BLR  Vol.7 No.4 , December 2016
The Graduate Law Degree Holders in the Legal Education Market: Evidence from the US, Rankings and Implications
Abstract: Given that the law is helpful, essential and non-separable with our lives, we surely would like to know the people that make laws and who practice in the legal profession. This query is the recent theme we have pursued in this and other related projects. The investigation has revealed a knowledge economy (savoir-faire) that has entwined law and the actions of law people, which growingly became edged to explain their behavior and moral and professional conduct. The expectation has been that graduate law classes are for foreign lawyers who would return to their home country to work as international lawyers or as professors. That has long been deemed as a given; but the precise reality has not been previously unraveled. With this backdrop, the current paper purports to survey the status and performance of graduate law degree holders in US law school, to rank global law schools, and explore the implications and findings concerning the processes and outcomes of their missions.
Cite this paper: Kim, K. , Borhanian, S. , Chung, K. , Park, Y. , Lee, W. and Kim, J. (2016) The Graduate Law Degree Holders in the Legal Education Market: Evidence from the US, Rankings and Implications. Beijing Law Review, 7, 371-399. doi: 10.4236/blr.2016.74031.

[1]   2012 Rankings of American LL.M/Master of Law.

[2]   Amsterdam, A. G. (1984). Clinical Legal Education—A 21st Century Perspective. Journal of Legal Education, 34, 612-618.

[3]   Black, B. S., & Caron, P. L. (2006). Ranking Law Schools: Using SSRN to Measure Scholarly Performance. Indiana Law Journal (Symposium on The Next Generation of Law School Rankings), Vol. 81, 2006; U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 52; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 05-14.

[4]   Brian Leiter’s Law School Report.

[5]   Brophy, A. L. (2015). Ranking Law Schools, 2015: Student Aptitude, Employment Outcome, and Law Review Citations. UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2624399, 28 June 2015.

[6]   Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[7]   Edwards, H. T. (1992). The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession. Michigan Law Review, 91, 34-78.

[8]   Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, Science, and Academia Graduate Education and Careers. Gender & Society, 15, 654-666.

[9]   Glendon, M. A., Gordon, M. W., & Osakwe, C. (1994). Comparative Legal Tradition: Text, Materials, and Cases on the Civil and Common Law Traditions, with Special Reference to French, German, English, and European Law. Saint Paul: West.

[10]   Kennedy, D. (1982). Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy. Journal of Legal Education, 32, 591-615.

[11]   Kim, K., Ju, H.-M., & Khatun, M. (2015). A Teacher and Researcher: A Scratch on the Science Community and Meaning of Evaluation with the Research Doctoral Programs Ranking. International Journal of Philosophy, 3, 34-46.

[12]   Korobkin, R. B. (1998). In Praise of Law School Rankings: Solutions to Coordination and Collective Action Problems. Texas Law Review, 77.

[13]   Laband, D. N. (1986). A Ranking of the Top U.S. Economics Departments by Research Productivity of Graduates. Journal of Economic Education, 17, 70-76.

[14]   Masuoka, N., Grofman, B., & Feld, S. L. (2007). The Production and Placement of Political Science Ph.D.s, 1902-2000. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40, 361-366.

[15]   McCormick, J. M., & Bernick, E. L. (1982). Graduate Training and Productivity: A Look at Who Publishes. Journal of Politics, 44, 212-227.

[16]   Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[17]   Pistor, K., Wellons, P. A., & Sachs, J. (1999). The Role of Law and Legal Institutions in Asian Economic Development, 1960-1995. New York: Oxford University Press.

[18]   Priest, G. L. (1983). Social Science Theory and Legal Education: The Law School as University. Journal of Legal Education, 33, 437-441.

[19]   Reynolds, P. D. (2015). Primer in Theory Construction: An A&B Classics Edition. London & New York: Routledge.

[20]   Savoy, P. N. (1970). Toward a New Politics of Legal Education. The Yale Law Journal, 79, 444-504.

[21]   Schmidt, B. M., & Chingos, M. M. (2007). Ranking Doctoral Programs by Placement: A New Method. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40, 523-529.

[22]   Shapiro, F. R. (2000). Most-Cited Legal Scholars. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 409.

[23]   Shapiro, F. R., & Pearse, M. (2012). The Most-Cited Law Review Articles of All Time. Michigan Law Review, 110, 1483-1520.

[24]   Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. S. (2007). Understanding the Negative Effects of Legal Education on Law Students: A Longitudinal Test of self-Determination Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 883-897.

[25]   Sherman, L. W., & Cohn, E. G. (1989). The Impact of Research on Legal Policy: The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment. Law and Society Review, 23, 117-144.

[26]   Sisk, G. C., Aggerbeck, V., Farris, N., McNevin, M., & Pitner, M. (2015). Scholarly Impact of Law School Faculties in 2015: Updating the Leiter Score Ranking for the Top Third. 12 University of St. Thomas Law Journal 100 (2015); U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-12.

[27]   Wizner, S. (2001). Law School Clinic: Legal Education in the Interests of Justice. Fordham Law Review, 70, 1929.