for example, G-proteins, protein kinases, protein phosphatases), some low-molecular compounds included into the cascade system of messenger molecules that transmit the perceived signal into the cell nucleus. Genes from the second group control transcription factors that regulate expression of certain genes, and response to the signal.

Affected by mutations occurring in various genes that control certain links of the signalling chain, signalling path to the cell nucleus and response are blocked partially or in full which leads to distortion in manifestation of the characteristic on the plant level in general or its organ level. Such phenomenon is observed in realization of many characteristics in animals and plants, including in A. thaliana. Table 1 presents several genes of Arabidopsis that control a signalling chain of signal transmission into the cell and distortions in manifestation of individual characteristics caused by those mutations.

In inheritance of such characteristics, as a rule, both allelic, and non-allelic gene interactions are observed. The simplest example of allelic gene interaction is complete suppression of expression of a recessive gene of one allelic pair by a dominant geneob

Table 1. A. thaliana genes regulating certain signalling chain links.

served almost in all crossings in the first generation hybrids.

So, for example, in A. thaliana, SHR1 gene encodes the transcription factor which controls gene expression in the cell nucleus [22] [23] . Mutation shr-1 of SHR1 gene in plants results in development of fibrous root system characterized by primary root stopping and formation of multiple secondary roots [24] . GPA1 gene is engaged in signal transmission in two-component chemosignal plant systems and encodes alfa sub- unit of G-proteins [25] . Mutation gpa1-3 for GPA1 gene is responsible for suppression of development of secondary roots in plants which leads to formation of taproot [26] . When shr-1 mutant-line plants with fibrous root are crossed with gpa1-3 mutant-line plant with a taproot, F1 hybrids form a wild-type-specific mixed root system which results from interaction between genes of two allelic pairs (shr-1 < SHR1, gpa1-3 < GPA1) [27] .

Examples of non-allelic interaction in inheritance of such characteristics are epistasis, polymery, complementary and modifying activity of genes. Complementary gene activity in A. thalianais observed in inheritance of root fibrilla shape when genes RHD3 and SAR1 interact, when the both supplementary genes are expressed independently.

RHD3 gene encodes α-sub-unit of G-proteins (GTP-binding proteins) that transmit a signal from the receptor to effector proteins which stimulates gene transcription and is responsible for the final cellular response [25] . Mutation rhd3-1 of RHD3 gene is responsible for development of wavy fibrillas of epiblema on roots [28] . SAR1 gene is a gene responsible for execution of response to a signal and encodes protein (synaptobrevin) involved, in general, in intracellular vesicles (membrane vesicles) connection with external cell membrane [29] . Mutation sar-1 in SAR1 gene leads to formation of outgrowths of root skin cells enlarged in the upper part (bulb-like) [30] .

Tubular (cylindrical) shape of root fibrillas is determined by a homozygous state of RHD3 allele, wavy shape―by rhd3-1 allele. Another allelic pair SAR1 SAR1 in a homozygous state is responsible for tubular shape of root fibrillas, whereas recessive homozygous state of sar-1 sar-1 gene results in formation of a bulb-like shape of epiblemafibrillas. When two rhd3-1 and sar-1 mutant line plants of Arabidopsis with wavy and bulb-like root fibrillas are crossed, the first generation hybrids RHD3 rhd3-1 SAR1 sar-1 turn out to have cylindrical shape of epiblemafibrillas. Self-pollination of such shapes in the second generation gives segregation of plants by phenotype in the following ratio: 9 with cylindrical shape of root fibrillas: 3 with bulb-like shape of outgrowths of root skin cells: 3 with wavy shape of epiblemafibrillas: 1 with wavy, thickened on top, shape of outgrowths of root surface cells (Table 2).

Despite the fact, that in F2 of this dihybrid crossing, nature of segregation by phenotype is not distorted, however, 1/16 of plants exhibit complementary activity of genes. In A. thaliana, joint activity in a genotype of two complementary recessive genes rhd3- 1 and sar-1, every of which by itself may be expressed independently, is responsible for formation of wavy, extended on the top root fibrillas in the second-generation plants. If any of mutant non-allelic genes is absent from the genotype, the new characteristic doesn’t develop.

Table 2. Results of hybridological analysis of F1 and F2 hybrids by the shape of root fibrillas.

Epistatic activity of genes in Arabidopsisis observed at the example of inheritance of lateral and secondary roots in the root system in interaction of GPA1 and SLR1 genes. SLR1 gene encodes the regulatory protein which controls late-response gene expression [22] [23] . Mutation slr-1 on SLR1 gene causes formation of only the primary root that doesn’t branch into lateral roots in plants. GPA1 gene encodes α-subunit heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) responsible for signal transmission from serpentine receptors to transcription factors [25] . Mutation gpa1-3 in this gene in plants is responsible for formation of taproot that has a distinct primary root which is longer and thicker than lateral roots [26] .

In A. thaliana, recessive allele gpa1-3 of GPA1 gene in homozygous state blocks development of secondary roots in the root system, and recessive allele slr-1 of another gene SLR1 also in homozygous state inhibits formation of secondary and lateral roots of the primary root. Crossing of gpa1-3 × slr-1 mutant-line plants gives the first generation hybrids of wild type, i.e. they have lateral roots of the primary root, and secondary roots. In the second generation from F1 hybrid self-pollination, segregation of plants into three phenotype classes is observed in the following ratio: 9/16 with lateral roots of the primary root, and secondary roots (GPA1_ SLR1_): 3/16 with lateral roots of the primary root but without secondary roots (gpa1-3 gpa1-3 SLR1_) : 4/16 without lateral roots of the primary root, and secondary roots (GPA1_ slr-1 slr-1, gpa1-3 gpa1-3 slr-1 slr-1) (Table 3).

Such behaviour of characteristics in inheritance may be explained by recessive epistasis of slr-1 slr-1 > GPA1_ type when recessive allele of one gene―SLR1 in homozygous state inhibits action of the dominant allele of the other gene―GPA1 in homo-or heterozygous state. And plants of slr-1 slr-1 GPA1_ genotype turn out to have no lateral roots of the primary root and no secondary roots, just like double homozygous recessive slr-1 slr-1 gpa1-3 gpa1-3, as recessive gene slr-1 in homozygous state causes formation only of the primary root that doesn’t branch into lateral roots thus it prevents dominant gene GPA1 from expressing in homozygous or heterozygous state responsible for development of secondary and lateral roots of the primary root in the

Table 3. Segregation in F2 generation by genes GPA1 and SLR1.

root system.

Polymeric activity of genes in A. thaliana is observed in inheritance of length of lateral and secondary roots of the primary root in the root system when SHY2 and MSG1 genes interact. Genes SHY2 and MSG1 encode the transcription factors which control gene expression in the cell nucleus [22] [23] . Mutations shy2-2, msg1-1 in genes SHY2, MSG1 are responsible for root branching distortion in the root system [27] .

In Arabidopsis, plants of some mutant lines―msg1-2, shy2-2 and others have a reduced degree of root branching determined by several various genes. So, for example, normal length of lateral roots of the primary root is determined by dominant genes SHY2 and MSG1, and reduced length―by recessive genes shy2-2 and msg1-2. When two plants of shy2-2 and msg1-2 mutant-lines that have reduced, comparing to the wild type, length of different-order lateral roots of the primary root, are crossed, all F1 hybrids (SHY2 shy2-2 MSG1 msg1-2) have a normal length of lateral roots. Self-pollination of such forms in F2 result in that 15/16 of all plants turn out to have varying length of lateral roots of the primary root, and 1/16 have no lateral roots (Table 4).

In this case, two dominant alleles SHY2 and MSG1 in homozygous or heterozygous state are responsible for the greatest length of lateral roots in the second generation hybrids, while unification of recessive alleles shy2-2 and msg1-2 in homozygous state is responsible for their complete absence. And the length of lateral roots depends on a number of dominant and recessive genes in the genotype. Presence of dominant alleles of two various genes SHY2 and MSG1 in homozygous or heterozygous state (SHY2_ MSG1_) is responsible for maximum length of lateral roots in 9/16 of plants. Presence of only the first recessive allele msg1-2 in homozygous state (SHY2_ msg1-2 msg1-2) or only the second recessive allele shy2-2 also in the heterozygous state (shy2-2 shy2-2 MSG1_) is responsible for various interim length of lateral roots in 6/16 of plants. Homozygous state in both recessive genes shy2-2 shy2-2 msg1-2 msg1-2 results in reduction of lateral roots in 1/16 of plants. These results may be explained by a polymeric effect of two other genes SHY2 and MSG1 on development of the same characteristic “length of lateral roots of the primary root”.

Polymeric nature of gene action is widely used in selection and directly related to heterosis. The type of polymeric gene interaction in plants usually determines inheritance of many commercially useful characteristics, such as protein amount in endos perm of corn and wheat grain, sugar content in beet-root, ear length, size of a corn cob,

Table 4. Segregation in F2 generation by genes SHY2 and MSG1.

content of vitamins in fruits and many others, including length of roots. Being aware of inheritance rules for lateral root length in the root system in gene interaction, one may by crossing, provided initial parental pairs are selected correctly, obtain, from genetic recombination, plants with positive transgressive combination in the same genotype of polymeric genes with additive action, responsible for a higher extent of root branching comparing to the both parental shapes. These plants will be a valuable material in selective programs for creation of agrochemically effective grades and hybrids.

4. Conclusions

In general, obtained study results show that the gene interaction mechanism is closely related to current idea of molecular principles of biologic responses. Development of any characteristic, property or reaction to unfavourable environmental conditions in plants is resulted from functioning of many genes that may interact in various ways. Expression regulation of these genes is controlled by endogenous and exogenous signals. They are received by specific receptors and transmitted through mediator molecules on a set of transcription factors suppressing or initiating transcription of certain genes causing the response.

Affected by mutations occurring in various genes controlling certain links of the signalling chain, signalling path to the cell nucleus and the response are blocked partially or in full which leads to distortion in expression of the characteristic on the plant level in general or its organ level. Such phenomenon is observed in realization of many characteristics in animals and plants, including in A. thaliana. When such characteristics are inherited, plants display all main forms of gene interaction. Inheritance of lateral and secondary roots in the root system in interaction of genes GPA1 and SLR1 occurs according to the recessive epistasis type (slr-1 slr-1 > GPA1_). Polymeric activity of genes SHY2 and MSG1 is observed in inheritance of length of lateral and secondary roots in the root system. Complementary gene activity is observed in inheritance of root fibrilla shape in interaction of genes RHD3 and SAR1.

Cite this paper
Hablak, S. (2016) Role of a Signalling System in Gene Interaction in Inheritance of Root System Characteristics of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.. Open Journal of Genetics, 6, 51-60. doi: 10.4236/ojgen.2016.63006.
References

[1]   Gulyaev, G.V. (1984) Genetics. Kolos, Moscow.

[2]   Inge-Vechtomov, S.G. (2000) Genetics of Plant Development. Science, Saint Petersburg.

[3]   Hablak, S.G., Chechenova, T.N. and AbdullaievaIa, A. (2012) Genetic Model in Root System Development inArabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Ecology and Nature Protection of Industry-Related Region, 1, 123-130.

[4]   Lobashev, M.E. (1985) Genetics. Publishing House of Leningrad State University, Saint Petersburg.

[5]   Kefeli, V.I. (1974) Natural Growth Inhibitors and Phitohormones. Nauka, Moscow.

[6]   Demkiv, O.T. (1981) Plant Growth and Differentiation. Nauka, Moscow.

[7]   Kulaieva, O.N. (1998) Ethylene in Plant Life. Sorosovksy Obrazovatelny Zhurnal, 11, 78-84.

[8]   Muromtsev, G.S. and Agnistikova, V.N. (1973) Plant Hormones Gibberellins. Nauka, Moscow.

[9]   Shpakov, A.O. (2009) Plant Chemosignal Systems. Cytology, 51, 721-733.

[10]   Kulaieva, O.N. (1978) On Gene Expression Regulation in Plant Cells. Physiology of Plants, 25, 990-1008.

[11]   Shestakov, S.V. (1998) Molecular Genetics of Photosynthesis. Sorosovksy Obrazovatelny Zhurnal, 9, 22-27.

[12]   Kevin, L.-C., Wang, H.L. and Ecker, J.R. (2002) Ethylene Biosynthesis and Signaling Networks. Plant Cell, 14, 131-151.

[13]   McCourt, P. (1999) Genetic Analysis of Hormone Signaling. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50, 219-243.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.219

[14]   Novikova, G.V., Stepanchenko, N.S., Nosov, A.V. and Moshkov, I.E. (2009) In the Beginning: Abscisic Acid Perception and Signallingin Plants. Physiology of Plants, 56, 806-823.

[15]   Romanov, G.A. (2009) How Cytokines Affect a Cell. Physiology of Plants, 56, 295-319.

[16]   Romanov, G.A. and Medvedev, S.S. (2006) Auxins and Cytokines in Plant Development. Physiology of Plants, 53, 309-319.

[17]   Shemarova, I.V. (2006) Role of Protein Kinase Cascades in Stress Signalling in Inferior Eukaryote Cells. Cytology, 48, 95-113.

[18]   Tsigankova, V.A., Galkina, L.A., Musatenko, L.I. and Sytnik, K.M. (2005) Genetic and Epigenetic Plant Growth and Development Control. Auxin Biosynthesis Genes and Auxin-Regulated Genes Controlling Plant Cell Division and Extension. Biopolymers & Cell, 21, 107-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7124/bc.0006E2

[19]   Rubin, B.A., Chernavina, I.A. and Potapov, N.G. (1978) Large Practical Course on Physiology of Plants. Vishay Shkola, Moscow.

[20]   Dospekhov, B.A. (1985) Field Experience Method. Agropromizdat, Moscow.

[21]   Borovikov, V. (2010) STATISTICA. Arts of Data Analysis on PC: For Professionals, Saint Petersburg, Piter.

[22]   Abel, S., Nguyen, D. and Theologis, A. (1995) The PS-lAA415-Like Family of Early Auxin-Inducible mRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Molecular Biology, 251, 533-549.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1995.0454

[23]   Helariutta, Y., Fukaki, H., Wysocka-Diller, J., Nakajima, K., Jung, J., Sena, G., Hauser, M.T. and Benfey, P.N. (2010) The SHORT-ROOT Gene Controls Radial Patterning of the Arabidopsis Root through Radial Signaling. Cell, 101, 555-567.

[24]   Hablak, S.G. (2013) Effect of SHR1 and SCR1 Genes that Regulate Activity of Root Apical Meristem on Root System Structure in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Journal of Udmurt University, 1, 46-51.

[25]   Weiss, C.A., Huang, H. and Ma, H. (1993) Immunolocalization of the G Protein Alpha Subunit Encoded by the GPA1 Gene in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 5, 1513-1528.

[26]   Hablak, S.G. and AbdullaievaIa, A. (2011) Root System Structure in Mutant Line g Protein alpha subunit1-3 (gpa1-3) Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Ecosystems, Optimization and Protection Thereof, 5, 71-78.

[27]   Hablak, S.G. and AbdullaievaIa, A. (2012) Effect of Auxin-Induced Genes on Root Branching in Root System of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Journal of Kharkiv National Agrarian University, 1, 57-63.

[28]   Shan, L., Zhao, S.-Y. and Xia, G.-M. (2008) Cloning of the Full-Length cDNA of the Wheat Involved in Salt Stress: ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 Gene (RHD3). Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 47, 881-891.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00090.x

[29]   Ono, E., Hatayama, M. and Isono, Y. (2006) Localization of a Flavonoid Biosynthetic Polyphenol Oxidase in Vacuoles. The Plant Journal, 45, 133-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02625.x

[30]   Park, M., Kim, S.J., Vitale, A. and Hwang, I. (2004) Identification of the Protein Storage Vacuole and Protein Targeting to the Vacuole in Leaf Cells of Three Plant Species. Plant Physiology, 134, 625-639.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.030635

 
 
Top