Peter Donald Rodgers^*

Show more
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Show less

Abstract: Did any physics experts expect SUPERRELATIVITY paper, a physics revolution producing the EINSTEIN-RODGERS RELATIVITY EQUATION, producing the HAWKING-RODGERS BLACK HOLE RADIUS, and producing the STEFAN-BOLTZMANN-SCHWARZSCHILD-HAWKING-RODGERS BLACK HOLE RADIATION POWER LAW, as the author gave a solution to The Clay Mathematics Institute’s very difficult problem about the Navier-Stokes Equations? The Clay Mathematics Institute in May 2000 offered that great $million prize to the first person providing a solution for a specific statement of the problem: “Prove or give a counter-example of the following statement: In three space dimensions and time, given an initial velocity field, there exists a vector velocity and a scalar pressure field, which are both smooth and globally defined, that solve the Navier-Stokes Equations.” Did I, the creator of this paper, expect SUPERRELATIVITY to become a sophisticated conversion of my unified field theory ideas and mathematics into a precious fluid dynamics paper to help mathematicians, engineers and astro-physicists? [1]. Yes, but I did not expect such superb equations that can be used in medicine or in outer space! In this paper, complicated equations for multi-massed systems become simpler equations for fluid dynamic systems. That simplicity is what is great about the Navier-Stokes Equations. Can I delve deeply into adding novel formulae into the famous Schwarzschild’s equation? Surprisingly, yes I do! Questioning the concept of reversibility of events with time, I suggest possible 3-dimensional and 4-dimensional co-ordinate systems that seem better than what Albert Einstein used, and I suggest possible modifications to Maxwell’s Equations. In SUPERRELATIVITY, I propose that an error exists in Albert Einstein’s Special Relativity equations, and that error is significant because it leads to turbulence in the universe’s fluids including those in our human bodies. Further, in SUPERRELATIVITY, after I create Schwarzschild-based equations that enable easy derivation of the Navier-Stokes Equations, I suddenly create very interesting exponential energy equations that simplify physics equations, give a mathematical reason for turbulence in fluids, give a mathematical reason for irreversibility of events with time, and enable easy derivation of the Navier-Stokes Equations. Importantly, my new exponential Navier-Stokes Equations are actually wave equations as should be used in Fluid Dynamics. Thrilled by my success, I challenge famous equations by Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking [2] [3].

Keywords: Superrelativity, Relativity, Navier-Stokes Equation, Physics, Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Black Hole, Clay Mathematics Institute

Cite this paper: Donald Rodgers, P. (2016) Superrelativity. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 6, 130-143. doi: 10.4236/ojfd.2016.62011.

References

[1]   Rodgers, P.D. (2014) Navier-Stokes Physics. Mind Magazine (Science & Psychology Section).

[2]   Aron, J. (2014) Stephen Hawking’s New Theory Offers Black Hole Escape. New Scientist (Physics & Math).

[3]   Merali, Z. (2014) Stephen Hawking: There Are No Black Holes. Nature, 24 January 2014.

[4]   Puthoff, H.E. (1999) Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations: A New Rosetta Stone of Physics? Everything for Nothing; The Energetic Vacuum: Implications for Energy Research; Polarizable-Vacuum (PV) Representation of General Relativity (PDF); in Quantum Foam, New Scientist 19 June 1999.

[5]   Rodgers, P.D. (2014) Navier-Stokes Equation. Mind Magazine (Science & Psychology Section).

[6]   Rodgers, P.D. (2014) Do Stephen Hawking’s Black Holes Exist? Mind Magazine (Science & Psychology Section).

[7]   Rosen, S.P., Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy (2016) Time Is of the Essence in Special Relativity, Part 2. The Twin Paradox.

[8]   Frankel, T. (1979) Gravitational Curvature. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

[9]   Setterfield, B. and Norman, T. (1987) The Atomic Constants, Light, and Time. An Invited Research Paper Prepared for Lambert Dolphin who was at that time a Senior Research Physicist at SRI International, Menlo Park, California. Not an official SRI report.

[10]   Hsu J.P. and Hsu, L. (1994) A Physical Theory Based Solely on the First Postulate of Relativity. Physics Letters A, 196, 1-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(94)91033-2

[11]   Einstein, A. (1960) Relativity, the Special and General Theory: A Popular Exposition. 15th Edition, Routledge, London.

[12]   Rodgers, P.D. (2014) Could Albert Einstein’s Special Relativity Be Correct. Mind Magazine (Science & Psychology Section).

[13]   Einstein, A. (1948) From the Soundtrack of the Film, Atomic Physics. J. Arthur Rank Organization, Ltd., UK.

[14]   Troitskii, V.S. (1987) Physical Constants and Evolution of the Universe. Astrophysics and Space Science, 139, 389-411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00644367

[15]   Montgomery, A. (1994) An Analysis of the Values of the Speed of Light to Determine Appropriate Data to Test the Setterfield Hypothesis. The 3rd International Conference on Creationism, Pittsburgh.

[16]   Montgomery, A. and Dolphin, L. (1993) Is the Velocity of Light Constant in Time? Galilean Electrodynamics, 4, No. 5.

[17]   Resnick, R. and Halliday, D. (1960) Physics. Wiley Toppan, New York.

[18]   Rodgers, P.D. (2008) Beyond Albert Einstein's Relativity: UFT Physics: Unified Field Theory of Theoretical Physics. Hervey Bay, Qld.

[19]   Sumner, W.Q. (1994) On the Variation of Vacuum Permittivity in Friedmann Universes. The Astrophysical Journal, 429, 491-498.

[20]   Hochstim, A.R. (1969) Kinetic Processes in Gases and Plasmas. Wiley Toppan, New York.

[21]   Jeans, S.J. (1940) An Introduction to the Kinetic Theory. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

[22]   Landau, L.D. and Lifshutz, E.M. (1969) Statistical Physics, Second Revised English Edition. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

[23]   Tabor, D. (1969) Gases, Liquids and Solids. Penguin, UK.

[24]   Wyllie, G.A.P. (1970) Elementary Statistical Mechanics. Hutchinson Uni Lib, London.

[25]   Rodgers, P.D. (2014) No Hawking’s Black Hole. Mind Magazine (Science & Psychology Section).

[26]   Rodgers, P.D. (2013) Einstein Wrong: UFT Physics.
http://www.academia.edu/16692849/EINSTEIN_WRONG_UFT_PHYSICS/

[27]   Rodgers, P.D. (2014) Relativity Black Hole Truth. Mind Magazine (Science & Psychology Section).