Back
 OJCE  Vol.6 No.4 , September 2016
Structural Topology Optimization Method for Morphogenesis of Dendriforms
Abstract: The topology optimization method of continuum structures is adopted for the morphogenesis of dendriforms during the conceptual design phase. The topology optimization model with minimizing structural strain energy as objective and subject to structural weight constraint is established by the independent continuous mapping method (ICM) which is a popular and efficient method for the topology optimization of continuum structures. This optimization model is an optimization problem with a single constraint and can be solved by the iteration formula established based on the saddle condition. Taking the morphogenesis of a plane dendriform as an example, the influences on topologies of the dendriform are discussed for several factors such as the ratio of the reserved weight to the total weight, the stiffness and the geometry shape of the roof structure, the height of the design area, and so on. And several examples of application scenarios are presented, too. Numerical examples show that the proposed structural topology optimization method for the morphogenesis of dendriforms is feasible. It can provide diversiform topologies for the conceptual design of dendriforms.
Cite this paper: Peng, X. (2016) Structural Topology Optimization Method for Morphogenesis of Dendriforms. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 6, 526-536. doi: 10.4236/ojce.2016.64045.
References

[1]   Riann, I.M. and Sassone, M. (2014) Tree-Inspired Dendriforms and Fractal-Like Branching Structures in Architecture: A Brief Historical Overview. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3, 298-323.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.03.006

[2]   Gawell, E. (2013) Non-Euclidean Geometry in the Modeling of Contemporary Architectural Forms. The Journal of Polish Society for Geometry and Engineering Graphics, 24, 35-43.

[3]   Li, R. (2014) Research on Branching Structures Based on Fractal Theory. Barbin Institute of Technology, Harbin. (In Chinese)

[4]   von Buelow, P. (2007) A Geometric Comparison of Branching Structures in Tension and Compression versus Minimal Paths. Proceeding of IASS 2007, University IUAV of Venice, Venice, 252.

[5]   Wu, Y., Zhang, J.L. and Cao, Z.G. (2011) Form-Finding Analysis and Engineering Application of Branching Structures. Journal of Building Structures, 32, 162-168. (In Chinese)

[6]   Zhang, Q., Chen, Z.H., Wang, X.D. and Liu, H.B. (2015) Form-Finding of Tree Structures Based on Sliding Cable Element. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 48, 362-371. (In Chinese)

[7]   Cui, C.Y., Jiang, B.S. and Cui, G.Y. (2013) The Sensitivity-Based Morphogenesis Method for Framed Structures. China Civil Engineering Journal, 46, 1-8.

[8]   Cui, C.Y. and Yan, H. (2006) An Advanced Structural Morphogenesis Technique—Extended Evolutionary Structural Optimization Method and Its Engineering Applications. China Civil Engineering Journal, 39, 42-47.

[9]   Sasaki, M. (2007) Morphogenesis of Flux Structure. AA Publications, London.

[10]   Huang, X.D. and Xie, Y.-M. (2010) A Further Review of ESO Type Methods for Topology Optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 41, 671-683.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0487-9

[11]   Sigmund, O. and Maute, K. (2013) Topology Optimization Approaches—A Comparative Review. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48, 1031-1055.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6

[12]   Sui, Y.K. and Ye, H.L. (2013) Continuum Topology Optimization Methods ICM. Science Press, Beijing, 1-27.

[13]   Liu, X. (2014) Morphogenesis Research for Branching Skeleton Structures of Wall. Barbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 6-7.

 
 
Top