The present manuscript mainly introduces three linguistic methods to
detect lies, namely Hand-writing Analysis, Voice Stress Analysis, and
Non-Verbal Analysis and the application of these linguistic deception detection
approaches in various fields, such as law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and
forensic context. These major deception detection techniques are illustrated by
examples based on graphology, psycho-physiological stress response, and
non-verbal communication studies.
Cite this paper
Ma, D. and Lin, D. (2015) Linguistic Methods to Detect Lies. Open Access Library Journal
, 1-7. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102173
 Ma, D.S. and Lin, D.A. (2015) Statement Analysis of Deception Detection. Open Access Library Journal, 2: e1975. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101975
 De Paulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. and Cooper, H. (2003) Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
 Ekman, P. (2001) Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. W.W. Norton, New York.
 Fitzpatrick, E. and Bachenko, J. (2009) Building a Forensic Corpus to Test Language-Based Indicators of Deception. Language and Computers, 71, 183-196.
 Fornaciari, T. and Poesio, M. (2013) Automatic Deception Detection in Italian Court Cases. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 21, 303-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-013-9140-4
 Hancock, J.T., Curry, L.E., Goorha, S. and Woodworth, M. (2007) On Lying and Being Lied to: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication. Discourse Process, 45, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638530701739181
 Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S. and Richards, J.M. (2003) Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010
 Strapparava, C. and Mihalcea, R. (2009) The Lie Detector: Explorations in the Automatic Recognition of Deceptive Language. Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, Singapore, 4 August 2009, 309-312.
 McClish, M. (2012) Don’t Be Deceived: The Definitive Book on Detection Deception. 2nd Edition, The Marpa Group, Inc., Winterville.
 Frank, M.G., Menasco, M.A. and O’Sullivan, M. (2008) Human Behavior and Deception Detection. In: Voeller, J.G., Ed., Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security, Vol. 5, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470087923.hhs299
 Adam, S.H. (1996) Statement Analysis: What Do Suspects’ Words Really Reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 65, 12-20.
 Toma, C.L. and Hancock, J.T. (2012) What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 78-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
 Haddad, D., Walter, S., Ratley, R. and Smith, M. (2012) Investigation and Evaluation of Voice Stress Analysis Technology. U.S. Department of Justice.
 Pease, A. and Pease, B. (2004) The Definitive Book of Body Language. Pease International, Australia.
 Palmatier, J.J. (2011) Credibility Assessment: The CVSA, Polygraph, and Turstech/Vericator Voice Analysis Technologies. http://www.nemesysco.com/JJP-research_Full.pdf
 Palmatier, J.J. and Rovner, L. (2015) Credibility Assessment: Preliminary Process Theory, the Polygraph Process, and Construct Validity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95, 3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.001
 Palmatier, J.J. and Rovner, L. (2015) Rejoinder to Commentary on Palmatier and Rovner (2014): Credibility Assessment: Preliminary Process Theory, the Polygraph Process, and Construct Validity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95, 31-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.11.009