Back
 MSA  Vol.7 No.12 , December 2016
A Novel Thin-Film, Single-Junction Solar Cell Design1 to Achieve Power Conversion Efficiency above 30 Percent
Abstract: The record efficiency for a thin-film, single-junction solar cell has remained static at 28.8% since 2012. This research presents a unique design that demonstrates potential to exceed record efficiency and approach the theoretical efficiency limit of ~33.5%. The findings of this study are significant, from an efficiency standpoint, and also because the cell design can be realized using existing fabrication methods that do not require complex, post-processing steps. In this study, a benchmark simulation is developed that closely resembles a high-efficiency, front-and-back contact cell. Intrinsic performance limiters are overcome by moving the emitter and front-contact to the back of the cell to eliminate electrical grid shading and improve optical performance. To further improve performance, the P-N junction formed by the emitter layer is removed from the model to allow selective Ohmic contacts to accept (reject) minority (majority) carriers as required. The design modifications improve open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current, and fill-factor which collectively boost efficiency above 30%-primarily due to a 2% gain of incident irradiance and improved optical performance.
Cite this paper: O’Connor, J. and Michael, S. (2016) A Novel Thin-Film, Single-Junction Solar Cell Design1 to Achieve Power Conversion Efficiency above 30 Percent. Materials Sciences and Applications, 7, 823-835. doi: 10.4236/msa.2016.712063.
References

[1]   Shockley, W. and Queisser, H. (1961) Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of P-N Junction Solar Cells. Journal of Applied Physics, 32, 510-520.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1736034

[2]   Miller, O., Yablonovich, E. and Kurtz, S. (2012) Strong Internal and External Luminescence as Solar Cells Approach the Shockley-Queisser Limit. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2, 303-311.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2198434

[3]   Green, M., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. and Dunlop, E. (2016) Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 47). Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications, 24, 3-11.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2728

[4]   Miller, O. and Yablonovich, E. (2013) Photon Extraction, the Key Physics for Approaching Solar Cell Efficiency Limits. Proceedings of SPIE Conference Optics + Photonics, San Diego, 25-29 August 2013, 880807-1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2024592

[5]   Wang, X., Khan, M., Gray, J., Alam, M. and Lundstrom, M. (2016) Design of Gaas Cells Operating Close to the Shockley-Queisser Limit. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 3, 737-744.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2241594

[6]   Yablonovich, E. (2011) The Optoelectronic Physics That Just Broke the Efficiency Record in Solar Cells.
http://energyseminar.stanford.edu

[7]   Kayes, B., et al. (2011) 27.6% Conversion Efficiency—A New Record for Single Junction Solar Cells under 1 Sun Illumination. Proceedings of IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Seattle, 19-24 June 2011, 4-8.
https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc.2011.6185831

[8]   Kayes, B., et al. (2012) Light Management in Single-Junction III-V Solar Cells. SPIE Optics + Photonics Conference Plenary Presentation, San Diego, 12-16 August 2012.

[9]   Bauhuis, G., Mulder, P., Haverkamp, E., Huijben, J. and Schermer, J. (2009) 26.1% Thin-Film Gaas Cell Using Epitaxial Lift-Off. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 93, 1488-1491.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2009.03.027

[10]   O’Connor, J. and Michael, S. (2016) Impact of Operating Temperature and Absorption-Layer Thickness on All-Back-Contact Solar Cell Efficiency. Proceedings of EU Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Munich, 20-24 June 2016, 983-986.

[11]   O’Connor, J. and Michael, S. (2016) Design and Optimization of a Novel Back-Contact Solar Cell in Silvaco®. Space Photovoltaic Research and Technology Conference, Cleveland, 20-22 September 2016, 1-3.

[12]   SILVACO® (2016) ATLAS™ User’s Manual.
https://dynamic.silvaco.com/dynamicweb/jsp/downloads/
DownloadManualsAction.do?req=silentmanuals&nm=atlas

[13]   Lumb, M., Steiner, M., Geisz, J. and Walters, R. (2014) Incorporating Photon Diffusion Recycling into the Analytical Drift-Diffusion Model of High Efficiency Solar Cells. Journal of Applied Physics, 116, 116-125.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4902320

[14]   Walker, A., et al. (2015) Impact of Photon Recycling on GaAs Solar Cell Designs. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 5, 1636-1645.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2479463

[15]   Steiner, M., et al. (2013) Effects of Internal Luminescence and Internal Optics of Voc and Jsc of III-V Solar Cells. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 3, 1437-1442.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2278666

[16]   Steiauf, D., Kioupakis, E. and van de Walle, C., (1993) Auger Recombination in GaAs from First Principles. ACS Photonics, 1, 643-646.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ph500119q

[17]   IoffePhysico-Technical Institute (2016) Characteristics and Properties of Semiconductor Materials.
http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/

[18]   Lush, L., et al. (1991) Determination of Minority Carrier Lifetimes in N-Type GaAs and their Implications for Solar Cells. Proceedings of IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Las Vegas, 7-11 October 1991, 182-187.
https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc.1991.169205

[19]   Ahrenkiel, R. (1992) Measurement of Minority-Carrier Lifetime by Time-Resolved Photoluminescence. Solid State Electronics, 35, 239-250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(92)90228-5

[20]   Sopra, S.A. (2016) GaAs Optical Data.
http://www.sspectra.com/sopra

[21]   Skauli, T., et al. (2003) Improved Dispersion Relations for GaAs and Applications to Nonlinear Optics. Journal of Applied Physics, 94, 6447-6455.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1621740

[22]   Jellison Jr., G. (1992) Optical Functions of GaAs, GaP, and Ge Determined by Two-Channel Polarization Modulation Ellipsometry. Optical Materials, 1, 151-160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-3467(92)90022-F

[23]   Aspnes, D., Kelso, S., Logan, R. and Bhat, R. (1986) Optical Properties of AlGaAs. Journal of Applied Physics, 60, 754-767.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.337426

[24]   Kachare, A., Spitzer, W. and Fredrickson, J. (1976) Refractive Index of Ion-Implanted GaAs. Journal of Applied Physics, 47, 4209-4212.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.323292

[25]   Schroder, D. and Meier, D. (1984) Solar Cell Contact Resistance—A Review. IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices, 31, 637-647.
https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1984.21583

[26]   Baca, A., Ren, F., Zolper, J., Briggs, R. and Pearton, S. (1997) A Survey of Ohmic Contacts to III-V Compound Semiconductors. Thin Solid Films, 308, 599-606.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00439-2

[27]   Ren, R., Cho, A., Sivco, D., Pearton, S. and Abernathy, C. (1994) Use of Sn-Doped GaAs for Non-Alloyed Ohmic Contacts to HEMTs. Electronic Letters, 30, 912-914.
https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19940599

[28]   Green, M., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. and Dunlop, E. (2012) Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 40). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 20, 606-614.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2267

[29]   Blakemore, J. (1982) Semiconducting and Other Major Properties of Gallium Arsenide. Journal of Applied Physics, 53, 123-181.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.331665

[30]   Michael, S. and O’Connor, J. (2016) GaAs Solar Cell with Back-Surface, Alternating-Contacts. US Patent Application 15/207,128.

[31]   O’Connor, J. and Michael, S. (2016) Emitter-Less, Back-Surface, Alternating-Contact Solar Cell. US Patent Application 15/282,460.

 
 
Top