OJPS  Vol.1 No.1 , August 2011
China’s Sui Generis plus Oxymoron- its justification
Author(s) Shaocheng Tang
ABSTRACT
In recent years, China’s overall performance stood out extraordinarily. Although the PRC is not only a socialist but also a developing country, it still has offered financial relief to European countries. None of Beijing’s leaders has been directly elected by the people, but most of them have been proven to be competent. Does this mean that the “Beijing Consensus” has taken over “Washington Consensus”? Given China’s vast population and its unique geographical environment and historical development, compared to European countries, China is sui generis. In the traditional Confucianism, benevolence (仁) is a virtue which human beings are born with, while the Western world is rooted deeply in the Christian culture of “original sin”. As a result the rule of virtue in China contrasts the rule of law in the West, harmony vs. contradiction. China’s “socialist market economy” and “Three Represents” are typical oxymorons but with great success. Since the implementation of a “socialist market economy” in 1992 there has been much more market economy than socialism. Currently, political, social and cultural sectors are lagging behind. Therefore, the gap between the rich and the poor must be reduced efficiently. Nonetheless, the corruption problem remains as another serious and important issue for the CCP. Without independent anti-corruption authorities, it would be extremely difficult for them to tackle this problem. For the time being the Mainland has to count on the leadership to set examples for others.

Cite this paper
nullTang, S. (2011) China’s Sui Generis plus Oxymoron- its justification. Open Journal of Political Science, 1, 1-9. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2011.11001.
References
[1]   Axinn, S. (2006). The first western pragmatist, immanuel kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 33, 83-94. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00337.x

[2]   Bell, D. A. (2007). China’s new Confucianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[3]   Bolton, P., & Mathias, D. (2005). Contract theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[4]   Chang, G. (2002) The coming collapse of China. New York, NY: Random House.

[5]   Chang, M. (2007). Let us now praise Hu Jintao. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/IG27Ad02.html;

[6]   Demenchonok, E. (2009). The universal concept of human rights as a regulative principle: Freedom versus paternalism. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68, 273-301. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00624.x

[7]   Deng, X. P., (1994). Selected works of Deng Xiaoping (Beijing: People’s Publishing House). China’s goal is to achieve “Xiao Kang” in this century (December 6, 1979), pp. 237-238; 鄧小平,鄧小平文選 (北京:人民出版社,1994)《中國本世紀的目標是實現小康》(1979年12月6日),第237-238頁。

[8]   Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

[9]   Fuchs, T. (2006). The European China-Receptions from Leibniz to Kant translation by MARTIN SCH?NFELD. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 33, 35-49. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00334.x

[10]   Gertz, B. (2000). The China threat: How the People’s Republic targets America. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.

[11]   Global Leadership Poll, June 23, 2008, 93% Chinese Support Hu Jintao, http://www.asianoffbeat.com/default.asp?display=1841.

[12]   Halper, S. (2010). The Beijing consensus: How China’s authoritarian model will dominate the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Basic Books.

[13]   Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10318-000

[14]   Hawkins, M. (1997). Social Darwinism in European and American thought 1860-1945: Nature and model and nature as threat. Cam- bridge, London: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558481

[15]   Helmut, von G., Kant und die Religionen des Osten (Kitzingen: Holzner, 1954): 89; Kant also called Confucius “the Chinese Socrates”.

[16]   Hogg, C. (21 November 2010). Thousands gather to mourn for 58 Shanghai flat fire victims (video). BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11805473.

[17]   Hu J. T. on the Seventeenth Party Congress Report. 胡錦濤在黨的十七大上的報告, http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2007-10/24/content_6938568_3.htm.

[18]   Ivanhoe, P. J. (1996). Self-cultivation in early confucianism. Francis Seaman Visiting Scholar Lecture Series. Philosophy Department, Idaho, University of Idaho.

[19]   Jacques, M. (2009). When China rules the world: The RISE of the middle kingdom and the end of the western world. London: Allen Lane.

[20]   Jekins, S. (2010). Only Britain can beg for scraps from China and tell them how to behave. David Cameron says he will drum up trade in China, and tackle human rights. It is an exercise in bluff concealing hypocrisy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/09/britain-beg-china-bluff-hypocrisy.

[21]   Kary, J. (2000). Contract law and the social contract: What legal history can teach us about the political theory of hobbes and locke. Ottawa Law Review, University of Ottawa.

[22]   Li, W. C., & Hans, P. (2006). Leibnitz’s positive view of China. Journal of Chinese philosophy, 33, 17-33. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00333.x

[23]   Martimort, D. (2008). Contract theory. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

[24]   Menzies, G. (2008). 1434: The Year a magnificent Chinese fleet sailed to Italy and ignited the renaissance. London: Harper Collins Publishers.

[25]   Menzies, G. (2002). 1421: The year China discovered the world. London: Bantam Press.

[26]   Oi, Jean, C., Rozelle, S., & Zhou, X. G. (ed.) (2000). Growing pains: tensions and opportunity in China’s transformation. Baltimore, Md: Brookings Institution Press.

[27]   Palmquist, S. How ‘Chinese’ was kant? The Philosopher, Volume LXXXIV No. 1. F. Nietzsche even called Kant the “Chinaman of Konigsberg”. http://www.the-philosopher.co.uk/chinese.htm.

[28]   Perkins, F. L. (2004). Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

[29]   Ptak, R. (2007). Die maritime seidenstrasse. Muenchen: Verlag C.H. Beck.

[30]   Ramo, J. C. (2004). The Beijing consensus. London: Foreign Policy Center.

[31]   Shen, F. W. (1985). The history of Sino-Western cultural exchange. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 448-450. 沈福偉, 中西文化交流史 (上海:上海人民出版社,1985)。

[32]   Watson, B. (2003). Xunzi: Basic writings. Columbia, NY: Columbia University Press,

[33]   Wenzel, C. H. (2006). Beauty in kant and confucius: A first step. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 33, 95-107. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00338.x

[34]   Williamson, J. (1989). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American readjustment: How much has happened (pp. 7-20). Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

[35]   Yao, X. Z. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

[36]   Yee, H., & Ian, S. (eds.) (2002). The China threat: perceptions, myths and reality. London: Routledge.

[37]   Zakaria, F. (2008). The Post-American world. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

[38]   Zhang, Y. (1992). Zheng He’s Voyage to the West. Taipei: Yunlong. 張研,鄭和下西洋 (台北:雲龍,1992)。

[39]   Zhu, Q. Z. (2005). The influence of Chinese philosophy on Europe. Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group. 朱謙之,中國哲學對歐洲的影響 (上海:上海世紀出版集團,2005)。

[40]   Zhu, S.-J., Chen, M. L., & Zheng, H. (2003). Nanjing: Jiangsu Litera- ture and Art. 朱蘇進/陳敏莉,鄭和(南京:江蘇文藝,2003)。

 
 
Top