Dr. Sen, in 2016  makes use of a simple black hole generation of entropy analogy which we write as, using Planck units for 3 + 1 dimensional geometry
N, in this case, is a counting mechanism, for “particles” leaving the event horizon of a black hole and we will have more to say about an alleged counting mechanism later, while r, in this case, is a radial “distance” which is assuming a nonsingular treatment with r, in this case equivalent to an event horizon   . We will though for the sake of a model, state that we are fixing say 106 (a million) relic black holes, at the boundary of Pre Planckian to Planckian physics. And that we are when doing that, making the following transformation, as given by 
The idea of a 2nd order transition in cosmology can be looked up in    but in fact what we are examining is due to  , namely if we are looking at the generation of gravitational waves/gravitons from decay of the following mass via
Take about 1 million black holes behaving as given in Equation (3) and also assume,  , i.e. a quantum bounce, with 
And we will be using in Equation (2)
In addition, from  we will be using the following for the inflaton, if, then
Furthermore, Sciama, in 1982  allows us to write the following, namely Sciama  in 1982 argued for the lifetime of a black hole, of mass M, that the following holds
Here, if the time is about 10−44 seconds (Planck time), then. If so, then, according to  , Calmert, et al. about 0.1% of the energy emitted, in the traditional 4 dimensional black hole (3 + 1 dimensions) would be gravitons. Then, becomes linked to Gravitons according to
This would mean then 1 primordial black hole would produce, if the mass of a graviton is 10−62 grams 
Or, for a million black holes about 1058 gravitons and we would, do the following for change in energy, namely write, from  , and using 
Furthermore, we will be assuming, using for Graviton production, that, i.e. the Planck length is approximately the same as the event Horizon of the Black hole, that then we will use Equation (1) directly with the result that for 3 + 1 dimensions, we are using if we use Planck length, that
For the remainder of this document we will be working with
We will be working with Equation (13) to isolate out what we can extract from this, in terms of early universe conditions. The approximation for Gravitons and entropy is based upon, Ng, namely we will, as a start, incorporate Ng’s infinite quantum statistics idea, of entropy being equivalent to a count of particles, i.e. by 
All this will be elaborated upon in the main analysis leading to the change in inflaton values, next.
2. Isolation of the Value of the Inflaton, Using Equation (13), Equation (14)
Given the above, we can write, if we do the math, that we need to do a basic re normalization via Planck units of the above in terms of, if so then we have that we rewrite Equation (13) via
Then if we can rewrite the Equation (13). To read as follows. If the mass of a graviton is 10−62 g, and the value of Planck mass is about 10−5 g with Planck mass renormalized by Planck scaling to be 1, then in the Planck rescaling we have
Now if the frequency, initially was of the order of
We get, then that
i.e. the inflaton, nearly zero, in the Pre-Planckian regime, becomes enormously large, right after the phase transition, and we are assuming that the scale factor, is invariant, in Equation (18). If so then there is a 10255 increase in the inflaton, according to Equation (18).
3. Conclusion: Is the Increase of 10255 for the Inflaton, a Driver of Inflation?
The final question to ask, is about the N in the right hand side of Equation (1). It can be viewed, as say the number of operations, for the Universe. i.e. in this sense is a counter point to the  of Seth Lloyd which has a power relationship of the entropy being 3/4th the power of the computational bits. i.e. our suggestion is that perhaps there are many more N computations than was supposed in Seth Lloyds  reference.
This work is supported in part by National Nature Science Foundation of China grant No. 11375279.
 Beckwith, A. (2016) Gedanken Experiment for Refining the Unruh Metric Tensor Uncertainty Principle via Schwarzschild Geometry and Planckian Space-Time with Initial Nonzero Entropy and Applying the Riemannian-Penrose Inequality and Initial Kinetic Energy for a Lower Bound to Graviton Mass (Massive Gravity). Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 2, 106-124.
 Padmanabhan, T. (2005) Understanding Our Universe, Current Status and Open Issues. In: Ashatekar, A., Ed., 100 Years of Relativity, Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 175-204.
 Abbott, B., et al. (2016) Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 061102.
 Abbott, B., et al. (2016) GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence. LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 241103.
 Abbott, B., et al. (2016) Tests of General Relativity with GW150914. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 221101. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.03841.pdf
 Corda, C. (2009) Interferometric Detection of Gravitational Waves: The Definitive Test for General Relativity. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 18, 2275-2282.
 Beckwith, A. (2016) Non Linear Electrodynamics Contributing to a Minimum Vacuum Energy (“Cosmological Constant”) Allowed in Early Universe Cosmology. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 2, 25-32.