CWEEE  Vol.5 No.4 , October 2016
Water Resource Pricing Study Based on Water Quality Fuzzy Evaluation: A Case Study of Hefei City
Abstract: Price plays an important role in water resources management. The price of water resources can also be considered as a “water resource tax” which reflects the value and opportunity cost of water, and people will pay for the right to use water. Currently, the water resource fees’ effect of regulating resource differential revenues is not manifest and it’s not enough to reflect the principle of paid use of resources as well as regulating resources differential revenues. Due to the ambiguity and complexity of water resources price, this paper uses methods relating to fuzzy mathematics for modeling and processing. The study had a comprehensive consideration of five factors including water quality, water resources per capita, household consumption level, per capita GNP, population or population density to evaluate the water resource price.
Cite this paper: Duan, Y. , Liu, G. (2016) Water Resource Pricing Study Based on Water Quality Fuzzy Evaluation: A Case Study of Hefei City. Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, 5, 99-111. doi: 10.4236/cweee.2016.54010.

[1]   Hung, M.F. and Chie, B.T. (2013) Residential Water Use: Efficiency, Affordability, and Price Elasticity. Water Resources Management, 27, 275-291.

[2]   Liu, X.L., Chen, X.K. and Wang, S.Y. (2009) Evaluating and Predicting Shadow Prices of Water Resources in China and Its Nine Major River Basins. Water Resources Management, 23, 1467-1478.

[3]   Ma, X.Z., Zhang, S.Q. and Mu, Q. (2014) How Do Residents Respond to Price under Increasing Block Tariffs? Evidence from Experiments in Urban Residential Water Demand in Beijing. Water Resources Management, 28, 4895-4909.

[4]   Wichelns, D. (2013) Enhancing the Performance of Water Prices and Tariff Structures in Achieving Socially Desirable Outcomes. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 29, 310-326.

[5]   Wichman, C.J. (2014) Perceived Price in Residential Water Demand: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107, 308-323.

[6]   Wood, M. and Alsayegh, O.A. (2014) Impact of Oil Prices, Economic Diversification Policies and Energy Conservation Programs on the Electricity and Water Demands in Kuwait. Energy Policy, 66, 144-156.

[7]   Yoo, J., Simonit, S., Kinzig, A.P. and Perrings, C. (2014) Estimating the Price Elasticity of Residential Water Demand: The Case of Phoenix, Arizona. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 36, 333-350.

[8]   Yoskowitz, D.W. (2002) Price Dispersion and Price Discrimination: Empirical Evidence from a Spot Market for Water. Review of Industrial Organization, 20, 283-289.

[9]   Yusuf, A.A. and Koundouri, P. (2005) Willingness to Pay for Water and Location Bias in Hedonic Price Analysis: Evidence from the Indonesian Housing Market. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 821-836.

[10]   Zhong, L.J. and Mol, A.P.J. (2010) Water Price Reforms in China: Policy-Making and Implementation. Water Resources Management, 24, 377-396.

[11]   Zilberman, D., Sproul, T., Rajagopal, D., Sexton, S. and Hellegers, P. (2008) Rising Energy Prices and the Economics of Water in Agriculture. Water Policy, 10, 11-21.

[12]   Ziolkowska, J.R. (2015) Shadow Price of Water for Irrigation—A Case of the High Plains. Agricultural Water Management, 153, 20-31.

[13]   Zuo, A., Wheeler, S.A., Boxall, P., Adamowicz, W.L. and MacDonald, D.H. (2015) Identifying Water Prices at Which Australian Farmers Will Exit Irrigation: Results of a Stated Preference Survey. Economic Record, 91, 109-123.