Back
 ENG  Vol.8 No.12 , December 2016
Effective Analysis by Arrangement of Multi-Baffle at Weir Downstream
Abstract: The purpose of the study is to analyze the reduction effects of multi-baffle installed for improving the scour issue of weir downstream and the study reviewed the flow reduction effect for the location of the battle and the reduction effect associated with the baffle installation. We carried out nine cases of experiments and analyzed reduction effects through the flow rate comparison for the arrangement type of the cases. As the result of the experiment, the maximum flow rate in the weir downstream of the case 1, which has no baffle installation, is measured at 2.068 m/s due to multidirectional flow and crossing waves, and channel walls had whirlpool generation on the left and right with fast discharge flow. The maximum water level showed lower water level than when the battle was installed as there is no flow resistance. The maximum stream velocity in the weir downstream from cases 2 to 9 installed with a baffle demonstrated reduction in the maximum stream velocity than before the battle was installed and showed an increased tendency than before the baffle was installed as the maximum water level is affected by flow resistance. As the result of the comparison of the reduction effect by installing the baffle, the V type of the case 6 demonstrated the best reduction effect.
Cite this paper: Kang, J. (2016) Effective Analysis by Arrangement of Multi-Baffle at Weir Downstream. Engineering, 8, 872-882. doi: 10.4236/eng.2016.812079.
References

[1]   Kim, Y.B., Jung, S.G. and Shim, S.B. (2006) Prediction of River Bed Change due to Yongdam Dam Discharge. Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 6, 69-81.

[2]   Lee, E.J. (2007) A Study on Local Scour of Fine-Grained Bed AROUND Bridge Pier Based on Shear Strength of Soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.

[3]   Cho, H.J. and Jun, W.Y. (2010) Flow Characteristics and Riverbed Change Simulation on Bridge-intensive Section. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 30, 589-598.

[4]   Yoon, J.S., Song, H.G., Jeong, S.I. and Jung, J.S. (2014) Numerical Study on Pier-Scour of Mankyeong and Dongjin River According to Saemanguem Master Plan. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference, Pusan, 9-10 May 2014, 369-374.

[5]   Lee, J.Y., Kim, K.Y., Son, S.H. and Shin, D.H. (2015) Prediction of Local Scour Development in Downstream due to Operation Rule of Movable Weir Gate. Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 15, 221-230.
https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.4.221

[6]   Korea Institute of Construction Technology (2005) The Multi-Function River Design Criteria. pp. 12-16 KICT.

[7]   Kim, C.S., Kang, J.G., Yeo, H.K. and Yeo, W.K. (2010) An Experimental Study for the Empirical Equation to Quantify the Subsidence of Riprap Scour Protection at Downstream of Vertical Drop Structures. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 43, 433-443.
https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2010.43.5.433

[8]   McLaughlin Water Engineers (1986) Evaluation of and design recommendations for drop structures in the Denver Metropolitan Area. A Report Prepared for Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District.

[9]   Agricultural Research Services (1991) ARS Construction Project Design Standard Manual. USDA, Beltsville.

[10]   Little, W.C. (1982) Model Study of Low Drop Grade Control Structures. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 108, 1132-1146.

[11]   Kim, J.H. (2004) Development of Stepped Drop Structure Effective for Energy Dissipation. Journal of Disaster Research, 6, 131-143.

[12]   Lee, J. (2016) Analysis of Hydraulic Characteristics for the Secondary Stilling Basin Using Numerical Simulation. M.D. Thesis, Hongik University, Seoul.

[13]   Cho, S. (2015) A Study on Hydraulic Energy Dissipation of Outflow Water by Baffle Block under Sluice Gate. M.D. Thesis, Incheon National University, Incheon.

[14]   Alikhani, A., Behrozi-Rad, R. and Fathi-Moghadam, M. (2010) Hydraulic Jump in Stilling Basin with Vertical End Sill. Journal of Physical Sciences, 5, 25-29.

 
 
Top