IJAA  Vol.6 No.3 , September 2016
A Modified Relativistic Model of Gravitational Propagation
Abstract: A novel model of gravity is proposed and developed by modifying general relativity through propagating the gravitational field in an entirely analogous way to that of electromagnetic fields. It is therefore not a purely geometric model of gravitation, but is self-consistent, having clear causality and has the benefit of being inherently compatible with unified field theories. This model reproduces the observed almost constant rotational velocities of many galaxies as well as other large scale non-Keplerian motion. This is achieved without assuming the existence of dark matter and is made possible by modelling a rapidly rotating central star which with the inclusion of a velocity induced Doppler shift (of gravity) generates a highly anisotropic and intense, sheet like gravitational field. At extremely high gravitational fields this model remains real and finite i.e. does not generate a black hole, instead it asymptotically approaches a field limit below which light may escape. This is due to the inclusion of self-interaction of gravity in vacuum leading to a non-li nearity in the propagation of gravitational energy i.e. the effects of a gravitational field upon itself. This model is implemented computationally using an iterative finite element model. On the scale of our solar system these corrections are small and are shown not to be in obvious disagreement with high precision solar system tests.
Cite this paper: Merrison, J. (2016) A Modified Relativistic Model of Gravitational Propagation. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6, 312-327. doi: 10.4236/ijaa.2016.63026.

[1]   Rubin, V.C., Ford, W.K. and Thonnard, N. (1980) Rotational Properties of 21 Sc Galaxies with a Large Range of Luminosities and Radii, from NGC 4605 (R = 4 kpc) to UGC 2885 (R = 122 kpc). The Astronomical Journal, 238, 471-487.

[2]   Brownstein, J.R. and Moffat, J.W. (2007) The Bullet Cluster 1E0657-558 Evidence Shows Modified Gravity in the Absence of Dark Matter. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 29-47.

[3]   Sanders, R.H. (1990) Mass Discrepancies in Galaxies: Dark Matter and Alternatives. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 2, 1.

[4]   Bugg, D.V. (2013) A New Perspective on MOND. Canadian Journal of Physics, 91, 668-675.

[5]   Mendoza, S. and Gonzalo, J.O. (2015) Astrophysical Constraints and Insights on Extended Relativistic Gravity. Astrophysics and Space Science, 357, 133.

[6]   Famaey, B. and McGaugh, S.S. (2012) Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions. Living Reviews in Relativity, 15, 10.

[7]   Hernandez, X., Jiménez, M.A. and Allen, C. (2012) Wide Binaries as a Critical Test of Classical Gravity. The European Physical Journal C, 72, 1884.

[8]   Hernandez, X. and Jiménez, M.A. (2012) The Outskirts of Globular Clusters as Modified Gravity Probes. The Astrophysical Journal, 750, 1-9.

[9]   Mendoza, S., Bernal, T., Hernandez, X., Hidalgo, J.C. and Torres, L.A. (2013) Gravitational Lensing with f(χ) = χ3/2 Gravity in Accordance with Astrophysical Observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 433, 1802-1812.

[10]   Reyes, R., et al. (2010) Confirmation of General Relativity on Large Scales from Weak Lensing and Galaxy Velocities. Nature, 464, 256-258.

[11]   Peebles, P. (1980) The Large Scale Structure of the Universe. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

[12]   Evans, N.W. (1996) The Nature of the Galactic Dark Matter. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 278, L5-L9.

[13]   Milgrom, M. (1983) A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics as a Possible Alternative to the Hidden Mass Hypothesis. The Astrophysical Journal, 270, 365-370.

[14]   Milgrom, M. (2014) MOND Laws of Galactic Dynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 437, 2531-2541.

[15]   Mould, J., Colless, M., Erdogdu, P., Jones, H., Lucey, J., Ma, Y., Magoulas, C. and Springob, C.M. (2015) Modified Gravity and Large Scale Flows. Astrophysics and Space Science, 357, 162.

[16]   Sanders, R. (2015) A Historical Perspective on Modified Newtonian Dynamics. Canadian Journal of Physics, 93, 126-138.

[17]   Bothun, G. (2015) The Motion of Test Particles and Cosmological Interpretations: The Role of MOND. Canadian Journal of Physics, 93, 139-150.

[18]   Bekenstein, J. (2004) Relativistic Gravitation Theory for the Modified Newtonian Dynamics Paradigm. Physical Review D, 70, Article ID: 083509.

[19]   Moffat, J.W. and Toth, V.T. (2015) Rotational Velocity Curves in the Milky Way as a Test of Modified Gravity. Physical Review D, 91, Article ID: 043004.

[20]   Moffat, J.W. and Rahvar, S. (2013) The MOG Weak Field Approximation and Observational Test of Galaxy Rotation Curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 436, 1439-1451.

[21]   Clifton, T., Ferreira, P.G., Padilla, A. and Skordis, C. (2012) Modified Gravity and Cosmology. Physics Reports, 513, 1-189.

[22]   Will, C.M. (2014) The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 4.

[23]   Tully, R.B., Courtois, H., Hoffman, Y. and Pomarède, D. (2014) The Laniakea Supercluster of Galaxies. Nature, 513, 71-73.

[24]   Turyshev, S.G. (2009) Experimental Tests of General Relativity: Recent Progress and Future Directions. Physics-Uspekhi, 52, 1-27.


[26]   Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. and Thompson, M.J. (2007) The Solar Tachocline Observational Results and Issues Concerning the Tachocline. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 53-86.

[27]   Clemence, G.M. (1947) The Relativity Effect in Planetary Motions. Reviews of Modern Physics, 19, 361-364.