Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is one of the important obstetrical emergencies and a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. According to the World Health Organization, postpartum haemorrhage constitutes 25% of all maternal deaths worldwide  . PPH can result from several obstetrical conditions including uterine atony, placental disorders such as placenta accreta, obstetrical trauma, bleeding diathesis, and trauma to the abdomino-pelvic region. If medical treatment and other nonsurgical interventions are not able to control bleeding, the management of PPH requires surgical intervention without any delay  . After the first report of hypogastric artery ligation (HAL) in 1960s as one of the surgical procedures to prevent hysterectomy, it has gained an important place in the armamentarium of conservative treatment of obstetrical haemorrhage  . As a component of the preventive measures to decrease bleeding, both the timing and the technique of internal iliac artery ligation need to be revisited to maximize its effectiveness. The rationale for this is based on the hemodynamic studies of Burchell, which showed that IIAL reduced pelvic blood flow by 49% and pulse pressure by 85%, resulting in venous pressures in the arterial circuit thus promoting haemostasis  . However, the reported success rate of IIAL varies from 40% to 100%   , and the procedure averts hysterectomy in only 50% of cases  . Failures were more evident in atonic PPH than in other causes of PPH  . IIAL is thought to be technically difficult, and although much quicker than a hysterectomy, it is seldom attempted. Keeping this in mind, present study was undertaken to evaluate the indications and the efficacy of clinical outcomes for bilateral IIAL as a life saving surgery.
2. Material and Methods
This was retrospective study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Aurangabad between the periods of July 2014- January 2016. A total of 57 cases that had undergone anterior division of IIAL were studied. Approval of Institutional Ethics committee was taken.
3. Inclusion Criteria
Cases which required bilateral anterior division of internal iliac artery ligation were done to prevent and to control refractory postpartum haemorrhage.
4. Exclusion Criteria
Referral cases where ligation was performed in some other hospital.
The study population was selected from women admitted for delivery or as referred cases of PPH after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. All women who delivered in our hospital were given Active management of third stage of labour (AMTSL) as per WHO guidelines which included an administration of a uterotonic, preferably oxytocin, immediately after birth of the baby; controlled cord traction (CCT) to deliver the placenta; and massage of the uterine fundus after the delivery of placenta .Women referred from outside and women who delivered in our hospital and landed in PPH were given medical as well as nonsurgical management of PPH as per our SOPs of our institute and if PPH was not controlled then the woman was posted for operative intervention as a case of refractory PPH. In atonic PPH, compression sutures and if required selective devascularisation were performed. The woman who underwent BIIAL was included in the study after taking written consent and explaining the purpose of study. History pertaining to age, parity, her antenatal registration status, gestational age at the time of delivery, mode of delivery, reason for referral, conservative management received ,general condition of the women along with shock index, along with other associated interventions and investigations were noted. Indication for bilateral anterior division of internal iliac artery ligation were analysed and classified as atonic, traumatic, adherent placenta and coagulopathy. All the IIAL was done by transabdominal anterior or posterior approach and at the hands of senior Obstetrician. Efficacy of IIAL was determined in terms of controlling obstetric haemorrhage with uterine salvage and saving maternal lives. Immediate intra-operative complications in the form of injury to adjacent organs, vessels, pelvic haematoma formation or accidental ureteric ligation were noted. Post operative and remote complications were noted in the form of fever, wound infection, claudication in posterior thigh, necrosis of perineal muscles. Length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit and requirement of blood and component therapy were studied. In case of maternal mortality cause and time interval between intervention and death were analysed. Appropriate statistical analysis was done.
Government medical college, Aurangabad is having one of the busiest labour rooms from Maharashtra state catering large number of labouring women from 7 nearby districts. A total 25,091 women delivered in the hospital during study period of 17 months from July 2014 to January 2015. IIAL was performed in total fifty seven women complicated by PPH after vaginal or cesarean delivery in our hospital or referred from other hospitals. The baseline characteristics of study subjects including age, parity, gestational age, shock index and mode of delivery were shown in Table 1. Out of 57 women who had undergone BIIAL (Table 2), atonic PPH (52.63%) leads the list followed by traumatic (19.29%), adherent placenta (12.27%), mixed variety (10.52%) and coagulopathy (5.26). Efficacy of IIAL (Table 3) in terms of saving maternal life is highest (93.3%) for atonic PPH followed by 90.9% in traumatic PPH, 85.7% for adherent placenta, 71.4% for mixed variety and 66.6% for coagulopathy. Overall efficacy in terms of uterine salvage was 54.38% and in terms of saving maternal life is 87.71%. Maternal outcome in women who had undergone IIAL (Table 4); no immediate or remote complications
Table 1. Baseline characteristics in study of IIAL.
Table 2. Indications of internal iliac artery ligation.
were noted. Postoperative complication like fever (10.52%), Paralytic ileus (7.01%) and Pneumonitis (1.75%) and wound sepsis (1.75%) were observed. ICU admission was required for 22.80% cases. Length of hospital stay was <10 days in 78.94% cases. Average number of blood transfusions required is 4.1 ± 1 bag. In spite of control of obstetric haemorrhage in all cases, maternal mortality (Table 5) was seen in 7 cases secondary to sequel of massive obstetric haemorrhage.
IIAL is an effective way of controlling obstetric haemorrhage, if executed properly, timely and successfully. Previously in severe PPH or in any other surgical procedure
Table 3. Efficacy of IIAL.
Table 4. Maternal outcome.
leading to postoperative bleeding, the traditional surgical treatment was to perform an emergency obstetric hysterectomy and eliminating possibility of future fertility. Nowadays obstetrical indications for obstetric hysterectomy have become rare due to use of newer modalities to control atonic postpartum haemorrhage. IIAL is an alternative life saving procedure which preserves the reproductive capacity in circumstances where these newer modalities to control obstetric haemorrhage are not available.
Table 5. Maternal mortality.
Here we report the largest series of retrospective analysis of 57 women who underwent bilateral anterior division of IIAL for management of refractory PPH. Till date; this is the highest series of IIAL for done for obstetric indications.
Nizard J. et al. stated that IIAL for postpartum haemorrhage was not responsible for secondary infertility, uterine contractility disorders, placental perfusion insufficiency, fetal anomalies or IUGR  . Wagaarachchi P.T. et al. studied 12 women who had undergone IIAL for PPH and concluded that it was a safe and effective procedure for life threatening obstetric haemorrhage, along with the preservation of fertility  .
Iwata A. et al. reported that the success for IIAL was between 40% and 100% and it prevents hysterectomy by 50%. IIAL is reported to be less successful in hysterectomy prevention in cases with uterine atony, when compared to other causes of PPH  . Evsen Mehmet Siddik et al. noted uterine salvage in 9 of 16 (56.2%) cases with atony, and it was determined that an additional procedure, that was the ligation of the ligament propriumovariae or B-Lynch suture was needed in the atony group for the preservation of uterus  . In abnormal placentation, the traditional treatment has been hysterectomy. However, in the recent years, uterine conservative methods have been described. The necessity of IIAL in cases of abnormal placentation has been emphasised by many previous studies, in both hysterectomy and preserved uterine cases   . In our study the, efficacy of IIAL in terms of uterine salvage was between 14.2% and 73.33% and maximum was noted for atonic PPH (73.33%). This was higher than most other studies due to the fact that additional procedures like compression sutures and uterine and ovarian artery ligation had already been performed. Efficacy of IIAL in terms of saving maternal life was between 66.6% and 93.3%. Maximum efficacy in terms of saving life was noted for atonic PPH. This depicts that timely decision was having higher success rate. Overall efficacy noted in terms of uterine salvage was 54.38% and in terms of saving maternal life was 87.71%. This overall efficacy in terms of uterine salvage was low due to the fact that 6 out of 7 cases where IIAL was done underwent obstetric hysterectomy for adherent placenta. Only in one case of placenta increta, uterine salvage was possible because only the focal lobe of placenta was adherent. In all these cases intra-operative blood loss was definitely reduced due to prophylactic ligation.
Fouzia Parveen et al. reported a total of eight patients undergoing IIAL; three for atonic uterus, two for placenta previa and one each for placenta accrete, rupture uterus and coagulopathy. After successful control of haemorrhage with IIAL, no woman had delayed haemorrhage requiring re-laparotomy. The failure rate was 16.66%. This may be because of less number of cases of atony of uterus and early decision of performing IIAL. She emphasised the fact that the treatment of severe haemorrhage requires not only the technical ability to carry out an appropriate surgical procedure but the ability to make a timely decision that this operation is necessary. No complications were reported, perhaps due to the surgery being performed by experienced consultants  . Reich and Nechtow have emphasized that the biggest pitfall with IIAL was waiting too long to perform it  .
Though IIAL is life saving procedure, it also has some complications which one should know, while performing this procedure-such as inadvertent external iliac artery ligation, injuring of the internal iliac vein or the ureter. Kalburgi E. B. et al. reported no complications followed by IIAL. Our study also reported no serious intra-operative complication  .
Debasmita Mandal et al. reported a good response of atonic PPH to IIAL, and observed less postoperative morbidity in comparison to emergency hysterectomy, requiring less operating time for those experienced surgeons  .
Our study reported, IIAL is safe and effective in controlling refractory PPH and has proved itself to be a boon.
Anterior division of IIAL was effective method in controlling refractory PPH, reducing morbidity and preserving uterus and future fertility. After conventional management with all oxytocics, uterine massage and compression sutures in atonic PPH, IIAL is one of the life & uterine saving surgery. However, in cases of mixed PPH and adherent placenta, one should go for IIAL without any delay. It was a safe life saving procedure at experienced hands.
Our study recommends inclusion of Pelvic cadaveric dissection and planning of Postgraduate curriculum for demonstration of internal iliac artery dissection to facilitate expertise in IIAL which will help them to take timely decision of saving maternal lives. We also recommend creation of National Database Registry for IIAL ligation for further study.
We are immensely thankful to our beloved teacher’s Dr. D. P. Bhavthankar and Dr. M. L. Kurtadikar and Dr. Arun Mahale for sharing their pearls of wisdom with us. We are also grateful to our colleagues Dr. V. L. Deshmukh, Dr. V. Y. Kalyankar, Dr. B. V. Kalyankar and Dr. S. B. Pagare for their assistance in running the study. Last but not least, we are thankful to our patients.