JEP  Vol.7 No.10 , September 2016
The Importance of Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity for Biodiversity in Forest—Heathland Mosaics and Implications for Heathland Conservation
Abstract: In biodiversity management, spatio-temporal heterogeneity is important to consider conserving high levels of habitat diversity and ecosystems. In this study, we investigated the relationship between landscape spatio-temporal heterogeneity and biodiversity in a mosaic-landscape, located in the Fontainebleau forest (France). The diversity of successional stages along a gradient from heathland to forest as well as the persistence of Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull in different forest stands was examined in order to find how the numerous patches of European Heathland habitat embedded in this area should be maintained. The results indicated that in the areas of high spatio-temporal heterogeneity, a general increase is observed in species richness, in particular for vascular plants, bryophytes and carabids. C. vulgaris persisted in coniferous stands and young mixed stand but decreased under deciduous trees and old mixed stands. The Ellenberg’s values for light, nutrients and acidity, show the persistence of favorable enviromental conditions for heathland vegetation under coniferous stands and young mixed stands. These results enable us to offer recommendations to better manage mosaic-landscape biodiversity, and in particular, the heathland semi-natural habitats in the Fontainebleau forest and elsewhere in Europe.
Cite this paper: Mobaied, S. , Geoffroy, J. and Machon, N. (2016) The Importance of Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity for Biodiversity in Forest—Heathland Mosaics and Implications for Heathland Conservation. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7, 1317-1332. doi: 10.4236/jep.2016.710115.

[1]   Burel, F. and Baudry, J. (2001) Ecologie du paysage. Tec and Doc-Lavoisier, Paris.

[2]   Tilman, D. and Kareiva, P. (Eds.) (1997) Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

[3]   Webb, N.R. (1998) The Traditional Management of European Heathlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 987-990.

[4]   EC Habitats Directive (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Brussels, Belgium.

[5]   Price, E.A.C. (2003) Lowland Grassland and Heathland Habitats. Routledge, London.

[6]   Aerts, R. and Berendse, F. (1988) The Effect of Increased Nutrient Availability on Vegetation Dynamics in Wet Heathlands. Vegetatio, 76, 63-69.

[7]   Aerts, R., Berendse, F., De Caluwe, H. and Schmitz, M. (1990) Competition in Heathland along an Experimental Gradient of Nutrient Availability. Oikos, 57, 310-318.

[8]   Barker, C.G., Power, S.A., Bell, J.N.B. and Orme, C.D.L. (2004) Effects of Habitat Management on Heathland Response to Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition. Biological Conservation, 120, 41-52.

[9]   Wamelink, G.W.W., de Jong, J.J., Van Dobben, H.F. and Van Wijk, M.N. (2005) Additional Costs of Nature Management Caused by Deposition. Ecological Economics, 52, 437-451.

[10]   Rosén, E. (1995) Periodic Droughts and Long-Term Dynamics of Alvar Grassland Vegetation on Oland, Sweden. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica, Praha, 30, 131-140.

[11]   Lageard, J.G.A., Wilson, D.B., Cresswell, N., Cawley, L.E., Jones, H.E. and Caporn, S.J.M. (2005) Wood Growth Response of Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull to Elevated N Deposition and Drought. Dendrochronologia, 23, 75-81.

[12]   Piessens, K., Honnay, O., Devlaeminck, R. and Hermy, M. (2006) Biotic and Abiotic Edge Effects in Highly Fragmented Heathlands Adjacent to Cropland and Forest. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114, 335-342.

[13]   Piessens, K., Honnay, O. and Hermy, M. (2005) The Role of Fragment Area and Isolation in the Conservation of Heathland Species. Biological Conservation, 122, 61-69.

[14]   Mobaied, S., Riera, B., Lalanne, A., Baguette, M. and Machon, N. (2011) The Use of Diachronic Spatial Approaches and Predictive Modelling to Study the Vegetation Dynamics of a Managed Heathland. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 73-88.

[15]   Mobaied, S. (2011) La dynamique spatiotemporelle de la végétation et l’organisation de la biodiversité des interfaces lande-forêt tempérée. Implication pour la gestion conservatoire des réserves naturelles. Thèse de Doctorat, soutenue le 04 Avril, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.

[16]   Natura 2000 Networking Programme (1992) Natura 2000 FRANCE.

[17]   Santi, E., Maccherini, S., Rocchini, D., Bonini, I., Brunialti, G., Favilli, L., Perini, C., Pezzo, F., Piazzini, S., Rota, E., Salerni, E. and Chiarucci, A. (2010) Simple to Sample: Vascular Plants as Surrogate Group in a Nature Reserve. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18, 2-11.

[18]   Vanderpoorten, A. and Engels, P. (2002) The Effects of Environmental Variation on Bryophytes at a Regional Scale. Ecography, 25, 513-522.

[19]   Pharo, E.J. and Zartman, C.E. (2007) Bryophytes in a Changing Landscape: The Hierarchical Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Ecological and Evolutionary Processes. Biological Conservation, 135, 315-325.

[20]   Niemela, J., Haila, Y. and Punttila, P. (1996) The Importance of Small-Scale Heterogeneity in Boreal Forests: Variation in Diversity of Forest-Floor Invertebrates across the Succession Gradient. Ecography, 19, 352-368.

[21]   Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1962) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

[22]   Hutchison, K. (1970) A Test for Comparing Diversities Based on the Shannon Formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 29, 151-154.

[23]   Braun-Blanquet, J. (1932) Plant Sociology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

[24]   Milan, C. and Zdenka, O. (2003) Plot Sizes Used for Phytosociological Sampling of European Vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 563-570.

[25]   Schaffers, A.P. and Sykora, K.V. (2000) Reliability of Ellenberg Indicator Values for Moisture, Nitrogen and Soil Reaction: A Comparison with Field Measurements. Journal of Vegetable Science, 11, 225-244.

[26]   Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Düll, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W. and Paulissen, D. (1991) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. ScriptaGeobot.

[27]   Jeannel, R. (1941) Coléoptères Carabiques, I. Collection Faune de France, Vol. 39, Lechevalier, Paris, 571 p.

[28]   Ormsby, T., Napoleon, E., Burke, R. and Napoleon, E.J. (2004) Getting to Know ArcGIS Desktop Basics of ArcView, ArcEditor, and ArcInfo. ESRI Press, Redlands.

[29]   Environmental Systems Research Institute ESRI (2006) ArcGis [Logiciel]. Version 9.2, Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands.

[30]   Krige, D. (1951) A Statical Problem to Some Basic Mine Valuation Problems on the Witwatersrand. Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Society of the South Africa, 52, 119-139.

[31]   Isaaks, E.H. and Srivastava, R.M. (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 413.

[32]   Addinsoft (2007) XLSTAT, Analyse de données et statistique avec MS Excel. Addinsoft, New York.

[33]   McDonald, J.H. (2008) Handbook of Biological Statistics. 2nd Edition, Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore.

[34]   Pickett, S.T.A. and White, P.S. (1985) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. AcademicPress, Orlando.

[35]   Turner, M.G. (Ed.) (1987) Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. Ecological Studies 64, Springer Verlag, New York.

[36]   Huston, M.A. (1994) Biological Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[37]   Forman, R.T.T. (1995) Land Mosaics. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[38]   Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995) Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[39]   Lassau, S.A., Hochuli, D.F., Cassis, G. and Reid, C.A.M. (2005) Effects of Habitat Complexity on Forest Beetle Diversity: Do Functional Groups Respond Consistently? Diversity and Distributions, 11, 73-82.

[40]   Ovalle, C., Del Pozo, A., Casado, M.A., Acosta, B. and De Miguel, J.M. (2006) Consequences of Landscape Heterogeneity on Grassland Diversity and Productivity in the Espinal Agroforestry System of Central Chile. Landscape Ecology, 21, 585-594.

[41]   Atauri, J.A. and de Lucio, J.V. (2001) The Role of Landscape Structure in Species Richness Distribution of Birds, Amphibians, Reptiles and Lepidopterans in Mediterranean Landscape. Landscape Ecology, 16, 147-159.

[42]   Debinski, D.M., Kindscher, K. and Jakubauskas, M.E. (1999) A Remote Sensing and GIS-Based Model of Habitats and Biodiversity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 3281-3291.

[43]   Luoto, M., Toivonen, T. and Heikkinen, R.K. (2002) Prediction of Total and Rare Plant Species Richness in Agricultural Landscapes from Satellite Images and Topographic Data. Landscape Ecology, 17, 195-217.

[44]   Moser, D., Zechmeister, H.G., Plutzar, C., Sauberer, N., Wrbka, T. and Grabherr, G. (2002) Landscape Patch Shape Complexity as an Effective Measure for Plant Species Richness in Rural Landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 17, 657-669.

[45]   Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. (1986) Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York.

[46]   Marty, P., Pe’laquier, E., Jaudron, B. and Lepart, J. (2003) Spontaneous Reforestation in a Peri-Mediterranean Landscape: History of Agricultural Systems and Dynamics of Woody Species. In: Fouache, E., Ed., The Mediterranean World Environment and History, Elsevier, Paris, 183-190.

[47]   Tatoni, T. and Roche, P. (1994) Comparison of Old-Fields and Forest Revegetation Dynamics in Provence. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 295-302.

[48]   Debussche, M., Debussche, G. and Lepart, J. (2001) Changes in the Vegetation of Quercus pubescens Woodland after Cessation of Coppicing and Grazing. Journal of Vegetation Science, 12, 81-92.

[49]   Curt, T., Prévosto, B., Klesczewski, M. and Lepart, J. (2003) Post-Grazing Scots Pine Colonization of Mid-Elevation Heathlands: Population Structure, Impact on Vegetation Composition and Diversity. Annals of Forest Science, 60, 711-724.

[50]   Johansson, M.B. (1995) The Chemical Composition of Needle and Leaf Litter from Scots Pine, Norway Spruce and White Birch in Scandinavian Forests. Forestry, 68, 49-62.

[51]   Priha, O., Grayston, S.J., Hiukka, R., Pennannen, T. and Smolander, A. (2001) Microbial Community Structure and Characteristics of the Organic Matter in Soils under Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula at Two Forest Sites. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 33, 17-24.

[52]   Millar, C.S. (1974) Decomposition of Coniferous Leaf Litter. In: Dickinson, C.H. and Pugh, G.J.F., Eds., Biology of Plant Litter Decomposition, Vol. 1, Academic Press, London, 105-128.

[53]   Sariyildiz, T., Anderson, J.M. and Kucuk, M. (2005) Effects of Tree Species and Topography on Soil Chemistry, Litter Quality, and Decomposition in Northeast Turkey. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 37, 1695-1706.

[54]   Nornberg, P., Sloth, L. and Nielsen, K.N. (1993) Rapid Changes of sandy Soils Caused by Vegetation Changes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 73, 459-468.

[55]   Miles, J. (1981) Problems in Heathland and Grassland Dynamics. Vegetatio, 46, 61-74.

[56]   Sanborn, P. (2001) Influence of Broadleaf Trees on Soil Chemical Properties: A Retrospective Study in the Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone, British Columbia, Canada. Plant and Soil, 236, 75-82.

[57]   Mallik, A.U. and Gimingham, C.H. (1985) Ecological Effects of Heather Burning. II. Effects on Seed Germination and Vegetative Regeneration. Journal of Ecology, 73, 633-644.

[58]   Valbuena, L. and Trabaud, L. (2001) Contribution of the Soil Seed Bank to Post-Fire Recovery of a Heathland. Plant Ecology, 152, 175-183.