CE  Vol.2 No.3 , August 2011
Quality Issues in Higher Education: A Multicriteria Framework of Satisfaction Measures
ABSTRACT
Higher education attributes significant interest to student satisfaction because of its potential impact on the quality dimensions of the offered services. This is illustrated from the large number of studies that have shown a moderate to strong relationship between these two concepts. This paper provides a detailed analysis of a student satisfaction survey conducted at the Health Care Management Department of the Technological Education Institute of Athens. The analysis was based on a multi-criteria preference disaggregation method (MUSA). Results are focused on the evaluation of student choices, while significant findings of the applied methodology constitute the determination of strong and weak points of the educational component’s preferences that form important suggestions for the improvement of the satisfaction level and the quality characteristics of the correspondent services.

Cite this paper
nullDimas, G. , Goula, A. and Pierrakos, G. (2011) Quality Issues in Higher Education: A Multicriteria Framework of Satisfaction Measures. Creative Education, 2, 305-312. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.23042.
References
[1]   Athiyaman, A. (1997). Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: the case of university education, European Journal of Marketing, 31, 528-540. doi:10.1108/03090569710176655

[2]   Bigne, E., Moliner, M., & Sanchez. J. (2003). Perceived quality and satisfaction in multiservice organizations.The case of Spanish public services. The Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 420-442. doi:10.1108/08876040310482801

[3]   Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24, 198-209. doi:10.1080/1360080022000013518

[4]   Grigoroudis, E., & Siskos, Y. (2002). Preference dissagregation for measuring and analyzing customer satisfaction: the MUSA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 148-170. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00332-0

[5]   Grigoroudis, E., & Siskos, Y. (2009). Customer Satisfaction Evaluation. Oklahoma: Springer.

[6]   Ham, L., & Hayduk, S. (2003). Gaining competitive advantage in higher education: analyzing the gap between expectations and perceptions of service quality.International Journal of Value-Based Ma- nagement, 16, 223-242. doi:10.1023/A:1025882025665

[7]   Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 9-34. doi:10.1080/0260293930180102

[8]   Harvey, L., & Knight, P., T. (1996).Transforming Higher Education. Buchingham, Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press.

[9]   Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16, 3-36.

[10]   Hendry, G. D., & Dean, S. J. (2002).Accountability, evaluation of teaching and expertise in higher education. Intern. Journal for Academic Development, 7, 75-82. doi:10.1080/13601440210156493

[11]   Hutyra, M. (2005). Quality management system as the part of university management, paper presented at Integrating for Excellence, Sheffield, 15-17 June.

[12]   Kim, J. W., & Richarme, M. (2009).Applying the service-profit chain to internet service businesses. Journal of Service Science and Management, 2, 96-106. doi:10.4236/jssm.2009.22013

[13]   Koilias, C., Kostoglou, V., Garmpis, A., & Van der Heijden, B. (2011). The incorporation of graduates from Higher Technological Education into the labour market. Journal of Service Science and Management, 4, 86-96. doi:10.4236/jssm.2011.41012

[14]   Lee, J. W., & Tai, S.W. (2008). Critical factors affecting customer satisfaction and higher education in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Management in Education, 2, 46-59.

[15]   Lagrosen, S., Seyyed-Hashemi, R., & Leitner, M. (2004).Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12, 61-69. doi:10.1108/09684880410536431

[16]   Martensen, A., Gr?nholdt, L., Eskildsen, J. K., & Kristensen, K. (2000). Measuring student oriented quality in higher education: application of the ECSI methodology. Sinergie-Rapporti di ricerca, 18, 371-383.

[17]   Tsirintani, M., Giovanis, A., Binioris, S., & Goula, A. (2010). A new modeling approach for the relationship between quality of health care services and patient’s satisfaction. Journal Nosileftiki, 49, 40-52.

[18]   Shemwell, D. J., Yavas, U., & Bilgin, Z. (1998). Customer-service provider relationships: an empirical test of a model of service quality, satisfaction and relationship oriented outcome. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9, 155-168. doi:10.1108/09564239810210505

[19]   Schertzer, C. B., & Schertzer, S. M. B. (2004). Student satisfaction and retention: A conceptual model. Journal of Marketing in Higher Edu- cation, 14, 79-91. doi:10.1300/J050v14n01_05

[20]   Shrikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. F. (2003). Developing a holistic model for quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 8, 215-224. doi:10.1080/1353832022000031656

[21]   Shure, C. J. M., Jansen, E. P. W., & Harskamp, E. G. (2007). Impact of degree program satisfaction on the persistence of college students. Higher Education, 54, 207-226. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-2376-5

[22]   Sureshchandar, G. S., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2002). The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction— A factor specific approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 16, 363- 379. doi:10.1108/08876040210433248

[23]   Van Kemenade, E., Pupius, M., & Hardjono, J. W. (2008). More value to defining quality. Quality in Higher Education, 14, 175-185. doi:10.1080/13538320802278461

[24]   Westerheijden, D. F., Hulpiau, V., & Waeytens, K. (2007). From design and implementation to impact of quality assurance: an overview of some studies into what impacts improvement. Tertiary Education and Management, 13, 295-312. doi:10.1080/13583880701535430

 
 
Top