Back
 OJBIPHY  Vol.7 No.1 , January 2017
Studying of Common Factors Affecting Reading of Lithium Fluoride Thermo-Luminescence Dosimeter Crystal
Abstract: The aim of this study was to study the technical factors affecting the reading of TLD (LiF:Mg:Ti) for radiation dosimetry. The method adapted was an exposure of LiF:Mg:Ti crystal with γ-ray with the following filters (Hp 0.07 and Hp 10), before and after usage of filter Hp (0.07), annealing, cooling by nitrogen flux and crystal morphology by scanning electron microscope. The collected data analyzed by EXCELL software showed that: TLD average count/second (C/s) with filter Hp (10) was greater than that obtained with filter Hp (0.07) with an amount of 1191 c/s (19%). Also the analysis showed that: the average C/s without filter Hp (0.07) was greater than that with filter by an amount of 994.5 C/s (16.4%), and there was proportional linear relationship; as the applied dose increased the TLD C/s increased significantly (R2 = 0.9) based on the equations: y = 885.1x ? 286.5 and y = 860.5x + 856.8 for filtered and without filtered beam respectively, where x refers to applied dose in mGy and y refers to C/s. Also the average C/s without nitrogen flux (cooling) was greater than with nitrogen count with an amount of 52.4 C/s (11%). The annealing (without filter) causes a reduction in dose by 82.2 μGy (19.2%), and in case of annealing with filter, the dose reduced by 66.7 μGy (21.9%) relative to annealing without filter. The morphology of TLD crystal shown by scanning electron microscope SEM was a darkening surface after irradiation.
Cite this paper: Omer, M. , Alsayyari, A. , Tamboul, J. , Ali, R. , Ahmed, A. and Abukonna, A. (2017) Studying of Common Factors Affecting Reading of Lithium Fluoride Thermo-Luminescence Dosimeter Crystal. Open Journal of Biophysics, 7, 14-24. doi: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2017.71002.
References

[1]   Tochilin, E., Goldstein, N. and Miller, W.G. (1969) Beryllium Oxide as a Thermoluminescent Dosimeter. Health Physics, 16, 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-196901000-00001

[2]   Fowler, J.F. and Attix, F.H. (1966) Solid State Integrating Dosimeters. In: Attix, F.H. and Roesch, W.C., Eds., Radiation Dosimetry, 2nd Edition, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, Chap. 14.

[3]   Yamashita, T., Nada, N., Onishi, H. and Kitamura, S. (1971) Calcium Sulfate Activated by Thulium or Dysprosium for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry. Health Physics, 21, 295-300.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-197108000-00016

[4]   Al-Haj, A.N. and Lagarde, C.S. (2004) Glow Curve Evaluation in Routine Personal Dosimetry. Health Physics, 86, S15-S19.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200402001-00007

[5]   Stadtmann, H., Delgado, A. and Go’mez-Ros, J.M. (2002) Study of Real Heating Profiles in Routine TLD Readout: Influences of Temperature Lags and Non-Linearities in the Heating Profiles on the Glow Curve Shape. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 101, 141–144.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200402001-00007

[6]   Stadtmann, H., Hranitzky, C. and Brasik, N. (2006) Study of Real Time Temperature Profiles in Routine TLD Read Out—Influences of Detector Thickness and Heating Rate on Glow Curve Shape. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 119, 310-313.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci655

[7]   Kitis, G. and Tuyn, J.W.N.A. (1998) Simple Method to Correct for the Temperature Lag in TL Glow-Curve Measurements. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 31, 2065-2073.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/31/16/017

[8]   Pradhan, A.S. and Bhatt, R.C. (1979) Metal Filters for the Compensation of Photon Energy Dependence of the Response of CaS04: Dy-Teflon TLD Discs. Nuclear Instrumentation and Methods, 166, 497-501.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(79)90540-8

[9]   Leon, B.W. (2009) Using Thermoluminescent Dosimeters to Measure the Dose from High and Low Energy X-Ray Sources. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, Paper 1203.

[10]   Lee, Y., Won, Y. and Kang, K. (2015) A Method to Minimize the Fading Effects of LiF:Mg, Ti (TLD-600 and TLD-700) Using a Pre-Heat Technique. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 164, 449-455.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu302

[11]   Zimmerman, D.W., Rhyner, C.R. and Cameron, J. (1966) Thermal Annealing Effects on the Thermoluminescence of LiF. Health Physics, 12, 525-531.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-196604000-00007

[12]   Dahoud, M. and Mustafa, I. (2014) Radiation Dosimetry by TLDs Inside Human Body Phantom While Using 192Ir HDR in Breast Brachytherapy. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 3, 172-176.

[13]   Faiz, K. (2010) The Physics of Radiation Therapy. 4th Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

[14]   Savva, A. (2010) Personnel TLD Monitors, Their Calibration and Response. MSc Dissertation, University of Surrey, Guildford.

[15]   Pradhan A.S., Gopalakrishnan, A.K. and Iyer, P.S. (1992) Dose Measurement at High Atomic Number Interfaces in Megavoltage Photon Beams Using TLDs. Medical Physics, 19, 355-356.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596909

[16]   Toktamis, H. and Necmeddin Yazici, A. (2012) Effects of Annealing on Thermoluminescence Peak Positions and Trap Depths of Synthetic and Natural Quartz by Means of the Various Heating Rate Method. Chinese Physics Letters, 29, Article ID: 087802.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/29/8/087802

[17]   Attlx, F. (2004) Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry. Wiley, Hoboken.

[18]   Lucke, W.C. (1970) Intrinsic Efficiency of Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Phosphors. Report 7104, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC.

[19]   Bos, A.J. (2001) High Sensitivity Thermoluminescent Dosimetry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B, 184, 3-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00717-0

[20]   Bilskia, P., Bergerb, T., Hajekc, M., Twardaka, A., Koernerb, C. and Reitz, G. (2013) Thermoluminescence Fading Studies: Implications for Long-Duration Space Measurements in Low Earth Orbit. Radiation Measurements, 56, 303-306.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.01.045

 
 
Top