OALibJ  Vol.3 No.3 , March 2016
Review of Important Cattle Tick and Its Control in Ethiopia
Abstract: Ethiopia has the largest livestock population in Africa, but the contribution for the economic aspect of the country is still lowest amount and disease can be considered as a major constrain. Ticks are the most important ectoparasites of livestock in tropical and sub-tropical areas. Ethiopia is not exceptional and ticks are responsible for severe economic losses both through the direct effects of blood sucking and indirectly as vectors of pathogens and toxins. Feeding by large numbers of ticks causes reduction in live weight gain and anaemia among domestic animals, while tick bites also reduce the quality of hides. However, the major losses caused by ticks are due to the ability to transmit protozoan, rickettsial and viral diseases of livestock, which are of great economic importance world-wide. This review concerns with general aspects of tick biology, the taxonomy, pathogenic effects and methods for the control of ticks. ticks belong to the suborder Ixodida, which contains a single super family, the Ixodoidea, which is divided into two major families, Argasidae (soft ticks) and Ixodidae (hard ticks), and the rare family Nuttalliellidae, with a single African species. The main tick genera found in domestic animals of Ethiopia are Amblyomma, Hyalomma, Rhipicephalus, Haemaphysalis and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus). Various breeds of cattle differ in their response to tick infestations. Bos indicus pure breeds and crossbreeds are reported to be more innately resistant than Bos taurus breeds. The conventional method of controlling tick infestations in Ethiopia is application of acaricide, either by hand spraying, by hand dressing. Therefore, to minimize tick adverse effect appropriate and timely strategic control measures are crucial.

Subject Areas: Veterinary Medicine

1. Introduction

Ethiopia is believed to have the largest livestock population in Africa. This livestock sector has been contributing considerable portion to the economy of the country, and still promising to rally round the economic development of the country [1] . In Ethiopia, livestock production remains crucial and represents a major asset among resource-poor small holder farmers by providing milk, meat, skin, manure and traction force [2] . The contribution of livestock to the national economy particularly with regard to foreign currency earnings is through exploration of live animal, meat and skin and hides [3] .

Poor health and productivity of animal due to disease has considerably become the major stumbling block to the potential of livestock industry [4] . Now a day parasitism represents a major obstacle to development and utilization of animal resource. In Ethiopia, ectoparasites in ruminant cause serious economic losses to small holder farmers, the tanning industry and country as a while through mortality of animals, decreased production, downgrading and rejection of skin and hide [5] . From the ectoparasites, ticks are ranked as the most economically important of livestock in tropics including sub-Saharan Africa [6] .

Ticks are small, wingless ectoparasitic arachinid arthropods that are cosmopolitan and prevalent in warmer climates [7] . Ticks cause substantial losses in cattle production, in terms of diseases, reduced productivity and fertility and often death, and are economically the most important ecto-parasites of cattle [8] . [9] indicates that different ticks have different predilection sites on the host’s body. Ticks suck blood; damage hides and skins introduce toxins and predispose cattle to myiasis and dermatophilosis [10] [11] . Furthermore, they reduce body weight gains and milk yield, in addition to creating sites for secondary invasion by pathogenic organisms [11] . More significantly, ticks transmit diseases from infected cattle to healthy ones. Ticks transmit a greater variety of pathogenic micro-organisms than any other arthropod vector group, and are among the most important vectors of diseases affecting animals [10] .

According to [12] ticks which are considered to be most important to health of domestic animal in Africa comprise about seven genera. Among these genera, the main tick genera found in Ethiopia include Ambylomma, sub genus Rhipicephalus (Boophilus), Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus. The genus Ambylomma and Rhipicephalus are predominating in many parts of country, Hyalomma and sub genus Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) also have significant role [13] . Due to economic and veterinary importance of ticks, their control and transmission of tick born diseases remain challenge for the cattle industry of the world and it is a priority for many countries in tropical and subtropical regions [14] . In Ethiopia, there are about 47 species of ticks found on livestock and most of them have importance as vector and disease causing agent and also have damaging effect on skin and hide production [15] . Therefore, the objective of this paper is to review tick biology, the taxonomy, pathogenic effects and methods for the control of ticks and highlighting status of ticks and tick borne haemo- parasitic diseases in Ethiopia.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Classification of ticks

Ticks are within a member called the phylum (Arthropoda), class (Arachnida), sub class (Acari) and Order (Parasitiformes) [16] . Within the Parasitiformes, ticks belong to the suborder Ixodida, which contains a single super family, the Ixodoidea, which is divided into two major families, Argasidae (soft ticks) and Ixodidae (hard ticks), and the rare family Nuttalliellidae, with a single African species [17] . The family Ixodidae, or hard ticks, contains some 683 species [18] . As adults, Ixodids exhibit prominent sexual dimorphism: the scutum covers the entire dorsum in males, but in females (and immatures) the scutum is reduced to a small podonotal shield behind the capitulum, thereby permitting great distention of the idiosomal integument during feeding [19] .

Ixodidae ticks are relatively large and comprise thirteen genera. Seven of these genera contain species of veterinary and medical importance: Amblyomma, sub genus Rhi. (Boophilus), Rhipicephalus, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Dermacentor and Ixodes [17] .

The family Argasidae, or soft ticks, consists of about 185 species worldwide and have one important genus that infests cattle, Ornithodoros [20] . Adult argasids lack a dorsal sclerotized plate or scutum, their integument is leathery and wrinkled, their mouthparts are not visible from above, and they show no obvious sexual dimorphism. Argasidae are wandering ticks, which only remain on their host while feeding [21] .

2.2. Epidemiology of ticks

2.2.1. Host relationship

Some ticks live in open environments and crawl onto vegetation to wait for their hosts to pass by. This is a type of ambush and the behavior of waiting on vegetation of is called questing. Thus in genera such as Rhipicephalus, Haemaphysalis and Ixodes the larvae, nymphs and adults will quest on vegetation. The tick grabs onto the host using their front legs and crawl over the skin to find a suitable place to attach and feed. Adult tick of genera Ambylomma and Hyalomma are active hunters, they run across the ground after nearby hosts [12] . All ticks spend most of their life cycle away from their hosts, hiding either in soil and vegetation or in the nests of their hosts. So they need to be able to find hosts on which to feed [20] .

2.2.2. Attachment Site

Tick attachment site specificity is one of the populations limiting system that operate through the restriction of tick species to certain parts of the host body. The ticks grab on to the hosts using their front legs and then crawl over the skin to find a suitable place to attach and feed. They seek out places on the hosts where they are protected and have favorable conditions for their development [22] . [9] indicated that different ticks have different predilection sites on the host’s body.

The favorable predilection sites for B.decoloratus was the lateral and ventral side of the animal; A. variegatum, teat and scrotum; A. coherence udder and H. truncatum, scrotum and brisket and H. marginatum rufipes udder and scrotum, R. evertsi evertsi under tail and anus and R. preaxtatus anus and under tail [9] . Depending on the tick, site preference on the host depends on the accessibility for attachment, to get blood and protection to overcome the environment damage that inhibits its existence and grooming activity of the host. Tick location on the host is lined to the possibility of penetration by hypostome. Genera with short hypostome for example Rhipicephalus, Dermacentor and Haemaphysalis species usually attach to hairless area such as undertail and anovulval area [9] .

2.3. Life cycle

Mating in the hard ticks takes place on the host, except with Ixodes where it may also occur when the ticks are still on the vegetation. Male ticks remain on the host and will attempt to mate with many females whilst they are feeding. They transfer a sac of sperm (spermatheca) to the female. The females mate only once, before they are ready to engorge fully with blood. When they finally engorge they detach from the host and have enough sperm stored to fertilize all their eggs. Female hard ticks lay many eggs (2000 to 20,000) in a single batch. Female argasid ticks lay repeated small batches of eggs. Eggs of all ticks are laid in the physical environment, never on the host [23] .

Members of the family Ixodidae undergo either one-host, two-host or three-host life cycles. During the one-host life cycle, ticks remain on the same host for the larval, nymphal and adult stages, only leaving the host prior to laying eggs. During the two-host life cycle, the tick molts from larva to nymph on the first host, but will leave the host between the nymphal and adult stages. The second host may be the same individual as the first host, the same species, or even a second species. Most ticks of public health importance undergo the three-host life cycle. The three hosts are not always the same species, but may be the same species, or even the same individual, depending on host availability for the tick. Argasid ticks have two or more nymphal stages, each requiring a blood meal from a host. Unlike the Ixodidae ticks, which stay attached to their hosts for up to several days while feeding, argasid ticks are adapted to feeding rapidly (about an hour) and then promptly leaving the host [12] .

All feedings of ticks at each stage of the life cycle are parasitic. For feeding, they use a combination of cutting mouthparts for penetrating the skin and often an adhesive (cement) secreted from the saliva for attachment. The ticks feed on the blood and lymph released into this lesion. All ticks orient to potential hosts in response to products of respiration [24] . Important Ixodidae ticks that feed on cattle according to the number of hosts required to complete life cycle are listed on table 1.

2.4. Cattle Resistance

Currently tick control depends largely on the use of different chemicals. But the development of resistance against commonly available acaricides has created problem in this regard and animal population is becoming

Table 1. Important Ixodidae ticks according to the number of their hosts.

Source: [25] .

susceptible to both the ticks and diseases they transmit, with disastrous outcomes [26] . Resistance of cattle to tick infestation was reported to consist of innate and acquired components. The defense mechanisms, including tick avoidance, grooming, skin characteristics and more specific immunological responses, are involved in reducing the number of ticks parasitizing cattle. Avoidance was attributed to the sighting of the ticks [19] . Spontaneous or acquired resistance may be following infestations, due to the development of cutaneous hypersensitivity. The mechanism responsible for acquired resistance to ticks has been suggested to be a mast cell-depen- dent eosinophil hypersensitivity [27] . Resistance can be passively transferred with viable lymph node cells but not with serum from resistant hosts. This passage method of tick resistance suggests a delayed hypersensitivity mechanism for the acquisition of resistance [28] . The blood histamine level have been found to be elevated as a result of cutaneous basophiles or mast cells increase in resistant hosts, which degranulate in the region of ticks attachment to produce histamine. The histamine has shown to stimulate detachment of tick larvae. But the infestation rate increases in normally resistant zebus either due to true inhibition by the allergic, or by reduced cutaneous pruritis that halts licking that enables to kill the larvae by resistant cattle [26] .

It has been recognized that various breeds of cattle differ in their response to tick infestations. Bos indicus pure breeds and crossbreeds were reported to be more innately resistant than Bos taurus breeds [27] ). According to the observation of authors, African cattle (Bos indicus) naturally self-groom and groom each other frequently and thoroughly. Significantly fewer ticks were found on those animals that were able to groom. Some breeds have the ability to reduce the number of ticks they carry and are considered resistant while others cannot control the number of ticks they carry and thus are referred to as sensitive breeds [20] . A number of physiological and environmental factors can affect the level of host resistance to ticks or the expression of host resistance. Among which nutrition, sex, pregnancy, lactation, age, exposure to ticks, breed and tick density play key roles [29] . Cattle lose resistance with time, and it seems that the older the animal, the lower the resistance. Pregnant cows were significantly more sensitive than non-pregnant female and carried a higher number of ticks mainly during the late stages of the pregnancy. The stress of lactation causes a marked decline in the resistance of exotic breeds; it also affect Zebu, but to a much smaller extent. Stable resistance is acquired after several months of exposure to the species of tick to which resistance is required [27] .

2.5. Pathogenic Role of Ticks

Direct effects of ticks on cattle are tick worry, blood loss, damage to hides and skins of animals and introduction of toxins [11] . The ecology and physiology of ticks have made them second most important vectors after mosquitoes. Ticks transmit a large variety of intercellular bacteria in the Rickettsia group like Rickettsia, Ehrlichia and Anaplasma. Similarly several piroplasm protozoa like T. annulata, T. parva and Babesiosis bigemmina are also transmitted specifically by ticks. Hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) are obligate hematophaguos ectoparasites and important vectors of viruses, bacteria and protozoa. They are considered second only to mosquitoes as the most medically important group of arthropods [24] . Tick worry is a generalized state of unease and irritability of cattle severely infested with ticks, often leading to serious loss of energy and weight. This negative effect on the growth of animals and their production is thought to be due to the effects of a toxin in the saliva of ticks [11] .

Anaemia is another inevitable consequence of heavy infestation by any blood-feeding parasite, and cattle deaths attributable to anaemia as a result of tick infestation are common [28] . Engorging Ixodidae females will increase their weight by 100 - 200 times but the actual amount of blood ingested is much greater than this, as blood meal is concentrated and fluid excreted in saliva. Estimates of the amount of blood removed vary according to the species under consideration [11] . Tick saliva contains toxins which have a specific pathogenic effect. The toxins affect not only the attachment site but also the entire organs of the host. Some ticks produce neurotropic toxins which induce tick paralysis that is characterized by an acute ascending flaccid motor paralysis. Females of the species Hyalomma truncatum produce a dermotropic (epitheliotropic) toxin which causes sweating sickness in calves and some adult cattle [31] .

2.6. Ticks Control Methods

The aim of tick control campaign is not to control all ticks simultaneously, but a definite species because of its particular role [29] . The successful implementation of rational and sustainable tick control programmes in grazing animals is dependent upon a sound knowledge of the ecology or epidemiology of the tick as it interacts with the host in specific climatic, management and production environments. In most situations, however, efficient and reliable methods for the control of cattle ticks and TBD are based on the use of a chemical treatment (acaricide application), often without a local understanding of appropriate ecology or epidemiology [32] .

The availability of each of these options, their advantages and disadvantages, and the cost benefit of each alternative strategy should be assessed before deciding on a control programme [32] . Ideally, strategies should target the parasitic and free-living phases of the life cycle and the role of the ticks in the transmission of TBDs should not be neglected [13] . It is now generally understood that tick control should not only be based on acaricide use, despite the fact that this remains the most efficient and reliable single method. Complementary approaches have been developed and are being researched to enable integrated control strategies against the tick and its haemoparasites [25] [32] . The following are the most commonly used tick control methods.

2.6.1. Ecological Tick control

Ecological control method is used for habitat and host linked treatment. Tick control in the habitat and vegetation requires modification of the plant cover by removal of vegetation that shelters ticks [25] . Pasture management, including spelling and seasonal changes in cattle grazing areas in Australia and in Zambia respectively has been used as a tick control strategy and are believed to be responsible for a decrease its burden [12] .

2.6.2. Biological Tick control

A first attempt at tick biocontrol was made with the introduction of tick parasitic wasps from France to the USA and Russia. During the past decades, interest in developing antitick biocontrol agents such as birds, parasitoides, entomopathogenic nematodes, entomopathogenic fungi and bacteria have gained momentum [33] . In biological tick control the activities of the hyperparasites chalcid flies Hunterellus are probably important in nature, but they are difficult to evaluate and it is still more difficult to manipulate or reproduce them for practical use. The biological agents, which potentially include predators like rodents, birds, ants, spiders, lizards and beetles as well as Prasitoids (destroy the host: the wasp lay the eggs in the engorged ticks and larvae eats the tick and emerges as adult to attack another tick) and parasites (Nematodes and fungus) are attack soil living stages of the ticks are effective and depending on the conditions, these predators can consume a large number of ticks Yet, having such effective importance the development of a biological tick control methods has been neglected as compared to the control of plant pests or dipterous insects harmful to men and animals [25] .

2.6.3. Chemical Tick control

Acaricide treatments are commonly used in a suppressive approach, applying multiple treatments at regular intervals during the height of infestation. Suppressive treatments are the most effective in the short term; keeping animals almost tick free, thereby reducing the direct effect of the ticks and the risk of disease transmission. This procedure will, however, select heavily for acaricide resistance in the ticks [33] . An ideal acaricide would be cheap, easily applied, with a strong knock down effect and sufficient residual effect on female ticks to prevent egg lying and to protect cattle from reinfestation by larvae. It should not select for resistance through a prolonged, gradual decay on the animal (i.e. it should have a sharp cut off in efficacy with time). In addition, it should be non-toxic to livestock and humans and have no detectable residues in meat and milk. Unfortunately, such an ideal acaricide has not yet been produced. Generally, although the use of acaricides for the control of ticks has limitations and tick resistance to acaricides is an increasing problem and real economic threat to the livestock worldwide, most livestock holders depend completely on acaricides to control ticks, but do not have access to guidelines on how to make a profit from their tick control program or how to detect and resolve problems with resistance to acaricides [33] .

2.6.4. Genetic tick Control

The application of acaricides is the most common method used to control cattle ticks. However, the improper use of these chemicals compounds has been causing the development of tick resistance to various pesticides available in the market, reducing these products’ useful lifetimes. Besides this, problems generated by the presence of chemical residues in meat, milk and the environment have prompted reflection on the need for better monitoring of their application [34] . Therefore, the study of the genetic resistance to ticks among different breeds of cattle can contribute to the development of alternative control methods [35] . It is widely known that Bos indicus cattle are more resistant to ectoparasites than are Bos taurus animals. There are great differences between these two breeds of cattle in regard to their susceptibility to parasitism by cattle ticks [36] . Studies are intensifying the crossing of these two groups, aiming to obtain animals that are more resistant to the conditions found in tropical countries and are also good meat producers [37] .

2.7. The distribution of ticks in Ethiopia

The distribution and abundance of tick species infesting domestic ruminants in Ethiopia vary greatly from one area to another area [38] . In Ethiopia, studies on tick fauna have begun early in the 19th century. Since then, different researchers from abroad and country determine the pattern of ticks and the TBDs; and ticks are common in all agro-ecological zones of the country [39] [40] . The main tick genera found in domestic animals of Ethiopia are Amblyomma, Hyalomma, Rhipicephalus, Haemaphysalis and Rhipicephalus [38] .

Among the genera Rhipicephalus, Rhipicephalus lunulatus species were observed in Central Ethiopia [41] , and Rhipicephalus muhasmae in Borena [42] , in wetter western areas of the country [39] [43] . [44] has recorded Rh. humoralis, Rh. cliffordi, Rh. compositus and Rh. distinctus in Wollo and Northeast areas. Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi, “Red-legged tick” [12] is the most widespread species of Rhipicephalus [45] [46] . Rhipicephalus pulchellus, “Zebra tick” [12] is distributed widely in the north eastern [44] , eastern [47] and southern rangel [46] , part of the country. Rhipicephalus simus, “Glossy tick” [12] , are found in northern [45] , eastern [47] , central [41] .

Of the genus Amblyomma four species that commonly infest cattle includes Amblyomma variegatum, A. gemma, A. lepidum and A. cohaerens and are known to exist in Ethiopia [48] . [42] in Borena zone showed that A. variegatum, A.gemma and A. lepidum distributed in wider area of southern Ethiopia. From the studies of [49] in Jimma A. variegatum and A. coherense are widely distributed in south western Ethiopia. Amblyomma variegatum and A. cohaerens are the two most prevalent Amblyomma speciesin Awassa areas in decreasing order [50] . In eastern Ethiopia, A.variegatum and A. gemma are the two most widely spread species [51] . Amblyomma gemma, “Gem-like bont tick” [52] , is recorded in eastern and southern Ethiopia [39] [43] . Ambylomma varie- gatum and Ambylomma coherence in was also recorded in Haramaya [53] . It is clearly associated with dry types of vegetation or semi-arid rangelands [39] . Amblyomma lepidum, “East African bont tick” [52] , is most commonly inhabits arid habitats and in open bushed shrub or wooded grassland and its distributions overlap with Ambylomma gemma and that of Ambylomma variegatum [12] .

Two species of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) sub genus are known to exist in Ethiopia, which include Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus. The study done by [42] in Borena zone; [41] in central Ethiopia; [54] in Asella; [50] in Awassa; [44] in Asella; [55] in Wollo and Asosa area [56] indicated the distribution of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus is known to present in Gambella region and recorded by [39] [43] . In Ethiopia, about eight species of Hyalomma that affect cattle are identified, which includes Hyalomma marginatum rufipes, Hy. dromedarii, Hy. tuncatum, Hy. m. marginatum, Hy. impelatum, Hy. anatolicum excavatum, Hy. anatolicum anatolicum and Hy. albiparmatum [53] .

2.8. Tick borne diseases and Status of tick Borne Haemoparasitic diseases in Ethiopia

2.8.1. Tick Borne Diseases

The term vector-borne disease refers to any of a broad array of infectious diseases caused by pathogens that are transmitted by arthropods or other biologic intermediaries. Although transmission usually occurs on blood feeding by an infected insect or acarine parasite, infection can also result when a vertebrate host ingests a vector or on contamination of a wound by infectious organisms in the feces of the arthropod intermediary. Regardless of the means of transmission, the vector, a critical component in disease transmission, engages in a lifestyle that is at least partially parasitic and that somehow contributes to its ability to both acquire and serve as a source of infection to animals [57] . Theileriosis, heartwater, babesiosis and anaplasmosis are considered the most important tick-borne diseases of livestock in sub-Saharan Africa [58] .

Ticks are effective disease vectors, second only to mosquitoes in transmitting infectious disease [30] . Some of the most important tick-borne diseases are East Coast Fever, Redwater, anaplasmosis and heartwater. Many other fatal and benign babesiosis, theileriosis and anaplasmosis are also transmitted by various tick species [18] . These diseases generally affect the blood and/or lymphatic system and cause fever, anaemia, jaundice, anorexia, weight loss, milk drop, malaise, swelling of lymph node, dyspnoea, diarrhoea, nervous disorders and even death. Major cattle tick-borne diseases in Ethiopia are anaplasmosis, babesiosis, theileriosis [59] and dermatophilosis [60] . Besides to disease transmission ticks inflict a huge economic loss. Production losses due to ticks and tick-borne diseases around the globe have been estimated at US$ 13.9 to US$ 18.7 billion annually leaving world’s 80% cattle at risk [61] . [51] estimated an annual loss of US$ 500,000 from hide and skin downgrading from ticks, and approximately 65.5% of major defects of hides in eastern Ethiopia are from ticks. Furthermore, the costs associated with maintaining chemical control of ticks in tropical and subtropical regions of the world have been estimated at US$ 25.00 per head of cattle per year [62] .

2.8.2. Status of tick Borne Haemoparasitic diseases in Ethiopia

Similar to other countries, there are a considerable number of economically important livestock diseases occurring in Ethiopia. Among others, tick borne haemoparasitic diseases are of the major constraints to the livestock industry of the country. [63] indicated the existence of Anaplasmosis, Babesiosis, Cowdriosis and Theileriosis (T. mutans), but their significance in terms of mortality and productive losses and the degree of enzootic stability are not yet very well known. Only [64] reported a conservative estimate of birr 1 million loss annually through rejection or downgrading of hide and skin. Moreover, light to severe inflammatory reaction sometimes leading to surgical removal of teats are damages caused by ticks. There are no clinical or serological reports of the presence of either T. annulata or T. parva in Ethiopia. But, there is relatively uncontrolled movement of livestock from Sudan and Kenya, where these diseases and their vectors are found [65] . In previous studies, conducted by [59] B. bovis, T. orientalis and T. velifera were reported from Gambella region, western Ethiopia. Table 2 indicates existing TB haemoparasitic diseases in four regions of Ethiopia.

Table 2. Existing TB haemoparasitic diseases in four regions of Ethiopia.

3. Conclusions and Recommendations

Ticks are obligate blood feeding ectoparasites of vertebrates and induce huge production loss in livestock industry and creating serious public health problems in the world. The main tick genera found in Ethiopia are Amblyomma, Boophilus, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus. Tick-borne diseases of cattle such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, cowdriosis and theileriosis (T. mutans) are present in Ethiopia. Heavy infestations by different tick species suppress the immunity of cattle and also damage teats and reduce productivity of animals and there are direct effects associated with tick infestation that leads to tick worry, anorexia and anemia. These all are the impacts of tick infestation so, to minimize tick impact appropriate and timely strategic control measures are crucial. The conventional method of controlling tick infestations in Ethiopia is application of acaricide, either by hand spraying, by hand dressing. The availability of vaccine is very small. The ability to induce an effective, sustained immunological response is crucial but needs improvement. Problems of acaricide resistance, chemical residues in food and the environment and the unsuitability of tick resistant cattle for all production systems make the current situation unsatisfactory and require the development of absolute control through effective vaccine. Therefore, in line with the above conclusions; the following recommendations are forwarded:

・ The government should monitor the use of potentially dangerous chemicals and conserve foreign exchange.

・ Intensive acaricide application to control ticks has a number of limitations. Therefore, immunization together with strategic tick control is recommended for exotic and crossbred cattle.

・ Research should be conducted on tick species and their epidemiology for the continuous understanding of improved control strategies

・ Awareness should be given to animal breeder on problem of tick and TBD and different control method.


Above all, I would like to praise my Almighty God, Allah, for supporting me health, wisdom and strength in my work and for his perfect protection and guidance of my life. I would like to express my sincere thanks and best regards to my beloved and respected family for their invaluable help and encouragement during my journey for their moral and financial support throughout my entire academic career Finally I would like to thanks all my friends those who helped me for my successfulness.

Cite this paper: Nejash, A. (2016) Review of Important Cattle Tick and Its Control in Ethiopia. Open Access Library Journal, 3, 1-11. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102456.

[1]   CSA (2013) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Central Statistical Authority, Agricultural Sample Survey (2012/2013). Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics (Privet and Peasant Holdings), Addis Ababa, 9-20.

[2]   Mesfin, T. and Lemma, M. (2001) The Role of Traditional Veterinary Herbal Medicine and Its Constraints in the Animal Health Care System in Ethiopia. In: Medhin, Z. and Abebe, D., Eds., Conservation and Sustainable Use of Medicinal Plants in Ethiopia, Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Research, Addis Ababa, 22-28.

[3]   MoARD (2008) The Effect of Skin and Hide Quality on Domestic and Export Market and Evaluation of the Campaign against Ectoparasites of Sheep and Goat in Amhara, Tigray and afar Region. Official Report to Region and Other Sectors, Addis Ababa.

[4]   Onu, S.H. and Shiferaw, T.Z. (2013) Prevalence of Ectoparasite Infestations of Cattle in Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Veterinary World, 6, 291-294.

[5]   Regasa, T.D., Kebede Tsegay, A. and Waktole, H. (2015) Prevalence of Major Ectoparasites of Calves and Associated Risk Factors in and around Bishoftu Town. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10, 1127-1135.

[6]   Lorusso, V., Picozzi, K., de Bronsvoort, B.M., Majekodunmi, A., Dongkum, C., Balak, G. and Welburn, S.C. (2013) Ixodid Ticks of Traditionally Managed Cattle in Central Nigeria: Where Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Parasit Vectors, 6, 171.

[7]   Olwoch, J.M., Revers, B. and Van Jaarsveld, A.S. (2009) Host Parasite Distribution Patterns under Simulated Climate: International Journal of Current Research, 4, 073-076.

[8]   Eyo, J.E., Ekeh, F.N., Ivoke, N., Atama, C.I., Onah, I.E., Ezenwaji, N.E. & Ikele, C.B. (2014) Survey of Tick Infestation of Cattle at Four Selected Grazing Sites in the Tropics. Global Veterinaria, 12, 479-486.

[9]   Huruma, G., Abdurhaman, M., Gebre, S. and Deresa B (2015) Identification of Tick Species and Their Prevalence in and around Sebeta Town. Journal of Parasitology and Vector Biology, 7, 1-8.

[10]   Yiwombe, K. (2013) AN INVESTIGATION TO DETE Boophilus TICK (BLUE TICK) T. Doctoral Dissertation, Midlands State University.

[11]   Marufu, M.C. (2008) Prevalence of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases in Cattle on Communal Rangelands in the Highland Areas of the Eastern Cape Province. MSc Thesis, University of Fort Hare, Alice.

[12]   Walker, A.R., Bouattour, A., Camicas, J.L., Estrada-Pena, A., Horak, I.G., Latif, A.A., Pegram, R.G. and Preston, P.M. (2003) Ticks of Domestic Animals in Africa: A Guide to Identification of Species. Bioscience Report, Edinburgh, 1-221.

[13]   Gebre, S., Nigist, M. and Kassa, B. (2001) Seasonal Variation of Ticks on Calves at Sebeta in Western Shewa Zone. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 7, 17-30.

[14]   Rajput, Z.I., Hu, S.H., Chen, W.J., Arijo, A.G. and Xiao, C.W. (2006) Importance of Ticks and Their Chemical and Immunological Control in Livestock. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 7, 912-921.

[15]   Tadesse, B. and Sultan, A. (2014) Prevalence and Distribution of Tick Infestation on Cattle at FitcheSelale, North Shewa, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 26.

[16]   Torr, S., Eisler, M., Coleman, P., Morton, J. and Machila, N. (2003) Integrated Control of Ticks and Tsetse. A Report for the DFID Advisory and Support Service Contract, Project ZV. NRIternational Ltd, 1-135.

[17]   Rodríguez-Vivas, R.I., Mata, M.Y., Pérez, G.E. and Wagner, W. (2004) The Effect of Management Factors on the Seroprevalence of Anaplasma marginale in Bos indicus Cattle in the Mexican Tropics. Tropical Animal Health Production, 36, 135-143.

[18]   Jongejan, F. and Uilenberg, G. (2004) The Global Importance of Ticks. Parasitology, 129, S3-S14.

[19]   Lora, R.B. (2001) Veterinary Parasitology: The Practical Veterinaria, Arthropods. Butterworth-Heinemann, a Member of the Reed Elsevier Group. Library of Congress Cataloging, United State of America, 16-21.

[20]   Latif, A.A. and Walker, A.R. (2004) An Introduction to the Biology and Control of Ticks in Africa. ICTTD-2 Project, 1-29.

[21]   Barker, S.C. and Murrell, A. (2004) Systematic and Evaluation of Ticks with a List of Valid Genus and Species Names. Journal of Parasitology, 129, 15-36.

[22]   Sathaporn, J.A, Weeraphol, J.A., Omar, O., Barriga, B. and Roger, W. (2004) Reduced Incidence of Babesia bigemina Infection in Cattle Immunized against the Cattle Tick, Boophilus microplus. Departement of Parasitology. FVM, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 36-47.

[23]   Charles, M.H. and Robinson. E.D. (2006) Diagnostic Parasitology for Veterinary Technicians. 3rd Edition, Mosby Elsevier, China, 192-195.

[24]   Torres, D.F. (2008) The Brown Dog Tick Rhipicephalus sanguinus (Acari: Ixodidae): From Taxonomy to Control. Veterinary Parasitology, 152, 173-185.

[25]   Kirby, C. (2010) Tick Management Hand Book. Biological Tick Control. 2nd Editition, The Connecticut Agricultural Experimentation Station, New Haven, 70-71.

[26]   Akhtar, M., Muhammad, F., Lodhi, L.A., Hussain, I. and Anwar, M.I. (2011) Immunity against Ticks—A Review. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 31, 9-16.

[27]   Minjauw, B. and de Castro, J.J. (2000) Host Resistance to Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases: Its Role in Integrated Control. Breeding for Diseases Resistance in Farm Animals. CAB International, 153-169.

[28]   Lodos, J., Boue, O. and Fuente, J. (2000) Model to Simulate the Effect of Vaccination against Boophilus Ticks on Cattle. Veterinary Parasitology, 87, 315-326.

[29]   FAO (2004) Acaricide Resistance: Diagnosis, Management and Prevention. Guidelines Resistance Management and Integrated Parasite Control in Ruminants, Animal Production and Health Division, Agriculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 25-77.

[30]   Ali, Z. (2010) Immunoprophylaxis of Tick Infestation in Bovine. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore.

[31]   Kahn, C.M. (2006) The Merck Veterinary Manual. 9th Edition, Merck and Co. Inc, Whitehouse Station.

[32]   Alanr, W. (2011) Eradication and Control of Livestock Ticks: Biological, Economic and Social Perspectives. Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Summerhall Place, Edinburgh, 236-253.

[33]   George, J.E., Pound, J.M. and Davey, R.B. (2008) Acaricides for Controlling Ticks on Cattle and the Problem of Acaricide Resistance. In: Ticks: Biology, Disease and Control, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 408-423.

[34]   Castro-Janer, E., Martins, J.R., Mendes, M.C., Namindome, A., Klafke, G.M. and Schumaker, T.T.S. (2010) Diagnoses of Fipronil Resistance in Brazilian Cattle Ticks Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Using in Vitro Larval Bioassays. Veterinary Parasitology, 173, 300-306.

[35]   Ibelli, A.M.G., Ribeirob, A.R.B., Giglioti, R., Regitanod, L.C.A., Alencard, M.M., Chagasd A.C.S., Pac, A.L., Oliveirac, H N., Duartee J.M.S. and Oliveirad, M.C.S. (2011) Resistance of Cattle of Various Genetic Groups to the Tick Rhi.(Boophilus) microplus and the Relationship with Coat Traits. Veterinary Parasitology, 196, 425-430.

[36]   Bianchin, I., Catto, J.B., Kichel, A.N., Torres, R.A.A. and Honer, M.R. (2007) The Effect of the Control of Endo- and Ectoparasites on Weight Gains in Crossbred Cattle (Bos Taurus Taurus×Bos Taurus Indicus) in the Central Region of Brazil. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 39, 287-296.

[37]   Graf, J.F., Gogolewski, R., Leach-Bing, N., Sabatini, G.A., Molento, M.B., Bordin, E.L. and Arantes, G.J. (2005) Tick Control: An Industry Point of View. Parasitology, 129, S427-S442.

[38]   Desalegn, T., Fikru, A. and Kasaye, S. (2015) Survey of Tick Infestation in Domestic Ruminants of Haramaya District, Eastern Hararghe, Ethiopia. Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology, 6, 246.

[39]   Pegram, R.G., Hoogstraal, H. and Wassef, H.P. (1981) Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of Ethiopia. Distribution, Ecology and Host Relationship of Tick Species Infecting Livestock. Bulletin of Entomology Research, 71, 339-359.

[40]   Morel, P.C. (1989) Manual Tropical Veterinary Parasitological. CAB International, United Kingdom, 299-460.

[41]   Mekonnen, S., Hussein, I. and Bedane, B. (2001) The Distribution of Ixodid Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in Central Ethiopia. The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 68, 243-251.

[42]   Regassa, A. (2001) Tick Infestation of Borana Cattle in the Borana Province of Ethiopia. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 68, 41-45.

[43]   de Castro, J.J. (1994) A Survey of the Tick Species in Western Ethiopia Including the Previous Findings and Recommendation, for Further Tick Survey in Ethiopia. FAO, Rome, 1-83.

[44]   Seyoum, Z. (2001) Study of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases on Cattle at Girana Valley in the North Wollo Zone. Proceeding of the Ethiopian Veterinary Association, 15.

[45]   Sinshaw, S. (2000) Distribution of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases at Metekel Ranch. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 1, 40-59.

[46]   Gebre, S., Mekonnen, S., Kaaya Godwin, P., Tekle, T. and Jobre, Y. (2004) Prevalence of Ixodid Ticks and Trypanosomosis in Camels in Southern Rangelands of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 8, 23-24.

[47]   Rahmeto, A., Thedrous, F., Mesele, A. and Jemere, B. (2010) Survey of Ticks Infesting Cattle in Two Districts of Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. Veterinary World, 3, 539-543.

[48]   Mekonnen, S., Pegram, R.G., Gebre, S., Mekonnen, A., Jobre, Y. and Zewde, M. (2007) A Synthesis of Ixodid (Acari: Ixodidae) and Argasid (Acari: Argasidae) Ticks in Ethiopian and Their Possible Roles in Disease Transmission. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 11, 1-17.

[49]   Abebaw, G. (2004) Seasonal Dynamics and Host Preference of Boophilus decoloratus (Koch, 1944) on Naturally Infested Cattle in Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 18, 19-28.

[50]   Berhane, M. (2004) Distribution of Livestock Tick Species in Awassa Area. DVM Thesis, AAU, FVM, Debre-Zeit, 1-16.

[51]   Bekele, T. (2002) Studies on Seasonal Dynamics of Ticks of Ogaden Cattle and Individual Variation in Resistance to Ticks in Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 49, 285-288.

[52]   Susan, E.A. (1998) The Merck Veterinary Manual. 8th Edition, Merck and Co. Inc., USA, 67.

[53]   Bedasso, M., Abebe, B. and Degefu, H. (2014) Species Composition, Prevalence and Seasonal Variations of Ixodidae Cattle Ticks in and around Haramaya Town, Ethiopia. Full Length Research Paper, 6, 131-137.

[54]   Assefa, B. (2004) A Survey of Ticks and Tick-Borne Blood Protista in Cattle at Asela, Arsi Zone. DVM Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, 25-36.

[55]   Dessie, S. (2005) Cattle Tick Dynamics in Different Agro-Ecological Zones of Wolayta, Southern Ethiopia. Master thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, 18-83.

[56]   Fantahun, B. and Mohamed, A. (2012) Survey on the Distribution of Tick Species in and Around Assosa Town, Ethiopia. Research Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 5, 32-41.

[57]   Bowman, D.D. (2009) Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarian. 9th Editon, Saunders, Newyork, 1-465.

[58]   Eygelaar, D., Jori, F., Mokopasetso, M., Sibeko, K.P., Collins, N.E., Vorster, I. and Oosthuizen, M.C. (2015) Tick-Borne Haemoparasites in African Buffalo (Syncerus caffer) from Two Wildlife Areas in Northern Botswana. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 1-11.

[59]   Mekonnen, S., de Castro, J., Gebre, S., Hussein, I. and Regassa, A. (1992) Ticks, tick-borne diseases and their control in Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 13, 661-664.

[60]   Mekonnen, S. (1996) Epidemiology of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases in Ethiopia: Future Research Needs and Priorities. In: Irvin, A.D., McDermott, J.J. and Perry, B.D., Eds., Epidemiology of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa. Proceedings of a Workshop, Harare, 12-13 March 1996. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya, 174.

[61]   Ghosh, S., Azhahianambia, P. and Yadav, M.P. (2007) Upcoming and Future Strategies of Tick Control: A Review. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, 44, 79-89.

[62]   Pegram, R.G. (2001) Getting a Handle on Tick Control: A Modern Approach May Be Needed. The Veterinary Journal, 161, 227-228.

[63]   Sileshi, M. (1994) Tick and TBDs Survey and Control in Ethiopia. In Dolan, T. T. and Musisi F-TBD control in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa. Proceeding of 16th Conference of EVA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 120-151.

[64]   Feseha, G. (1983) Notes on Ticks species and TBDs of domestic animals in Ethiopia. FVM, AAU, Ethiopia, 1-64.

[65]   Jewaro, A. (1986) A Survey of Tick and Tick Born Disease in Gamo Gofa Administrative Region. DVM Thesis. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Debre zeit, Ethiopia.

[66]   Wollega, D. (1997) Survey of Ticks and Tick Born Disease in Eight Domestic Animals in and round Deberzeit. DVM Thesis, Facility of Veterinary Medicine Deberzeit, Addis Ababa University, Eastern Showa, 1-79.

[67]   Gebre, S., Kaaya, G.P., Feseha, G. and Tilahun, G. (1998) Insect Science and Its Application. Journal of Ethiopian Veterinary Association, 18, 59-66.