Received 24 May 2016; accepted 27 June 2016; published 30 June 2016
Ceramic alumina are widely used as structural materials for applications requiring good mechanical strength, good wear resistance and good behavior under the influence of severe conditions in terms of mechanical stress often coupled to thermal shock in highly corrosive environments   .
One of the current trends in order to improve the performance of these materials is the development of mixed ceramic alumina-mullite, namely materials composed of two crystalline phases.
Mullite is a characteristic constituent of ceramics produced from aluminosilicates. It is the only stable compound in the diagram SiO2-Al2O3. It is with excellent physical properties: high melting temperature, low coefficient of expansion, good creep resistance, bending strength and thermal shock resistance, high chemical inertness   .
Mixed ceramic alumina-mullite is widely as refractory materials for the coating of high temperature furnaces.
Several routes of preparation are used: either by sintering at 1500˚C of mixtures of commercial oxides of silica and alumina  or from natural raw materials such as kaolin and bauxite   . In the latter case, the material consists of crystalline alumina and mullite phase and a glassy phase in which the different impurities are confined (Fe2O3, CaO, TiO2, …). It is in this last part that fits our work. We intend to develop materials mixed alumina-mullite by thermal treatment up to 1200˚C from a local clay with high potential, high diaspore AlOOH and topaz associated with quartz and argillaceous phases such as kaolinite.
Geological and petrographic work carried out on this deposit indicating a complexity regarding the mineralogical composition, structure, distribution of minerals identified on the site and their variability  .
2. Materials and Methods
From geological data previously set by the Moroccan National Office of Hydrocarbons and Mines (ONHYM), we collected three samples referenced as G1, G2 and G3:
・ G1 is made up of compact greyish gloss shine dense rocks,
・ G2 consists of friable whitish to pinkish rocks,
・ G3 consists of two types of rocks. The first shade is made of well differentiated whitish to gray very compact rocks and well individualized crystals. The second shade is composed of loose rock clusters of the same color than the first one.
In order to investigate the scope of these samples in industry, a set of characterizations were performed:
・ quantification of the main major elements by X-ray fluorescence using a MagixPRO/Panalytical spectrometer;
・ mineralogical analysis by X-ray diffraction on powder using Siemens D500 apparatus equipped with λKCuα1 = 1.541874 Å detector;
・ thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using DTA-TGA Shimadzu DTG-60/60H type thermobalance at a heating rate of 5˚C/min;
・ thermal expansion analysis by using a Setaram apparatus with a heating rate of 5˚C/min;
・ mechanical compression tests by using an universal testing machine equipped with a 10 kN capacity load cell (Instron 5566 type).
2.1. Quantitative Chemical Analysis
The quantitative chemical analysis data are reported in Table 1. Note that silica (SiO2) is the major oxide in G1 that shows a low fire loss. The alumina content in G2 is lower than G3 but the flux contents are slightly higher (alkali metal oxides Na2O and K2O) and iron oxide Fe2O3. G3 shows special features compared to the other two. First the very high alumina content possibly indicates the presence of diaspore. This so high alumina content is strongly desired for refractory ceramic applications. Second, the important fire loss (11.2%) can be connected to the high content of alumina hydrate.
2.2. Mineralogical Characterization
The X-ray diffraction spectra of the samples under study are shown in Figure 1. The detected minerals are: diaspore (D), illite (I), kaolinite (K), muscovite (Mu), quartz (Q) and topaz (T).
The mineral compositions of the samples G2 and G3 are similar. They are mainly composed of silica as
Table 1. Chemical composition of the samples (% oxide mass).
*Lost on ignition at 1000˚C. **Total chemical composition.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectra of the different samples (D: Diaspore; I: Illite; K: Kaolinite; Mu: Muscovite; Q: Quartz; T: Topaz).
quartz, diaspore, topaz, muscovite and kaolinite. Muscovite is not detected by X-ray diffraction due to its low rate (low wt% of Na2O and K2O) in G3 while it is detectable in G2 (Figure 1). The qualitative mineralogical identification based on the results of the physico-chemical characterization of different samples is presented in Table 2.
Chemical and mineralogical analyzes show that G1 is composed mainly of quartz and poor in alumina, so this sample is of little interest for the intended purpose: the preparation of corundum-mullite mixed.
2.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
Figure 2 shows the evolution of the mass loss as a function of temperature for samples G2 and G3. The trends are similar although the total loss is higher for G3 (9%) than for G2 (7%). These losses can be explained considering three phenomena:
・ the first phenomenon is the dehydration of the aluminium hydrate (the diaspore) according to the following dehydration reaction  -  :
・ the second phenomenon is the dihydroxylation of the kaolinite into metakaolinite:
Figure 2. TGA curves recorded at a heating rate of 5˚C/min under air.
Table 2. Mineralogical composition (XRD) of the samples.
To confirm these transformations, mineralogical determination was performed on G3 after exposure at 570˚C and 700˚C. The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 3. It is apparent that the characteristic lines of the diaspore and those of the kaolinite disappear at 570˚C and 700˚C, respectively. The difference between the drying temperature of the diaspore and the dihydroxylation temperature of the kaolinite as compared to those of the pure products can be explained by the complexity of field-collected samples.
・ The third invoked phenomenon is the decomposition of the topaz into mullite at 1075˚C according to R. A. Day et al.  :
2.4. Thermal Expansion Behaviour
The thermal behaviour is plotted in Figure 4(a) in terms of percent expansion as a function of the temperature for each sample:
・ regarding the sample G1, the expansion occurring at around 580˚C is attributed to the quartz a ® b transformation. The plateau observed in the range 600˚C - 900˚C is characteristic of the presence of illite. The sharp contraction that occurs beyond 950˚C indicates the beginning of sintering;
・ G2 and G3 behave in the same way with:
-a slight thermal expansion up to 500˚C,
-followed by a slight decrease at 600˚C, which corresponds to the dehydroxylation reaction of kaolinite,
-then occurs a dimensional stability in the temperature range 650˚C - 900˚C,
-a second much steeper withdrawal occurs between 950˚C and 1000˚C, followed by sintering up to 1200˚C.
To better represent the withdrawal, Figure 4(b) shows the recorded withdrawal in percent as function of the
Figure 3. X-ray spectra of the raw G3 sample (a), heat treated at 570˚C (b) or 700˚C (c) (K: Kaolinite; Mu: Muscovite; D: Diaspore; T: Topaz; Q: Quartz).
Figure 4. Dilatometric curves (a), shrinkage vs. time at 1200˚C (b).
dwell at 1200˚C. The samples G1 and G3 have high dimensional stability at this temperature while clearly G2 flows.
2.5. Structural Transformations in the Temperature Range 900˚C - 1200˚C
G2 and G3 powders were crushed moistened (6% by weight of water) and then uniaxial pressed using a hydraulic press to obtain test pieces with dimensions 4 × 1.5 × 16 cm. These green briquettes were dried at 105˚C for 24 h, then for different temperatures (900˚C, 1000˚C, 1100˚C, 1150˚C and 1200˚C), three briquettes were heated up in a muffle furnace (Nabertherm type) at a rate of 10˚C/min and a dwell of 3 hours. The fired samples were then milled for mineralogical investigation by X-ray diffraction (Figure 5).
X-ray data analyses of G2 and G3 fired at 1200˚C reveal the presence of corundum (α-Al2O3), mullite (3Al2O3-2SiO2) and quartz. The reaction mechanism giving corundum and mullite starting from diaspore, topaz and quartz is complex but can be summarized as follows:
・ during heating, from 570˚C, corundum issues from the dehydration of the diaspore according to Figure 3(b),
・ at 900˚C the characteristic pics of the topaz are more intense compared to the non-fired sample (Figure 5(b)). The pics associated with muscovite appeared because they were initially obscured by the presence of diaspore (Figure 5(b)). The same applies to the topaz and quartz rays that intensify after the disappearance of the diaspore. This finding is more pronounced in the G3 nuance because it contains more diaspore.
・ from 1000˚C topaz turns into mullite.
2.6. Mechanical Properties
The evolution of the flexural strength as a function of the heating temperature is shown in Figure 6(a) and Figure 6(b) for G2 and G3, respectively. For G2, a continued raise is noted in the explored temperature range: 37 MPa at 1100˚C up to 48 MPa at 1200˚C. This huge increase is explained by a higher densification (Figure 7(a)
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction spectra of G2 and G3 (a) and after heat treatment at 900˚C (b), 1000˚C (c) and 1200˚C (d). (D: Diaspore; T: Topaz; Q: Quartz; K: Kaolinite; Mu: Muscovite; M: Mullite ; C: Corundum).
Figure 6. Evolution of the flexural strength of G2 (a) and G3 (b) as a function of the heating temperature.
(a) (b)(a) (b)
Figure 7. SEM of G2 (a) (b) and G3 (c) (d) at different temperatures.
and Figure 7(b)). By cons, for G3 the strength increases between 1100˚C (47 MPa) and 1150˚C (70 MPa), then seems to decrease (65 MPa at 1200˚C). The higher strengths of G3 at 1100˚C is linked to the presence of a glassy phase (Figure 7(c)) while at 1150˚C it is fostered by a more important crystallization of mullite and corundum (Figure 5) due to the elevated amount of alumina in this deposit. Figure 7(d) illustrates this feature. The decreasing trend observed beyond 1150˚C for G3 may be explained by the gas exhaust associated with the decomposition of topaz present in greater quantity than in G2 (Equation 3).
One feature of the G2 and G3 deposits is their high content of topaz, which allows for the production of mullite. The presence of topaz in the G2 and G3 deposits can be explained by various mechanisms reported in the literature:
・ According to Abdel-Rehim A. M. et al.  and Shan Liu et al.  , in the presence of fluorine the formation of topaz between 770˚C and 800˚C can occur in different ways:
a) reaction of the quartz and the aluminum fluoride to form fluoro-topaz:
b) reaction of the corundom (formed at around 500˚C by transformation of the diaspore) and the quartz with the aluminum fluoride to produce fluoro-topaz:
Corundum Quartz Fluro-Topaz
These works also point out that beyond 1000˚C the decomposition of the fluoro-topaz produces a mix of corundum and mullite:
Fluoro-Topaz Corundum Mullite
・ The works by R. A. Day et al.  and other researchers   showed that above 1100˚C mullite can form by the direct decomposition of the topaz (Equation 3). In presence of other sources of fluorine the decomposition of the topaz involves two steps:
These literature data help explaining the abundance of topaz in both deposits, together with the main mineral, diaspore, and minority clay phases (muscovite, illite and kaolinite) under the action of a hydrothermal action.
Worldwide, three deposits   -  consisting mainly of natural sources of aluminum, similar to our case, have been identified. The main mineral phases composing the rocks of these reference deposits are diaspore (α-AlO (OH)), hydrargillite (γ-Al (OH)3) and boehmite (γ-AlO (OH)). Other phases are frequently detected as kaolinite, goethite and hematite. These deposits are:
・ Guangxi deposit, in the Jingxi region of China  , consists of a dispersed ore in quaternary laterite in the west of Guangxi. This ore originates from a bauxite horizon in the Permian via physical disruption (faults) and a re-sedimentation process in the quaternary.
・ The Goian deposit in Spain (Pontevedra)  consists of diaspore (as blue-white natural slices), geographically located in the north-west of Spain.
・ The Milas deposit in Turkey   consists mainly of a single deposit undergoing primary metamorphism followed by a late re-mobilized hydrothermal and resulting in diaspore formation. The latter was formed during different geological periods.
The deposits investigated in this work are similar to those mentioned above, which are operated industrially.
Through targeted prospecting, two fields of industrial interest for their high content of diaspore, topaz and quartz (as major minerals) and containing kaolinite, illite and muscovite (as secondary minerals) have been identified. Heating up these materials at 1200˚C yields a mixture of corundum and mullite, two demanded ceramic materials in various industrial fields. The detailed analysis of structural transformations indicates that this result is due to the particular nature of the raw materials that contain certain secondary minerals and fluoride. The presence of the latter is necessary for the formation of sufficient topaz.
 Medvedovski, E. (2006) Alumina-Mullite Ceramics for Structural Applications. Ceramics International, 32, 369-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2005.04.001
 Pask, J.A. (1996) Importance of Starting Materials on Reactions and Phase Equilibria in the Al2O3-SiO2 System. European Ceramic Society, 16, 101-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0955-2219(95)00147-6
 Schneider, H., Schrener, J. and Hildmann, B. (2008) Structure and Properties of Mullite—A Review. European Ceramic Society, 28, 329-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.03.017
 Yang, Z., Li, K., Zhao, W. and Zhang, Y. (2011) Preparation of Corundum/Mullite Composites by Sintering. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 84-85, 64-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.84-85.64
 Maldhure, A., Tripathi, H.S., Ghosh, A. and Das, S.K. (2013) Mullite-Corundum Composites from Bauxite: Effect of Chemical Composition. Transactions-Indian Ceramic Society, 73, 31-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0371750X.2013.870050
 Hatipoglu, M., Can, N. and Karali, T. (2010) Effects of Heating on Fire Opal and Diaspore from Turkey. Physica B, 405, 1729-1736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2009.12.078
 Day, R.A., Vance, E.R. and Cassidy, D.J. (1995) The Topaz to Mullite Transformation on Heating. Journal of Materials Research, 10, 2963-2969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1995.2963
 Abdel-Rehim, A.M. (2012) Thermal and XRD Analysis of Synthesis of Fluoro-Topaz. Thermochimica Acta, 538, 29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.03.006
 Liu, S., Liu, J., Zhao, Y., Hou, F. and Du, H. (2014) Microstructure and Properties of the Inter-Locked Corundum/Mullite Structure. Ceramics International, 40, 16825-16828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.152
 Sabioni, A.C.S. and da Costa, G.M. 2004() Comportamento do mineral topázio a altas temperaturas. Metalurgia and Materiais, 57, 173-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0370-44672004000300006
 Liu, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Feng, Y. and Cai, S. (2012) Mineralogical Characteristics of the Superlarge Quaternary Bauxite Deposits in Jingxi and Debao Counties, Western Guangxi. China. Asian Earth Sciences, 52, 53-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.02.011
 Garcia-Guinea, J., Correcher, V., Rubio, J. and Valle-Fuentes, F.J. (2005) Effects of Preheating on Diaspore: Modifications in Colour Centres. Structure and Light Emission. Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 66, 1220-1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2005.04.001