Received 7 July 2016; accepted 6 September 2016; published 9 September 2016
The endemic South African succulent plant Sceletium tortuosum (L.) N.E. Br., family Mesembryathemaceae, is known as kanna in Nama, kougoed in Afrikaans, and sceletium in English. This plant has one of the oldest documented histories of use in South Africa, with the earliest unequivocal written record dated to 1685  . Kolben declared that sceletium was “the greatest cheerer of the spirits, and the noblest restorative in the world”  . The plant has been used as a tea and as a masticatory for millennia by indigenous San hunter-gatherers and Nama pastoralists for endurance and well-being. An 1873 ethnobotanical record (the entry is for kaauwgoed the old Dutch name for sceletium) reports that the plant “gives strength to their limbs, and takes away pain, and makes their memory strong” (Manuscript MSS BC151 006, Manuscript and Archives Department of the University of Cape Town)  .
Over the last two decades manufactured products containing sceletium raw material and extracts have become widely available as supplements, health teas and beverages sold through farm stalls, health food shops, pharmacies and via internet and by multi-level marketing. The products are typically used for promoting a sense of calm, well-being, relieving stress, elevating mood, reducing anxiety and enhancing focus and concentration.
A proprietary standardized and characterized extract of a cultivated selection of Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin®) was shown in-vitro to be a dual 5-HT uptake inhibitor and PDE4 inhibitor  . In an in-vivo study in rats, field potential recordings were made for three doses of this extract and for a saline control  . Zembrin® dose dependently attenuated spectral power in all electroencephalogram frequency ranges to varying degrees. Comparison of the electropharmacograms of Zembrin® with the electropharmacograms of selected botanical extracts and pharmaceuticals demonstrated that this extract Sceletium tortuosum produces a similar EEG signature to Ginkgo biloba, and to the EEG signature of the synthetic PDE4-inhibitor rolipram, supporting potential health and wellness applications for improving mood and cognitive function.
1.3. Clinical Studies
Extract Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin®) has been shown to be safe and well tolerated in pre-clinical  and clinical studies  . The acute effects of extract Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin®) administration in 16 healthy young adults was studied in a pharmaco-fMRI study focused on anxiety-related activity in the amygdala and its connected neuro-circuitry. Amygdala reactivity to fearful faces under low perceptual load conditions was attenuated after a single 25.0 mg dose of Zembrin®. Follow-up connectivity analysis on the emotion matching task demonstrated that amygdale-hypothalamus coupling was also reduced. These results demonstrated for the first time the attenuating effects of Sceletium tortuosum on the threat circuitry of the human brain and provide supporting evidence that the dual 5-HT reuptake inhibition and PDE4 inhibition of Zembrin® might have anxiolytic potential by attenuating the sub-cortical threat response  .
The neurocognitive effects of extract Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin) was tested for the first time in a repeat dose crossover study in a group of adults (n = 21, mean age 54.6 years) using the CNS Vital Signs® battery of tests. Zembrin® 25.0 mg daily dosage taken for 3 weeks significantly improved executive function and cognitive set flexibility compared with the placebo group. These promising cognitive enhancing effects lend support to PDE4 inhibition as a possible mechanism of action for Zembrin®, operating through the PDE4-cAMP-PCREB cascade  .
1.4. Neurophysiological Background
Drugs typically exert their action within the organism by interaction with defined large protein molecular targets, including receptors, enzymes, ion channels, and transporters. With respect to the central nervous system, neurotransmitter receptors represent a major drug target. Interaction of drugs with these molecules induces a signaling cascade, which finally ends up with the control of ion channel conductance. Since the electric activity of single neurons depends on the set of momentarily active ion channels, communication between neurons is governed by channel activity. From here, it is obvious that electrical field potentials contain the net information of larger local networks of electrically active neurons, reflecting the interaction of drugs with their targets within the concert of neurotransmission.
Frequency analysis of the field potentials in the presence of drugs can be depicted as the so-called electropharmacogram, which has been widely used to characterize drug actions on rat  and human brains  . Interpretation of the results is made with respect to the likely underlying neurotransmitter activity responsible for changes in the selected frequency ranges, and aims at advancing an understanding of possible clinical applications in humans. The relationship between EEG delta waves and cholinergic neurotransmission was first recognized in 2005  , and it was recognized that theta waves are influenced by drugs acting at the biochemically defined norepinephrine alpha2 receptor  . Presynaptic interaction with this receptor leads to drowsiness and sleep, and increases of theta waves have been used as part of a formula describing depth of sleep in humans. Dopaminergic activity is reflected by changes in alpha2 frequencies  .
Many herbal preparations have been tested using neurophysiological techniques   . In order to characterize the psychophysiological effect of Zembrin®, a new clinical study design was used, named “EnkephaloVision”. This new approach consists of the combination of quantitative EEG recording during cognitive and emotional challenges with conventional Eye-Tracking, providing very high time resolution of epochs of 364 ms (Neurocode-Tracking)  .
In the present study 60 subjects, randomized to receive a single dose of 25.0 mg or 50.0 mg Zembrin®, or placebo, were exposed visually to 5 cognitive (Stroop-Test, Brain Teaser, Memory-Test, Picture Comparison, CPT-Test) and 4 emotional challenges (Emotion Pictures, Animal Videos and Horror Videos), by asking for task performance and watching video clips of a short duration. Regional quantitative EEG changes in the presence of these challenges during baseline recording have been documented in a preceding publication  .
2. Materials and Methods
Sixty healthy male and female subjects (30/30) aged between 40 and 75 years were recruited by announcements in the newspaper. Mean age was 51.53 ± 7.78 (male) and 51.93 ± 7.34 (female).
・ Healthy male and female subjects.
・ Age between 40 and 75 years (both included).
・ Subjects fluent in the German language.
・ Right handed.
・ BMI (body mass index) > 18 or <32.
・ Subject must be capable of giving informed consent.
・ Acceptance of written consent to participate in the study after education in written and oral form (informed consent).
・ No psychiatric or neurologic disease including epilepsy, cerebrovascular disturbance or traumatic injury.
・ No major or untreated disease including severe uncontrolled diabetes, ischemia, infarct, unstable angina pectoris or uncontrolled high blood pressure.
・ No presence of clinically relevant pathological EEG features or artifact-free portion of the screening EEG <30%.
・ No clinically relevant allergic symptoms.
・ No detection of alcohol at the time of initial examination (day SC) or on study day A (negative alcohol test) or by case history.
・ No detection of drugs (positive drug test) at the time of initial examination (day SC) or drug abuse within the last 6 months.
・ No consumption of clinically relevant medication during last fourteen days before and during the active study period based on the notification of the subject or his case history.
・ No consumption of medication with primarily central action (i.e. psychotropic drugs or centrally acting antihypertensive).
・ No known intolerance/hypersensitivity (allergy) to plant-derived extracts or any of the ingredients of the investigational product (anamnestic).
・ No presence of a rare genetic disease such as fructose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption or sucrase-isomaltase deficiency (anamnestic).
・ No consumption of unusual quantities or misuse of coffee (more than 4 cups a day), tea (more than 4 cups a day) or tobacco (more than 20 cigarettes per day).
・ No smoking on day A.
・ No participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days.
・ No positive pregnancy test (day A).
・ No lactation.
2.2. Investigational Product
The active ingredient of the investigational product is a special extract of the above ground material of a cultivated traditionally used selection of Sceletium tortuosum, Zembrin®. This is standardized and characterized after aqueous ethanolic extraction (purified water 30% V/V and ethanol 70% V/V, spray-dried onto a maltodextrin carrier), and was manufactured to GMP by Polifenoles Naturales S.L., Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain. UPLC analysis against validated analytical reference standards confirmed that the total alkaloid content of the extract conformed to the specification of 0.4% total alkaloids, and the relative concentrations of mesembrenol and mesembrenone greater than 60% by weight, and mesembrine less than 20% by weight. Active capsules contained 25.0 mg and 50.0 mg of the extract, together with mannitol as excipient, while identical-looking placebo capsules contained only mannitol. Placebo and active capsules were manufactured according to GMP by Hubertus Apotheke, Berlin, Germany.
2.3. Quantitative EEG
EnkephaloVision is the term for the new combination of quantitative EEG (Neurocode-Tracking) and Eye- Tracking.
In this study a 17-channel EEG recording was combined with Eye-Tracking. Details of the EEG recording method have been published earlier  . A new modified software for analysis of shorter time epochs of 364 ms duration was used (neo-CATEEM®, supplied by MEWICON CATEEM-Tec GmbH, 4164 Schwarzenberg, Austria). A manuscript containing details and validation of the software package―now called “Neurocode-Track- ing”―has been published  . In short: For the present new approach, the EEG frequency ranges to be analyzed had to be adjusted slightly to give the following exact ranges. Delta: 1.375 - 4.125 Hz; Theta: 4.125 - 6.875 Hz; Alpha1: 6.875 - 9.625 Hz; Alpha2: 9.625 - 12.375 Hz; Beta1: 12.375 - 17.875 Hz; Beta2: 17.875 - 34.375 Hz. This adjustment is a precondition for the new fast dynamic frequency analysis (Neurocode-Tracking) because under this condition each frequency range from delta up to alpha2 contains only one frequency (middle frequency within the particular frequency band). Data were analyzed in the current source density mode  . All other features remained identical to the classic analysis currently in use for nearly 20 years  . Maps were constructed by transforming spectral power values into spectral colors followed by additive color mixture (RGB-mode as in TV).
The recording was performed in the presence of a video clip (s. methods), which contained several different cognitive and emotional challenges in series (Table 1). The total video was presented twice: a) during baseline
Table 1. Challenges during EEG recordings at experimental days.
recording and b) 120 min after intake of one capsule Zembrin® 25.0 mg or 50.0 mg or one placebo capsule. Representative scenes from the total video are given in Figures 3-11. The time line of consecutive scenes is documented in the following Table 1.
Eye-Tracking (equipment and software from Tobii AB, S-18217 Danderyd Sweden), was performed concomitantly with Neurocode-Tracking (fast dynamic quantitative EEG recording). All mental and emotional challenges were presented as a single video clip. Single challenges were first constructed as a Power Point file and then converted into a final video clip (by Adobe Captivate software). For offline analysis and synchronization with the eye-track data a screen grabber (Adobe Captivate) was used to produce a video containing all successively calculated EEG maps of 364 ms duration. A second video was obtained from the eye-tracker software running on a separate computer. It is called a “gaze overlay” movie depicting the presented pictures, tasks or video films. In this gaze overlay video the momentary gaze of the subject is documented by a red spot. The presentation always started with an audio signal (gong). This audio signal was registered by screen capture of the EEG computer and was used for synchronization of both videos by means of a video cut software (Adobe Premiere Pro). Due to the processing time of the brain (300 to 400 ms) plus that of the computer (depends individually on the type and number of active processors!) the gaze overlay video is shifted in our case (quad core, 3.4 Giga-Hz) for one second in order to obtain synchronized images between gaze and the particular EEG epoch of 364 ms. For detailed offline documentation a movie was exported and analyzed image by image. Single representative images containing the gaze and corresponding EEG map (called an Enkephaloglyph  ) were cut from the screen by a video editing software tool available on all computers.
2.5. Statistical and Analytical Plans
EEG data from the first recording session before intake of the capsules are given as absolute numbers (µV2). For exploratory statistical evaluation the non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used. For mathematical differentiation of the different mental loads linear discriminant analysis according to Fischer was used. Results from the first three discriminant functions were projected into space (X, Y and Z coordinates), whereas results from the fourth to sixth discriminant functions were coded into red, green and blue color, respectively, followed an additive color mixture (so-called RGB-mode). In order to document statistically the different electric reaction of the brain to various cognitive and emotional loads, data from each part of the presentation were divided by the data obtained during fixation of the cross on the monitor (1 minute) at the beginning. Comparison of the effect of 25.0 mg, 50.0 mg Zembrin® capsules versus placebo was accomplished by evaluation of the second EEG recording of the day 120 minutes after intake. Data from the first recording (baseline) were set to 100% and electrophysiological changes produced by placebo or Zembrin® 25.0 mg or 50.0 mg capsules are depicted as %-changes thereof. Estimation of the number of subjects to be included into the study was performed by considering data from earlier experimental results obtained under a similar experimental design. Level of statistical significance in comparison to placebo was defined as *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.01. The study was conducted according to the Protocol after approval by the Ethikkommission [ethics committee] of the “Landesärztekammer Frankfurt, Germany on 14.07.2015 (PP_2615_HG & H_FINAL V1.0_14072015). The study was conducted from September to December 2015.
First step in the analysis was to find out if the different cognitive and visually presented emotional challenges lead to changes of spectral power. For this goal data from each type of challenge were averaged over the total presentation time of cognitive or emotional challenges in order to follow each of the brain regions with respect to the pattern of spectral power changes with respect to each frequency. These data have been published separately  . In short: Mental activation in terms of functional anatomy was observed primarily in lateral forebrain as increases of delta and theta frequencies during all challenges starting with the boring animal video. The more complex the single challenges were, the more brain regions and frequencies became involved. In addition to the frontal brain areas, the temporal and parietal areas showed changes of electric brain activity in terms of increases (delta, theta and beta waves) or decreases (alpha waves in central regions).
The absolute starting values of spectral power in the six frequency ranges (delta to beta2) are given in Table 2. These values do not differ from each other in a statistically significant way―except for the electrode position F7 and F8 with respect to delta and theta power―suggesting that both groups―placebo and verum―have a similar starting position. This allows for a pre-post comparison of drug action. These absolute values are set to 100% and drug induced changes are documented in % of these starting values.
The effect of Zembrin® was tested by using a new methodology called “EnkephaloVision”, which consists of a combination of a fast quantitative EEG analysis termed “Neurocode-Tracking” and Eye-Tracking (for details see methods). Sixty subjects were exposed to a series of mental tasks and emotional audio-visual video-clips before and 2 hours after intake of 25.0 or 50.0 mg of Zembrin® or placebo (for timeline s. Figure 1). After synchronization of the EEG video and the eye track video by means of the “gong” at the beginning of the experiment one can compare scene by scene of the combined video with respect to placebo intake or intake of the two doses of Zembrin®. Representative examples for evaluation of single scenes and a group evaluation during the picture comparison and during performance of brain teasers are documented in Figures 2-5, respectively.
For example, comparing the spectral pattern of a baseline scene during performance of a picture comparison
Figure 1. Time line of experimental day.
Table 2. Spectral power with respect to 17 locations under the recording condition “eyes open”. Comparison of the absolute starting values of both groups of subjects. Data are given as µV2 within each frequency range (delta-beta2). M = median value. E = indicates electrode positions according to the so-called 10/20 system  . Pl = placebo; 25 mg = Zembrin® 25.0 mg and 50 mg = Zembrin® 50.0 mg.
Figure 2. Representative scene of 364 ms duration during baseline recording (left side) and in the presence of 25.0 mg Zembrin® 2 h after intake (right side). Upper part: maps according to RGB mode as described under methods. Lower part left: global median spectral power (s. methods) for each of the 17 electrode positions. Colored bars represent frequency ranges: red (delta), orange (theta), yellow (alpha1), green (alpha2), turquoise (beta1), blue (beta2). Lower part right: Picture comparison presented by the Eye-Tracking software. Current glance of the volunteer is represented by a yellow-red spot.
Figure 3. Representative scene of 364 ms duration during baseline recording (left side) and in the presence of 50.0 mg Zembrin® 2 h after intake (right side). Upper part: maps according to RGB mode as described under methods. Lower part left: global median spectral power (s. methods) for each of the 17 electrode positions. Colored bars represent frequency ranges: red (delta), orange (theta), yellow (alpha1), green (alpha2), turquoise (beta1), blue (beta2). Lower part right: Picture comparison presented by the Eye-Tracking software. Current glance of the volunteer is represented by a yellow-red spot.
Figure 4. Representative scene of 364 ms duration 2 h after intake of placebo (left side) and 2 h after intake of 25.0 mg of Zembrin® (right side). Data are documented for the whole group during performance of the same brain teaser (see upper part of the images). Current glances of the volunteers are represented by yellow-red spots.
with a pattern in the presence of 25.0 mg of Zembrin® shows huge increases of delta and theta waves in the left frontal area (electrode position F3) and in the left occipital lobe (electrode position O1) as documented in Figure 2 on the right side. A similar pattern emerged in the presence of 50.0 mg Zembrin® during performance of brain teasing (Figure 3). Again increases of delta and theta waves are seen at left frontal areas (electrode positions F3 and F7 as documented in Figure 3 on the right side. Here one can also observe an increase of theta waves within the right temporal lobe (electrode position T6).
Comparable results were obtained by group analysis. During performance of brain teasing delta and theta spectral power increases in the presence of 25.0 mg of Zembrin® in the lateral forebrain (electrode positions F3 and F8) and with respect to delta also at electrode position F8, as documented in Figure 4 (Please note different scaling on the ordinate!). Intake of 50.0 mg of Zembrin® also resulted in enormous increases of delta and theta spectral power in the lateral frontal cortex at the same electrode positions during performance of brain teasing as documented in Figure 5.
Averaging the spectral power values over the duration of a single challenge like the performance of the arithmetical calculation allows for detection of changes with respect to the whole surface of the brain including statistical evaluation in comparison to placebo. Examples for this test in the presence of 25.0 or 50.0 mg of Zembrin® are given in Figure 6. In the presence of 25.0 mg of Zembrin® (Figure 6, upper image) increases of delta and theta spectral power are observed in the parietal lobe (electrode positions P3 and P4), left temporal lobe (electrode positions T3 and T5) and centrally (electrode position C3). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was only reached centrally.
In the presence of 50.0 mg of Zembrin®, increases of delta were observed within several brain regions most pronounced in the frontal lobe at electrode position F3. Here was a statistical significance of p < 0.05 was reached. The difference to placebo with respect to theta spectral power at the same location (F3) was significant with p < 0.1. At the same time beta2 power increased within several brain areas in a statistically significant manner (Figure 6, lower image).
In order to see whether there was a drug induced difference with respect to cognitive or emotional challenges, average values of spectral power were calculated on the whole series of consecutive cognitive or emotional challenges, respectively. During cognitive challenges some increases of delta and theta power were seen in the parietal lobe (P3) and temporal lobe (T5) in the presence of 25.0 mg of Zembrin®, which, however, did not reach statistical significance except for central electrode position C3 with p < 0.1 (Figure 7). In general, less alpha1 and alpha2 spectral power was produced, however, with only occasional statistical significance. The higher
Figure 5. Representative scene of 364 ms duration 2 h after intake of placebo (left side) and 2 h after intake of 50.0 mg of Zembrin® (right side). Data are documented for the whole group during performance of the same brain teaser (upper part of the image). Current glances of the volunteers are represented by yellow-red spots.
Figure 6. Local changes of spectral power with respect to all frequency ranges in the presence of 25.0 mg (upper image) or 50.0 mg of Zembrin® (lower image) during performance of the arithmetic calculation test “CPT”. Statistical comparison of time-averaged data to placebo is documented for different p values indicated by seize of the quads.
Figure 7. Local changes of spectral power with respect to all frequency ranges in the presence of 25.0 mg (upper image) or 50.0 mg of Zembrin® (lower image) during consecutive performance of all cognitive challenges. Statistical comparison of time-averaged data to placebo is documented for different p values indicated by seize of the quads.
Figure 8. Local changes of spectral power with respect to all frequency ranges in the presence of 25.0 mg (upper image) or 50.0 mg of Zembrin® (lower image) during consecutive performance of all emotional challenges. Statistical comparison of time-averaged data to placebo is documented for different p values indicated by seize of the quads.
Figure 9. Overview on spectral power changes in the delta and theta range at the frontal electrode positions F3 and F4 during single cognitive and emotional challenges. Statistical comparison to placebo data was performed according to non-parametric Wilcoxon test. *p < 0.10; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01.
Figure 10. Overview on spectral power changes in the alpha1 and alpha2 range at the frontal electrode positions F3 and F4 during single cognitive and emotional challenges. Statistical comparison to placebo data was performed according to non-parametric Wilcoxon test. *p < 0.10; **p < 0.05.
dosage of 50.0 mg of Zembrin® induced increases of delta and theta power in most brain regions: The strongest changes were observed frontally at electrode position F3 with statistical significance (p < 0.05). In addition, at this region statistically significant increase of alpha1 waves also emerged. Finally, some increases of beta2 power were detected during this series of consecutive cognitive challenges.
A similar but less pronounced pattern of changes in the presence of Zembrin® was observed during consecutive emotional challenges. A statistical trend was only seen in the presence of the higher dosage of Zembrin® with respect to delta and theta waves (Figure 8).
Since most significant drug induced changes of spectral power occurred in the lateral frontal lobe, data from this region (electrode positions F3 and F4) were averaged in order to uncover changes with respect to every single challenge. The result is depicted for placebo, 25.0 mg and 50.0 mg of Zembrin® in Figure 9 for delta and theta and in Figure 10 for alpha1 and alpha2. Beta waves did not change in this frontal region. Changes in the presence of the lower dosage only reached statistical significance in comparison to placebo during performance of brain teasing with respect to delta waves. The higher dosage of 50.0 mg of Zembrin® induced statistically significant increases of delta waves during performance of the memory test, the arithmetic calculation, brain teasing and looking at a boring animal video. Theta waves were increased during arithmetic calculation, watching emotional
pictures and looking at a boring animal video (Figure 9). Increases of alpha1 reached statistical significance during relaxation, performance of arithmetic calculations, brain teasing, looking at emotional pictures and the boring animal video. Increases of alpha2 waves reached statistical significance during relaxation, memory test, arithmetic calculation and brain teasing.
Finally, data were fed into a linear discriminant analysis in order to process all data (102 variables) and compare the effect of Zembrin® to other compounds or medications recorded during earlier clinical trials using quantitative EEG. The result is depicted in Figure 11. Both dosages of Zembrin® were projected at distance to placebo.
Evaluation of the psychometric performance revealed only a small tendency of improvement with respect to some of the tests in comparison to placebo. An overview of the results is given in Table 3. No statistical significance was reached.
Figure 11. Result of discriminant analysis based on all brain regions and frequencies 120 minutes after intake of placebo or 25 mg or 50 mg Zembrin. Results from the first three discriminant functions are depicted with the space coordinates x, y and z. Results from the next three discriminant functions are depicted as RGB color mixture like in TV technology. Zembrin® projected. Difference to baseline is taken for each drug. Diazepam and Fluoxetine are looked at 1 hour after intake, Hypericum and Zembrin® after 2 hours, all other preparations 3 hours after intake.
Table 3. Mental performance in cognitive tests: picture comparison, Stroop test, memory test, CPT-concentration perfor- mance test and brain teasers before and 2 h after intake of 1 capsule Zembrin® 25.0 mg, 50.0 mg or placebo. SD = standard deviation, SEM = standard error of the mean.
An important issue with regard to interpretation of quantitative EEG features is to discriminate between so- called baseline activity recorded during a relaxed state (usually with eyes open) and during sensory input or under mental load. As shown in 1974  and later  as well as in the 1990’s. Schober  , cognitive process- ing induced prominent increases of frontal spectral delta and theta power. This has also been verified using the newly developed methodology of EnkephaloVision  , and in addition to increases of delta and theta power within the frontal brain, increases of beta power in temporal and parietal regions were observed. Spectral delta power is usually accepted to be related to sleep  , however during sleep the extent of increase is much higher and occurs in all brain regions, whereas delta increase during mental loads is restricted to the frontal brain. Interestingly, higher delta and theta power have been related to estimation of mental energy versus tiredness, where increases indicated higher mental energy  . It has been even suggested that psychometric testing could be replaced by direct measurement of quantitative EEG using source density analysis  .
It is known from the literature that oscillatory brain dynamics in the theta frequency range are functionally related to the retrieval of lexical semantic information  . Spectral theta oscillations have also been described earlier by other authors during a working memory task  . The present investigation revealed that the same frequencies in the same brain regions were changed in the presence of Zembrin®. Increases of delta and theta spectral power in the frontal brain indicate stronger mental activation, and in the presence of Zembrin® this happens to occur during cognitive and emotional challenges to a significant degree in comparison to placebo.
Within the frontal brain increases of alpha1 spectral power were also observed in the presence of Zembrin®. Higher spectral alpha1 power indicates relaxation and a higher degree of calmness  . In addition, there is evidence from a study in Parkinson patients that those suffering from depressive symptomatology showed significantly lower absolute alpha1 spectral power  . The increase observed in the presence of Zembrin® may be interpreted as a positive effect on calmness and mood.
During performance of the memory test, the arithmetic calculation and solving brain teasers alpha2 spectral power was increased in the presence of Zembrin® in frontal brain. In addition to theta power, alpha2 power in particular has been related to memory processes   . Since spectral alpha power has been used to discriminate patients with mild cognitive impairment from controls during a memory working task  , it can be extrapolated that Zembrin® may have a positive influence on memory related brain processes.
Cognitive challenges also lead to increases of beta2 spectral power as reported earlier  . The additional increases of beta2 power as observed in the temporal, parietal and occipital region during this experimental series- i.e. during performance of arithmetic calculation in the presence of the higher dosage of Zembrin® may therefore indicate a positive action of Zembrin® on those electrical circuits involved during cognitive processing. This reasoning is underlined by a positive tendency with respect to psychometric performance in the presence of both dosages of Zembrin®. Possibly, the duration of the different tasks was too short to unravel statistically significant actions.
Feeding all 102 parameters into a linear discriminant analysis revealed not only a distance between placebo and Zembrin®, but also a distance between the two dosages of Zembrin®. This may indicate a dose-response, with slightly different action of the two dosages: the 25 mg dose projects not far from L-theanine, used as to reduce psychological stress and enhance concentration, and the 50 mg dose projects in the vicinity of Hypericum extract, typically recommended or prescribed for treatment of depression.
The present investigation was undertaken in order to find out if single doses of Zembrin® could change the activity of electric circuits of the brain only two hours after ingestion, under the condition of several cognitive and emotional challenges documented by concomitant Eye-Tracking. In comparison to placebo, Zembrin® induced enhanced increases in power of frontal delta, theta, alpha1 and alpha2 frequencies during several tasks. Since increases in these frequencies in the frontal brain have been related to attention and memory, these results may represent a positive dose dependent action of Zembrin® on cognitive and emotional processes in the brain.
Mrs. Ingrid K. Keplinger-Dimpfel is thanked for performance of the logistics of the study and quality control. We greatly appreciate the experimental work as well as the data documentation performed by Mrs. Leonie Schombert.