A New Offer of Approach of Motivation Factors Measurement

Nargiz E.  Samadova; Rustam B.  Rustamov

doi:10.4236/oalib.1101607

Nargiz E. Samadova¹, Rustam B. Rustamov²

Abstract: The fact is that it is always attempted to develop suitable motivation factors satisfying company management needs in this very sensitive as well as vital aspects of development. Each of existing approaches at some point has been applied and tested as to its effects on people’s lives, jobs, and personal goals in life as well as in the work place. Honestly, it is very difficult to find out motivation factors, which can be used in wide areas of management process. There is no flexible manner of factors to apply in large areas of business. It makes necessary to adopt behavior of motivation factors depending on business type or spheres. Obviously it opens an environment to differentiate motivation factors for successful observation and monitoring of the process. There are wide methods of motivation factors existing in different sources [1]. This paper offers a new approach of definition of motivation factors. For this reason a cognitive classification formed on the Masloff hierarchy categories is suggested. It states detailed classification of a large number of factors, which make assume a wide use of such option in different type of business areas. One more advantage of this classification of motivation factors is the most convenient of measurability of developed system. This subject is highly important especially meeting the main requirements of the system with SMART segmentation. It makes possible and opens an opportunity easily to assess the system for further right decision-making.

Keywords: Motivation, Factor Measurement, Hierarchy, Indicator, Evaluation, Determination, Employee, Performance, Self-Actualization, Esteem

Cite this paper: Samadova, N. and Rustamov, R. (2015) A New Offer of Approach of Motivation Factors Measurement. Open Access Library Journal, 2, 1-6. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101607.

References

[1] Ruthankoon, R. and Ogunlana, S.O. (2003) Testing Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory in the Thai Construction Industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10, 333-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09699980310502946

[2] Touré-Tillery, M. and Fishbach, A. (2014) How to Measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 328-341.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12110

[3] Ferguson, M.J. and Bargh, J.A. (2004) How Social Perception Automatically Influences Behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 33-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.004

[4] Finkel, E.J., DeWall, C.N., Slotter, E.B., Oaten, M. and Foshee, V.A. (2009) Liking Is for Doing: The Effects of Goal Pursuit on Automatic Evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557-572.

[5] Fishbach, A. and Choi, J. (2012) Self-Regulatory Failure and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 483-499.

[6] Molden, D.C., Hui, C.M., Scholer, A.A., Meier, B.P., Noreen, E.E., D’Agostino, P.R. and Martin, V. (2012) Motivational versus Metabolic Effects of Carbohydrates on Self-Control. Psychological Science, 23, 1137-1144.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612439069

[7] Magill, R.A. (2011) Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[8] Maslow, A.H. (1987) Motivation and Personality. In: Frager, R., Fadiman, J., McReynolds, C. and Cox, R., Eds., 3rd Edition, Addison Wesley, Boston.