The aerodynamic sound from a bluff body in a stream is an important topic of interest in fluid and environmental engineering. Many research papers have been published on the aerodynamic sound from a bluff body, such as circular and rectangular cylinders, which are summarized in review papers  -  . However, there have been fewer publications on semi-circular cylinders  -  , despite the industrial importance of the design of wing mirrors for automobiles  , Savonius wind turbine rotors  , and so on.
Takizawa et al.  studied the aerodynamic characteristics of a semi-circular cylinder by measuring the pressure distribution on the wall surface. Later, Fujita  investigated the aeroacoustic characteristics of two-dimensional cylinders of various cross-sectional configurations and showed that the rounded corners in front of the bluff body are effective at improving the aeroacoustic characteristics of the bluff body. Such a body shape looks similar to the geometry of a semi-circular cylinder. More recently, Yamagata et al.  studied the aerodynamic characteristics of a semi-circular cylinder and showed the aerodynamic/acoustic characteristics of a semi-circular cylinder at various angles of attack. It is found that the drag forces and the Sound Pressure Level (SPL) of the semi-circular cylinder are lower than the circular cylinder at certain angles of attack; this suggests that a semi-circular cylinder has superior aerodynamic/acoustic characteristics.
In order to investigate the sound source measurements from bluff bodies, experimental methods, such as acoustic impedance   , microphone array   , cross-correlation  -  , and a method based on time-resolved Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV)  -  have been reported in literature. Although these experimental methods allow the localization of the aerodynamic sound sources, the last two methods can simultaneously evaluate the sound source and velocity field, which is useful for understanding the generation mechanism of aerodynamic sound. Recently, a method using two sets of standard PIV systems has been reported for the localization of the sound source from a circular cylinder in a uniform flow  . This method allows the evaluation of the sound source without relying on the high-speed PIV system; thus, it is well suited for the detection of the sound source from a bluff body of complex geometry for industrial applications, though the applications have not yet been reported.
The purpose of this study is to examine the sound source distribution of a semi-cir- cular cylinder in a uniform flow using two sets of standard PIV systems. Particular attention is placed on the visualization of the sound source distribution related to the noise production mechanism of the semi-circular cylinder by comparing it with that of the circular cylinder.
2. Theoretical Background
According to vortex sound theory   , the acoustic sound pa can be expressed by the following equation assuming a low Mach number:
Here, c is the speed of sound; φ is the velocity potential; r is the distance from the sound source; t is time; u is the velocity vector; V is the volume of interest; xi is the position of interest; and ω is the vorticity vector. The vector product of vorticity and velocity in Equation (1) is called the Lamb vector, and the time derivative of the Lamb vector times the gradient of the velocity potential is the sound source intensity. In this paper, a planar PIV measurement is applied to the flow around the semi-circular cylinder, so the measurements are limited to a two-dimensional cross section perpendicular to the cylinder axis. Then, the time derivative of the Lamb vector in Equation (1) can be reduced to the following equation:
Here, ωz is the vorticity in z-direction; u is the stream wise velocity; and v is the normal velocity. Therefore, Equation (2) shows the sound intensity distribution of the aerodynamic sound generated from a bluff body. It should be mentioned that the velocity potential of a semi-circular cylinder is numerically obtained by solving the Laplace equation together with the Neumann boundary conditions on the wall and outer boundaries.
3. Experimental Method
The experiment was performed in an acoustic open-jet wind tunnel, which has been described in Ref.  . The test section is 190 × 190 mm and 600 mm long. A semi-cir- cular cylinder of 15 mm in diameter was placed horizontally 300 mm downstream of the contraction nozzle exit at the mid-height of the wind tunnel. The semi-circular cylinder was placed axisymmetric to the stream with the convex side facing upstream, as shown in Figure 1, where the sound pressure level (SPL) was found to be lower than that of the circular cylinder  . The experiment was performed at a mean free-stream velocity of U0 = 30 m/s, which corresponds to a Reynolds number of Re (=U0 d/ν) = 3 × 104, where d is the diameter of the semi-circular cylinder; U0 is the free-stream velocity; and ν is the kinematic viscosity of the working fluid (air). Note that the mean free- stream velocity in the test section was uniform within an accuracy of ±1%, and the free- stream turbulence level was about 1%.
The time-derivative measurement of the Lamb vector in Equation (2) is performed using two sets of standard PIV systems, which are illustrated in Figure 1. Each PIV system consists of Nd:YAG lasers (50 mJ/pulse with 15 pulses/sec), two CCD cameras (1280 × 1024 pixels with 12 bits), and a pulse generator, as described in Ref.  .
Figure 2 shows the timing chart of the illumination and imaging for the two pairs of
Figure 1. Experimental setup and measuring system.
Figure 2. Timing chart of illumination and imaging.
PIV images at a short time interval. It should be mentioned that the time interval between the first and second images of camera A is set to 5 μsec, which is also the case for the third and fourth images captured by camera B. On the other hand, the time interval between the first and third images, which corresponds to the time interval between the two instantaneous velocity vectors, is set to 200 μsec. This time interval was determined by considering the pixel resolution of the velocity measurement, which is about 0.1 pixels in the present PIV analysis; the time interval is much shorter than the time interval of the vortex shedding (2.5 msec). It should be mentioned that the time interval between the two cameras is set independent of the frame rate of the cameras in the present technique, while it is fixed at a constant for the time-resolved PIV system. The accuracy of time-derivative measurement of the present method can be adversely influenced by the illumination from laser B on the second image, while it does not lead to erroneous vectors in the present PIV analysis. This was confirmed by the analysis of the number of erroneous vectors.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Sound Spectrum
The sound spectrum of the semi-circular cylinder was measured using a microphone with a diameter of 12.7 mm, which was located over the cylinder at a vertical distance of 500 mm. Figure 3 shows the sound spectrum of the semi-circular cylinder in a uniform flow compared with that of a circular cylinder. It is found that the sound spectrum of the semi-circular cylinder has a peak spectrum around 400 Hz, while that of the circular cylinder is around 370 Hz. The Strouhal number of the semi-circular cylinder, St (=fd/U0) = 0.21, is slightly larger than that of the circular cylinder, 0.19. It is clear that the peak sound pressure level (SPL) of a semi-circular cylinder is lower than that of a circular cylinder, and the reduction effect is observed in the lower frequency range of the spectrum. These results suggest better aeroacoustic performance for a semi-circular cylinder compared with a circular cylinder.
Figure 3. Frequency spectrum of aerodynamic sound.
4.2. Mean Velocity Contour
Figure 4(a) and Figure 4(b) show the mean velocity distribution around the semi-cir- cular cylinder and the circular cylinder, respectively, which are obtained from the present PIV measurement. Note that the magnitude of the mean velocity is shown by a color contour. The major difference in the mean velocity field appears in the wake width downstream of each cylinder, which is narrower for the semi-circular cylinder than for the circular cylinder. It should be mentioned that the mean velocities of the shear layer from the edge of the semi-circular cylinder penetrate into the wake region and modify the wake structure such that the width and length of the wake are reduced in the semi-circular cylinder compared with the circular cylinder. Corresponding to this change, the accelerated mean velocity region over the semi-circular cylinder becomes shorter than that over the circular cylinder.
4.3. Visualization of Sound Source Distribution
Figure 5(a) and Figure 5(b) show the instantaneous sound source intensity distributions downstream of the semi-circular cylinder and the circular cylinder, respectively, which are evaluated from the present experimental data using Equation (2). The sound sources of the semi-circular cylinder are highly concentrated over the semi-circular cylinder and the region nearby, while those of the circular cylinder are found over the circular cylinder as well as in the near-wake region widely. This result suggests that a quantitative difference in the sound source intensity distribution is found in the semi- circular cylinder and the circular cylinder. It should be noted that the instantaneous sound source intensity shows both positive and negative values due to the contribution of the signs in the vorticity ωz.
In order to visualize the sound source intensity distribution, the RMS sound source intensity is evaluated based on 600 instantaneous velocity fields measured at 4 Hz in the flow around the semi-circular cylinder. The results are compared with those of the circular cylinder, which are shown in Figure 6(a) and Figure 6(b), respectively. Although the main feature of the sound source intensity distribution of the semi-circular cylinder looks similar to that of the circular cylinder, there are quantitative differences, such as the length and width of the shear layer and the distribution in the near wake. It is found
Figure 4. Mean velocity field: (a) semi-circular cylinder, (b) circular cylinder.
Figure 5. Instantaneous sound source intensity distribution: (a) semi-circular cylinder, (b) circular cylinder.
Figure 6. RMS intensity distribution of sound source: (a) semi-circular cylinder, (b) circular cylinder.
that the sound source magnitude and the area are reduced in the semi-circular cylinder compared with the circular cylinder. These changes are due to the reduction of the vortex shedding from the shear layers and the modification of vortices behind the semi- circular cylinder.
The measurements of the velocity field and sound source intensity distribution around a semi-circular cylinder were performed using two sets of standard PIV systems, and the results were compared with those of a circular cylinder. It was found that the magnitude and area of the sound source intensity distribution in the near wake of the semi-circular cylinder were reduced compared with those of the circular cylinder. Such change in the sound source intensity distribution is due to the modification of the time derivatives of the vorticity and velocity potential in the near wake of the semi-circular cylinder.
The authors would like to express thanks to Prof. S. Shimizu and Prof. G. Peng of Nihon University and Dr. T. Yamagata of Niigata University for their helpful comments and discussions on this work.
c: sound speed
d: diameter of cylinder
pa: acoustic sound
r: distance from sound source
Re: Reynolds number (=UD/ν)
SPL: sound pressure level (dB)
St: Strouhal number (=fD/U)
u: velocity vector
U, V: mean velocities in streamwise and normal direction, respectively
U0: free stream velocity
u, v: instantaneous streamwise and normal velocity, respectively
x, y, z: coordinates (see Figure 1)
xi: position of interest
V: volume of interest
ν: kinematic viscosity of fluid
ρ: density of fluid
φ: velocity potential
ω: vorticity vector
ωz: vorticity in z direction
Submit or recommend next manuscript to SCIRP and we will provide best service for you:
Accepting pre-submission inquiries through Email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.
A wide selection of journals (inclusive of 9 subjects, more than 200 journals)
Providing 24-hour high-quality service
User-friendly online submission system
Fair and swift peer-review system
Efficient typesetting and proofreading procedure
Display of the result of downloads and visits, as well as the number of cited articles
Maximum dissemination of your research work
Submit your manuscript at: http://papersubmission.scirp.org/
Or contact email@example.com