Back
 BLR  Vol.7 No.3 , September 2016
Balancing the Force in Criminal Mediation
Abstract: There is a paradigm shift in the manner in which criminal cases are processed and resolved in the criminal justice system. Criminal mediation has become a fixture of the criminal justice system, running parallel to traditional adversarial system of adjudicating crimes. It is no longer a means to the end but rather an end in itself. Singapore’s criminal mediation is at its infancy having started only in 2010, whereas in other jurisdictions it has been existence since 1990s. Hence it is important to cultivate the right environment for criminal mediation to grow and evolve. The objectives of this paper are as follows: first, to consider the process and genesis of criminal mediation in general; references are made to the criminal mediation model practiced in Singapore and variants in other jurisdictions, particularly the American states; second, the benefits of such a process in the criminal justice system; and third, the importance of maintaining integrity of the criminal mediation process and the end product, i.e. the negotiated plea settlement.
Cite this paper: Koman, R. (2016) Balancing the Force in Criminal Mediation. Beijing Law Review, 7, 171-180. doi: 10.4236/blr.2016.73018.
References

[1]   ADRWORLD.COM (2003). Justice Department to Fund DC Criminal Mediation Program.

[2]   Attorney General’s Chambers (2013). The Code of Practice for the Conduct of Criminal Proceedings by the Prosecution and the Defence.

[3]   Batchelor, J. (2004). Changes and Challenges: C.P. Court Administrator Carole Kirshner. Delaware Law Weekly, 7, 35.

[4]   Bibas, S., & Bierschbach, R. A. (2004-2005). Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure. Yale Law Journal, 114, 85-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4135717

[5]   Brown, J. G. (1994). The Use of Mediation to Resolve Criminal Cases: A Procedural Critique. Emory Law Journal, 43, 1247-1309.

[6]   Chan, S. (2011). Keynote Address by Chief Justice Chan at the Subordinate Courts Workplan 2011.

[7]   Davisson, S. P. (2007). Balancing the Scales of “Confidential” Justice: Civil Mediation Privileges in the Criminal Arena— Indispensable, Impracticable, or Merely Unconstitutional? McGeorge Law Review, 38, 679-727.

[8]   Frohlich, A. W. (2008-2009). Criminal Mediation. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 15, 11-15.

[9]   Gottsfield, R., & Michowski, M. (2007). Settlement Conferences in Criminal Court. Arizona Attorney, 43, 8-16.

[10]   Paisley, C. (2008). Felony Meditation: Essential Elements and Potential Hurdles. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 15, 12-13.

[11]   Simms, L. (2006-2007). Criminal Mediation Is the BASF of the Criminal Justice System: Not Replacing Traditional Criminal Adjudication, Just Making It Better. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 22, 797-838.

[12]   State Courts (2016). Community Court.
https://www.statecourts.gov.sg/CriminalCase/Pages/CommunityCourt.aspx

[13]   Subordinate Courts (2011). Registrar’s Circular No. 4 of 2011.
https://www.statecourts.gov.sg/Lawyer/Documents/RC4Of2011.pdf

[14]   Supreme Court of Kentucky (2005). Supreme Court of Kentucky Order 2005-02.
http://courts.ky.gov/courts/supreme/Rules_Procedures/20052.pdf

 
 
Top