoterapia, 69, 13-19.

[17]   Fokou, P.A. (2006) Chemical Investigation of Three Plants Used in Cameroonian Traditional Medicine: Maesopsis eminii (Rhamnaceae), Autranella congolensis (Sapotaceae) and Pentadesma grandifolia (Guttiferae). PhD Thesis, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld.

[18]   Fokou, P., et al. (2004) Triterpenes from Maesopsis eminii. Journal of Natural Products, 67, 2124-2126.

[19]   Soil Conservation Service (1984) Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples. Soil Survey Invest. Rep. No. 1, US Gov. Print. Office. Washington DC.

[20]   Klute, A. and Dirksen, C. (1986) Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods. In: Klute, A., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1: Physical and Miner Alogical Methods, 2nd Edition, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, ASA, Madison, 687-734.

[21]   Yerima, B.P.K. (2008) Prototype for Watershed Management and Biodiversity Conservation in the Degraded Western Highland Regions of Cameroon. Published under the Conference Sub-Themes: 4—Analysing the Multi-Functional Nature of Complex Commons. Study of the Commons, Gloucester.

[22]   Yerima, B.P.K. and Van Ranst, E. (2005) Introduction to Soil Science: Soils of the Tropics. Trafford Publishing, Bloomington.